LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities. Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

On Cavity Tilt + Gradient Change (Beam Dynamics) K. Kubo K. Kubo.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Linear Collider Damping Rings Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Code parameters optimization & DTL Tank 1 error studies Maud Baylac, Emmanuel Froidefond Presented by JM De Conto LPSC-Grenoble HIPPI yearly meeting, Oxford,
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics Justifying L01 November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justifications of modification of.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
NSLS-II Transfer Lines BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS NOVOSIBIRSK.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
XFEL X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Bernward Krause MEA WP-12: Warm Magnets WPL: B. Krause.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Beam Stay-Clear (BSC) Apertures in LCLS-II June 24, 2015 P. Emma Take up work Jim Welch started (LCLSII-TN-14-15, Jan. 23, 2015) Goal is to define stay-clear.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
Post-LH Diagnostic Line for LCLS-II P. Emma, M. Woodley, Y. Nosochkov, Feb. 26, 2014 Steal beam at Hz with y -kicker after LH (  y = 15 mm) Bend.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Cornell ERL-FFAG Lattice Using Dejan’s doublet arc cell September 2014Stephen Brooks, FFAG’141.
LCLS-II Particle Tracking: Gun to Undulator P. Emma Jan. 12, 2011.
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
1 Error study of non-scaling FFAG 10 to 20 GeV muon ring Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
12 GeV CEBAF.
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Chromatic Corrections in LCLS-II P. Emma, Y. Nosochkov, M. Woodley Mar
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Laser assisted emittance exchange to reduce the X-ray FEL size
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Arc FODO Cell Inventory
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

LCLS-II Magnet Error Sensitivities

Sensitivities of dipole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted point increases the geometric mean of the x and y projected emittances by 2%. Dipole magnet field quality sensitivities are shown at top (|b 1 /b 0 | as relative quadrupole field normalized to dipole field at r = 10 mm and |b 2 /b 0 | as relative sextupole field normalized to dipole field at r = 10 mm), and dipole magnet roll angle sensitivities are shown at bottom. Field quality sensitivities in the BC1 and BC2 magnets are tight (e.g., |b 2 /b 0 | < at r = 10 mm as the worst case), but roll sensitivities are reasonable (|  | < 1 mrad as the worst case). Sensitivity of Dipole Magnets (gradient, sextupole, and roll) BC1 BC2 10  3 (r = 10 mm) 1 mrad

Sensitivity of Quadruple Magnets (x & y alignment and roll) Sensitivities of quadrupole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted point increases the geometric mean of the x and y projected emittances by 2%. Quadrupole magnet transverse alignment sensitivities are shown at top (|  x tol | and |  y tol |), and quadrupole magnet roll angle sensitivities are shown at bottom. Alignment sensitivities are not very tight with many at the millimeter level and |  x tol | < 0.1 mm as the worst case, and roll sensitivities are also reasonable (e.g., |  tol | < 10 mrad as the worst case). 1 mm 10 mrad

Sensitivity of Quadruple Magnets (sextupole and gradient error) Sensitivities of quadrupole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV), where each plotted point increases the geometric mean of the x and y projected emittances by 2%. Quadrupole magnet field quality sensitivities are shown at top (|b 2 /b 1 |) as relative sextupole field normalized to quadrupole field at r = 10 mm, and quadrupole magnet relative field strength error sensitivities are shown at bottom. Field quality sensitivities are not very tight (e.g., |b 2/ b 1 | < 1 % as the worst case), and relative field strength error sensitivities are also reasonable (e.g., |  B/B 0 | < 0.3% as the worst case). 10% (r = 10 mm) 1%

Sensitivity of Quadruple Magnets (vibration and chromatic aberration) Sensitivities of quadrupole magnets, from injector output (95 MeV) to SXR undulator input (4 GeV). Quadrupole magnet transverse vibration sensitivities are shown at top (   x,   y ) where each plotted point will add 5% rms transverse jitter (normalized to the nominal rms beam size) in the undulator, and the quadrupole magnet chromatic sensitivities are shown at bottom, where each plotted point is the relative emittance growth of that one quadrupole magnet due to its focal length dependence on particle energy (and relative energy spread at that magnet). Vibration sensitivities are fairly tight (e.g.,   y < 0.1 mm as the worst case), but chromatic sensitivities in the injector are somewhat large (e.g., |  y /  y |  5% as the worst case).