Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Water discharge rate is monitored continually. 2 Sampling of stream and drainage water is made automatically or by grab sampling weekly while groundwater.
Advertisements

Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
Trend analysis: considerations for water quality management Sylvia R. Esterby Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, University of British Columbia Okanagan.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
SCOPE OF DATA STREAM FLOW AND SOLUTE FLUXES Stream discharge gauging Stream water chemistry PRECIPITATION AND DEPOSITION NRCS Snow Survey and Snow Pillow.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
Evaluation of Street Sweeping as a Water Quality Management Tool in Three Residential Basins in Madison, WI Bill Selbig USGS – WRD Middleton, WI Bill Selbig.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Impact of Sampling Frequency on Annual Load Estimation Amber Spackman Jones Utah Water Research Lab Nancy Mesner Watershed Science Jeff Horsburgh Utah.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Nutrient Concentrations in Coastal Streams, Variation with Land Use in the Carpinteria Valley (Santa Barbara Coastal LTER) Timothy H. Robinson John M.
Influence of Catchment Characteristics on Stream Nitrogen Transport to the Hood Canal Osborne, S.N.; Brett, M.T.; Richey, J.E.; Steinberg, P.D.; Newton,
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Regression Analysis of Phosphorous Loading Data for the Maumee River, Water Years Charlie Piette David Dolan Pete Richards Department of Natural.
Nutrient Loading in Coastal Streams, Variation with Land Use in the Carpinteria Valley Timothy H. Robinson Bren School of Environmental Science and Management.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Update of Tributary Concentration and Loading Estimates to Lake Champlain Maurie Clark, Annie Procaccini, and Jamie Van Clief.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Nutrient Trends in the Des Moines River Donna S. Lutz Des Moines River Water Quality Network.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Stream Monitoring of Selected Sub-watersheds of Conesus Lake.
Nutrient Fluxes in the New River, NC: The Dark Side of Hog Farms Rae Mooney Hydrology May 1, 2007.
QA/QC Assessment of Lay Monitoring in Rhode Island Elizabeth M. Herron, Linda T. Green & Arthur J. Gold URI Watershed Watch University of Rhode Island.
 Nutrient Limitation What’s happening in the Chesapeake Bay and how does it compare to our results?
Trends in Agricultural Chemical Concentrations for Three Sites with Corn Production Ashlynn Stillwell CE397: Statistics for Water Resources April 30, 2009.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
USGS Kansas Water Science Center
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Flatford Swamp Hydrologic Restoration Feasibility Study (H089)
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Continuous Water- Quality Monitoring. Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Advantages Needed in rapidly changing systems Provides better understanding.
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge.
The Confounding Effect of River Discharge on Estuarine Response to Nutrient Loading Borsuk, M. E., C. A. Stow, and K. H. Reckhow Confounding effect.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Conclusions & Future Work
Statistics in WR: Lecture 22
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Jim McClelland Rae Mooney University of Texas at Austin
Defining and Targeting High Flows
West Virginia CBP Non-tidal Network: 2006 Status Update
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Funded by ANRC through Kings River Watershed Partnership

2009 Summary: Loads and Flow-Weighted Concentrations ClSO 4 NH 3 -NNO 3 -NSRPTNTPTSS Loads 2,156,0004,170,00047,000663,00051,000920,000250,000169,710,000 FWC

Water samples were collected at the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas Stage was recorded in 30 min intervals by the USGS to estimate discharge Water samples were collected once a week and targeted storm events Water samples were analyzed for nitrate-N, ammonia-N, total N, total P, soluble reactive P, total suspended solids, sulfate and chloride Sampling Location

Load Determination & Mean Concentration Linear regression was used to determine the relationship between daily load, flow and seasonal factors: ln(L d ) = β o + β 1 ln(Q d ) —or— ln(L d ) = β o + β 1 ln(Q d ) + β 2 sin(2πT) + β 3 cos(2πT) BCF was used to remove bias from log transformations: BCF= ∑e R n

Some constituents exhibited seasonal effects…

And, some constituents required hydrograph separation…

Daily Loads were variable…

Monthly Loads were least during late summer…

Phosphorus loads have been variable following the general trend in annual discharge.

Nitrogen loads in 2009 were less than that observed in 2008, even though discharge increased.

Total suspended solids loads in 2009 were similar to that observed in 2008.

The regressions used to estimate loads considered seasonal effects, where appropriate And, this site also showed different relations between concentration and discharge at low and high flow The new monitoring program was successful at estimating loads at the Kings River.