QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 LBNL: Helene Felice – Tiina Salmi – Ray Hafalia – Maxim Martchevsky.
Advertisements

Protection study options for HQ01e-3 Tiina Salmi QXF meeting, 27 Nov 2012.
Long HQ coil drawings now available 1 Miao Yu. Dead voltage taps in TQ/LQ/HQ coils Inner layer: 24, outer layer: 12 (33 inner/23 outer per coil for TQ/LQ/HQ)
MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Heat transfer in SIS 300 dipole MT/FAIR – Cryogenics Y. Xiang, M. Kauschke.
1 QXF heater proposal M. Marchevsky, H. Felice, T. Salmi, D. Cheng, G. Sabbi, LBNL.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
3 Nov 2006S. Kahn -- Quench Protection1 Quench Protection of the 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. 3 November 2006.
Susana Izquierdo Bermudez. With many contributions from Juho Rysti, Gerard Willering and all the people involved in the manufacturing and test of the magnet.
Overview of main results from first HQ02a test For HQ meeting 7/30/13.
Coil parts & Instrumentation issues for LQ/HQ coils tested at Fermilab HQ/LHQ coil parts task force.
1 QXF heater design: current status and the path forward M. Marchevsky (LBNL) 03/06/2014 D.W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi (LBNL), G. Ambrosio (FNAL)
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
Susana Izquierdo Bermudez. OUTLINE 1. Margin and MIITs overview 2. Quench study based on FNAL 11T tests results 1. Longitudinal quench propagation 2.
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
1 QXF heater parameters G. Chlachidze, M. Marchevsky March 13, 2014.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
Brookhaven - fermilab - berkeley US LHC ACCELERATOR PROJECT LHC IR Quad Heaters.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
QXF instrumentation trace development
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
MQXF protection – comparison between 1 or 2 power supplies Vittorio Marinozzi 06/08/
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
LQ Quench Protection – G. Ambrosio 1 LQ DS video Mtg – May. 23, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Quench Protection Giorgio Ambrosio LQ DS.
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Test Program and Results Guram Chlachidze for FNAL-CERN Collaboration September 26-27, 2012 Outline Test program Quench Performance Quench Protection Magnetic.
SIS 300 Magnet Design Options. Cos n  magnets; cooling with supercritical Helium GSI 001 existing magnet built at BNG measured in our test facility 6.
QXF quench heater delay simulations Tiina Salmi, T. Salmi.
1 Quench Protection Workshop - 04/29/2014 QXF heater design M. Marchevsky, D.W. Cheng (LBNL) E. Todesco (CERN) T. Salmi (Tampere UT) G. Chalchidze, G.
HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.
E. Todesco PROTECTION FOR QXF E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland QXF protection meeting 28 th October 2013.
1 QXF / SQXF heater design update M. Marchevsky (12/03/13)
Quench Protection Maximum Voltages G. Ambrosio, V. Marinozzi, M. Sorbi WG Video-Mtg January 14, 2015.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
MQXF protection: work in progress and plans Vittorio Marinozzi 9/23/ QLASA calibration with HQ02 data.
Tiina Salmi and Antti Stenvall, Tampere University of technology, Finland FCCW2016 Roma, April 13 th, 2016 Quench protection of the 16T dipoles for the.
Study of the HTS Insert Quench Protection M. Sorbi and A. Stenvall 1 HFM-EuCARD, ESAC meeting, WP 7.4.1CEA Saclay 28 feb. 2013,
Protection heater design for MQXF outer layer *Using long Super- Heating Stations for ensuring quenhces at low currents* Tiina Salmi, Tampere.
Heaters for the QXF magnets: designs and testing and QC M. Marchevsky (LBNL)
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
First Q4 cold mass engineering follow up meeting 16/03/2016 Q4 Status update H. Felice, M. Segreti, D. Simon and JM. Rifflet.
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
MQXFSM1 results Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev 10 June 2015LARP meeting.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
MQXFS1 Protection heater delays vs. Simulations 9 May 2016 Tiina Salmi, Tampere university of technology Acknowledgement: Guram Chlachidze (FNAL), Emmanuele.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
CHATS-AS 2011clam1 Integrated analysis of quench propagation in a system of magnetically coupled solenoids CHATS-AS 2011 Claudio Marinucci, Luca Bottura,
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Status of QLASA Tool Adapter
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
MQXF Quench Protection and Meeting Goals
Protection of FCC 16 T dipoles
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
Tiina Salmi, Tampere University of Technology
Update on voltage calculations
MBHSP02 test STATUS and first results
Protection Database Tool
Quench Protection Measurements & Analysis
Using the code QP3 to calculate quench thresholds for the MB
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Guram Chlachidze Stoyan Stoynev
FRESCA Facility for the REception of Superconducting CAbles
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

QXF protection heater design : Overview and status Tiina Salmi QXF quench protection meeting April 30, 2013

E. Todesco: Time margins in superconducting magnets (WAMSDO 2013) Protection heater design for QXF GOAL: Quench all the turns fast enough (ideally in ~ 35 ms, including detection time!) CONSTRAINS: 1.Heater voltage ≤ 400 V (t.b.d.) 2.Heater temperature ≤ 300 K 3.Heater strip length = 4 m 2

Concept of heating stations 3 HS Hotspot First quench after “Heater delay”, t d,PH Quench propagation (QP) All turn quenched, t d,Qturn = t d,PH + t d,QP Hotspot * L NS = Longitudinal heater coverage at the turn under HS L NS * Optimization: Minimize t d,Qturn LQ-style heater strip I PH stainless steel

Design trade-offs 4 Heating station power Several low-power heating stations  Longer t d,PH, Faster t d,QP vs. Fewer high-power heating stations  Faster t d,PH, Longer t d,QP Heater insulation thickness Thicker insulation  Better electrical integrity  Longer t d,PH What is the optimal geometry and power? Heater geometry Several short heating stations  Longer t d,PH, Faster t d,QP vs. Fewer long heating stations  Faster t d,PH, Longer t d,QP

QXF heater: First iteration HF: w wide = 25 mm, w NS = 8.3 mm LF: w wide = 32 mm, w NS = 10.7 mm Heater insulation: mm Kapton (2 mils) NS lengths and heater power result of optimization* (taking into account magnetic field) LF and HF optimized separately Design margin of 0.2 Ω for connectors 5 QXF |B| I NOM (17320 A) HF block, NZPV = 20 m/s NS1, B = 9.3 T NS2, B = 7.8 T NS3, B = 6.9 T LF block, NZPV = 10 m/s NS1, B = 6.5 T NS2, B = 6.0 T NS3, B = 5.7 T Only outer layer heater: 4 strips per coil 3 NS for HF and LF block * More information in the appendix Heating station: 3 tunable Narrow Segments (NS)

Preliminary result 6 L NS1 L NS2 L NS3 w NS Narrow segment lengths and periodSimulated delays L NS1 (mm)L NS2 (mm)L NS3 (mm)L wide (mm)L Period (mm)t d,PH (ms)*t d,Qturn (ms)** HF strip LF strip Delay to quench all block (does not include detection time!) “Heater delay” The time margin was 35 ms… We cannot conclude that the magnet is safe with only heaters on the outer layer. Heater power = 75 W/cm 2

Next steps Improved modeling for heater design: Simulate quench propagation velocity (now maybe too optimistic) Simulate quench propagation from outer layer to inner layer Iteration with heating stations shape Simulation of hotspot temperature: Input heater geometry and delays in QLASA and/or ROXIE Experimental data from HQ02: Measurement of heater delays and quench propagation velocity – Impact of magnet current and heater power – Inner and outer layer Important to experiment also with quench back since we are really at the limit of heater performance… – For example: Measuring MIITs after a provoked protection with only outer layer heaters (already tests at low current informational) 7

Appendix 8

Heater delay simulation Single turn with periodic PH coverage 2-D Heat conduction model No turn-to-turn propagation Thermal network method Quench when cable reach T cs (I,B) *No free parameters* NS length / 2 (Kapton or G10) Cable width Imag HQ: Field and heater coverage (L NS ) vary  Delay depends on quench location… Simulation for 6 turns, shortest delay predicts the measurement HQM04 HQ01e Simulated delays in HQ coils are within 20% of measurement. Magnet current / short sample limit [%] Magnet current [A] Model Validation 9

Length of the heating station, L HS The heating stations mathematics 10 Schematic for demonstration purposes, not final drawing. HS dimensions to be optimized Narrow segment width, w NS is constant Stainless steel thickness, d ss is given Resistance of heating station, R HS : Resistance of wide part, R wide : Strip total length L strip and resistance R strip : NHS = Number of heating stations / strip

QXF heater design: Parameters 11 Conductor RRR150 Cu%53 Cu/SC1.13 # strands40 Cable width (bare)18.3mm Cable mid thickness (bare)1.557mm Strand diameter (before reaction)0.85mmG10 Voids fraction (estimation)0.15Epoxy Heater and insulation layers Cable insulation thickness0.15mmG10 Interlayer insulation0.5mmG10 PH Bottom ins. (interlayer + cable)0.65mmG10 PH Top ins. (ground ins.)0.5mmKapton Stainless steel thickness0.0254mmSs Heater strip length4.0m Magnet operation Transfer functionB peak = *Imag Bpeak – 12.2 T at I NOM I Nom 17320A Critical surface fit Bc2m = T, C = 2105 TAGodeke

Symbols and abbreviations NotationExplanationUnit PHProtection heater HSHeating station- NHSNumber of periods / strip- P HS Dissipated HS power / AreaW/m 2 wwidthm LLength longitudinally along cablem RResistanceOhm V PH Heater strip voltageV I PH Heater strip currentI T PH Heater strip temperatureK t d,PH Delay time to quench after heater activations t d,QP Time to quench propagate btw HSs td, Qturn Time to quench all turn after heater activations t ss Stainless steel heater thicknessm ρStainless steel resistivityΩm BMagnetic field strengthB I ss Magnet current short sample limitA OL / ILCoil Outer Layer / Inner Layer- 12