Full and Open Access GEOSS: Are we there yet? Massimo Craglia, Elena Roglia, Alessandro Sorichetta European Commission Joint Research Centre

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Days 2 & 3 ID-01 Data Sharing.
Advertisements

Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Product Quality and Documentation – Recent Developments H. K. Ramapriyan Assistant Project Manager ESDIS Project, Code 423, NASA GFSC
Interoperability Principles in the Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Presented 13 March 2006 at eGY in Boulder, CO by: Eliot Christian,
Essential Climate Variables (ECV) Inventory NOAA/NESDIS National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC WCRP Data Advisory Council 3 rd Session May 6-7, 2014.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
Architecture and Data Management Strategy (Action Plan) Ivan 1 DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alessandro Annoni, EC, ADC Co-chair Jay Pearlman, IEEE, ADC.
1 EnviroGrids: Building Capacity for a Black Sea Catchment Observation and Assessment System supporting Sustainable Development Nicolas.
The GEOSS Portfolio for Science and Technology Produced by ST Featuring: Biodiversity: GEO Protected Areas Assessment & Monitoring Pilot: The GRAAMP.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter- operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
Architectural enhancements for GEOSS Douglas Nebert February 2011.
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
SCADM MEETING, SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 STATUS OF THE ANTARCTIC MASTER DIRECTORY.
Prepared for the 3rd SBB telecon 20 Mar 2012 Michele Walters, BI-01 task coordinator.
D. R. Fraser Taylor, FRSC Distinguished Research Professor Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada Presentation to the OGC Korea Interoperability Day Workshop.
January 2002 Géraud Servin 1 of 12 Terrestrial Ecosystem Monitoring Sites.
ID-01 report 17 September 2014 IDIB meeting, Enschede Michel Schouppe
© GEO Secretariat Ways to raise awareness and use of the GEOSS Data-CORE Michel SCHOUPPE & Jose Miguel RUBIO IGLESIAS DSWG face-to-face meeting Geneva,
Considerations Arising from the Data Sharing Action Plan for the GEOSS Common Infrastructure Linda Moodie Co-chair/United States Data Sharing Task Force.
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
1 How to make the GEOSS Data CORE a reality Part 1 Max Craglia Presented on behalf of Max by: Alan Edwards, EC Stefano Nativi, CNR.
Digital Earth Communities GEOSS Interoperability for Weather Ocean and Water GEOSS Common Infrastructure Evolution Roberto Cossu ESA
EUM/SIR/VWG/11/012 WP 2000: Climate SBA 9 October 2011 WP 2000: Climate Societal Benefit Area Robert Husband (EUMETSAT)
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-01 Advancing the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Suggestions for the GEOSS Workplan C. Waldmann and R. Huber MARUM, Germany.
WGISS Technology Subgroup Report WGISS-29 Bonn, 2010 Nataliia Kussul WGISS.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
Any data..! Any where..! Any time..! Linking Process and Content in a Distributed Spatial Production System Pierre Lafond HydraSpace Solutions Inc
Which infrastructure for GEOSS? Max Craglia European Commission Joint Research Centre.
Task ID_01 “Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” The Group on Earth Observations Data Sharing Activities for 2013 Reported by Lerato Senoko 29 th EXCOM:
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
11-12 June 2015, Bari-Italy Coordinating an Observation Network of Networks EnCompassing saTellite and IN-situ to fill the Gaps in European Observations.
IPCC-GEO meeting 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development Goals and Beyond" Bonn,
ADC Portal & Clearinghouse GEO Architecture and Data Committee 2-3 March 2006 George Percivall OGC Chief Architect
Robert S. Chen Co-chair/Data Sharing Task Force Geneva, Switzerland 1-3 February 2011 Implementation of the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Task IN-03 GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 GEOSS Common Infrastructure IN-03.
Task XX-0X Task ID-01 GEO Work Plan Symposium April 2014 Task ID-01 “ Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” Experiences related to data sharing.
CoGland- Collaborative Global Land Information Jun Chen 1,2,3 1 National Geomatics Center of China 2 GEO SB Int. Society of Photogrammetry and.
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
Task DI Progress report Gonéri Le Cozannet IGOS-Geohazards
GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.
The GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholders: Implementing the Science and Technology Road Map through an open, global networking approach Goals: - Engage.
Science and Technology Roadmap - current progress 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Helen M. Wood Co-chair / U.S.A. On behalf of the Data Sharing Task Force 22nd Meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland July 2011.
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
SIT-27 Meeting La Jolla, CA, USA March 26-28, CEOS Priorities for 2012 Timothy Stryker CEOS Executive Officer.
GEOSS Data Sharing: Plans for 2016 and beyond GEO Work Programme Symposium WMO, Geneva, 2 May 2016 Robert Chen on behalf of the DSWG co-chairs (GEO Foundational.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
CrossCutting topic: Data Quality and European Network of EO Networks
GEO WP 1. INFRASTRUCTURE (Architecture and Data Management)
GCI Requirements and GEOSS Portal Functionalities
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
2017 WPS Break-Out Session: Addressing Gaps
Which infrastructure for GEOSS?
INSPIRE Geoportal Thematic Views Application
The GEO DAB possible contributions
Search Relevancy in GEO Data Access Broker
WGISS Connected Data Assets April 9, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
Workshop on Gap Analysis and Prioritization
WGCapD Perspectives of Work Plan –
WGISS Connected Data Assets Oct 24, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
2nd Marine Board Forum: towards a European Network of Marine Observatories for monitoring and research Session 2: Projects and Initiatives Alan Edwards.
Presentation transcript:

Full and Open Access GEOSS: Are we there yet? Massimo Craglia, Elena Roglia, Alessandro Sorichetta European Commission Joint Research Centre

The GEOSS Data CORE The GEOSS Data Collection of Open Resources for Everyone (GEOSS Data CORE), is a distributed pool of documented datasets with full, open and unrestricted access at no more than the cost of reproduction and distribution. The establishment of the GEOSS Data CORE was approved at the Beijing GEO Summit in 2010 and started in Progress was slow in but gathered considerable pace in 2013.

The GEOWOW Survey An on-line survey was conducted by the the FP7 GEOWOW project ( between July 1st and 31st, 2013 to assess the GEOSS community’s level of awareness about the GEOSS Data CORE, understand the community willingness to contribute to it and use it, and identify potential barriers preventing its use. The results show that additional effort is needed to increase the awareness and use of the GEOSS Data CORE. We plan to repeat the survey in 2014 to measure the extent of progress made in building this key asset for GEOSS.

70 respondents from 31 Countries belonging to different type of organizations involved in GEOSS. 24% of respondents were NOT aware of the concept of GEOSS Data CORE; 17% were using the GEOSS Data CORE, 24% were contributing to it. GEOSS Data CORE Survey: Awareness, Involvement, and Challenges

Key barriers: the difficulty to find and discover GEOSS Data CORE resources; some thematic area are poorly represented; Key advantages: the possibility to reduce data costs and facilitates advancing disciplinary and inter- disciplinary research; Key limitations: the fact that data spatial extent and temporal resolution do not fit users’ needs. Improve awareness and participation by providing technical support and disseminating successful stories.

Potential Accessibility of GCI Resources Assessed using the 50 GCOS Essential Climate Variables as keywords to perform a search; 126,000 records returned (of which 60% GEOSS Data CORE); 8% not providing Distribution Information; 3% accessible via OGC protocols; 29% mostly accessible via HTTP and FTP protocols; 60% do not specify protocols (but with working links). Many coming form the Pangaea infrastructure are easily accessible via ftp (

Detailed accessibility analysis of sample datasets contained in the “CEOS, CGMS, and WMO ECV inventory database” 50% belonging to the GEOSS Data CORE; Very good data accessibility through different protocols (mostly HTTP and FTP); 1/4 datasets accessible by 1-click (mostly via FTP); 3/4 datasets accessible, on average, by 4.2 clicks. So we have a link in the metadata, and then what?

Conclusions The GEOSS data CORE has the potential to be one of the key success stories of GEOSS, setting it apart form any other web-based infrastructure. The survey shows that more work is needed to increase awareness and use. Progress in 2013 has been very substantial but is not yet reflected in the survey results. Most resources in GEOSS relating to the Essential Climate Variables are easily accessible. More tests needed for others domains.

Verify the accessibility of other Essential Variables related to different thematic areas (e.g., Essential Biodiversity Variables) Repeat GEOSS data CORE survey to monitor progress in user satisfaction For more information about GEOWOW please visit: Next steps EC Grant Agreement no