Warm Up 09.27.11 Week 7 1) Write the equation for the line that goes through the point and slope: ( 2, -9 ) and m = 3.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Sec 2-3 Concept: Deductive Reasoning Objective: Given a statement, use the laws of logic to form conclusions and determine if the statement is true through.

Advertisements

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

2.5 If-Then Statements and Deductive Reasoning

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Lesson 2.3 p. 87 Deductive Reasoning Goals: to use symbolic notation to apply the laws of logic.

Definitions © 2006 by Mr. Mayers Reasoning Conditional Statements Properties Undefined Terms Symmetry Team 1Team 2Team 3Team

If (-3,y) is a solution to the equation -2x+7y=-8, what is the value for y ? a / 2 b. -2 c. - 2 / 7 d warm-up 4.

2. 1 Inductive Reasoning & Conjecture 2. 2 Logic 2

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning. Ohio Content Standards.

Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

2.3: Deductive Reasoning p Deductive Reasoning Use facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.

Review! It’s Go Time!.

Section 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

Verifying Arguments MATH 102 Contemporary Math S. Rook.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

Warm Up Week 6 m ∡ 9 = 33º ) What is m ∡ 7? 2) What is m ∡ 8?

Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

2.4 DEDUCTIVE REASONING Playing the game of logic well.

Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Chapter 2 Lesson 3 Objective: To use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism.

 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.

Logic Puzzles Four friends (Al, Gary, Mike, & Roger) each have a favorite TV show. Oddly enough, while the four are close friends, their interest in TV.

Warm Up Week 7 1) find the slope between the two points: ( 2, -9 ) and ( -13, 21 )

2.3 – Apply Deductive Reasoning

Do Now. Law of Syllogism ◦ We can draw a conclusion when we are given two true conditional statements. ◦ The conclusion of one statement is the hypothesis.

Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warm Up Week 2. Section 10.6 Day 1 I will write the equation of a circle. Circle Equation Must know the coordinate of the center and the radius.

2.3 – Apply Deductive Reasoning. Deductive Reasoning: Law of Detachment: Law of Syllogism: Using facts, definitions, and logic to form a statement If.

Section 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Objectives: Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Inductive Reasoning: based on observing what has happened.

Deductive Reasoning Geometry Chapter 2-3 Mr. Dorn.

2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car.

Warm Up Week 8 If it does not snow, then we will go camping. If we go camping then we will cook marshmallows. The following statement depicts.

2.3 Deductive Reasoning p. 87 Reminders Statement Conditional statement Converse Inverse Contrapositive Biconditional Symbols p → q q → p ~p → ~q ~q.

Geometry 2-3 Law of Syllogism The Law of Syllogism allows you to draw conclusions from two conditional statements. Law of Syllogism If p  q and q  r.

Reasoning and Proof DAY 4: 2.4 Deductive Reasoning.

Warm Up Week 6 1) write an equation that passes through the given point and y-intercept. ( 2, 1 ) ; b = 5.

Name vertical angles and linear pairs. Name a pair of complementary angles and a pair of supplementary angles.

Reasoning in Algebra & Deductive Reasoning (Review) Chapter 2 Section 5.

Week 5 Warm Up { -3, 8, 19, 30, 41, . . } n = 3 1) tn = 2) tn - 1 =

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Objective:

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.

Palm trees grow in warm climates

Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Look at specific examples. • Recognize patterns, which.

2.4 Deductive Reasoning.

2.3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures

2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:

Drawing and Supporting Conclusions

Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.

Math Humor Q: How is a geometry classroom like the United Nations?

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Conditional Original IF-THEN statement.

Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.

2-4 Deductive Reasoning 8th Grade Geometry.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.

Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard

2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Angles, Angle Pairs, Conditionals, Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2

TODAY’S OBJECTIVE: Standard: MM1G2

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Vocab:

Goal 1: Using Symbolic Notation Goal 2: Using the Laws of Logic

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Presentation transcript:

Warm Up Week 7 1) Write the equation for the line that goes through the point and slope: ( 2, -9 ) and m = 3

Geometry 2.3 Day 2 I will use and understand the difference between the law of detachment and the law of transitivity. If p → q is true and p is true, then q is true. Law of detachment If a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true. If Josh misses practice, then he will not start in the game. Josh misses practice. Ex 1

Geometry 2.3 Day 2 I will use and understand the difference between the law of detachment and the law of transitivity. If p → q is true and p is true, then q is true. Law of detachment If a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true. If Josh misses practice, then he will not start in the game. Josh misses practice. Ex 1

Geometry 2.3 Day 2 I will use and understand the difference between the law of detachment and the law of transitivity. If p → q is true and p is true, then q is true. Law of detachment If a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true. If Josh misses practice, then he will not start in the game. Josh misses practice. Ex 1

Geometry 2.3 Day 2 I will use and understand the difference between the law of detachment and the law of transitivity. If p → q is true and p is true, then q is true. Law of detachment If a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true. If Josh misses practice, then he will not start in the game. Josh misses practice. Ex 1

Geometry 2.3 Day 2 I will use and understand the difference between the law of detachment and the law of transitivity. and p is true, then q is true. Law of detachment If a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true. If Josh misses practice, then he will not start in the game. Josh misses practice. If p → q is true Ex 1

Geometry 2.3 Day 2 I will use and understand the difference between the law of detachment and the law of transitivity. If p → q is true and p is true, then q is true. Law of detachment If a conditional statement is true and its hypothesis is true, then the conclusion is true. If Josh misses practice, then he will not start in the game. Josh misses practice. Conclusion:Josh does not start in the game. Ex 1

If p → q and q → r are true conditional statements, then p → r is true. Ex 2 Law of transitivity (syllogism) If it is Saturday, then Sylvia has a lot of free time. If Sylvia has a lot of free time, then she will go shopping. p → q rq → p → r

If p → q and q → r are true conditional statements, then p → r is true. Ex 2 Law of transitivity (syllogism) If Sylvia has a lot of free time, then she will go shopping. p → q rq → p → r If it is Saturday,then Sylvia has a lot of free time.

If p → q and q → r are true conditional statements, then p → r is true. Ex 2 Law of transitivity (syllogism) If Sylvia has a lot of free time, then she will go shopping. p → q rq → p → r If it is Saturday,then Sylvia has a lot of free time.

If p → q and q → r are true conditional statements, then p → r is true. Ex 2 Law of transitivity (syllogism) p → q rq → p → r If it is Saturday,then Sylvia has a lot of free time. If Sylvia has a lot of free time, shopping. then she will go

If p → q and q → r are true conditional statements, then p → r is true. Ex 2 Law of transitivity (syllogism) p → q rq → p → r If it is Saturday,then Sylvia has a lot of free time. If Sylvia has a lot of free time, shopping. then she will go

If p → q and q → r are true conditional statements, then p → r is true. Ex 2 Law of transitivity (syllogism) p → q rq → p → r If it is Saturday,then Sylvia has a lot of free time. If Sylvia has a lot of free time, shopping. then she will go Conclusion: If it is Saturday, then Sylvia will go shopping.

If it does not rain, then the river will dry up. If the river dries up the boats cannot float. Ex 3 Conclusion: If it does not rain, then the boats cannot float. If it does not rain, then the river will dry up. It does not rain. Ex 4 Conclusion: The river dries up. Law of Logic: Transitivity Law of Logic: Detachment

Do: 1 Conclusion: Assignment: Textbook Page 93, 45 – 48 All. And #51 Handout – Laws of Detachment and Syllogism If it is six pm, then the pizza shop is open. If the pizza shop is open, then Suzan will go buy a pizza. Law of Logic:

If it is Halloween, Sheela will buy lots of candy. If Sheela buys lots of candy, then she will eat all the candy. Ex 5 p → q: If it is Halloween, then Sheela will buy lots of candy. q → r: If Sheela buys lots of candy, then she will eat all the candy. p → r: If it is Halloween, then Sheela will eat all the candy.