Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemotherapy Prolongs Survival for Isolated Local or Regional Recurrence of Breast Cancer: The CALOR Trial (Chemotherapy as Adjuvant for Locally Recurrent.
Advertisements

Obesity at Diagnosis Is Associated with Inferior Outcomes in Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer 1 The Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the Efficacy.
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Elizabeth Shurell, M.D., M.Phil. UCLA General Surgery Resident Research Fellow, Division.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
PREOPERATIVE PLASMA CONCENTRATION OF MMP-9/TIMP-1 COMPLEXES IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASE OUTCOME IN PRIMARY BREAST CANCER (N=483) Anne-Sofie Schrohl.
Discordance in Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer during Tumor Progression Lindstrom LS et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S3-5.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
References 1.Salazar R, Roepman P, Capella G et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J.
A 14-gene prognosis signature predicts metastasis risk in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, Tamoxifen-treated breast cancer in different ethnogeographic.
Discussion abstracts Alberto Sobrero MD Ospedale San Martino Genoa, Italy.
Sgroi DC et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-9.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Metabolic Syndrome and Recurrence within the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Risk Categories in Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Lakhani A et al. Proc.
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
Clinical Trials Evaluating the Role of Sentinel Node Resection in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Krag DN et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA505.
Dubsky P et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S4-3.
INCREASED EXPRESSION OF PROTEIN KINASE CK2  SUBUNIT IN HUMAN GASTRIC CARCINOMA Kai-Yuan Lin 1 and Yih-Huei Uen 1,2,3 1 Department of Medical Research,
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
Impact of age and comorbidities on treatment effect, tolerance and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated on CALGB
Clinical variables, pathological factors, and molecular markers for enhanced soft tissue sarcoma prognostication G. Lahat, B. Wang, D. Tuvin, DA. Anaya,
Outcomes Following Adjuvant 5-FU based Treatment (AT) for Colon Cancer vs Impact on Recurrence Rate, Time from Recurrence to Death.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Snyder D, Heidel RE, Panella T, Bell J, Orucevic A University of Tennessee Medical Center – Knoxville Departments of Pathology, Surgery, and Medicine BREAST.
Risk Stratified Analysis Improves Prediction of Treatment Benefit Over Subgroup Analysis: Findings from Intergroup N9741 HK Sanoff, ME Campbell, HC Pitot,
on behalf of the ACOSOG Z4032 Investigators
Poster Title ABSTRACT #59 Cell cycle progression genes differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Steven Stone 1 Jack Cuzick 2, Julia Reid.
Tumor clock protein PER2 as a determinant of survival in patients (pts) receiving oxaliplatin-5-FU- leucovorin as 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic.
CHFR METHYLATION AS AN EPIGENETIC MARKER FOR RECURRENCE OF COLON CANCER M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Motofumi Tanaka, Salil Sethi, Donghui.
Evidence for a Survival Benefit Conferred by Adjuvant Radiotherapy in a Cohort of 608 Women with Early-stage Endometrial Cancer O. Kenneth Macdonald 1,
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
FREEDOM FROM PROGRESSION FOR PATIENTS RECEIVING I 125 VERSUS Pd 103 FOR PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY Jane Cho, Carol Morgenstern, Barbara Napolitano, Lee Richstone,
Ki-67 index cutoff value of 1% is a valuable prognostic biomarker for pulmonary carcinoids based on this large cohort. Our data also provide strong evidence.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Pan-cancer analysis of prognostic genes Jordan Anaya Omnes Res, In this study I have used publicly available clinical and.
Lymph Node (LN) Ratio (LNR) Based Risk Classification (RC) in Stage III Colon Cancer (CC) with Internal and External Validation: Finding from the ACCENT.
The impact of smoking on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB Nadine A. Jackson, Charles S.
CV-1 Trial 709 The ISEL Study (IRESSA ® Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer) Summary of Data as of December 16, 2004 Kevin Carroll, MSc Summary of Data.
Mamoun A. Rahman Surgical SHO Mr Osborne’s team. Introduction Blood transfusion: -Preoperative ( elective) -Intra/postoperative ( urgent) Blood transfusion.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Age > 50 Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding outcomes and AT benefit/toxicity in Y pts with stage II and III CC. We examined overall survival.
Introduction Patients and Methods Results Conclusion Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 108 patients included in the biomarker analysis. Objectives.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Staging of Synovial, Epithelioid, and Clear Cell Sarcomas. Ugwuji N. Maduekwe, Francis J. Hornicek, Dempsey S.
Local Recurrence Growth Rate Predicts Outcome In Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma James Park, MD, Li-Xuan Qin, PhD, Francesco Prete, MD Murray.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Results Abstract Analysis of Prognostic Web-based Models for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: A Population-based Validation of Numeracy and Adjuvant! Online.
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Microsatellite Instability Predicts Improved Response to Adjuvant Therapy With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Stage III Colon Cancer In association.
What Factors Predict Outcome At Relapse After Previous Esophagectomy And Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Esophageal Cancer? Edward Yu 1, Patricia Tai 5,
Neuropathy Is Not Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Taxane-Containing Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer Bryan P. Schneider,
COMPARING DISEASE OUTCOME OF WOMEN WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR NEGATIVE/HER2 POSITIVE (HR-/HER2+) OR TRIPLE NEGATIVE (TN) METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) RECEIVING.
J Clin Oncol 30: R2 윤경한 / Prof. 김시영 Huan Jin, Dongsheng Tu, Naiqing Zhao, Lois E. Shepherd, and Paul E. Goss.
Risk Stratification in Stage II Colon Cancer Patients Ramzi Amri, MD, PhD; Liliana G Bordeianou, MD, MPH; and David L Berger, MD Massachusetts General.
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Prognostic significance of tumor subtypes in male breast cancer:
Immunoscore Prognostic in Colon Cancer
Aspirin Associated With Reduced Mortality in Patients With CRC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
TBCRC (the translational breast cancer research consortium) 005 Prospective study
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Postmenopausal Women with Node-Positive, Estrogen- Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
A subgroup analysis of a large multicenter study
Effect of Obesity on Prognosis after Early Breast Cancer
Time-dependent patterns of treatment effect and failure as an explanation for the predictive role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in stage II and III.
MJ O’Connell for the ACCENT Collaborative Group
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Presentation transcript:

Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent, Qian Shi, Murray B. Resnick, Stephen Lyle, Michael O. Meyers, Atoussa Goldar-Najafi, Thomas Clancy, Sharlene Gill, Jean-Francois Haince, Yves Fradet Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University, Providence, RI; UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA; UNC, Chapel Hill, NC; Lahey Clinic, Burlington MA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; DiagnoCure inc., Quebec, QC, Canada Abstract #441 Background Our results suggest that detection of GCC mRNA in LNs is associated with risk of disease recurrence in stage II CC patients not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The GCC LNR appears to have the greatest clinical utility for T3 patients with ≥ 12 LNs assessed, which constitute the majority of stage II CC patients. A confirmatory trial (VITAR) is underway, with a planned sample size of 500 patients 1.Birbe R et al. (2005) Hum Pathol 36: Hyslop T et al. (2011) Clin Cancer Res 17: Waldman SA, et al. (2009) JAMA 301: Sargent DJ, et al. (2011) Ann Surg Oncol 18: Haince JF, et al. (2010) J Clin Pathol 63: References Conclusions Objective Heterogeneity in risk of recurrence exists in stage II CC patients Molecular markers and gene signatures have been recently evaluated to identify patients with a higher risk of recurrence. GCC is a colon-specific biomarker normally found in gastrointestinal epithelium whose expression is preserved in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells 1 Preliminary studies have suggested that the presence of GCC gene expression in LN increased the likelihood of disease recurrence in stage II CC patients, independently of traditional high risk features 2-3 A GCC LN risk classification was established based on the analysis on pre-planned training set in a multi-center cohort study 4 Results Table 2 Unadjusted and Adjusted Associations (HRs) In this pooled analysis, the prognostic value of the ratio of the number of GCC+ LNs over the total number of informative LNs was confirmed. High LNR significantly predicted higher recurrence risk. The estimated 5-yr recurrence risks were 11% and 32% for the low and high risk group. Figure 1A (HR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.65 – 5.42, p=0.0003) Higher GCC LNR (≥ 0.1) is also significantly associated with increased risk of all cause mortality (HR = 1.83, and disease- free survival events (HR = 2.23). In a subset of pts with traditionally favorable prognostic factors (negative margins, T3 tumor, and ≥12 LNs examined), the GCC LNR had a HR for recurrence of 4.34 (95% CI , p=0.0001), translating into 5-yr recurrence rates of 8% among low risk patients and 34% for the high risk group. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for age, T stage, grade, number of LNs assessed, and LVI, the GCC LNR significantly predicted higher recurrence risk (HR, 2.64; 95% CI: , p=0.0014). Table 2A Methods Table 1 Baseline Characteristics (n=310) We conducted a pooled individual data analysis to confirm whether molecular detection of GCC in LNs indicates high risk of disease recurrence and poor survival in untreated stage II CC. GCC expression  GCC mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using formalin fixed LN tissues from untreated stage II CC patients blinded to clinical outcome.  Individual LN GCC status was determined by relative quantification of GCC (∆Ct = Ct GUSB – Ct GCC) with a validated cut-off (-5.9). Populations  Sargent : N = 241,  5-year recurrence rate = 15.8%  Median age = 74 yrs, range = 34 – 96 yrs  Male = 42%  Surgery in 2004 – 2006: 47%  Grade: G1 = 8%; G2 = 74%; G3 = 18%  T stage: T3 = 95%; T4 = 5%  Haince : N = 69,  5-year recurrence rate = 24.9%  Median age = 68 yrs, range = 23 – 94 yrs  Male = 41%  Surgery in 2004 – 2006: 6%  Grade: G1 = 24%; G2 = 58%; G3 = 18%  T stage: T3 = 99%; T4 = 1% Statistical Analyses Clinical outcomes: Time to Recurrence (TTR) -- time from surgery to first event of recurrence (local or distant), or death related to first primary Overall Survival (OS) – time from surgery to death due to any cause Disease-free survival (DFS) – time from surgery to first event of recurrence or death due to any cause LN ratio (LNR) : number of positive nodes by GCC divided by number of informative nodes High risk group: LNR ≥ 0.1 Low risk group: LNR < 0.1 Stratified log-rank testused to examine the relationship between GCC LN risk classification and primary and other clinical outcomes. Stratified Cox models (univariate and multivariate) used to estimated unadjusted and adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs), comparing the risk of recurrence and/or death between risk groups defined by GCC LNR values Figure 1A: TTR This study was supported by research funds from DiagnoCure Inc. overall Survival (%) Recurrence-Free Survival (%) Event-free rate at 5yrs (95%CI) Low Risk (GCC LNR ≤0.1) 89% (84% – 94%) High Risk (GCC LNR >0.1) 68% (56% – 81%) Figure 1D: DFS Disease-Free Survival (%) Time from surgery (months) Event-free rate at 5yrs (95%CI) Low Risk (GCC LNR ≤0.1) 79% (73% – 85%) High Risk (GCC LNR >0.1) 48% (38% – 61%) Event-free rate at 5yrs (95%CI) Low Risk (GCC LNR ≤0.1) 83% (78% – 89%) High Risk (GCC LNR >0.1) 66% (56% – 78%) Figure 1B: OS Time from surgery (months)