Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development January 26, 2006 University of Hawai`i.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
Advertisements

IP MANAGEMENT IN UNIVERSITIES
Technology Commercialization Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President for Affiliate Members Association.
By Page Heller President Hopes Creek. Licensing Objectives  Realize the Value of the Technology  Facilitate Effective Commercialization.
2nd Panel, Best Practices: “ IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Dr. Tamar Raz, CEO Hadasit, the Technology Transfer Company of Hadassah.
Financial Risk Management of Insurance Enterprises Interest Rate Caps/Floors.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
CHAPTER Section 22.1 Franchising & Licensing Section 22.2 Exit Strategies Franchising & Exit Strategies.
© 2012 Cooley LLP, Five Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA The content of this packet is an introduction to Cooley LLP’s capabilities.
Fosterswift.com PROTECTING AGAINST THE UNKNOWN : How to Successfully Review IT Contracts to Increase Your Rights and Avoid Potential Liability Samuel Frederick.
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
1 FASB’s MOVE TOWARDS FAIR VALUE AND ACADEMIC RESEARCH Derivatives Contingencies Financial instruments Stock Options – 123R Guarantees – Int. 45 Fair value.
LOWER SHORE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM Bringing the Benefits of Discovery to the World MAY 23, 2012 Wesley D. Blakeslee Executive Director Johns Hopkins.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
Unconventional Financing of Intellectual Property: Patent Donations Varda N. Main Associate Director, Intellectual Property Rochester Institute of Technology.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A STRATEGIC TOOL Alison Campbell OBE PhD RTTP Belgrade 30 October 2012.
EXPRESS LICENSE AGREEMENTS Ted Hagelin Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Kauffman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Director, NY Science & Technology.
Iberian Universities technology transfer conference Technology Licensing SMBR and Walkinsense 29th November 2010, Ayamonte.
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Copyright © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Successful Technology Licensing Chapter III: Key Terms Cluster 3: Forms of Payment and other Financial Terms Arnaud Michel Gide Loyrette Nouel, Paris (Bogota,
1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret.
Building and Valuing the Business Model Chapter 8.
Welcome P&P Topics for GFY 2002 Patent Awards Tech Transfer Cycle: Part III FOOD!!!! PATENTS & PIZZA June 4, 2001.
Intellectual Property and Senior Design Projects.
BUSINESS VENTURE VALUATION. ALTERNATIVES FOR BUYING EXISTING BUSINESS ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES.
The Multinational Corporation and Globalization
Alternative Financing for Entrepreneurs How Israeli Companies Can Access Alternative US Capital Sources from Strategic Buyers By Bruce Kobritz CALITC.ORG.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Budgeting and Controlling Operations and Taxes. Control Financial Planning  Operating System Financial Planning  Operating System Steps Steps Set performance.
University Intellectual Property Transfer Mechanisms: Adaptation and Learning Maryann P. Feldman Johns Hopkins University.
BA J. Galván1 ACCOUNTING IN E- COMMERCE COMPANIES E-commerce companies characteristics and unique accounting methods.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
SCORE ® Counselors to America’s Small Business Service Corps of Retired Executives Create a Winning Business Plan Session 5 Supporting Documents Other.
1 L25: Alternative Risk Transfer Objective: understand why ART products are used and describe examples of specific types of ART products.
PROMOTING TECHNOLOGY TO INDUSTRY Technology transfer objectives: enhance commercial value of invention promote technology to partner / investor identify.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
CRUI - WIPO Training Programme on intellectual property and management of innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises, Universities, Spin off and.
Navigating the University Technology Transfer August 23, 2012 Christopher Moulding Sr. Manager, Technology Advancement and Licensing I’ve got an idea…now.
Lecture 28. Chapter 17 Understanding the Principles of Accounting.
Life of a Stanford Invention. Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions.
Solving Challenges Others Cannot Statutory Frameworks for Public Private Partnerships NCPPP/AGC Conference Phoenix, AZ Christopher D. Lloyd January 27,
©2001 Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership PLANNING AND GROWING A BUSINESS VENTURE™ ™ Traditional Money Sources Banks Government loan programs.
SELECTED IDEAS FROM FROM IDEAS TO ASSETS (CHAPTER 5 AND 15) BY JONAS HELLER Managing IP Financial Assets and Analyzing Financial Growth.
Robert J. Scott. Agenda Licensing Models Perpetual vs. Subscription User vs. Device Agreement Types Microsoft Business and Services Agreement Online Subscription.
Getting to “Yes” in University IP Licensing: Mock Negotiation Workshop October 25, 2012 Presented by Jim Singer Brienne Terril.
Mark Collins © 2015 Mark Collins.  Original, invented, creative, unique  Patents ◦ Protected through registration  Copyright ◦ Protected through litigation.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Buying an Existing Business
Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Case Study on Profit Split / Intangibles Workshop on Transfer Pricing and Exchange of Information Guatemala 2.
OPERATIONAL ASSETS: ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION Chapter 10 © 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Presentation by Dr. Andreas O. Tobler September 1, 2011 Tento projekt je spolufinancován Evropským sociálním fondem a státním rozpočtem České republiky.
1-1 Chapter 1: Business Combinations. 1-2 Business Combinations: Objectives 1.Understand the economic motivations underlying business combinations. 2.Learn.
1 ST Market Engagement Session 3 rd October 2014 RE-PROCUREMENT OF CUSTODIAL TENANT DEPOSIT PROTECTION SCHEME Presentation by Ruth Hayes.
Agent Advantages to Seller Low Cost Quicker Entry Lower Time Commitment Can be a domestic sale US Laws pertain Disadvantages to Seller Low return Reduced.
Intellectual Property 101
Building and Valuing the Business Model
Financial Accountability Fully-Insured and Self-Funding September 12, 2017 Title Slide 1b - Sneak peek at an alternate accent color.
Intellectual Property 101
Technology Commercialization & Industry Partnering
Global Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management
Transfer of Medical Devices Manufacturing Technology
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development January 26, 2006 University of Hawai`i

Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development (OTTED)  Revenue-oriented service center Help UH personnel identify, protect, and commercialize their inventions/creations Help build UH research enterprise Generate licensing income  Support State economic development initiatives

UH Business Plan Competition  OTTED offering up to $20,000 in additional prize money  Recipients must base their business plan on a UH technology available for licensing through OTTED  Recipient(s) must be 1 st, 2 nd, or 3 rd place winner(s)  Money must be used to help commercialize the technology generally means that winning team becomes a licensee  Award goes to highest placing winner

Technology Licensing

Evolution of the relative value of tangible and intangible assets to total value 100 years ago, tangible assets generally accounted for 90+% of a company’s value... 90% 10% Today, the value of many companies is derived from their intangible assets. 100 years agoToday

University technologies are valuable and will become more valuable as companies continue to leverage their R&D budgets through the acquisition of outside technologies

Technology Transfer Process Invention Disclosure Marketing & Protecting Legal protection available? Licensing UH ownership ? Yes No Yes No Commercial interest ? YesNo Return to inventor TLG activities Solicit, accept, administer invention disclosures TLG activities Evaluate, market, protect technologies TLG activities Negotiate, formalize, audit licenses Note: This chart is necessarily brief - it represents only the most basic functions of the technology transfer process. Please contact the Technology Licensing Group ( ) with questions or for further information about your invention and the technology transfer process. Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3

Licensing as a Business Model  Licensor – Inventor/owner of technology  Licensee – User  License – contract not to sue  Consideration – usually financial but may include other consideration, such as cross license

Why license university technologies?  Technologies – early stage, high risk Technological risk – it may not work Market risk – unknown demand  Licensee – reduces risk Reduces R&D expenses Proves concept, may provide working model  Permits end users to “kick the tires”, lowers market uncertainty Establishes relationship with University  Licensor – expands income potential Reduces/eliminates mfg., mktg., dist’n costs May help identify new income opportunities Establishes relationship with company(ies)

Possible Deal Structures  Traditional licensing w/fees, royalties  Equity participation Spin-offs/start ups  Sublicensing  Options  Sponsored research agreements With/without option to acquire license

Compensation, Diligence, Patents, and Liability

Compensation Structures and Alternatives  Up-front fees  Royalty arrangements  Milestone payments  Patent registration costs  Liability/indemnification

Up-front fees  Good for University Reduce University’s financial risk Offset University’s previous out-of-pocket expenses (research costs, patents, etc.) Generally not refundable nor creditable against future royalties  BUT … Increase licensee’s financial risk May reduce licensee’s research sponsorship commitment May “lock in” licensing rights

Royalty arrangements  Permits University to share in the success of commercialization  University’s increasingly willing to be flexible in their approach and royalty requirements  Equity can be exchanged for royalties

Milestone payments  Milestones should follow natural development of the technology  Often tied to diligence provisions  Levels revenue flow to University in early years  Equity can be exchanged for cash payments.

Payment of Patent Expenses  Licensed patent = licensee pays  Business expense  Cost sharing for multiple licensees each licensee pays 1/n of patent expenses licensor may limit licensee’s liability, cap or set n>1

Liability Issues and Disclaimers  Licensee takes all the blame and the responsibility and the cost  University takes all the credit and none of the responsibility …and wants to be paid for it

Liability Issues  Licensee assumes fitness for use  Licensee assumes product liability and names university as additional insured  Licensee/university each assumes liability for its own employees

Success Stories and Exemplary Technologies

Past Business Plan Participants/Winners  Pipeline Communications and Technology, Inc. telecommunications and antenna technologies company has 7 employees, is in pre-production phase  Hawaii Environmental BioSolutions dairy waste processing company has 0 employees, is in start-up phase  Research Analytical Labs diagnose and treat pre-term labor status of company unknown

Examples of UH technologies available for licensing  Hydrogen storage materials  Biodegradable biopolymers  Hydrogen/oxygen production from water  Acoustic wave micromixer  Wastewater treatment with zero valent iron  Ventilating roofing system

Contacting OTTED  Website  /Phone Richard Cox, Gaylene Anderson, Lisa Matsunaga, Ann Park, Jonathan Roberts, Andrea Yuen,