OPSM 405 Service Operations Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMBA-2, BUP Major Asad EO Chapter 5: Process Analysis.
Advertisements

QUAN 6610 Flow Time Analysis (T)
The information contained in this presentation, the source code and underlying program are protected by copyright owned by PlusDelta Technologies, LLC.
Process Analysis and Applications Module
Flow Rate and Capacity Analysis
OPSM 301 Operations Management
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 12: Service processes and flow variability Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin.
Slide 1Time and Throughput Management & Improvement© Van Mieghem Bottleneck Management and Improvement  Time and Throughput: –Critical Path vs. Bottleneck.
Lin/Operations/Process Analysis & Apps1 Process Analysis and Applications Module u Operational Measures: Time T, Inventory I, Throughput rate R »Link to.
S. Chopra/Operations/Managing Services1 Operations Management: Capacity Management in Services Module u Why do queues build up? u Process attributes and.
OPSM 405 Service Management Class 19: Managing waiting time: Queuing Theory Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Chapter 4 Process design Shenval. Alamy.
OM&PM/Class 2b1 1Operations Strategy –Class 1a: Introduction to OM –Class 1b: Strategic Operational Audits 2 Process Analysis –Class 2a + 2b: Process Flow.
Based on the book: Managing Business Process Flows.
OM&PM/Class 7a1 Operations Management & Performance Modeling 1Operations Strategy 2Process Analysis 3Lean Operations 4Supply Chain Management 5Capacity.
Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints
7 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Constraint Management 7 For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
Process Analysis and Applications Module
S. Chopra/Operations/Quality1 Wrap Up Levers for Improving Process Performance.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.9 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 9 – Layout Strategy © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render.
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.9 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 9 – Layout Strategy © 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render.
Chapter – 8 The Supporting Facility
Flow Rate and Capacity Analysis
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Supporting Facility.
The Supporting Facility
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 7: Process analysis Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Operations Scheduling. Scheduling in a Process-Focused Environment.
Product layout Assembly-line balancing approach. 2 Facility layout Process terminology Cycle time: Average time between completions of successive units.
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Chapter 18 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints  Goldratt’s Rules.
S. Chopra/Operations/Quality1 Wrap Up Levers for Improving Process Performance.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
Chapter 6 Process Analysis.
1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Introduction (from Chase) Process Analysis.
1-1 1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
Operations Managment Kristen’s Cookie - Lecture 4 (Chapters 4 and 5)
OPSM 301: Operations Management
Based on the book: Managing Business Process Flows.
OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 6: The Goal Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
1 Chapter 5 Flow Lines Types Issues in Design and Operation Models of Asynchronous Lines –Infinite or Finite Buffers Models of Synchronous (Indexing) Lines.
Operations Management Module 4 : Process Analysis S.Balachandran 2007 December 2007.
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
COPYRIGHT © 2008 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
OPSM 501: Operations Management Week 4: Process analysis Kristen’s Cookie Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
1 Slides used in class may be different from slides in student pack Chapter 5 Process Analysis  Process Analysis  Process Flowcharting  Categories of.
The Supporting Facility Creating the Right Environment.
TOC 1 Theory Of Constraints. TOC 2 Theory of Constraints How does TOC differ from the conventional shop control theory? Throughput definition * Emphasis.
OPSM 301 Operations Management Class 5: Business process flows: Analysis Koç University Zeynep Aksin
Process Analysis CHAPTER 5. Learning Objectives 1. Recognize three basic types of processes: a serial flow process, parallel processes (such as what happens.
Chapter 09 The Supporting Facility
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 1.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Process Characteristics
IE450 Models Relating Cycle-time, Throughput, WIP and Batch Sizes
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Chapter 17 Synchronous Manufacturing and the Theory of Constraints.
The Supporting Facility Creating the Right Environment.
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 13-14: Queue management Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin
Lin/Operations/Managing Services1 Capacity Management in Services Module u Queuing processes and performance measures u Why do queues build up? u Performance.
Key Learnings: Little’s Law
Theoretical Capacity Theoretical capacity: The capacity (throughput rate) of a process under ideal conditions (units / time) Effective capacity: The capacity.
Chapter 6 The Supporting Facility
Introduction to the Theory of Constraints (TOC) & Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) Major Mark McNabb.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved
Chapter 5 Process Analysis. Chapter 5 Process Analysis.
Managing Flow Variability: Safety Capacity
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Analytical Tools for Process Analysis and Improvement
Synchronous Manufacturing
Chapter 5 Process Analysis.
Synchronous Manufacturing and Theory of Constraints
Presentation transcript:

OPSM 405 Service Operations Management Koç University OPSM 405 Service Operations Management Class 17: Wrap-up of process game Process Analysis Zeynep Aksin zaksin@ku.edu.tr

Original process flowchart M M P C P M M C Task times? Bottleneck? Resource utilization? Cycle time? (Flow time) Value adding time? (theoretical)

Terminology Flow Time (CT or T) The flow time (also called variously throughput time, cycle time) of a given routing is the average time from release of a job at the beginning of the routing until it reaches an inventory point at the end of the routing. Flow time 1 2 3 4

Terminology Throughput Rate (TH or R) The average output of a production process per unit time. At the firm level, it is defined as the production per unit time that is sold. 1 2 3 4

Critical Path & Critical Activities Critical Path: A path with the longest total cycle time. Critical Activity: An activity on the critical path. A B D C

X-Ray Service Process 1. Patient walks to x-ray lab 2. X-ray request travels to lab by messenger 3. X-ray technician fills out standard form based on info. From physician 4. Receptionist receives insurance information, prepares and signs form, sends to insurer 5. Patient undresses in preparation of x-ray 6. Lab technician takes x-ray 7. Darkroom technician develops x-ray 8. Lab technician checks for clarity-rework if necessary 9. Patient puts on clothes, gets ready to leave lab 10. Patient walks back to physicians office 11. X-rays transferred to physician by messenger

Example: X-Ray 3 7 1 2 9 10 6 12 7 75% 4 5 6 7 8 start end 5 3 2 3 25% 11 20 6 20 transport support Value added decision Measured actual flow time: 154 minutes

Consider all possible paths

Levers for Reducing Flow Time Decrease the work content of critical activities work smarter work faster do it right the first time Move work content from critical to non-critical activities to non-critical path or to ``outer loop’’ Reduce waiting time. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

X-Ray revisited Resource Pool Res. Unit Load Load Batch Theoretical Capacity of Res. unit No of units in pool Theoretical capacity of pool Messenger 40 min/patient 1 1.5 patients/hr 6 9 Patient/hr Receptionist 5 12 X-ray technician 16 3.75 4 15 X-ray lab 7.5 8 2 Darkroom technician 3 Darkroom Changing room 10 20

Utilizations given an observed throughput of 5.5 patients/hr Resource pool Theoretical capacity Patients/hr Capacity utilization Messenger 9 61.11 Receptionist 12 45.83 X-ray technician 15 36.67 X-ray lab 16 34.38 Darkroom technician Darkroom 8 68.75 Changing room 20 27.50

Levers for Increasing Process Capacity Decrease the work content of bottleneck activities work smarter work faster do it right the first time change product mix Move work content from bottlenecks to non-bottlenecks to non-critical resource or to third party Increase Net Availability work longer increase scale (invest) increase size of load batches eliminate availability waste ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Structuring The Service Enterprise Example: Automobile’s Driver’s License Office License Renewal Times Activity Description Time (Sec) 1 Review application for correctness 15 2 Process and record payment 30 3 Check for violations and restrictions 60 4 Conduct eye test 40 5 Photograph applicant 20 6 Issue temporary license 30

Present Flow Diagram Flow time: sec Throughput rate: per hour Activity Activity Activity 2 120 30 Activity Activity 4 90 40 Activity 5 180 20 6 120 30 1 240 15 3 60 60 /hr /hr /hr /hr /hr /hr sec sec sec sec sec sec Flow time: sec Throughput rate: per hour What happens if you hire one more employee? Activity flow rate per hour time (sec)

Throughput rate: per hour Proposed Flow Diagram Activity Activity 1,4 65 55 3 60 60 /hr /hr sec sec Activity Activity 2 120 30 Activity 5 180 20 6 120 30 /hr /hr /hr sec sec sec Activity Activity 1,4 65 55 3 60 60 /hr /hr sec sec Flow time: sec Throughput rate: per hour

Throughput rate: per hour Another Design 1-5 22 165 sec /hr Activity 1-5 22 165 sec /hr Activity 1-5 22 165 sec /hr Activity Activity 6 120 30 /hr 1-5 22 165 sec /hr Activity sec 1-5 22 165 sec /hr Activity Flow time: sec Throughput rate: per hour 1-5 22 165 sec /hr Activity

The role of task times: a balanced line if task times are similar will have a balanced line in the absence of variability (deterministic) complete synchronization is possible in a balanced line idleness is minimized, though in the presence of variability full synchronization cannot be achieved

The role of task times: an unbalanced line if average task times are different will have an unbalanced line will have idleness in unbalanced case, slowest task determines output rate bottleneck is busy idleness in other stages

The role of variability 6/hr 6/hr 4 or 8/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 10 2 or 10 0 or 12 0 or 12 As variability increases, throughput (rate) decreases

Compounding effect of variability and unbalanced task times 6/hr 4/hr 4/hr 3.5/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 6/hr 2 or 10 0 or 8 2.5/hr

Resource interaction effects In a serial process downstream resources depend on upstream resources: can have temporary starvation (idleness) 6/hr 6/hr 6/hr 6/hr 6/hr 6/hr 4 or 8/hr 4.5/hr 4 or 8/hr 4 or 8/hr 2 or 10 2 or 10 3/hr 6/hr 2 or 10 6/hr 0 or 12 0 or 12 1.5/hr 0 or 12 As variability increases, the impact of resource interaction increases

Want to eliminate as much variability as possible from your processes: how? specialization in tasks can reduce task time variability standardization of offer can reduce job type variability automation of certain tasks IT support: templates, prompts, etc. incentives

Want to reduce resource interference in your processes: how? smaller lotsizes (smaller batches) better balanced line by speeding-up bottleneck (adding staff, changing procedure, different incentives, change technology) through cross-training eliminate steps buffers integrate work (pooling)

The impact of task integration (pooling) balances utilization... reduces resource interference... ...therefore reduces the impact of temporary bottlenecks there is more benefit from pooling in a high utilization and high variability process pooling is beneficial as long as it does not introduce excessive variability in a low variability system the benefits exceed the task time reductions due to specialization

Examples of pooling in business Consolidating back office work Call centers Single line versus separate queues

Summary of fundamental process principles identify and eliminate bottlenecks reduce as much variability as possible eliminate handoffs, improve communication to minimize resource interference for high utilization processes build-in more slack