Traffic Monitoring Guide 2012 Update May 9, 2013 DBP Roadway Transportation Data Business Plan presented to Data Palooza U.S. Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Advertisements

1 AASHTO - FHWA Peer Exchange on Asset Management and Performance Management July 26-27, 2010.
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
IT Governance Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
Connected Vehicles: The Future of Transportation Safety and Efficiency.
OHIO OFFICE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Even the agents are suffering…
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
Application Streamlining Initiative Kickoff Meeting August 23, 2011.
Affiliated Information Security Collaborative An Affiliated Enterprise Approach to Information Security Deans and Vice Presidents Meeting April 17, 2014.
Purpose of the Standards
Vers. national spatial data infrastructure training program Geospatial Business Planning Introduction to FGDC Initiatives Related to Geospatial Business.
Transport Policy as an Enabling Framework for Green Growth in South Africa Ngwako Makaepea Department of Transport 18 May 2010.
Mobility Services for All Americans Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Yehuda Gross Technical Lead: Brian Cronin/William Wiggins, FTA APTS Division.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Roles and Responsibilities
Participatory research to enhance climate change policy and institutions in the Caribbean: ARIA toolkit pilot 27 th meeting of the CANARI Partnership January.
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Chapter © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
ITS Program Update Moving Towards Implementation of Wireless Connectivity in Surface Transportation Talking Freight Webinar January 19, 2011.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
A Review of the Standing Committee of Caribbean Statisticians (SCCS) as a Mechanism for Statistical Development and Harmonisation The Second Meeting of.
AASHTO CV/AV RESEARCH ROADMAP NCHRP (98). 2 PROJECT MOTIVATION  CV/AV technologies continue to advance towards introduction  Open questions and.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Jean-Noel Guillossou Program Manager, SSATP SSATP Strategic Priorities Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
SDCG-6 Oslo, Norway October 22-24, 2014 SDCG 3-Year Work Plan Stephen Ward, SDCG EXEC (Australia) SDCG-6: Oslo,
Using the FRP to Enhance Georgia’s Leadership Program May 9, 2006 Stephanie Busch P 2 AD.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Systems Engineering “Understanding Where it Fits in Your Agency” a session in fhwa’s Systems Engineering t3 series aug. 02, 2007.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data 1 Roadway Safety Data Program.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Florida Enterprise GIS Workgroup Collaborating and sharing to empower and enhance GIS services and resources statewide Sara Wander, GISP
CT TEFT 1 November 5, Agenda Introduction Goal of Pilot Tier Piloting Activity to Pilot Role of Connecticut in the pilot Standards and Technologies.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Managing the National Communications Process UNFCCC Workshop on Exchange of Experiences and Good Practices among NAI Countries in Preparing NCs September.
Washington Traffic Records Committee Creating & Coordinating a Shared Vision for Traffic Records 2006 Traffic Records Forum August 1, 2006.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
ITS Professional Capacity Building Program ITS Advisory Council Presentation Mac Lister Program Manager, ITS PCB ITS Joint Program Office April 7, 2010.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
Introduction to the NAP process & the NAP Expo NAP-Expo 8– 9 August 2014, Bonn, Germany LEG Thinley Namgyel.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Melissa Lance Operations Systems Manager July 16, 2015 Connected Vehicle Update National and Virginia Perspective.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
1 USDOT Next Generation Initiative Laurie Flaherty EMS Division, NHTSA.
California Health and Human Services Agency - Office of Systems Integration (OSI) PMO Forum November 19,
Data Architecture World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Jack Stickel Alaska Dept of Transportation & Public Facilities
DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMING FEDERAL WORKFORCE THROUGH INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION Randy Bergquist Chair, Interagency Chief Learning Officer Council.
Quality Framework Overview
Presentation transcript:

Traffic Monitoring Guide 2012 Update May 9, 2013 DBP Roadway Transportation Data Business Plan presented to Data Palooza U.S. Department of Transportation By Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP

Introduction The Data Business Plan Story: » What is the Problem? » What did we do? » What were the Outcomes? » What were the Recommendations? » What would be the benefits? 2

Introduction What is the Problem? » FY Office of Operations identified need to investigate consistencies between U.S. DOT Data Programs What did we do? » Developed White Paper on Needs and Gaps in the Operations and Coordination of U.S. DOT DCM Programs » Developed a Data Business Plan to mitigate Data Gaps 3

Introduction What was the Outcome of the White Paper? » Data Gaps – resulting from: Inconsistencies in the definition of performance measures (e.g. travel time reliability); Use of default values for data elements, in some cases the data is not independently validated; Redundancies in the collections efforts (inventory is needed); Inconsistencies in location referencing of data; and Varying standards » Coordination Gaps – due to: U.S. DOT staffs are often unaware of what projects others are working on. Resulting in duplication of studies (funding & wasted efforts) » Data Standards and Governance Gaps to facilitate integration – these include: Minimum data quality standards for: Data collection & processing 4

Introduction What was the Recommendation? (cont.) » Goals of the Data Business Plan are to: Provide leadership by suggesting or offering best data collection / management practices to the primary data collectors Foster coordination and communication across U.S. DOT offices to: ♦ Avoid duplications /redundancies in the collections efforts of data related programs ♦ Address inconsistencies in the definition of performance measures (e.g. travel time reliability) ♦ Address inconsistencies in location referencing of data ♦ Address varying standards 5

Introduction What would be the Benefit? » More transparency and accountability » More efficient ways to locate and take advantage of available data and information » Standard data integration methods from multiple sources » Processes and systems that: Reduce redundancy and Promote consistency in data results » More timely data and information » More department-wide spatial data tools 6

Overview of Data Business Plan Purpose of the DBP » Address gaps identified in the Data Gaps paper (e.g. improve the coordination and communication mechanism across U.S. DOT offices to avoid investing resources to the same or similar types of data related programs); » Serve as prototype for other U.S. DOT offices; and » Provide leadership by suggesting or offering best data collection/management practices to primary data collectors. 7

Overview of Data Business Plan Data Business Plan Components » Recommendations to address U.S. DOT needs in serving data end-users and address overlaps and gaps » Best practices and recommendations on data services and knowledge management tools and procedures » Recommendations for coordinating data-related efforts within US DOT with the goal of reducing redundant or uncoordinated efforts » Recommendations for improved governance and coordination among data-related programs and offices within U.S. DOT ***Designed to be a “living document”*** 8

Overview of Data Business Plan Goals of the DBP: » GOAL 1. Improve the coordination and communication mechanism across U.S. DOT and FHWA offices involved with roadway travel mobility data to avoid investing resources in the same or similar types of data related programs. Objective 1.1. Identify gaps and redundancies in roadway travel mobility data programs. Objective 1.2. Devise “rules of engagement” regarding collaboration of the data functions for roadway travel mobility data. 9

Overview of Data Business Plan Goals of the DBP (cont.): » GOAL 2. Improve the coordination of the data capture activities associated with ITS JPO-sponsored research in wirelessly connected vehicle technologies with roadway travel mobility data programs within U.S. DOT and FHWA. Objective 2.1. Identify how current and planned data from the connected vehicle initiative can support existing roadway travel mobility data programs. Objective 2.2. Identify how data from roadway travel mobility data programs within U.S. DOT and FHWA can support the connected vehicle initiative. Objective 2.3. Identify existing/future data inventory and data structures/ policies/governance practices that could be applicable to the Research Data Exchange. 10

Data Management Practices Data Governance Data Acquisition Data Quality Data Standards Business Analysis Tools Data Privacy and Security Data Storage and Access 11

Data Management Practices Traceability Performance Measures Risk Assessment Value of Data Programs Knowledge Management 12

Stakeholder Needs and Gap Analysis: Stakeholder Group » ITS JPO » BTS » Office of Human Environment – Bike/Ped Program » HPPI » Office of Operations – Road Weather Management » Office of Operations – HOTM » TFHRC » FAA » Office of Freight Management & Operations » FMCSA » Research & Development – Visualization » Office of Performance Management 13

Stakeholder Needs and Gaps Analysis Areas for Improvement » Data Scope (Gaps) » Data Acquisition and Updating » Data Quality » Data Standards » Business Analysis Tools » Data Privacy and Security » Data Storage and Access » Internal Coordination » Traceability » Performance Measures » Data Governance Framework » Data Catalog » Value of Data Programs » Knowledge Management System 14

Data Coordination Framework Major Components: » Formal designation of Mobility Data Coordination Group » Data Coordination Model Diagram » Roles and Responsibilities for Data Coordination » Rules of Engagement » Outreach Mechanisms 15

Data Coordination Framework Data Coordination Model Diagram 16 Data Governance Risk Assessment FHWAData Governance AdvisoryCouncil Coordinates with Data Storage & Access Traceability D. Community of Interest (Internal) Data Privacy & Security Data Quality Data Standards Business Analysis Tools Performance Measures Data Acquisition Value of Data Programs Knowledge Management Infrastructure/Inventory Data Working Group Travel Data Working Group Climate Data Working Group Modal Data Working Group Connected Vehicle Data Capture Working Group E. Community of Interest (External) Use A. U.S. DOT Mobility Data Coordination Group

Overview of Data Governance 17 FHWA Data Governance Advisory Council FHWA Data Governance Advisory Council FHWA Office of Operations Data Governance Team Roadway Travel Mobility Data Community of Interest Connected Vehicle Data Community of Interest Relationship of Data Governance Groups

Mobility Data Coordination Group Formal Designation of Mobility Data Coordination Group to coordinate on data issues: » Data gaps/overlaps in specific types of roadway mobility data Infrastructure/inventory Roadway travel mobility data (speed/volume) Climate data Modal data Data capture activities associated with ITS JPO-sponsored research in wirelessly connected vehicle technologies » Cross-cutting data management issues that impact all data types Data quality Standards Privacy/security 18

Rules of Engagement Example Rules of Engagement » Understand and promote the value of data as a U.S. DOT-wide asset » Share RFPs for current and upcoming initiatives » Identify needs and opportunities to create links between data sets to support performance measurement and asset management purposes » Share current activities and best practices related to data strategies, policies, standards, metadata, architecture, procedures, and metrics » Develop data standards and stewardship recommendations for consideration by the FHWA Data Governance Advisory Council 19

Data Integration Test Pilots Applicability of Connected Vehicle Data for National Performance Monitoring Reconciliation of Speed Data from Multiple Sources Intended outcomes » Creation of a link between an existing data set and a connected vehicle data set in the future, » Maximize integration of national data sets for performance measurement and asset management purposes, » Creation of value added to the Research Data Exchange or other USDOT research data sets, and » Documentation of lessons learned for the USDOT, State DOTs and regions. 20

Next Steps Execute Data Business Plan Coordination Conduct Integration Test Pilots Execute Data Governance within FHWA Office of Operations 21

22 Questions