1 Top ID in tt → 6-Jet channel Erik Devetak Edinburgh Collaboration Meeting (18-03-08)‏

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Advertisements

1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
1 Measuring the Top Quark Cross Section in the Semileptonic Channel Andrea Bangert.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
T-CHANNEL MODELING UNCERTAINTIES AND FURTHER QUESTIONS TO TH AND NEW FIDUCIAL MEASUREMENTS Julien Donini, Jose E. Garcia, Dominic Hirschbuehl, Luca Lista,
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Introduction Ricardo Goncalo HSG5 H->bb weekly meeting, 18 October 2011.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final LHC Kittikul Kovitanggoon * & Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University Michael Weinberger.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
L. Bellagamba, Excited fermions and other searches at HERA 1 International Conference on High Energy Physics Amsterdam July 2002 Excited fermions.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
1 A.Nomerotski SUSY Benchmarking Analyses with SiD Yiming Li, Tomas Lastovicka, Andrei Nomerotski (University of Oxford) TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009.
LCFI Package and Flavour 3TeV Tomáš Laštovička Institute of Physics AS CR CLIC WG3 Meeting 9/6/2010.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
C2cr07, Lake Tahoe 26-FEB-07 G. Gutierrez, Fermilab The Top Quark Mass and implications Gaston Gutierrez Fermilab So, in the next 20’ I will try to give.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
Higgs self coupling Djamel BOUMEDIENE, Pascal GAY LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Recent b physics results from OPAL David Waller, Carleton University for the OPAL Collaboration EPS Conference HEP2003 Heavy Flavour Physics Session Aachen,
SEARCH FOR AN INVISIBLE HIGGS IN tth EVENTS T.L.Cheng, G.Kilvington, R.Goncalo Motivation The search for the Higgs boson is a window on physics beyond.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
1 Studies of Heavy Flavour Jet Tagging with ZVTOP in JAS3 Overview Jet flavour tagging in JAS3 Cosθ dependence Primary vertex momentum Use of neutral energy.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Summary of Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal, University of Udine Top Working Group, CERN October 29 th, 2003.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
E. Devetak - SiD Meeting RAL 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL SiD 04/2008 Abingdon‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
VHF working meeting, 4 Oct Measurement of associated charm production in W final states at  s=7TeV J. Alcaraz, I. Josa, J. Santaolalla (CIEMAT,
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
American Physical Society Meeting St. Louis, MO April th, 2008 Measuring the top mass at DØ using the Ideogram Method Amnon Harel
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Inclusive Tag-Side Vertex Reconstruction in Partially Reconstructed B decays -A Progress Report - 11/09/2011 TDBC-BRECO.
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
ttH (Hγγ) search and CP measurement
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
Presentation transcript:

1 Top ID in tt → 6-Jet channel Erik Devetak Edinburgh Collaboration Meeting ( )‏

2 Talk outline Identifying the top in tt →6 jet channels 6-Jet Ycut optimization (Jet finder)‏ True angular jet flavour and b tagging Looking at phase space at parton level (understand kinematics)‏ B tag of tt W - Kinematic fit (using capability of MarlinReco)‏ Top – Kinematic fitting Conclusion

3 Flavour tagging with 6 Jets  First look if jets well separated at reconstruction level  Then look at b tag given only b jets at MC level  Performance not degraded in any noticeable way.  Still need to check degradation of parton (vertex) charge…  Caveat: Used SID fast MC – expecting worst performance with full MC but not dramatic decrease. Closest jet to the MC b quark

4 B - tagging identifying tt  All inclusive decays. Use only events where 6 jets reconstructed  Clear peak at 2 reconstructed b quarks. Good discriminator for top  Corruption from missing acceptance cuts and failure of b reconstruction reason of peak at 1  Useful to take care of such events! (not yet done)‏

5  All inclusive decays. Use only events where 6 jet reconstructed  Use kinematic fit to identify W.  Constrain MassW 1 =MassW 2  4-Jet combinatorics use less b like jets plot best result  Combine with b jets for top mass GeV W Mass W – kinematic fit Top Mass ( combine all b jets with W)‏ Top Mass Combine closest b E b-jet > 60GeV

6 Top Mass - identifying the top  All inclusive decays. Use only events where 6 jet reconstructed  If plot all 6 jets combinatorics top peak barely visible  Setting energy and momentum constrains peak is much sharper  Still present wrong w – b combinatorics.  Corruption from events with one top decaying leptonicaly.  Use previous slides to improve! GeV Peak: Mean = 170 GeV Sigma = 11 GeV Mystery: Why substantial difference in performance wrt previous slide?

7 Conclusion  Showed all components of reconstruction can deal with 6-jets events (vertex charge to come)‏  Optimized Y-cut  Showed b-tag response for the tt events  Found W mass Peak  Found top mass peak  Outlined method to ID the tt bar events!  Need acceptance cuts  Need better study of lepton events in 6 jet sample  Move to full MC