January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University10842-1c-1 ECEG398 Quantum Optics Course Notes Part 1: Introduction Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio and Prof.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rae §2.1, B&J §3.1, B&M § An equation for the matter waves: the time-dependent Schrődinger equation*** Classical wave equation (in one dimension):
Advertisements

Xkcd Xkcd.com. Section 3 Recap ► Angular momentum commutators:  [J x, J y ] = iħJ z etc ► Total ang. Mom. Operator: J 2 = J x 2 + J y 2 +J z 2 ► Ladder.
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields
Commutators and the Correspondence Principle Formal Connection Q.M.Classical Mechanics Correspondence between Classical Poisson bracket of And Q.M. Commutator.
Integrals over Operators
Quantum One: Lecture 4. Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for a Free Quantum Particle.
Quantum One: Lecture 3. Implications of Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for Conservative Systems.
January 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEU692 Subsurface Imaging Course Notes Part 2: Imaging with Light (1) Profs. Brooks and.
Quantum statistics: a formal approach Reminder to axioms of quantum mechanics  state vector of the Hilbert space describes quantum mechanical system 
Wavefunction Quantum mechanics acknowledges the wave-particle duality of matter by supposing that, rather than traveling along a definite path, a particle.
No friction. No air resistance. Perfect Spring Two normal modes. Coupled Pendulums Weak spring Time Dependent Two State Problem Copyright – Michael D.
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields  = charge density, J = current density.
Almost all detection of visible light is by the “photoelectric effect” (broadly defined.) There is always a threshold photon energy for detection, even.
Chapter 3 Formalism. Hilbert Space Two kinds of mathematical constructs - wavefunctions (representing the system) - operators (representing observables)
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
The Harmonic Oscillator
Ch 9 pages ; Lecture 21 – Schrodinger’s equation.
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
February 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG398 Quantum Optics Course Notes Part 2: Thermal Imagers Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio and.
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
MSEG 803 Equilibria in Material Systems 6: Phase space and microstates Prof. Juejun (JJ) Hu
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Chap 3. Formalism Hilbert Space Observables
April 2004 DiMarzio & McKnight, Northeastern University ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 19: Conclusion Profs. Charles A. DiMarzio.
Lecture 2. Postulates in Quantum Mechanics Engel, Ch. 2-3 Ratner & Schatz, Ch. 2 Molecular Quantum Mechanics, Atkins & Friedman (4 th ed. 2005), Ch. 1.
The free wavicle: motivation for the Schrödinger Equation Einstein showed that hitherto wavelike phenonomenon had distinctly particle-like aspects: the.
Ch 9 pages Lecture 22 – Harmonic oscillator.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Interference in BEC Interference of 2 BEC’s - experiments Do Bose-Einstein condensates have a macroscopic phase? How can it be measured? Castin & Dalibard.
(1) Experimental evidence shows the particles of microscopic systems moves according to the laws of wave motion, and not according to the Newton laws of.
Lecture 15 Solving the time dependent Schrödinger equation
MODULE 1 In classical mechanics we define a STATE as “The specification of the position and velocity of all the particles present, at some time, and the.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules The Schrödinger equation and how to use wavefunctions Dr Grant Ritchie.
Bound States Review of chapter 4. Comment on my errors in the lecture notes. Quiz Topics in Bound States: The Schrödinger equation. Stationary States.
Ch 4. Using Quantum Mechanics on Simple Systems
Jan 2004 Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University b-1 ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 3: Noise and Photon Detection Profs. Charles A.
Mathematical Tools of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Chemistry: Our Agenda Postulates in quantum mechanics (Ch. 3) Schrödinger equation (Ch. 2) Simple examples of V(r) Particle in a box (Ch. 4-5)
February 2004 Charles A. DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 14: SNR Analysis Profs. Charles A. DiMarzio.
Introduction to Coherence Spectroscopy Lecture 1 Coherence: “A term that's applied to electromagnetic waves. When they "wiggle" up and down together they.
5. The Harmonic Oscillator Consider a general problem in 1D Particles tend to be near their minimum Taylor expand V(x) near its minimum Recall V’(x 0 )
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
An equation for matter waves Seem to need an equation that involves the first derivative in time, but the second derivative in space As before try solution.
1 Reading: QM Course packet – Ch 5 BASICS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS.
Review for Exam 2 The Schrodinger Eqn.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules
Measurement and Expectation Values
Q. M. Particle Superposition of Momentum Eigenstates Partially localized Wave Packet Photon – Electron Photon wave packet description of light same.
Schrodinger wave equation
Schrödinger Representation – Schrödinger Equation
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Time Dependent Two State Problem
Quantum Mechanics.
Quantum Mechanics.
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
CHAPTER 5 The Schrodinger Eqn.
CHAPTER 5 The Schrodinger Eqn.
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Quantum One.
Elements of Quantum Mechanics
Concept test 15.1 Suppose at time
Quantum One.
Quantum Mechanics.
Shrödinger Equation.
Department of Electronics
Introductory Quantum Mechanics/Chemistry
Linear Vector Space and Matrix Mechanics
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17
Presentation transcript:

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-1 ECEG398 Quantum Optics Course Notes Part 1: Introduction Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio and Prof. Anthony J. Devaney Northeastern University Spring 2006

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-2 Lecture Overview Motivation –Optical Spectrum and Sources –Coherence, Bandwidth, and Fluctuations –Motivation: Photon Counting Experiments –Classical Optical Noise –Back-Door Quantum Optics Background –Survival Quantum Mechanics

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-3 Classical Maxwellian EM Waves E E E x y z H H H λ v=c λ=c/υ c=3x10 8 m/s (free space) υ = frequency (Hz) Thanks to Prof. S. W.McKnight

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-4 Electromagnetic Spectrum (by λ) 1 μ10 μ100 μ = 0.1mm 0.1 μ10 nm =100Å VIS= μ 1 mm1 cm0.1 m IR= Near: μ Mid: μ Far: μ UV= Near-UV: μ Vacuum-UV: nm Extreme-UV: nm MicrowavesX-RayMm-waves 10 Å1 Å0.1 Å Soft X-RayRFγ-Ray (300 THz) Thanks to Prof. S. W.McKnight

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-5 Coherence of Light Assume I know the amplitude and phase of the wave at some time t (or position r). Can I predict the amplitude and phase of the wave at some later time t+  (or at r+  )?

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-6 Coherence and Bandwidth Pure Cosine f=1 Pure Cosine f= Cosines Averaged f= 0.93, 1, 1.05 Same as at left, and a delayed copy. Note Loss of coherence.

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-7 Realistic Example 50 Random Sine Waves with Center Frequency 1 and Bandwidth 0.8. f Long Delay: Decorrelation Short Delay

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-8 Correlation Function I 1 +I 2

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-9 Controlling Coherence Making Light Coherent Making Light Incoherent Spatial Filter for Spatial Coherence Wavelength Filter for Temporal Coherence Ground Glass to Destroy Spatial Coherence Move it to Destroy Temporal Coherence

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-10 A Thought Experiment Consider the most coherent source I can imagine. Suppose I believe that light comes in quanta called photons. What are the implications of that assumption for fluctuations?

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-11 Photon Counting Experiment 05 Clock Gate Counter t Clock Signal t Photon Arrival t Photon Count 312 Probability Density n Experimental Setup to measure the probability distribution of photon number.

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-12 The Mean Number Photon Energy is h Power on Detector is P Photon Arrival Rate is  =P/h –Photon “Headway” is 1/  Energy During Gate is PT Mean Photon Count is n=PT/h But what is the Standard Deviation?

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-13 What do you expect? Photons arrive equally spaced in time. –One photon per time 1/  –Count is  T +/- 1 maybe? Photons are like the Number 39 Bus. –If the headway is 1/  5 min... –Sometimes you wait 15 minutes and get three of them.

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-14 Back-Door Quantum Optics (Power) Suppose I detect some photons in time, t Consider a short time, dt, after that –The probability of a photon is P(1,dt)=  dt –dt is so small that P(2,dt) is almost zero –Assume this is independent of previous history –P(n,t+dt)=P(n,t)P(0,dt)+P(n-1,t)P(1,dt) Poisson Distribution: P(n,t)=exp(-at)(at) n /n! The proof is an exercise for the student

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-15 Quantum Coherence Here are some results: Later we will prove them.

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-16 Question for Later: Can We Do Better? Poisson Distribution – –Fundamental Limit on Noise Amplitude and Phase –Limit is On the Product of Uncertainties Squeezed Light –Amplitude Squeezed (Subpoisson Statistics) but larger phase noise –Phase Squeezed (Just the Opposite) Stopped here 9 Jan 06

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-17 Back-Door Quantum Optics (Field) Assume a classical (constant) field, U sig Add a random noise field U noise –Complex Zero-Mean Gaussian Compute  as function of Compare to Poisson distribution Fix to Determine Noise Source Equivalent to Quantum Fluctuations

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-18 Classical Noise Model Add Field Amplitudes Re U Im U UsUs UnUn tex:2

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-19 Photon Noise tex: tex:5 = tif

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-20 Noise Power One Photon per Reciprocal Bandwidth Amplitude Fluctuation –Set by Matching Poisson Distribution Phase Fluctuation –Set by Assuming Equal Noise in Real and Imaginary Part Real and Imaginary Part Uncorrelated

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-21 The Real Thing! Survival Guide The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics States and Wave Functions Probability Densities Representations Dirac Notation: Vectors, Bras, and Kets Commutators and Uncertainty Harmonic Oscillator

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-22 Five Postulates 1. The physical state of a system is described by a wavefunction. 2. Every physical observable corresponds to a Hermitian operator. 3. The result of a measurement is an eigenvalue of the corresponding operator. 4. If we obtain the result a i in measuring A, then the system is in the corresponding eigenstate,  i after making the measurement. 5. The time dependence of a state is given by

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-23 State of a System State Defined by a Wave Function,  –Depends on, eg. position or momentum –Equivalent information in different representations.  (x) and  (p), a Fourier Pair Interpretation of Wavefunction –Probability Density: P(x)=|  (x)| 2 –Probability: P(x)dx=|  (x)| 2 dx

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-24 Wave Function as a Vector List  (x) for all x (Infinite Dimensionality) Write as superposition of vectors in a basis set.   (x)   (x) x x  (x)=  a 1  1 (x)+a 2  2 (x)+...

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-25 More on Probability Where is the particle? Matrix Notation

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-26 Pop Quiz! (Just kidding) Suppose that the particle is in a superposition of these two states. Suppose that the temporal behaviors of the states are exp(i  1 t) and exp(i  2 t) Describe the particle motion.   (x)   (x) x x Stopped Wed 11 Jan 06

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-27 Dirac Notation Simple Way to Write Vectors –Kets –and Bras Scalar Products –Brackets Operators

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-28 Commutators and Uncertainty Some operators commute and some don’t. We define the commutator as [a b] = a b - b a Examples [x p] = x p - p x = ih  x  p  h  [x H] = x H - H x = 0

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-29 Recall the Five Postulates 1. The physical state of a system is described by a wavefunction. 2. Every physical observable corresponds to a Hermitian operator. 3. The result of a measurement is an eigenvalue of the corresponding operator. 4. If we obtain the result a i in measuring A, then the system is in the corresponding eigenstate,  i after making the measurement. 5. The time dependence of a state is given by

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-30 Shrödinger Equation Temporal Behavior of the Wave Function –H is the Hamiltonian, or Energy Operator. The First Steps to Solve Any Problem: –Find the Hamiltonian –Solve the Schrödinger Equation –Find Eigenvalues of H * Born: 12 Aug 1887 in Erdberg, Vienna, Austria Died: 4 Jan 1961 in Vienna, Austria* *

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-31 Particle in a Box Before we begin the harmonic oscillator, let’s take a look at a simpler problem. We won’t do this rigorously, but let’s see if we can understand the results. Momentum Operator:

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-32 Some Wavefunctions Eigenvalue Problem H  =E  Solution Shrödinger Equation Temporal Behavior

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-33 Pop Quiz 2 (Still Kidding) What are the energies associated with different values of n and L? Think about these in terms of energies of photons. What are the corresponding frequencies? What are the frequency differences between adjacent values of n?

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-34 Harmonic Oscillator Hamiltonian Frequency Potential Energy x

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-35 Harmonic Oscillator Energy Solve the Shrödinger Equation Solve the Eigenvalue Problem Energy –Recall that...

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-36 Louisell’s Approach Harmonic Oscillator –Unit Mass New Operators †

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-37 The Hamiltonian In terms of a, a † Equations of Motion

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-38 Energy Eigenvalues Number Operator Eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-39 Creation and Anihilation (1) Note the Following Commutators Then

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-40 Creation and Anihilation (2) Eigenvalue EquationsStates Energy Eigenvalues

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-41 Creation and Anihilation (3)

January 2006Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University c-42 Reminder! All Observables are Represented by Hermitian Operators. Their Eigenvalues must be Real