Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, 2006 1 Object Modeling System - A Modeling Platform Olaf David 1,2, Laj Ahuja 2, Frank Geter 3 1 Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Advertisements

MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
O David Colorado State University, ARS/NRCS Fort Collins, CO (J Lyon, W Lloyd, K Rojas, F Geter, L Ahuja, J Ascough, J Carlson, M Arabi, L Garcia)
Aims, objectives and how we work Chris Murphy Project Officer, APSIM.
THE MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM (MMS)
Enabling Service Based Environmental Modelling Using Infrastructure-as-a-Service Cloud Computing Olaf David iEMSs – Leipzig, Germany - July 2012
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
A MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVED AGRICULTURAL WATER- SUPPLY FORECASTING George Leavesley 1, Olaf David 1, David Garen 2, Angus Goodbody 2, Jolyne Lea.
Building Enterprise Applications Using Visual Studio ®.NET Enterprise Architect.
National Research Support Project Proposal National Animal Nutrition Program Duration: 5 years Administrative Advisors: Nancy Cox – Southern Region (Lead)
Automated Analysis and Code Generation for Domain-Specific Models George Edwards Center for Systems and Software Engineering University of Southern California.
1 Pendahuluan Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: H0062/Teori Sistem Tahun: 2006.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Automated Tests in NICOS Nightly Control System Alexander Undrus Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Software testing is a difficult, time-consuming.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Watershed Data System: Overview Jean L. Steiner, E. John Sadler, Jin-Song Chen Greg Wilson, David James, Bruce Vandenberg John Ross, Teri Oster, Kevin.
Center for Enterprise Dissemination Services
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): -Adoption of.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Environmental Finance Center Boise State University Working on the “How to Pay” Issues of Watershed Restoration The Environmental Finance Center.
1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
OpenAlea An OpenSource platform for plant modeling C. Pradal, S. Dufour-Kowalski, F. Boudon, C. Fournier, C. Godin.
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ Montana State University.
A Collaborative Approach to Component-Based Community Models and Tools George Leavesley and Olaf David Colorado State University, USDA, Fort Collins, CO.
Cotton Modeling to Assess Climate Change and Crop Management December 2005 V. R. Reddy 1 and K. R. Reddy 2 1 USDA-ARS, Crop Systems and Global Change Laboratory,
The Role of the Object Modelling System (OMS) for Integrated Assessment of Conservation on Agricultural Land in the United States J. Carlson, O. David,
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Development of a Common Wind and Water Erosion Model
Freshwater Interoperable Modelling Project Daniel Rutledge, Sandy Elliott, Simon Guest, Alexander Herzig, Trevor Knopp, Alistair Ritchie, Paul Smale, Val.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
SOFTWARE DESIGN (SWD) Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) USDA Agricultural Research Service E. John Sadler, Coordinator M. A. Weltz, National Program Leader.
Systems Design Approaches The Waterfall vs. Iterative Methodologies.
The Saguaro Digital Library for Natural Asset Management Dr. Sudha RamSudha Ram Advanced Database Research Group Dept. of MIS The University of Arizona.
Components for Beam Dynamics Douglas R. Dechow, Tech-X Lois Curfman McInnes, ANL Boyana Norris, ANL With thanks to the Common Component Architecture (CCA)
Status of the CEAP National Assessment Robert Kellogg Jerry Lemunyon Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
Using the Soil Conditioning Index to Assess Management Effects on Soil Carbon USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Quality National Technology.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
THE MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM (MMS) and PRMS Tools for the development, application, and analysis of hydrologic and ecosystem models Other components and.
American Water Resources Association 2012 Annual Conference Jacksonville, Florida November 13, 2012 Steve Markstrom U.S. Geological Survey.
Object Modeling System (OMS 3) Update 1. General 2. Annotations replace API 3. Multi-threading 4. Simulations 5. Documentation - Audit-trails 6. Model.
THE ARS WATERSHED RESEARCH PROGRAM Watershed Processes National Program Component AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED RESEARCH History Facilities.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Soil and Water Conservation Modeling: MODELING SUMMIT SUMMARY COMMENTS Dennis Ojima Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY 31 MARCH.
“America’s NOAA National Weather Service: Protecting Lives, Livelihoods, and A Way of Life” Water Resources Vision 2020 Deliver a broader suite of improved.
Development of a Prototype Framework to Facilitate Interoperable Freshwater Modelling in New Zealand Daniel Rutledge, Sandy Elliott, Val Snow, Gabi Turek,
Object Modeling System Laj Ahuja, Frank Geter, Olaf David, Ian Schneider George H. Leavesley ARS Great Plains System Research, Fort Collins NRCS Information.
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
1 Critical Water Information for Floods to Droughts NOAA’s Hydrology Program January 4, 2006 Responsive to Natural Disasters Forecasts for Hazard Risk.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
GOS Economic Model (GEM) Overview Uses the same underlying simulation software (Stella) which was used in developing TNM Economic Model (NB-Sim) Provides.
RFC Climate Requirements 2 nd NOAA Climate NWS Dialogue Meeting January 4, 2006 Kevin Werner.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Santhi et al.ASAE1 Environmental and Economic Impacts of Reaching and Doubling the USDA Buffer Initiative Program on Water Quality C. Santhi 1, J. D. Atwood.
OMS Briefing 1 The Object Modeling System (OMS) Olaf David, Ken Rojas, Jim Ascough, Laj Ahuja, and Jack Carlson.
C.E.A.P. Conservation Effects Assessment Project Wayne M. Maresch Director Resources Inventory & Assessment Division USDA - NRCS.
A Modeling Framework for Improved Agricultural Water Supply Forecasting George Leavesley, Colorado State University, Olaf David,
DIAS INFORMATION DAY GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE Date: 09/07/2004 Research ideas by The Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences (DIAS)
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) A collaborative supercomputing environment for global change science Earth Science Division/NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS)
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
From MMS to OMS to a Minimally Invasive Modeling Framework George Leavesley and Olaf David Colorado State University, USDA, Fort Collins, CO.
Delivery of Science Components to NRCS Business Applications
OMS 3.0 O. David, J. Carlson, J. Ascough II, K. Rojas, F. Geter, W. Lloyd USDA - ARS - Agricultural Systems Research Unit USDA – NRCS - Information Technology.
Automated Analysis and Code Generation for Domain-Specific Models
Presentation transcript:

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Object Modeling System - A Modeling Platform Olaf David 1,2, Laj Ahuja 2, Frank Geter 3 1 Colorado State University 2 USDA-ARS, Integrated Agricultural System Research Unit 3 USDA-NRCS, Information Technology Center Fort Collins, Colorado

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, ARS Laboratory Locations 104 Locations, ~70 in Natural Resources >$1 billion annual budget (FY03), ~$175 million annually in NR >2,100 scientists, ~ in NR ~1,000+ research projects, ~200 in NR

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Modeling Efforts within ARS Soil, Water, Plant, and Animal models as it relates to the Agricultural Community Customers are NRCS, US Forrest Service, Landowner, Ag-Consultants, Farmers, or other Agencies Simple Screening models and complex simulation models (SWAT, Rusle, WEPP, WEPPS, Concepts, RZWQM … ) Desktop PC models / Webservices / Webfarm Model development (co-)located at Research Locations, usually as CRIS, maybe commercial usage as CRADA

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Motivation to use a Modeling Framework ARS has more than 100 models for a variety of purposes – component and system models. Developed over time as a need was identified. Used the best technology available at the time. The maintenance and upkeep are proving very difficult and expensive. Their alteration as new needs arise is not easy. They may not give the same results. Model retirement problem.

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Typical Breakdown of efforts involved in model development [Watson et al. 2001]

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Two Supporting Efforts Supporting the co located development of simulation models using an Software project management infrastructure - USDA Colaborative Development Laboratory (Colab) Move gradually to a common platform for model development and application – Object Modeling System (OMS)

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Object Modeling System

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Prescription Modeling MF Wind / Water Erosion Mississippi Delta Water Quality CEAP Models Hydrology Plant Growth Soil Erosion Nutrients Pesticides Transport Science Module Library

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Features/Workflow Component Builder Component Library Model Builder Model Runtime Output Analysis publish integrateexecute analyze Component Development Component Library Management Component Integration Model Application Data Analysis

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Lifecycle support OMS facilitates –Code reuse and sharing –Capture of legacy knowledge –Collaborative development –Database access –Verification / validation –QA / QC and certification –Multi-purposing –Maintenance and change management –Facilitates legacy code integrationComponentIntegration, Model Development ModelApplication,Analysis ComponentDevelopment,Test

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Benefits Supports building of new models and decision support tools from reusable/standardized components from a library. Facilitates long term maintainability and improvement of existing ARS models by decomposing them into their science component parts. Leads to “Customized Modeling” – fitting the model to the problem and customer need. Enhances deployment of new tools to action agencies (NRCS) and leverages established databases.

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Components “Components are software units that are context- independent both in the conceptual and technical domain.” Well adopted methodology for software reuse. Components are providing an implementation for exact one concept. Components can be “discovered” by component builder tools.

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, OMS as a Modeling IDE Modeling Projects Component Library Assembled Model Parameter Editor Component Editor Output Analysis

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Visual Model Building Model Editor

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Spatial – Temporal Support Temporal Loop Spatial Loop

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Applications Creating regionalized models within the NRCS/ARS Conservation Effects Assessment Program Implementing an ARS Unified Water and Wind Erosion Model based on WEPP / WEPPS Create a physical based simulation model supporting the iFarm effort (Integrated Farm Management) at GPSR, Livestock/Rangeland Providing the framework for water supply stream flow forecasting using PRMS / ESP for the NRCS National Water and Climate Center …

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, Application Example: CEAP Conservation Effects Assessment Program Complements the National Assessment –Develop a quantitative water quality, soil quality and water conservation database –Provide watershed scale benefits information –Provide estimates of uncertainties – Develop a set of regionalized models –Develop and document indicators of benefits Develop prototype for regional watershed models Use best technology from existing models such as SWAT, AGNPS, REMM, Concepts, … Long term effort

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, OMS Development MOU & Collaborations ARS –Great Plains System Research –NPS / NPA – Upcoming: National Software Support Center NRCS –ITC Fort Collins –Science and Technology Divisions –Soil Survey and Resource Assessment Divisions –National Water and Climate Center USGS –Water Resources Division Colorado State University, Fort Collins Collaborations –MOU on Multimedia Environmental Models including USGS, USDA, DoE, ANL, EPA, and others (FRAMES, MMS, COSU,..) –APSRU (CSIRO) on AgSystem models and Frameworks (APSRU) –IEMSS on Modular Modeling and Frameworks

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, OMS in Colab –Modeling Projects –OMS Incubator for Modeling Projects –OMS Development for System Development

Joint Federal Interagency Conferences, Reno, USDA Modeling and Collaboration Infrastructure Model Development - Construct - Run - Analyze - Test - Verify Model ProjectManagement Model Project Management - Tracker - Forums - Documents - CMM Reports - Access Control ModelResourcesChange Management Model Resources Change Management - Version Control - Change Management - Repository - Concurrent Access OMSOMS SubversionSubversion CodebeamerCodebeamer