第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

17. April 2015 Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Application of a multiscale transport model for magnetized plasmas in cylindrical configuration Workshop.
6th Japan Korea workshop July 2011, NIFS, Toki-city Japan Edge impurity transport study in stochastic layer of LHD and scrape-off layer of HL-2A.
Conference on Computational Physics 30 August 2006 Transport Simulation for the Scrape-Off Layer and Divertor Plasmas in KSTAR Tokamak S. S. Kim and S.
Spectroscopy of hydrocarbon in low temperature plasmas : Results from JT-60U T. Nakano J apan A tomic E nergy A gency, Ibaraki, Japan. 6-9/11/2006 ITPA.
SUGGESTED DIII-D RESEARCH FOCUS ON PEDESTAL/BOUNDARY PHYSICS Bill Stacey Georgia Tech Presented at DIII-D Planning Meeting
1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
Physics of fusion power
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Progress on Determining Heat Loads on Divertors and First Walls T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Pathways Project Meeting December 12-13, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia.
CHE/ME 109 Heat Transfer in Electronics
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Simple Core-SOL-Divertor Model To Investigate Plasma Operation Space Joint Meeting of US-Japan JIFT Workshop on Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions G M McCracken Hefei, October 2007.
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
N EOCLASSICAL T OROIDAL A NGULAR M OMENTUM T RANSPORT IN A R OTATING I MPURE P LASMA S. Newton & P. Helander This work was funded jointly by EURATOM and.
10th ITPA meeting on SOL & divertor physics, Avila, Spain, Jan 7-10, 2008 Arne Kallenbach 1/15 Prediction of wall fluxes and implications for ITER limiters.
- 1 - Radiation process of carbon ions in JT-60U detached divertor plasmas O-26(15+3min.) 29May2008 Spain Japan Atomic Energy Agency T. Nakano,
Transport in a field aligned magnetized plasma and neutral gas boundary: The end of the plasma… C.M. Cooper, W. Gekelman, P. Pribyl, J. Maggs, Z. Lucky.
SOL-Divertor Plasma Simulations by Introducing Anisotropic Ion Temperatures and Virtual Divertor Model 非等方イオン温度と仮想ダイバータモデルを導 入した SOL- ダイバータプラズマシミュレー ション.
Nam-Sik Yoon (Chungbuk National University of Korea) A Dust Charging Model under Tokamak Discharge Conditions 6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation.
Model prediction of impurity retention in ergodic layer and comparison with edge carbon emission in LHD (Impurity retention in the ergodic layer of LHD)
Simulation Study on behaviors of a detachment front in a divertor plasma: roles of the cross-field transport Makoto Nakamura Prof. Y. Ogawa, S. Togo, M.
PIC simulations of the propagation of type-1 ELM-produced energetic particles on the SOL of JET D. Tskhakaya 1, *, A. Loarte 2, S. Kuhn 1, and W. Fundamenski.
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
Japanese Efforts on the Integrated Modeling - Part II : JAEA Contribution - T. Takizuka (JAEA) acknowledgments : T. Ozeki, N. Hayashi, N. Aiba, K. Shimizu,
1 Modeling of EAST Divertor S. Zhu Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
1 Development of integrated SOL/Divertor code and simulation study in JT-60U/JT-60SA tokamaks H. Kawashima, K. Shimizu, T. Takizuka Japan Atomic Energy.
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
10th ITPA conference, Avila, 7-10 Jan Effects of High Energy Ions Accelerated in front of ICRF Antennas in LHD S. Masuzaki on behalf of the LHD Experimental.
International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion June 2004 Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University “Stopping.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
Plasma-wall interactions during high density operation in LHD
D. Tskhakaya et al. 1 (13) PSI 18, Toledo July 2008 Kinetic simulations of the parallel transport in the JET Scrape-off Layer D. Tskhakaya, R.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Radial Electric Field Formation by Charge Exchange Reaction at Boundary of Fusion Device* K.C. Lee U.C. Davis *submitted to Physics of Plasmas.
EXTENSIONS OF NEOCLASSICAL ROTATION THEORY & COMPARISON WITH EXPERIMENT W.M. Stacey 1 & C. Bae, Georgia Tech Wayne Solomon, Princeton TTF2013, Santa Rosa,
ELM propagation in Low- and High-field-side SOLs on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga 1), N.Oyama 1), S.Takamura.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
ELM propagation and fluctuations characteristics in H- and L-mode SOL plasmas on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga.
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
2014/03/06 那珂核融合研究所 第 17 回若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 SOL-divertor plasma simulations with virtual divertor model Satoshi Togo, Tomonori Takizuka a, Makoto Nakamura.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Saturn Magnetosphere Plasma Model J. Yoshii, D. Shemansky, X. Liu SET-PSSD 06/26/11.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Meike Clever | Institute of Energy Research – Plasma Physics | Association EURATOM – FZJ Graduiertenkolleg 1203 Dynamics.
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Numerical investigation of H-mode threshold power by using LH transition models 8th Meeting of the ITPA Confinement Database & Modeling Topical Group.
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
Integrated discharge scenario
Recycling and impurity retention in high-density,
Finite difference code for 3D edge modelling
ITERに係わる原子分子過程 Atomic and Molecular Processes in ITER SHIMADA, Michiya ITER International Team Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Plasma Science and Nuclear.
N. Asakura, K. Shimizu, K. Tobita Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka
ITER consequences of JET 13C migration experiments Jim Strachan, PPPL Jan. 7, 2008 Modeled JET 13C migration for last 2 years- EPS 07 and NF paper in prep.
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
Presentation transcript:

第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 2013/03/04-06 @Naka, JAEA Development of Multi-Layer 1D divertor code and analysis of detached divertor plasmas aSatoshi Togo, bMakoto Nakamura, cKatsuhiro Shimizu, dTomonori Takizuka, bKazuo Hoshino, aYuichi Ogawa aGraduate School of Frontier Science, University of Tokyo bJapan Atomic Energy Agency, Aomori cJapan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki dGraduate School of Engineering, Osaka University

Back ground Divertor heat load Reduction of the divertor heat load is one of the crucial issues for commercializing the fusion reactors. The divertor heat load have to be 5~6MW/m2 at most from the material point of view. Core Plasma Pout Pout ~ 90MW (ITER) Pout ~ 500MW (Slim-CS) The wetted area is a few square meters so some sort of power handling is necessary.

Back ground Divertor detachment S. Takamura, J. Plasma Fusion Res. 72, No.9, 866-873 (1996). Divertor detachment is thought to be a promising way. N. Ohno and S. Takamura, J. Plasma Fusion Res. 84, No.11, 740-749 (2008).

Two-dimensional SOL-divertor code Back ground Two-dimensional SOL-divertor code 2D codes are used in order to estimate rigorously the performance of the divertor. In simulating detached divertor regime, there are some quantitative disagreements with the experimental results. Numerical grid for JT-60U in the SONIC simulation The electron temperature and the parallel ion flux as a function of the mid-plane density K. Hoshino et al., J. Plasma Fusion Res. Ser. 9, 592-597 (2010).

Purpose of our research We have been developing Multi-Layer (ML) 1D divertor code so as to generate an understanding of the important processes for the quantitative reproduce of (partially) detached divertor plasmas. http://www.lhd.nifs.ac.jp/ Core Plasma Detached Tube Attached X-point Magnetic Field L x The characteristics of partially detached divertor plasmas in the perpendicular direction are reproduced with only two flux tubes. Schematic picture of ML 1D code

Basic equations Mass conservation: Momentum conservation: ML 1D code Basic equations Core Plasma Detached Tube Attached X-point Magnetic Field L x Mass conservation: Momentum conservation: Radial transport is included in the source terms. Energy conservation: Density, velocity and temperature of ion and electron are assumed to be equal, respectively.

Source terms/Atomic processes ML 1D code Source terms/Atomic processes Particle source: Momentum source: Energy source: S. Takamura, J. Plasma Fusion Res. 72, No.9, 866-873 (1996).

Boundary condition ML 1D code x=0 Stagnation point (x = 0) Divertor plate (x = L) x=L Core Plasma Detached Tube Attached X-point Magnetic Field L x is the sheath heat transmission factor.

Neutral model Particle conservation: Boundary condition: ML 1D code Convection with Franck-Condon Energy Diffusion by charge exchange reaction Radial transport Neutralization rate Boundary condition: S. Nakazawa et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 42, 401-413 (2000).

Calculation condition ML 1D code Calculation condition Simulation has been done for ASDEX-Upgrade like plasma. A. Kallenbach et al., Nucl. Fusion 48 085008 (2008). ・Major radius R:1.7m ・Minor radius a:0.6m ・Surface safety factor q:3.3 ・Connection length πqR:17.6m ・Divertor leg:4.4m ・Area of separatrix:40m2 ・Width of the SOL:2cm http://www.ipp.mpg.de/ippcms/eng/for/projekte/asdex/ ・Heat flux from the core plasma:4MW ・Neutralization rate of the plate η:99% ・Impurity:Carbon, 1%, non-coronal equilibrium

Attached plasma solution Recent result Attached plasma solution [/m3] X-point [eV] Diffusion by the charge exchange is assumed to be dominant. Particle flux from the core plasma is 1.0×1021 s-1. [/m3]

Attached plasma solution Recent result Attached plasma solution [W] Heat loss is too small to dissipate all of the heat flux from the core so that the temperature near the plate is relatively high. Heat flux Core Imp. CX Ioniz. At such temperature, volume recombination can’t dominate ionization so that detachment doesn’t occur. Recomb. ION NEUTRAL Core 5×1020/s Ionization 499×1020/s Recycled Not recycled Neutralization 504×1020/s [/s] Particle flux Core Ioniz. Recomb.

Detached plasma solution Recent result Detached plasma solution X-point [/m3] [eV] If radial neutral loss is large enough, τn~10-4 s, particle balance is accomplished and steady state solutions appear. [/m3] The gradient of the neutral density profile near the plate is negative implying neutral flows toward the plate there.

Detached plasma solution Recent result Detached plasma solution [W] Heat loss is large enough to dissipate all of the heat flux from the core so that the temperature near the plate is relatively low. Core Imp. CX Ioniz. The temperature is low enough for volume recombination to dominate ionization so that detachment occurs. Recomb. Heat flux [/s] ION NEUTRAL Core 2.5×1022/s Ionization 6.2×1022/s Radial loss Recombination 8.7×1022/s Core Ioniz. Recomb. Particle flux

Conclusion ・ML 1D divertor code has been developed. During the last year, numerical neutral model was introduced and numerical scheme was improved. The detached regime has been successfully reproduced. ・Heat and particle balance in both attached and detached regime have been investigated indicating that the difference in the particle balance between attached and detached regime might be related to the formation of partially detached divertor plasma. ・To distinguish the mechanism of neutral transport by means of their generation is our future work.