History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Neil WILSON Director, Functional Support Division Brands and Designs Sector Seminar on WIPO Services and Initiatves Global IP Systems The Madrid, Hague.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Collective Marks and Certification Marks
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
Membership Status RMIMCM A B C D A B Representative Member Corporate Member Individual Member.
Trade Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership for ASEAN and Other Asian Countries Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Geographical Indications (GIs) in the Implementation of Public Policies: Best Practices and the Socio- Economic Dimension of GIs Presented at the Second.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Marketing Products identified by their origin (or Geographical Indications) A tool for rural development.
Alexander Anton Attorney-at-Law German Dairy Association (MIV), Brussels Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Generics in cheeses.
WIPO’s Activities in the ASEAN : Focus on the Madrid Protocol AIPA Annual Conference March 28, 2015 Denis CROZE Director, WIPO Office in Singapore.
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Geographical Indicators Daniel Pick Economic Research Service.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
1 THE DEBATE CONCERNING THE AGREEMENT ON TRADE-RELATED ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (TRIPs) FROM A DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE Simonetta Zarrilli.
Global Places. Q1. Name the country given by the X. X France Germany Greece Italy Poland Russia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine.
© Lloyd’s Regional Watch Content Guide CLICK ANY BOX AMERICAS IMEA EUROPE ASIA PACIFIC.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
The need for recognition and protection of geographical indications in South Africa Prof Johann Kirsten Head of the Department of Agricultural Economics,
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Overview of origin-linked.
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
Annual Exporters Conference 2014
Department of International Relations – Geographical Indications (GIs)
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
Massimiliano Di Pace1 EU TRADE POLICY Eu has exclusive competence on Trade policy (art. 3 TfUe) This means that every decision on this subject cannot be.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
Figure 1 Developing countries Developed countries.
Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau The World of Organic Agriculture: Regulations and Certification Emerging.
Membership Status RMIMCM A B C D A B Representative Member Corporate Member Individual Member.
Welcome to class of World Marketplace by Dr. Satyendra Singh University of Winnipeg Canada.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
1 The Protection of Patents, Trademarks, Industrial Designs and GIs and Their Role in Trade and Commerce Denis Cohen, WIPO.
2A. She’s British. Countries & nationalities Point out what countries through their flags & which nationalities?
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
Appellation of origin and peculiarities of its development in Russia (questions concerning development of appellation’s of origin institution in Russia.
Where is China? Sorry That Was the Wrong Answer.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Word Bank Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan Cambodia China India Indonesia
2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index. 2Deloitte and US Council on Competitiveness I 2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness IndexCopyright.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
N= 14,210 * Includes English Learners (ELs) in Philadelphia School District schools as of February 15,2017. Incluye estudiantes de inglés como segundo.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Global overview partner work permits* Sept ‘16
China India United States Indonesia
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Incheon (2009) Registration
74 PDOs - 27 names PGIs (Sum 101 without wines)
Economic Exports.
Electrification Products
Locations where Black Panther was released in the theaters in 2018.
Name the world flag… Bell Ringer Activity
Eastern Europe, Russia and Middle and South America
Asia: Locations 1.
The global alliance of GIs
Electrification business
Pattern of Trade OCR Year 2 Macro.
Presentation transcript:

History of the GI system How it all started

History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th C. BC wine from the Greek island of Chios, but also Olive oils and spices In the middle ages, when cheeses took on the name of where they were produced 15th centuray « Roquefort cheese » defined and protected by decree

2 « sources of inspiration » As an agricultural market development tool Giving rise to the more stringent concept of: « Protected Appellation of Origin » -Very strong link to the territory -All production steps must be in the geographical zone -Tool to maintain and improve quality As a market regulation tool / Intellectual property tool Concept Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) Main focus is the protection of an indication of source with a reputation (linked to an origin)

History of the legal protection of Geographical Indication (national level) First French regulation beginning of 20 th century to protect the reputation of French wines In southern Europe (Italy, Spain, Portugal) create different categories of PDOs (wine, cheese, meat product,…) EU regulation of 1992 (extends system to all EU countries) In Switzerland, ordinance on PDO and PGI in 1997 Justifications: 1.Legal protection of geographical origin 2.Tool to improve the quality (1935 in France) 3.Added value linked to the terroir (1990)

Lattest developement Inclusion of Gis in TRIPS agreement of the WTO : 2 levels of protection stringent for wines and Spirits, less so for all other products. - Increasing interest from countries outside Europe to develop Sui Generis systems of GI protection Failure of WTO talks – increasing number of Bilateral agreements in which GIs are included. Reform of the Lisbon agreement

2 basic forms of protection Through the Trademark system (usually as collective or certification marks): USA, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Bangladesh, most African countries, Iraq, UAE … Pakistan, Bhutan, Sri-Lanka, Taiwan, …. (though some have a sui generis system for wines) Through a specific legal tool (so called sui generis) for the protection of GIs: EU, Switzerland, Most Latin American countries, French speaking west Africa (OAPI) + Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia Jamaica and other Caricom countries, India, Russia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam South Korea China has both systems, Japan and Myanmar – in development

Ways to be protected internationally Basic principal, you have some form of protection in your « home market » By obtaining protection directly in the jurisdiction concerned, either as a Trademark (collective or certification mark), or as a GI (example Café de Colombia in the EU), Through the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (but Phil not a member, and for the moment only 28 states), through the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks (in which the GI concerned is protected in the country of origin as a collective or certification marks) by concluding bilateral agreements between States or commercial partners Source : WIPO publication « Geographical Indications –An Introduction », Geneva 2013

Why develop special rules to protect Geographical terms? Contrary to “trademarks”: The geographical name all ready exists and “belongs” to a community. -Special rules ensure that the user rights remain open to all legitimate producers. A GI recognises an existing product with a reputation (and therefor quality) linked to a territory. Special rules ensure that the quality is codified (in the CoP) and will continue to exist (Enshrining certain traditional practices that make to special quality of the product)

Discussion : 1) From a policy point of view, what do you expect from the protection of Geographical Indications ? 2) In the shoes of the producers – why would you want to ask for GI protection ?