SUCKLING CONTROL IN PRIMIPAROUS BEEF COWS UNDER RANGE CONDITIONS G. Quintans, C. Jiménez de Aréchaga and A.I. Vázquez National Institute of Agricultural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alternative Livestock Production: Miniature Cattle Adele Harty Cow/Calf Field Specialist Rapid City Regional Center.
Advertisements

Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Replacement Heifers: Target Weights, Target Dates, and Fat Supplementation Rick.
Beef Production.  In this unit you learn about: Breeds and their Characteristics. Gestation Periods & Oestrous Cycle Dental Formula Grazing Systems Target.
BEEF PRODUCTION Beef. Introduction  The beef industry in Ireland is the largest sector of the Irish Agricultural Economy  There are 4.5 million beef.
Yearling heifer mating Rebecca Hickson. Profitability of calving heifers Beef cow efficiency Why calve heifers Why not calve heifers Performance of heifers.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
 Beef Cattle.  In the United States there are more than 80 recognized breeds of beef cattle.
Reducing weaning stress in beef cattle Derek B. Haley and Joseph M. Stookey Large Animal Clinical Sciences Western College of Veterinary Medicine University.
Dairy Calf Rearing.
1 Performance Modifiers. 2 The Problem After the realization that animals had a need for protein supplementation the livestock industry was still trying.
Evaluation of beef cow-calf nutrition in Yucatan, Mexico: MS thesis progress report Animal Science Kotaro Baba January 2006.
B114 Embryo Transfers.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand the reproduction cycle  Assess herd reproductive efficiency  Understand the decisions involved.
Beef cow reproductive management
Energy balance changes in cows and matching calving seasons with forage availability TIES Seminar Kotaro Baba.
1.8 Management Heat Stress 1.9 Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows 1.10 Guide to Good Dairy Farming Practice By: Mohammed Sabah 2014 Ch.1 Dairy cows.
Genetics of the Black Polled Hereford By: Cassady Wilson.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
Maximizing Reproductive Performance in Beef Cows Keith VanderVelde Livestock Agent Marquette Co. UWEX Spring 2004 Cow Calf Programs Mauston-March 6 Plover-March.
The Beef Industry. The average size beef herd is around 100 head.
Reproductive Management of Dairy Cows with Particular Reference to Organic Systems Michael G Diskin & Frank Kelly Animal Production Research Centre,
Improvement in the Cattle Industry Stephanie Stimpson.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
Effect of continuous suckling/”ewe-rearing” and supplementation on growth performance of Katahdin lambs and reproductive performance of the ewes. S.L.
Nutrition and Feeds for Developing Heifers and Bulls Developing heifers Developing heifers –Goal: Feeding heifers for constant wt. gain following weaning.
Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the effects of reducing rumen degradable protein (RDP) with constant rumen undegradable protein in mid-lactation.
Improving Beef Cattle Reproductive Rates Through Management Part 1 Dr. Tom R. Troxel Professor and Associate Department Head – Animal Science.
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
The effects of continuous-suckling and supplementation on growth performance of crossbred Katahdin lambs (Birth weight 4.2 ± 0.2 kg) were investigated.
Detection of the embryonic loss in dairy cattle by ELISA tests György Gábor 1* - Fruzsina Tóth 1 – László Ózsvári 2 – Garth Sasser 3 1 Research Institute.
INFLUENCE OF SYNCHRONIZED OVULATION AND PRE- SYNCHRONIZATION ON PREGNANCY RATES USED TIMED AI IN LACTATING DAIRY COWS G. Gabor and F. Toth.
The effects of continuous suckling and supplementation on growth performance and degree of parasitism of pasture- raised crossbred Katahdin lambs were.
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Improving Pregnancy Rates Ontario Association of Bovine Practitioners Reproductive.
Body Condition Scoring Chris Ellason. Introduction What is Body Condition Scoring (BCS)? Nutritional Priorities of Cattle Body Condition Scoring System.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.
The Reproductive Cycle
Impact of increased energy and amino acids in sow lactation diets on piglet performance in large litters Aimee-Louise Craig*1, 2 and Dr. Elizabeth Magowan1,
Principles and Practises
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
University of Minnesota Beef Improvement Federation
Charolais By: Maria and Aaron. Breed Characteristics They are usually white in color with a pink muzzle and pale hooves. There are now Charolais cattle.
Beef Cattle. BEFORE THE 1960’s… Approximately 20 different breeds were available in the United States. Today, there are over 70 breeds found in the United.
Hereford By: Austin Emery.
MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Research update Dr. Ron Lemenager Beef Extension Specialist
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Body Condition Scoring as a Beef Management Tool Produced by John Fleming Madison Co. Young Farmer Advisor.
WEST VIRGINIA SHEPHERD’S SHORT COURSE Camp Pioneer, December 2010 INDUCTION OF ESTRUS AS A REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT TOOL IN ANESTROUS EWES Keith Inskeep.
Effect of continuous suckling/”ewe-rearing” and supplementation on growth performance of pasture-raised Katahdin lambs S.L. Rastle-Simpson, K.N. D’Souza,
Dept. Theriogenology, Fac. Vet. Med. Comparison between two regimes for induction of fertile estrus in early postpartum ewes A Kh Abdel-Razek, A Ali, A.
Doubling calf weights by weaning
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
3. Milk production and composition
Robustness and energy efficiency of french beef cows
F. Y. Obese, G. B. Martin, M. A. Blackberry, J. K. Damptey and C. M
Ovarian and Hormonal Changes During Ovsynch Program in Buffalo-cows
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM IMPACTS OF HEAT STRESS
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Animal Production Research Institute,
EQUATION OF REPRODUCTION
Results and Discussion
Joyce,. J. R. ¹, Jeffries, B. H. ², Stewart, Jr. R. L. ³, Segers, J. R
Beef and Dairy Cattle.
Body Condition Scoring of Beef Cattle, Sheep and Goats
EQUATION OF REPRODUCTION
Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight
Developing Heifers Earl H. Ward.
Presentation transcript:

SUCKLING CONTROL IN PRIMIPAROUS BEEF COWS UNDER RANGE CONDITIONS G. Quintans, C. Jiménez de Aréchaga and A.I. Vázquez National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Ruta 8 Km 281, 33000, Uruguay. Introduction Reproductive efficiency is key to the achievement of high productivity in cow-calf production systems. One of the major causes of poor reproductive efficiency in beef suckled cows is an extended postpartum anoestrous interval which, under range conditions can exceed 120 days (Quintans and Vázquez, 2002). Suckling and nutrition are generally recognised as two major factors controlling the length of the post-partum anovulatory period (Short et al., 1990). In a preliminary study, ten days of calf removal had similar benefit to nose plates on ovarian cyclicity but on the former, calves presented higher daily live weight gain without compromising maternal bond (Quintans et al., 2003). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different suckling control techniques on reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows and on calves performance. Materials and Methods Forty Angus x Hereford three years old primiparous cows were used in the study. They calved with (mean ± s.e.m) 359 ± 3.4 kg of live weight and 4.7 ± 0.05 units of body condition (BCS, 1= thin, 8= fat) and they were assigned to four treatments at 67±0.87 days postpartum (Day 0): calves weaned from their mothers (W; n=10) calves fitted with nose plates during 14 days remaining with their mothers (NP; n=10) calves were completed removed from their mothers for 10 days (CR; n=10) calves remained with and had free access to their mothers (C; n=10). All cows were in anoestrous on Day 0. The breeding period lasted 2 months, started on Day 0 and it was by natural service using one bull of proven fertility. Blood samples were collected twice weekly from Day -7 until the end of the breeding period (Day 60) for progesterone analysis. Cow live weight (LW) and BCS were recorded at calving and at biweekly intervals. Results Table 1. Interval from onset of treatments (Day 0) to first normal oestrous cycle (OC) and percentage of ovulated cows. Conclusions Cows calved in good body condition and the use of suckling control such as early weaning or calf removal for ten days was effective to advance the first oestrous cycle and tended to increase the number of cows ovulating. Ten days of calf removal did not compromise either the maternal bond or the normal growth of calves. During the first 14 days after the onset of treatments, calves in W and CR lost 0.42±0.09 and 0.56±0.09 kg/d respectively, while calves in NP gained 0.28±0.09 kg/d and in C, 1.05±0.09 kg/a/d (P<0.05). The mean daily LW gain of calves during the total period of the experiment was lower (P<0.05) in W (0.53±0.08 kg/d) than in NP (0.78±0.08) and was intermediate but not different for calves in CR (0.76±0.08) and C (0.68±0.08). References Quintans and Vázquez, 2002 Proc. of the Sixth International Symposium in Domestic Ruminants, Crieff, Scotland (A65) Quintans et al., 2003 Proc. of the IX World Conference on Animal Production, Porto Alegre, Brasil, pp 219. Short et al, 1990, Journal of Animal Science 68: