BIOE 301 Lecture Thirteen. Review of Lecture 12 The burden of cancer Contrasts between developed/developing world How does cancer develop? Cell transformation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DiseaseNo disease 60 people with disease 40 people without disease Total population = 100.
Advertisements

Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
Chapter 4 Pattern Recognition Concepts: Introduction & ROC Analysis.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves
What Happens to the Performance of a Diagnostic Test when the Disease Prevalence and the Cut-Point Change? Pathological scores Healthy scores Healthy population.
© 2014 SynteractHCR. All rights reserved. SHARED WORK. SHARED VISION. Pitfalls in Companion Diagnostics Don't underestimate the power of conditional probabilities.
TUTORIAL SCREENING Dr. Salwa Tayel, Dr. A. Almazam, Dr Afzal Mahmood
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Epidemiology in Medicine Sandra Rodriguez Internal Medicine TTUHSC.
Anthropometry Technique of measuring people Measure Index Indicator Reference Information.
Statistical Fridays J C Horrow, MD, MSSTAT
Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests. Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual.
IE486 Work Analysis & Design II Lab 4 – Upper Limb Assessment Supplementary Notes on Evaluation of Analysis Tools March 23, 2007 Vincent G. Duffy, IE &
Screening for Disease Guan Peng Department of Epidemiology School of Public Health, CMU.
(Medical) Diagnostic Testing. The situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or.
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D. El Maghraby Professor of Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Johns Hopkins University.
BIOE 301 Lecture Eleven. Four Questions What are the major health problems worldwide? Who pays to solve problems in health care? How can technology solve.
Lecture Fourteen Biomedical Engineering for Global Health.
Diagnostic Testing Noelle Lewis Molecular Biology.
BASIC STATISTICS: AN OXYMORON? (With a little EPI thrown in…) URVASHI VAID MD, MS AUG 2012.
Medical decision making. 2 Predictive values 57-years old, Weight loss, Numbness, Mild fewer What is the probability of low back cancer? Base on demographic.
BIOE 301 Lecture Twelve Jair Martinez Bioengineering Department Rice University.
Lecture 4: Assessing Diagnostic and Screening Tests
Basic statistics 11/09/13.
Bioengineering and World Health Lecture Thirteen.
Sensitivity Sensitivity answers the following question: If a person has a disease, how often will the test be positive (true positive rate)? i.e.: if the.
BME 301 Lecture Eleven. Four Questions What are the major health problems worldwide? Who pays to solve problems in health care? How can technology solve.
Statistics. Statistics = everything you need to know, but continually want to forget!!!!
Sensitivity & Specificity Sam Thomson 8/12/10. Sensitivity Proportion of people with the condition who have a positive test result Proportion of people.
Lecture Thirteen Biomedical Engineering for Global Health.
Lecture Twelve Biomedical Engineering for Global Health.
MEASURES OF TEST ACCURACY AND ASSOCIATIONS DR ODIFE, U.B SR, EDM DIVISION.
BME 301 Lecture Thirteen. Review of Lecture 12 The burden of cancer Contrasts between developed/developing world How does cancer develop? Cell transformation.
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
BME 301 Lecture Twelve.
Screening Puja Myles
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Screening of diseases Dr Zhian S Ramzi Screening 1 Dr. Zhian S Ramzi.
Diagnostic Tests Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /7/20151.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
1 Wrap up SCREENING TESTS. 2 Screening test The basic tool of a screening program easy to use, rapid and inexpensive. 1.2.
Predictive values prevalence CK and acute myocardial infarction –sensitivity 70% –specificity 80% –prevalence - 40% –prevalence - 20% –PPV and NPV.
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Bioengineering and World Health Lecture Twelve. Four Questions What are the major health problems worldwide? Who pays to solve problems in health care?
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Screening.  “...the identification of unrecognized disease or defect by the application of tests, examinations or other procedures...”  “...sort out.
10 May Understanding diagnostic tests Evan Sergeant AusVet Animal Health Services.
Laboratory Medicine: Basic QC Concepts M. Desmond Burke, MD.
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests & ROC Curve Analysis PhD Özgür Tosun.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Timothy Wiemken, PhD MPH Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Tests.
CHAPTER 3 Key Principles of Statistical Inference.
Uses of Diagnostic Tests Screen (mammography for breast cancer) Diagnose (electrocardiogram for acute myocardial infarction) Grade (stage of cancer) Monitor.
دکتر حمیدرضا صابری
Sensitivity and Specificity
Evidence-Based Medicine
Class session 7 Screening, validity, reliability
BME 301 Lecture Fourteen.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D.
کاربرد آمار در آزمایشگاه
How do we judge efficacy of a screening test?
Hint: Numerator Denominator. Vascular Technology Lecture 34: Test Validation (Statistical Profile and Correlation) HHHoldorf.
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D.
Is a Positive Developmental-Behavioral Screening Score Sufficient to Justify Referral? A Review of Evidence and Theory  R. Christopher Sheldrick, PhD,
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Patricia Butterfield & Naomi Chaytor October 18th, 2017
Expert Perspectives on NIPT
Presentation transcript:

BIOE 301 Lecture Thirteen

Review of Lecture 12 The burden of cancer Contrasts between developed/developing world How does cancer develop? Cell transformation  Angiogenesis  Motility  Microinvasion  Embolism  Extravasation Why is early detection so important? Treat before cancer develops  Prevention Accuracy of screening/detection tests Se, Sp, PPV, NPV

How do we judge efficacy of a screening test? Sensitivity/Specificity Positive/Negative Predictive Value

Sensitivity & Specificity Sensitivity Probability that given DISEASE, patient tests POSITIVE Ability to correctly detect disease 100% - False Negative Rate Specificity Probability that given NO DISEASE, patient tests NEGATIVE Ability to avoid calling normal things disease 100% - False Positive Rate

Possible Test Results Test Positive Test Negative Disease Present TPFN# with Disease = TP+FN Disease Absent FPTN#without Disease = FP+TN # Test Pos = TP+FP # Test Neg = FN+TN Total Tested = TP+FN+FP+TN Se = TP/(# with disease) = TP/(TP+FN) Sp = TN/(# without disease) = TN/(TN+FP)

Amniocentesis Example Amniocentesis: Procedure to detect abnormal fetal chromosomes Efficacy: 1, year-old women given the test 28 children born with chromosomal abnormalities 32 amniocentesis test were positive, and of those 25 were truly positive Calculate: Sensitivity & Specificity

Possible Test Results Test Positive Test Negative Disease Present 253# with Disease = 28 Disease Absent 7965#without Disease = 972 # Test Pos = 32 # Test Neg = 968 Total Tested = 1,000 Se = 25/28 = 89% Sp =965/972 = 99.3%

As a patient: What Information Do You Want?

Predictive Value Positive Predictive Value Probability that given a POSITIVE test result, you have DISEASE Ranges from 0-100% Negative Predictive Value Probability that given a NEGATIVE test result, you do NOT HAVE DISEASE Ranges from 0-100% Depends on the prevalence of the disease

Possible Test Results Test Positive Test Negative Disease Present TPFN# with Disease = TP+FN Disease Absent FPTN#without Disease = FP+TN # Test Pos = TP+FP # Test Neg = FN+TN Total Tested = TP+FN+FP+TN PPV = TP/(# Test Pos) = TP/(TP+FP) NPV = TN/(# Test Neg) = TN/(FN+TN)

Amniocentesis Example Amniocentesis: Procedure to detect abnormal fetal chromosomes Efficacy: 1, year-old women given the test 28 children born with chromosomal abnormalities 32 amniocentesis test were positive, and of those 25 were truly positive Calculate: Positive & Negative Predictive Value

Possible Test Results Test Positive Test Negative Disease Present 253# with Disease = 28 Disease Absent 7965#without Disease = 972 # Test Pos = 32 # Test Neg = 968 Total Tested = 1,000 Se = 25/28 = 89% Sp =965/972 = 99.3% PPV = 25/32 = 78% NPV =965/968 = 99.7%

Dependence on Prevalence Prevalence – is a disease common or rare? p = (# with disease)/total # p = (TP+FN)/(TP+FP+TN+FN) Does our test accuracy depend on p? Se/Sp do not depend on prevalence PPV/NPV are highly dependent on prevalence PPV = pSe/[pSe + (1-p)(1-Sp)] NPV = (1-p)Sp/[(1-p)Sp + p(1-Se)]

Is it Hard to Screen for Rare Disease? Amniocentesis: Procedure to detect abnormal fetal chromosomes Efficacy: 1, year-old women given the test 28 children born with chromosomal abnormalities 32 amniocentesis test were positive, and of those 25 were truly positive Calculate: Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities

Is it Hard to Screen for Rare Disease? Amniocentesis: Usually offered to women > 35 yo Efficacy: 1, year-old women given the test Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities is expected to be 2.8/1000 Calculate: Sensitivity & Specificity Positive & Negative Predictive Value Suppose a 20 yo woman has a positive test. What is the likelihood that the fetus has a chromosomal abnormality?

Possible Test Results Test Positive Test Negative Disease Present 2.5.3# with Disease = 2.8 Disease Absent #without Disease = # Test Pos = 9.48 # Test Neg = Total Tested = 1,000 Se = 2.5/2.8 = 89.3% Sp 990.2/997.2= 99.3% PPV = 2.5/9.48 = 26.3% NPV =990.2/990.5 = 99.97%