L1Calo Intro Cambridge Group, Dec 2008 Norman Gee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Advertisements

6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
TileCal Electronics A Status Report J. Pilcher 17-Sept-1998.
8 th Workshop on Electronics for LHC experiments - Colmar- September 9 th -13 th 2002Gilles MAHOUT Prototype Cluster Processor Module for the ATLAS Level-1.
A segmented principal component analysis applied to calorimetry information at ATLAS ACAT May 22-27, Zeuthen, Germany H. P. Lima Jr, J. M. de Seixas.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
L1Calo – towards phase II Mainz upgraders : B.Bauss, V.Büscher, R.Degele, A.Ebling, W.Ji, C.Meyer, S.Moritz, U.Schäfer, C.Schröder, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge.
ATLAS L1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade - Uli Schäfer, MZ -
Phase-0 topological processor Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Level-1 Topology Processor for Phase 0/1 - Hardware Studies and Plans - Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 S-L1Calo upstream links architecture -- interfaces -- technology.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger updates for Phase 1.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University L1Calo upgrade hardware planning + Overview of current concept + Recent work, results.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger upgrade for Phase 1.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University L1Calo upgrade discussion Overview Issues  Latency  Rates  Schedule Proposed upgrade strategy R&D.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
1 1 Rapid recent developments in Phase I L1Calo Weakly 25 Jul 2011 Norman Gee.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
April CMS Trigger Upgrade Workshop - Paris1 Christian Bohm, Stockholm University for the L1 calorimeter collaboration The ATLAS Trigger Upgrade.
Alan Watson ATLAS Overview week, Prague, 17/09/2003 Rx   Calorimeters (LAr, Tile) 0.2x x Mb/s analogue ~75m 0.1x0.1 RoI Builder L1 CTP.
Ideas about Tests and Sequencing C.N.P.Gee Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 3rd March 2001.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
SL1Calo Input Signal-Handling Requirements Joint Calorimeter – L1 Trigger Workshop November 2008 Norman Gee.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics La Jolla, California Giovanna Lehmann - CERN EP/ATD The DataFlow of the ATLAS Trigger.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Status of the ATLAS first-level Central Trigger and the Muon Barrel Trigger and First Results from Cosmic-Ray Data David Berge (CERN-PH) for the ATLAS.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
L1Calo Installation Status Murrough Landon, QMUL Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger (University of Birmingham, University of Heidelberg, University of Mainz,
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
The ATLAS Trigger System 1.Global Requirements for the ATLAS trigger system 2.Trigger/DAQ Architecture 3.LVL1 system 4.HLT System 5.Some results from LHC.
1 J. Varela, CMS Trigger, RT09, Beijing, May 2009 J. Varela IST/LIP Lisbon CMS Trigger Project Manager 16 th IEEE NPSS Real Time Conference May 10-15,
Samuel Silverstein, SYSF ATLAS calorimeter trigger upgrade work Overview Upgrade to PreProcessor MCM Topological trigger.
The ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter: Overview and Performance Huaqiao ZHANG (CPPM) On behalf of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Group.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
Upgrade Intro 10 Jan 2010 Norman Gee. N. Gee – Upgrade Introduction 2 LHC Peak Luminosity Lumi curve from F.Zimmermann : Nov Upgrade Week ? ?
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Samuel Silverstein, Stockholm University For the ATLAS TDAQ collaboration The Digital Algorithm Processors for the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Phase2 Level-0 Calo Trigger ● Phase 2 Overview: L0 and L1 ● L0Calo Functionality ● Interfaces to calo RODs ● Interfaces to L0Topo Murrough Landon 27 June.
Configuration and local monitoring
Multi-step Runs – an L1Calo Perspective
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
L1Calo upgrade discussion
ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade
Cabling Lengths and Timing
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Level-1 Calo Monitoring
ATLAS: Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger
The ATLAS First Level Calorimeter Trigger
BESIII EMC electronics
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Presentation transcript:

L1Calo Intro Cambridge Group, Dec 2008 Norman Gee

Trigger strategy RoIB High-level Trigger ROD Other detectors Calorimeters Muons CALO trigger MUONS trigger CTP Level-1 L1A. 40 MHz 75 kHz <2.5  s ROB Det. readout DAQ Event Builder ROS Level-2 <40 ms L2S V EFN L2A. 2 kHz RoI requests RoI Data Regions of Interest (RoI) Event Filter ~1 s L2N EF Acc. 200 Hz Full events hardware Software 300 Mb/s 120 Gb/s 3 Gb/s L1 Dedicated hardware (ASICS & FPGAs) Calorimeters & muons Latency < 2.5  s L1A 75 kHz (Max 100kHz) L2 ~500 dual CPUs Full granularity Regions of Interest (~2%) Latency ~40 ms L2A 2kHz Event Filter (L3) ~1600 dual CPUs Access to full event & calibration constants More detailed reconstruction Use Offline algorithms Latency ~1s 200Hz 2

Level-1 trigger system (L1) 3 sub-systems L1 - Calorimeters (L1Calo) L1 – Muons (L1Muon) Central Trigger Processor (CTP ) Signature identification e/  /hjets  e/ ,  /h, jets,  Multiplicities per E T threshold Isolation criterion Missing E T, total E T, jetE E T Preprocessor Cluster Processor e/  /h e/ ,  /h Jet/Energy Processor jetsE T jets, E T Muon Barrel Trigger Muon Endcap Trigger Muon-CTP Interface Central Trigger Processor LAr TileRPCTGC RoIB L2 supervisorDetector readout CTP Receive & synchronize trigger information Generate level-1 trigger decision (L1A) Deliver L1A to other sub-detectors 3

L1 Calorimeter - Architecture L1Calo partitioned into 3 sub-systems  Real time transmission to CTP  DAQ + RoIs at each L1A ( 75kHz ) Pre-Processor (PPr) Receive & sample signal from calorimeters Trigger Towers Coarser granularity (Trigger Towers) Noise filter Bunch crossing identification (BCID) E T Determine final E T value Processors JEP & CP Physics algorithms Search for and identify:  isolated leptons, taus  jets Compute E T total, missing,… 4

5 Electromagnetic calorimeter - Endcap Cryostat Electromagnetic calorimeter - Barrel Tile Calorimeter Hadronic Calorimeter – End cap Forward Calorimeter Calorimeters

Trigger towers (TT) LArTiles (semi-projective segmentation ) trigger towers map 0.1x <|  |< x <|  |< x <|  |< x0.1 |  |< 2.5  x  Position Analogue summation of calorimeter cells 3584 x 2 (EM+HAD) trigger towers 6

7 Overview of the trigger front-end Long cables: Cavern to USA15 Typically 40–70m long Detector responsibility 256 TileCal, 360 LAr Short cables: Internal to trigger racks Typically 5–8m long L1Calo responsibility 776 in total All analogue cables: 16 individually shielded pairs F/R denote front/rear of modules All connectors D37 except TCPP inputs, which are D50

8 Cable Installation

10 b Sampling 40 Mhz, Flash-ADC 10 bits 1 FADC count  250 MeV Pedestal 40 FADC counts PPr Receivers (Rx) Input signal conditioning to L1 (2,5V  250GeV) Variable gain amplifier (VGA) E  E T Conversion (Hadronic layers only, LAr already E T ) Local signal monitoring Pre-Processors – Energy reconstruction Transmission to processors & DAQ 10 b E T calibration Look-Up Table Look-Up Table (LUT) Pedestal subtraction, noise suppression FADCGeV FADC (10b)  GeV (8b) conversion E thres 8b Bunch crossing identification (BCID) Finite impulse response filter (FIR) Peak finder (linear/saturated) Assign E T to the ‘correct’ bunch crossing a0a0 a1a1 a2a2 a3a3 a4a4 + FIR filter

10 PreProcessor Module (PPM) [Heidelberg] RAW FADC values and LUT outputs are Read out when L1A fires Multi-chip module (MCM) with FADCs, ASIC and LVDS serialisers Clock for FADC individually adjusted to sample on pulse peak. Then digital data synchronised (coarse & fine adjustment) to identical times. Towers for CP multiplexed, then serialised to 400 Mb/s and sent as LVDS on cables to CP For JEP, 2 x 2 em or Had towers summed, then sent at 400 MB/s to JEP

Algorithms and Regions of Interest (RoI) Processor input is a matrix of tower energies Algorithms look for physics signatures (sliding window) RoI data sent to Level-2 trigger following L1A Cluster Processor Jet/Energy-sum Processor Criteria for e/  or  /h candidate: EM or Had. cluster > E threshold Total E T in EM Isolation Ring  EM isolation thresh. Total E T in Had. Isolation Ring  Had. isolation thresh. Local E T Maximum compared to neighbor windows. e/  only: Had. core  core isolation threshold Jet candidate Coarser granularity 0.2x0.2 (jet element) Digital summation EM + Had. Sliding, overlapping windows (3 sizes) Missing energy ECAL+HCAL 11

12 Cluster Processor Module Serialisers CP FPGAs Readout

Backplane Traffic 2 columns of fan-out towers to adjacent CPM on ‘left’ (- η) 1 column of fan-out towers to adjacent CPM on ‘right’ (+η) Backplane Fan- in/out runs at 160 Mb/s to reduce pin count Output: hit counts. 3 bits for each of 8 threshold sets, + parity. 25 e/  bits go left, 25  /h bits go right

Backplane 14

Jet-Energy module [Mainz/Stockholm] 15

Common Merger Module

17 Central Trigger Processor (CTP) Receivesynchronizealign Receive, synchronize and align trigger information Other signals: Random trigger Calibration Minimum biais events (MBTS) Generate the level-1 trigger decision (L1A) Programmable trigger menu Latency 100 ms (4BC) Deliver the L1A to the other sub-detectors

Bunch crossing Average offset from L1A timing in EM layer Average offset from L1A timing in EM layer

19 Energy correlation with calorimeters HadronicElectromagnetic L1Calo reconstructed E T vs calorimeter precision readouts Cosmic muons Reasonable correlation achieved Very crude calibration applied, still room for improvement L1Calo

20 LAr EMB timing from pulser run Coarse timing ok Focusing on fine tuning Timing calibration Internal timing of L1Calo trigger is achieved Input timing realized in pre-processors Not a trivial task Several strategies depending on signal origin: calibration cosmic rays collisions Different setup & automatic procedures Setup coarse/fine timing Ensure signals are correctly sampled (3 rd sample at maximum) Signal shape with 1 ns sampling step

21 Pedestal & Noise Pedestals set to 40 ADC counts Sensible RMS ~ 400 MeV Nearly all channels behaving correctly (>99%) HadronicElectromagnetic Mean RMS ADC counts