Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Physician Engagement.
Advertisements

Building Your SUSP Team Part II
Leadership for Safety: Safety Briefing (Part I) Essential Hospitals Engagement Network November 14, 2013.
Leading Teams.
Just Culture Application Consoling Employees
September 2012 Your hosts: Jody Rothe, MetaStar Stephanie Sobczak, WHA.
Learning Objectives Review key steps of the CUSP Toolkit
Just Culture Collaborative
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Physician Engagement. Immersion Call Overview 1.Project overview 2.Science of Improving Patient Safety 3.Eliminating CLABSI 4.The.
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
Just Culture Assessing Readiness – Focus on Process Jill Hanson Certified Just Culture™ Champion WHA 1.
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Kristina Weeks, MHS, DrPH(c) January 13, 2015 Designing and Using Scorecard for SUSPtainability 1.
NICU CLABSI Affinity Group Meeting September 12, 2012 Denise Flook, RN, MPH, CIC HAI Collaborative Lead Vice President, Infection Prevention/Staff Engagement.
Webinar 7: Testing on a Small Scale Using “Table- top” Simulation.
THIS PRESENTATION/PUBLICATION/ OR OTHER PRODUCT IS DERIVED FROM WORK SUPPORTED UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY (AHRQ)
On the CUSP: Stop BSI National Content Call Chris George, RN MS Director, National Projects MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety & Quality Monthly Team.
Dear User, This presentation has been designed for you by the Hearts and Minds Support Team. It provides a template for presenting the results of the SAFE.
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
Improvement Forum    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s hospitals    March.
Just Culture Implementation – Phase 1
Guide to Patient & Family Engagement Insert hospital logo here Become a Patient and Family Advisor: Information Session [Hospital Name | Presenter name.
WHA Improvement Forum For June    “Tapping Front-line Knowledge”   Presented by Stephanie Sobczak and Jill Hanson Courtesy Reminders: Please place.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Identifying Barriers to Evidence-based Guideline Compliance.
Systematic Improvement VTE 1 Courtesy Reminders: Please place your phones on MUTE unless you are speaking (or use *6 on your keypad) Please do not take.
1 Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI): Barriers and Challenges MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety and Quality (MHA Keystone) Chris George,
Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s.
Learning Objectives 2 2 Explain the role of the senior executive in addressing technical and adaptive work Identify characteristics to search for when.
Webinar 8: Engaging Your Colleagues. Summary of Last Week’s Call Updated you on the webinar specifically for surgeons. Checked in with participants. Reviewed.
Physician Engagement. Learning Objectives To relate what is meant by physician engagement To discuss strategies at management and staff levels to enhance.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Content 1: Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
CUSP for VAP: EVAP Shadowing Another Professional Kathleen Speck, MPH November 14, 2013.
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Kristina Weeks, MHS, DrPH(c) June 3, 2014 Designing and Using Scorecard for SUSPtainability.
Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s.
Webinar 13: Implementing the Checklist Continued: Improving the use of the Checklist Through Coaching.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
NEXT STEPS Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 1.
October 2012 Your hosts: Jody Rothe, MetaStar Stephanie Sobczak, WHA.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2012 Optional SUSP Tools: Briefing Audits, Morning Huddle, and Shadowing.
Science of Safety and Identifying Defects CUSP 4 MVP-VAP Content Call, Module #2.
Webinar 6: Checklist Modification, Small Scale Testing, and Coaching Call.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Revisiting Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Webinar 13: Implementation Barriers. Summary of Last Week’s Call Making the debriefing count: The McLeod Experience Tips on engaging your colleagues when.
July 2012 Your hosts: Jody Rothe, MetaStar Stephanie Sobczak, WHA.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
Title Block HSOPS: So You’ve Done the Survey – Now What? Dolores Hagan, RN, BSN K-HEN Education/Data Manager.
Identifying Barriers to Evidence-based Guideline Compliance On the CUSP: STOP BSI.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
Just Culture Implementation – Phase 2 Using the Just Culture Algorithm
A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety
WHA Improvement Forum For July    “Data Driven Improvement”   Presented by Stephanie Sobczak Courtesy Reminders: Please place your phones on MUTE.
Efficiently Implementing Protocols and Bundles: Engaging Stakeholders    December 9 from 2 – 3 pm    Hosted by: Stephanie Sobczak Courtesy Reminders:
Just Culture Collaborative Jill Hanson and Stephanie Sobczak Certified Just Culture™ Champions WHA 1.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Quantitative Implementation Assessment 1: Aggregated Results Kisha Ali, MS Mayo Levering, BS September 2, 2014.
Staff Safety Assessment 1. Learning Objectives To understand Step 2 of CUSP:Identify Defects To understand how to Implement the Staff Safety Assessment.
Testing the Checklist in the OR & Engaging Enthusiastic Colleagues.
Courtesy Reminders: During the webinar, you may select *7 on your phone to speak, and use *6 to mute. Please refrain from placing the phone on HOLD during.
ICME Interdisciplinary Case Management Experience.
Identifying Defects Chris Goeschel June Identifying Defects What DO you know? What SHOULD you know?
Courtesy Reminders: During the webinar, you may select *7 on your phone to speak, and use *6 to mute. Please refrain from placing the phone on HOLD during.
Items in red require your input
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
Staff Safety Assessment
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Staff Safety Assessment
Webinar 8: Engaging Your Colleagues
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s hospitals    July 2013 Courtesy Reminders: Please place your phones on MUTE unless you are speaking (or use *6 on your keypad) Please do not take calls and place the phone on HOLD during the presentation.

A four part Series 2 Part I – May 14 The Science of Safety and forming the CUSP team Part II – June 11 The Staff Safety Assessment & Safety Huddles Part III – July 9 Identifying Defects Part IV – August 13 Learning from Defects

Identify Defects I.Review Assignments & mid-month survey II.The process of identifying barriers III.Barrier Identification and Mitigation Tool IV.Culture Check-Up V.30 day Action Items 3

Action Item Review 4 Options to Try Conduct a Staff Safety Assessment (if you haven’t already) Working with your Executive Sponsor, assess, then prioritize, staff safety assessment findings using the Safety Issues Worksheet Try Testing: Safety Huddle and/or Daily Goals Checklist Determine how staff bring up a just in time safety concern (AHRQ Survey Results, or discussion)

Review - the Staff Safety Assessment 5 Just two (2) very important questions for any clinical unit:

6 Mid Month Review Poll Did you conduct a staff safety assessment and share the findings with your executive sponsor? Yes No

Discussion Did you determine how staff bring up a just in time safety concern in your unit? What did you learn? 7 Courtesy Reminders: Please place your phones on MUTE unless you are speaking (or use *6 on your keypad to mute)

The Barrier Mitigation Process 8

The “Both – And” of CUSP 9 Barrier Mitigation Process

Why Examine “Barriers”?  99% of clinical staff don’t come to work intending to make mistakes!  Procedures, policies, and processes are typically written down, and taught. Which leads to….Something getting in the way of doing things the right way (leading to a defect). Your team should find out what the “something” is. 10

Barrier Mitigation Process 11 Step 1 - Assemble the Team and Identify Barriers  Prioritize if necessary Step 2 – Compile & summarize the Barrier Information Step 3 – Develop an Action Plan for Each Targeted Barrier

Prioritize Your Findings Prioritize each finding from the Staff Safety Assessment: Likelihood: How likely is it that a clinician on the unit could be involved in a similar potential harm situation? 1.Low 2. Moderate 3. High 4. Very High Severity: How likely is it that a patient may be harmed if this situation isn’t improved? 1. Low 2. Moderate 3. High 4. Very High 12

Prioritize Your Findings Low Likelihood High Likelihood High Severity Low Severity Take Action on these!

Step 1: Assemble an Interdisciplinary Team 14 Determine who should be involved in assessing the barriers? Involve those who actually do the work Detailed directions in WHA Improvement Workbook – Section 5, page 5-4

Step 2: Identify Barriers 15 Seeing something very familiar, for the very first time. Observe: Observe a few clinicians engaged in the tasks related to the task, process, or guideline. Discuss: Ask various staff members about the factors influencing proper task performance or guideline adherence. Walk the Process: Consciously follow the process or guideline during a simulation, or if appropriate, during real clinical practice.

Barrier Identification Form 16 Carefully assess Provider, Guideline/Process and System Factors. Observe separately & compare notes. Each CUSP team member could interview a different clinician.

Step 3: Compile and Summarize 17

The “Both – And” of CUSP 18 Culture Check-up Process

Talking to Staff About Safety The biggest challenge: “How do we get staff to “open-up” about areas of risk they may be seeing in their day to day work?” 19 Use the CUSP Culture Check up Tool

Culture Check Up A process for using your Safety Culture Survey results (whether AHRQ or another survey) Select an item where responses indicate a need for improvement (an item were the average response is 3 or below or a domain score with less than 60% agreement). Provides a structured opportunity for leadership to hear the staff perspective. 20

AHRQ Survey Example 21 For example, your hospital scores an average of 3.14 on this survey question as compared to an average of 4.3 on other survey questions. This is an indication of an opportunity for improvement in your Culture of Safety The goal is for each AHRQ question to be answered “Strongly Agree”

Culture Check up Toolkit 22

Conducting a Culture Check-Up 23 Step 1: Convene a representative group of frontline caregivers for a minute discussion. This can be informal over lunch breaks, or a formal agenda item for unit/departmental meetings. As a rule of thumb, 5 to 7 caregivers of mostly mid-level seniority will facilitate a rich discussion. Step 2: Review the unit patient safety culture assessment results and the key item with the group. Step 3: Assign someone to complete the Culture Item Discussion Form, to document the issues that surface and suggested improvement actions.

Conducting a Culture Check-Up 24 Step 4: Remind participants to use active listening skills to guide participant feedback. This is not a meeting to rationalize or justify issues, but rather a time to focus on identifying opportunities to improve local culture. Step 5: Conclude the meeting with agreement on making at least one change that could positively affect the cultural issue discussed, and commit to revisit whether the change resulted in improvement in 6 months.

When to do a Culture Check-up? Do no more than one per quarter. Choose at the most 3 or 4 things from your AHRQ Safety Culture Survey to work on each year. Great to share the findings with your Quality Council, Management Team, or Medical Staff – to raise awareness of issues. 25

In the next 30 days 26 ACTION ITEMS Prioritize findings from the Staff Safety Assessments (if you haven’t done so already) Conduct a Barrier Assessment using the Barrier Identification and Mitigation (BIM) Toolkit for one of your findings (WHA Workbook section 5-4 and 5-5) Schedule or conduct a Culture Check-up based on your “worst” AHRQ scores (WHA Workbook section 5-2)

Quality Center Resources 27 CUSP page on the Quality Center website ( center.org)

Thank You Questions? Jill Hanson Stephanie Sobczak