E.Loop 2008 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION FOR FSS-ROYALTY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Dr. Ernst-Adolf Loop SAATEN-UNION GmbH, Hannover Tallinn, 4 th of March 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Unit F: Effectively Managing Business Transactions Lesson 1: Understanding Business Expenses.
Advertisements

The SWO Rape Breeding Programme & Introduction to Trinity Pieter de Groot Lantmännen SW Seed.
Price of Being a Breeder Organization Hamdi Çiftçiler MAY Seed / Deputy Chairman of Board of Management.
(2) The Big Picture Vavilov Centers Diversity Lost Thomas Jefferson, Seed Saver Key Legal Moments.
1 The Turkish Seed Industry – from a Global Perspective The Turkish Seed Industry – from a Global Perspective by Michael Turner TSUAB Meeting 02 December,
OSIVO joint stock company ZVOLEN Company introduction
CEREAL AND WINTER OILSEED RAPE
Air Freight Security Changes in European Regulation 2013.
SEED LLP AND TRADE Bernice Slutsky American Seed Trade Association.
© CommNet 2013 Education Phase 3 Food production – farm to fork.
Changes in Agriculture and Industry Created by tbonnar.
Changes affecting farming systems in the EU Case study: Mr Redfern’s Home Farm, Birmingham.
Romania Netherlands Controlling Authority For Milk And Milk Products.
“ Farm Seed Opportunities, recommendations for on-farm conservation in Europe” Riccardo Bocci, Véronique Chable, Kastler Guy, Louwaars Niels Farmers’ Rights.
FARM SAVED SEED IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC Ing. Vojtech Dukát 2008.
STATE OF PLAY - FORECASTS FOR EUROPEAN CONSTRUCTION
© 2012 All rights reserved, MedWOW Ltd. Join MedWOW’s Global Inspectors Network!
European integration 1www.ecb.europa.eu © Progress of European integration 1952ECSC European Coal and Steel Community 1958 EEC and EURATOM European Economic.
Annual Report Executive Summaries Food and Veterinary Office Unit F1-Country profiles, Coordination of Follow-up.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
Ornamental plant production and varieties legal protection in Poland Mieczysław Grzesik, Adam Marosz Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture, Skierniewice,
10th Baltic Electronic Communications & Postal Services Regulators’ Meeting Latvia, 29 August 2013 Postal market supervision Kristina Masiulytė Acting.
Dipl. Soz. Barbara Brandl T HE R OLE OF I NSTITUTIONAL F ACTORS FOR C ONCENTRATION T ENDENCIES IN S EED M ARKETS Presentation at the 17th ICABR Conference.
Udo von Kröcher 1 Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights in the Agricultural Sector in Germany Udo von Kröcher Bundessortenamt (Federal Plant Variety Office)
GROWTH DRIVERS AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN EUROPEAN CONSTRUCTION TO 2016 Michael Weingärtler Metal Expert Europe Steel.
Plant Variety Protection and Royalty Collection in Germany Meeting of AMSEM on Klaus Schlünder.
PROTEST Why are people protesting globalisation (because the plants and animals can’t?) Why protest free trade? Why protest the power of the international.
II.INTERNATIONAL SEED CULTIVATION WORKSHOP II.INTERNATIONAL SEED CULTIVATION WORKSHOP KAM İ L YILMAZ -B İ SAB Tares A.Ş. Deputy Director General Industrial.
OATS – Enhancing The Value A European Breeding Perspective Chris Green Fargo, July 2006.
COBRA: Coordinating Organic Plant Breeding Activities for Diversity March 2013 – February partners, 18 Countries  31 Full partners  10 Associate.
International Taxation – Case Study Dubrovnik, 26 September
Farm saved seed in the Czech Republic Czech Republic Ing. Vojtech Dukát.
Loop 2008 FSS in the view of breeders Ernst A. Loop TAIEX-Meeting, 4. March 2008, Tallinn.
« SUSTAINABLE LOW-INPUT CEREAL PRODUCTION: REQUIRED VARIETAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CROP DIVERSITY » NEW COST ACTION PROPOSAL Domain Agriculture and Biotechnology.
1 Changes Brought by Implementing Regulations on Purchase / Sales of Cereals and Paddy Rice.
Ag Finance Situation Overview Rodney Jones, Ph.D. Oklahoma Farm Credit Chair In Agricultural Finance, OSU Dept. of Agricultural Economics.
CROP BREEDING AND IMPROVEMENT
The yield of plant variety protection Russell Thomson Swinburne University of Technology 1.
CPVO Seminar11-12 May Warsaw (PL) Community rules on “Farm-saved seed”. J. GENNATAS European Commission.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand and identify the key crop production targets  Be able to state performance targets for individual.
Federal Association of Farm and Forest Owners in Austria Implementation of Common Agricultural Policy in Austria Vienna Twinning Conference 7 th October.
European Survey FENCA Number of respondents Austria 0 Belgium 0 Czech Republic 4 France 11 Germany 103 Greece 0 Italy 30 Netherlands 0 Norway.
Agribusiness Management Muhammad Talha Azeem DAAM,UoK.
Price support mechanisms in the grain sector History and current situation Michel Ferret FranceAgriMer Paris.
John Mukuka, PhD COMSHIP: ENHANCING CROSS BOARDER TRADE AFSTA CONGRESS, 2016.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
11 th Report on European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2005 Viviane Reding – Commissioner DG Information Society and Media 20 February.
Cisgenesis and SMEs 21 June 2011 Karel van der Linden.
Reijo Käki FOPA –Finnish Organic Farmers Alliance
The need for a new seed legislation
REGIONAL DIVERSIFICATION OF AGRICULTURE IN POLAND
LESSON 6-2 Inventory Costing
Farmer Funded Farmer Directed Crop Research
For a more efficient, fair and sustainable Common Agricultural Policy PAC Group, Academy of Agriculture of France, September
Point 5. Countries plans on Time Use Surveys
5. Areas under organic farming
Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC)
The Supply Chain Initiative Update
LESSON 6-2 Inventory Costing
General Delegate Euro Contrôle Route
Ivo Sedláček General Manager SELGEN, a.s.
ASTA V&F Seed Conference EI WG
OCVV Seminar Eric Devron, SICASOV Sofia the 20th September 2018.
Alberta Fusarium Regulation Update
Value Creation in Cereal Crop Breeding
Meeting of Water Directors State of transposition and implementation
Cathy Blanc-Gonnet Director NGO Humatem, FRANCE
Transposition and implementation of WFD
Statutory Breeding and Technology Fee on Self-Pollinated Crops
Presentation transcript:

E.Loop 2008 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION FOR FSS-ROYALTY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Dr. Ernst-Adolf Loop SAATEN-UNION GmbH, Hannover Tallinn, 4 th of March 2008 TAIEX –Meeting

E.Loop 2008 The Legislation  EC-Council Regulation N o 2100/94 EC – Commission Regulation N o 1768/95 Farmers have to pay for the use of FSS Amount per ha or % of normal royalty for FSS-royalty has to be fixed between the plant-breeders-associations and farmers-unions in the member states. The amount of royalty for FSS has to be significant lower than the royalty for certified seed!

E.Loop 2008 Situation for Cereal and OSR Breeding in the UK The part of FSS both for cereal and OSR more than doubled in UK during the last 10 years to about 50% in average. UK is the only country in Europe with a ratio of nearly 50% FSS with OSR!!! (Only few hybrid varieties are used in UK) Cost of breeding is increasing due to new technologies: DH, Marker-Techn., Cell-cultures, GMO (?), etc. Royalty – income for cereal-breeding is decreasing. Only one familiar owned breeding unit survived in UK(Elsoms) in % of the seed market is in the hands of 4-5 multinationals (Syngenta, Monsanto, Limagrain, KWS, Pioneer)

E.Loop 2008 Collection off FSS-royalty in UK All farmers, who purchased certified seed, have to answer questions regarding use of FSS The FSS royalty is collected at t of used FSS All processors of FSS for farmers like mobile cleaning contractors have to informs the BSPB about processed volumes, names and address of their clients BSPB is sending invoices both to farmers answering themselves for use of FSS and to those, who used cleaning and processing facilities for their FSS The collected amount is about 50% of normal royalty Costs for collection of FSS are about 20% of collected amount

E.Loop 2008 Problems with Collection off FSS-royalty in UK Farmers use very different amounts of FSS per ha: a payment only at t of FSS is always causing many discussions use of seed per ha may be very different: rye: kg per ha  spring wheat kg per ha depending at sowing time amount of use from FSS for spring barley may be very different: 75 kg at sowing in February with low TGW up to 160 kg for sowing in late April with high TGW Processors of FSS for farmers like mobile cleaning contractors have to informs the BSPB only about processed volumes, not about ha sown by farmers

E.Loop 2008 Collection off FSS-royalty in UK All farmers, who purchased certified seed, have to answer questions regarding use of FSS All processors of FSS for farmers like mobile cleaning contractors have to informs the BSPB about processed volumes, names and address of their clients BSPB is sending invoices both to farmers answering themselves for use of FSS and to those, who used cleaning and processing facilities for their FSS Costs for collection of FSS are about 20% of collected amount

E.Loop 2008 Status of FSS-royalty implementation: France (>50% FSS wheat / < 10% FSS for barley)  for wheat an agreement between farmers, processors, collectors and seed-producers has been officialized under a French Decre:  0,5 € per ton of collection wheat has to be forwarded to the breeders. U sers of certified seed can apply to get back the amount of payed royalty !

E.Loop 2008 Optimal implementation of FSS-Royalty: Finland (70% FSS)  System implemented since 2001 with a fixed amount per ha for the use of FSS (3,84 €/ha) Agricultural authorities collect needed data for FSS-royalty from farmers as a part of their „IACS-data collection work system“. 98% of all FSS-royalty is collected!! Costs of collection only about 4% of FSS-royalty!!!

E.Loop 2008 Normal implementation of FSS-Royalty: Sweden (15% FSS)  95% of FSS-royalty is collected costs of collection is about 15% of FSS-royalty semilar systems are implemented in DK, NL, BE, IR, UK  part of FSS is 15 – 50%, costs of collection: about 20% in average

E.Loop 2008 Implementation in New EC-Countries SL (60% FSS): private agreements between big farms and plant- breeders for FSS SK (70% FSS):System has recently been implemented and starts to work PL (90% FSS):a state law is under discussion to assure payment of FSS-royalty to cereal breeders CZ (40% FSS):certified seed get subvention from the CZ-agriculture ministery  lower volumes of FSS System for FSS-royalty is under implementation LT (90% FSS):seed multipliers are only allowed to sell seed of new varities to farmers who agree to 1. pay 4 €/ha for use of FSS 2. allow inspection of fields and field maps 3. pay a penalty of € if 1. or 2. are not fulfilled