Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

LightSail.
POLICY Space Export Controls Update Since Delivering the 1248 Report to Congress - April 2012 −Congress added language into the FY13 National Defense Authorization.
Lunar Lander / Orbiter CubeSats Dr. Carl Vermont Technical College (Voice) Randolph Center, VT USA
Low Energy, Low Cost Swift A design experiment June 2010.
Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection Scientific Rationale The first generation of stars were very important for the conditions of the early.
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
Attitude Determination and Control
Telescopes and Spacecraft Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 7.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Commercial Confidential 1 LIM Yoram Yaniv, October 2010 LIM Yoram Yaniv, October 2010.
Karla Vega University of California, Berkeley Attitude Determination and Control 6/9/2015.
Attitude Estimation Thomas Bak Institute of Electronic Systems
University of Kansas EPS of KUTEsat Pathfinder Leon S. Searl April 5, 2006 AE256 Satellite Electrical Power Systems.
Astronomy 101 Section 020 Lecture 6 Optics and Telescopes John T. McGraw, Professor Laurel Ladwig, Planetarium Manager.
Swift 1 Swift Spacecraft and Instruments. Swift 2 Spacecraft Design 1 of 6 Reaction wheels Gyros Star Trackers.
Twenty years ago IRAS gave us what is still our best view of the mid  infrared sky.
MAXIM Power Subsystem Diane Yun Vickie Moran NASA/GSFC Code (IMDC) 8/19/99.
Constellation Orion Visible Light Constellation Orion Infrared Light.
S/C System Design Overview Robert G. Melton Department of Aerospace Engineering.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Today’s APODAPOD  Read NASA website:  solarsystem.nasa.gov solarsystem.nasa.gov  IN-CLASS QUIZ THIS FRIDAY!!  Solar Lab, Kirkwood, Rooftop this week.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
X-ray Timing and Polarization mission & instrumentation DONG Yongwei Center for Particle Astrophysics Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy.
AMSAT Fox-1 Overview AMSAT Engineering Team 2011 Space Symposium.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
Team Force Field Leslie Chapman Scott Cornman Adam Johnson Richard Margulieux Brandon Phipps.
A SEMINAR ON HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE PRESENTED BY: HARI OM ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION REG NO SECTION-C ROLL NO.– 123.
Attitude Determination and Control System
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Brief introduction of YINGHUO-1 Micro-satellite for Mars environment exploration J. Wu, G. Zhu, H. Zhao, C. Wang, L. Lei, Y. Sun, W. Guo and S. Huang Center.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Mark Baker Mario Botros Terry Huang Erin Mastenbrook Paul Schattenberg David Wallace Lisa Warren Team Ptolemy.
PLANS FOR RUSSIA’s GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE PROGRAM: GOMS/ELECTRO #2 RUSSIAN FEDERAL SERVICE for HIDROMETEOROLOGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SRC PLANETA.
Preliminary Design of NEA Detection Array Contractor 2 Kim Ellsworth Brigid Flood Nick Gawloski James Kim Lisa Malone Clay Matcek Brian Musslewhite Randall.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
By P.Pranavi Beyond Night Sky. 1957TILL DATE Beyond Night Sky.
The University Nanosatellite Program: Oculus-ASR NASA Jet Propulsion Lab Summer Intern Cubesat Symposium July 31 st, 2013 Branden Ghena
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Telescopes. Light Hitting a Telescope Mirror huge mirror near a star * * * small mirror far from 2 stars In the second case (reality), light rays from.
1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory JPL Flight Team Adam Nikolic Josh Ruggiero Bob Hoffman Dusty Terrill.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
Light & Telescopes (Chapter 5) All of what we know and understand about the stars is the result of observation and analysis of light.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
Tyler Croteau MSU Solar Physics REU: SSEL Mentor: Dr. Klumpar.
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
HokieSat Introduction
Sponge: Draw the four types of reflectors.. Light from different directions focuses at different points, and an image is formed near the prime focus.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel 2/5/09 Structures and Thermal Lunar Descent Phase Kelly Leffel Structures and Thermal 1.
The Space in Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Courses HokieSat Labs Vomit Comet New Projects Chris Hall, Randolph 224D
From you host … Dr. H. Introduction Communications design requires us to think about the following issues: Communications design requires us to think.
Introduction: The on-board measurements available for control are a dual-slit sensor to find the elevation of the sun and a magnetometer to measure the.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
KEPLER TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents: Mission Overview Scientific Objectives Timeline Spacecraft Target Field of View Transit Method Johannes Kepler.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
EXTP Accomodation Study Hong Bin, Zhang Long Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering. CAST Oct 27th, 2015.
Be P16102 Constrain Subsystems House Internals Provide Access Mount components securely Stow Solar Panels Gather Solar Energy Expose Panels before Deployment.
Presented by G. Hena Mercy Sugirthem G. Hena Mercy Sugirthem M. Sharmila M. Sharmila.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
Rover Components.
Sponge: Draw the four types of reflectors.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
HA1L High Altitude 1U Laboratory
SPECS 2004 Various ADCS Sizing
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
CubeSat vs. Science Instrument Complexity
Charles Sommer October 21st, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Contractor 3

I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit

 Twelve 3U cubesats  External, deployable telescope feature  Thruster and Attitude control system  Solar and battery power  Ability to individually transmit data to ground  Circular formation for maximum resolution

Pegasus XL – Orbital Sciences Cape Canaveral, FL : Latitude 28 °N Launch due East i=28°

Line CircleConcentric Circles Y ShapePlusSin Wave

FormationMost Likely # of PixelsMaximum # of Pixels Line112 Circle610 Concentric Circles67 Y Shape65 Plus76 Sin Wave58  Decided to focus formation on detecting NEAs with 140 m diameter.  The equally spaced circle formation provided an acceptable maximum number of pixels

Resolution = 250 meters 12 Cube Sat Solution

3U Cubesat Camera System Attitude Control System Battery System Propulsion System Solar Panels Optical System Components

 Power System  Solar panels  Batteries  Communication System  Transmitter  Antenna  Propulsion System  Thrusters  Attitude System  Attitude Determination & Control System  Optical System  Telescope parts  Camera

 Primary Power Source: Solar Panels  High quality PCB substrate & Kapton overlay.  Generate up to 1 Watt of power each  Number of panels is dependent power required and space available  Backup Power Source: Lithium- Polymer Batteries  High energy density  Previous success on satellites  Battery size is dependent on power required (150 Watt-hour per kilogram)

 Regulator: EPS board  Will regulate and monitor power generated.  Under-voltage and over-current protection.  Distributor: Power Distribution Module  Will distribute power to all components in the Cubesat.  Under-voltage and over-current protection.

 Calculated data rate of 80 kb/s.  Estimated fly over GS time of 7 min.  Individual communication of each satellite with ground station.  S – Band Transmitter ▪ 2 mb/s data rate  S – Band patch antenna

 Large maneuvers: Pulse Plasma Thruster  Delta V = 250 m/s for mission duration  Typical shot energy 1.8J  Mass <200g including 10g of propellant  Copper Tungsten electrode provides durability  Power draw of less than 0.5W  Specific impulse measured at 590s

Blue Canyon Technologies XACT Fully integrated solution:  3 axis stellar attitude determination  3 Reaction Wheels  3 torque rods  IMU  Magnetometer  Sun sensors  Computer

 Cassegrain Reflector  primary concave mirror  secondary convex mirror  CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) Detector  CCD 595 from Fairchild Imaging  Designed for space applications  9216 x 9216 full frame CCD array

COMPONENTCOST Solar Panels25,000 Battery5,000 Antenna4,500 Transmitter8,900 Thrusters18,000 Attitude Control System18,000 Telescope20,000 Photodetector/Camera3,000 EPS4,500 Power Distribution Module7,750 Total114,650 Total Cube Sat Cost1,210,800