1 Large Aperture Dielectric Gratings for High Power LIGO Interferometry LSC/Virgo Meeting, Baton Rouge March 19-22, 2007 Optics Working Group Jerald A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dual Recycling for GEO 600 Andreas Freise, Hartmut Grote Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Universität Hannover Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik.
Advertisements

Status of High-Power Laser Development at Stanford Shally Saraf*, Supriyo Sinha, Arun Kumar Sridharan and Robert L. Byer E. L. Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation Experience in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Virgo/LSC Meeting, Cascina, May 2007 LIGO-G Z.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Coating-reduced interferometer optics Resonant waveguide gratings S. Kroker, T. Käsebier, E.-B. Kley, A. Tünnermann.
CNMFrascati 12/01/061 High Power Laser System for Advanced Virgo C.N.Man Design goals Present technology Other activities in the world Virgo+ and Laser.
Harald Lück, AEI Hannover 1 GWADW- May, 10-15, 2009 EU contract #
Transportation of Ultra-Stable Light via Optical Fiber Emily Conant Bard College, California Institute of Technology Mentors: Evan Hall, Rana Adhikari,
Adaptive Optics for Wavefront Correction of High Average Power Lasers Justin Mansell, Supriyo Sinha, Todd Rutherford, Eric Gustafson, Martin Fejer and.
Thermal Compensation Review David Ottaway LIGO Laboratory MIT.
LISA symp July 02, PSU 1 Technologies for the Future of interferometric detectors C. Nary MAN UMR 6162, Observatoire Cote d’Azur, BP 4229,
Thermal noise issues Chinyere Ifeoma Nwabugwu Louisiana State University August 05, 2005 Eric Black, Akira Villar, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, Kate Dooley, Royal.
LSC meeting, HLO, August 18, 2004 IAP/UF/LIGO Research Collaboration: Status and Prospectives Efim Khazanov, Ilya Kozhevatov, Anatoly Malshakov, Oleg Palashov,
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
1 The Status of Melody: An Interferometer Simulation Program Amber Bullington Stanford University Optics Working Group March 17, 2004 G D.
A. Bunkowski Nano-structured Optics for GW Detectors 1 A.Bunkowski, O. Burmeister, D. Friedrich, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel in collaboration with T.
GEO‘s experience with Signal Recycling Harald Lück Perugia,
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Thermal Compensation: The GEO and LIGO experience and requirements for advanced detectors Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Absorption in bulk crystalline silicon and in the crystal surfaces Aleksandr Khalaidovski 1 Alexander Khalaidovski 1, Jessica Steinlechner 2, Roman Schnabel.
LSC Meeting LIGO Hanford March 19-23, LIGO_LSC_Sun_Grating_060322v2.ppt, K. Sun LIGO-G Z Progress in Grating Optical Sensors for Gravitational.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Absorption in bulk crystalline silicon and in the crystal surfaces Aleksandr Khalaidovski 1 Alexander Khalaidovski 1, Jessica Steinlechner 2, Roman Schnabel.
The investigation of optical inhomogeneities of the multilayer mirrors progress report Moscow State University Bilenko I.A
LIGO Laboratory1 Enhanced and Advanced LIGO TCS Aidan Brooks - Caltech Hannover LSC-VIRGO Meeting, October 2007 LIGO-G Z.
DFG-NSF Astrophysics Workshop Jun 2007 G Z 1 Optics for Interferometers for Ground-based Detectors David Reitze Physics Department University.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Stanford High Power Laser Lab Status of high power laser development for LIGO at Stanford Shally Saraf*, Supriyo Sinha, Arun Kumar Sridharan and Robert.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
1st Advanced Virgo Review – November 3-4, 2008 – L. Pinard 1 Mirrors Sub-System Overview  Introduction  Scope of the subsystem, main tasks  Substrates.
V. Sonnenschein, I. D. Moore, M. Reponen, S. Rothe, K.Wendt.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
Status of High-Power Laser Development at Stanford Todd S. Rutherford*, Shailendhar Saraf, Karel Urbanek, Justin Mansell, Eric K. Gustafson, and Robert.
Studies of Thermal Loading in Pre-Modecleaners for Advanced LIGO Amber Bullington Stanford University LSC/Virgo March 2007 Meeting Optics Working Group.
LSC-Virgo Caltech on March 20, 2008 G E1 AdvLIGO Static Interferometer Simulation AdvLIGO simulation tools  Stationary, frequency domain.
LIGO Laboratory1 Thermal Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems- Caltech Baton Rouge LSC Meeting, March 2007 LIGO-G Z.
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch
G R LIGO’s Ultimate Astrophysical Reach Eric Black LIGO Seminar April 20, 2004 Ivan Grudinin, Akira Villar, Kenneth G. Libbrecht.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
Ultra-stable, high-power laser systems Patrick Kwee on behalf of AEI Hannover and LZH Advanced detectors session, 26. March 2011 Albert-Einstein-Institut.
G D Workshop on Optical Coating, March 20-21, The Coating Scattering and Absorption Measurements of LIGO I mirrors at Caltech Liyuan Zhang,
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Optical Coatings for Gravitational Wave Detection Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration - August.
LIGO-G D Core Optics Components (COC) Polishing Pathfinder Kickoff Advanced LIGO Project GariLynn Billingsley Caltech.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
1 Cascina – October 19, 2011 ASPERA Forum Laurent Pinard Substrates, Polishing, Coatings and Metrology for the 2 nd generation of GW detector Laurent PINARD.
Thermal compensation issues: sensing and actuation V. Fafone University of Rome Tor Vergata and INFN ASPERA Technological Forum – EGO October, 2011.
LIGO-G v1 Inside LIGO LIGO1 Betsy Weaver, GariLynn Billingsely and Travis Sadecki 2016 – 02 – 23 at CSIRO, Lindfield.
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300 Results from the Stanford 10m all-reflective polarization Sagnac interferometer Peter Beyersdorf TAMA300.
A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Interferometric speed meter as a low-frequency gravitational-wave detector Helge Müller-Ebhardt Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (AEI) and Leibniz.
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Laboratoire des Matériaux Avancés - Lyon
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Nanostructured Optics
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
Modeling of Advanced LIGO with Melody
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

1 Large Aperture Dielectric Gratings for High Power LIGO Interferometry LSC/Virgo Meeting, Baton Rouge March 19-22, 2007 Optics Working Group Jerald A. Britten, Hoang T. Nguyen, James D. Nissen, Cindy C. Larson, Michael D. Aasen, Thomas C. Carlson, Curly R. Hoaglan Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Patrick Lu, Ke-Xun Sun, Robert L. Byer Stanford University This work was performed under the auspices of the United States Department of Energy by the University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract no. W-7405-Eng-48 UCRL-PRES G Z

2 UCRL-PRES LIGO needs reflective grating beamsplitters for high-power interferometry. -Transmissive optics suffer from thermal lensing. >CO 2 heating laser already required for ITM’s on initial LIGO. >Advanced LIGO will require 830kW of circulating power in the arms. For a 6cm spot size, that comes out to 30kW/cm 2 of intensity. Significant investment and progress has been made in the development of multilayer dielectric diffraction gratings for high-energy Petawatt-class laser systems. -Projects such as LIGO are poised to take advantage of this capability. Motivation

3 UCRL-PRES Laser Heating in Advanced LIGO End test mass Signal recycling mirror (7%) Power recycling mirror Input test mass Intracavity Power Level 830 kW Laser Power after Mode Cleaner 125 W 2.1 Splitter Thermal lensing due to dn/dT Mode Cleaner Laser

4 UCRL-PRES All Reflective Grating Reduces Bulk Heating K.X. Sun, et. al, “All-reflective Michelson, Sagnac, and Fabry-Perot interferometers based on grating beam splitters,” Optics Letters, 8(23), p (1998) Littrow mounting. -1 overlaps with input Gratings used as beamsplitter and input couplers to arm cavities. -No thermorefractive aberrations. Thermoelastic aberrations only. -No bulk absorption. Surface absorption only. -Greater design flexibility: allows the use of nontransparent substrates, which can be more thermally conductive. Intracavity Power Level 830 kW Laser Power after Mode Cleaner 125 W 2.1 Splitter Input grating. Large aperture. ~80cm aperture required based on 67 o Littrow spread.

5 UCRL-PRES Current Subject of Investigation 830kW circulating power Light incident on grating at Littrow angle (67 o ) Littrow mounting causes -1 diffracted order to circulate in cavity. Advanced LIGO Arm Cavity Diffraction efficiency > 99.5% The goal of this study is to build and test a working model of this configuration. HR End Mirror Cavity finesse ~ 1200

6 UCRL-PRES LIGO’s Requirements for Gratings Large Aperture cm mirror diameter 1. -Gratings must be 83 cm based on a 67 o Littrow angle. Low thermal aberrations -Advanced LIGO: 830 kW circulating in arm cavities 2 -6 cm spot size -Intensity: 30kW/cm 2 High Efficiency % desired 3 - Over large aperture for beam quality Low Scattering -Light scattering noise couples seismic activity into signal 1 P. Barriga, et. al, “Numerical calculations of diffraction losses in advanced interferometric gravitational wave detectors,” 2 C. Zhao, et. al, “Compensation of Strong Thermal Lensing in High Optical Power Cavities,” gr-qc/ v2 3 Miyakawa, et. al, “Measurement of Optical Response of a Detuned Resonant Sideband Extraction Interferometer,” LIGO- P R

7 UCRL-PRES substrate Clean Prime Resist coat substrate resist layer Expose Develop Metrology Transfer- etch (RIBE) substrate Cleaning & Metrology During manufacture, optics are exposed to heat, aggressive liquids, and vacuum processing. substrate Multilayer oxide deposition Design (efficiency, E-field distribution, …) (only part of process not done at LLNL) 575 nm period MLD grating fabrication process flow

8 UCRL-PRES In the past 18 months LLNL has produced 77 production 1740 l/mm Apertures from 140 mm to 800 mm Over 11 m 2 of grating surface with average efficiency > 96% For use wavelengths from 1017 nm to 1064 nm LIGO project

9 UCRL-PRES Ratioing scanning photometry LLNL for efficiency measurements 500 mW CW 1064 nm laser Fused silica window Reference detector Signal detector Fused silica wedge Grating and HR on XZ translation stage Ratio HR to beam in air at beginning and end of test for absolute scale Ratio grating to HR at same location for every pass while scanning grating over beam

10 UCRL-PRES #011 (200x100 mm): 99.2% Ave, 0.3% RMS #021 (170x100 mm): 99.3% Ave, 0.2% RMS histogram of 10K data points histogram of 10K data points Design spec of >99.5% is achievable 1740 line/mm HfO 2 /SiO 2 grating on BK7 substrates >99% diffraction efficiency gratings have been delivered to Stanford

11 UCRL-PRES Resolution991 x 1005 Wedge1.000 PV wv PVq(99%) wv RMS wv Strehl CW021 CW Resolution991 x 1005 Wedge1.000 PV wv PVq wv RMS wv Strehl0.988 CW orientation w/ S/N up Gratings exhibit flat diffracted wavefront Diffracted Wavefront at Littrow angle for 1053 nm (66.4 o )

12 UCRL-PRES GSI5_06_04_19_221034_EFF_XLS #005 (800x nm, 72.5 o: 97.3% Ave, 0.7% RMS #011: 97.1% 1053 nm, 72.5 o:, so this grating could be >99% for LIGO conditions LLNL has delivered 13 production gratings at this size (800x400 mm) LIGO aperture required has been demonstrated for other projects

13 UCRL-PRES Byer Group Laser Lab NPRO Oscillator and Rod Amplifiers 100~200 W Amplifiers Laser lab is being set up for high power cw laser heating characterization of LLNL gratings

14 UCRL-PRES Initial thermal testing of 100 mm diameter LLNL MLD witness grating Shack-Hartman Wavefront Sensor He-Ne Laser 4x Beam Expander LIGO 8 W NPRO oscillator with 2 stage 4 passes rod amplifier Mini Slab Power Amplifiers (300 W diode pump) Modecleaner 30W Single Frequency TEM nm laser MLD Grating Max power was 34.5 W in a 1.5mm spot: ~2 kW/cm 2

15 UCRL-PRES Thermal testing of 100 mm diameter LLNL witness grating

16 UCRL-PRES mm HeNe Probe Beam removed Tip, Tilt, and Piston PV: 59.3 nm, Rms: 11.2 nm 11 W, 0.6 kW/cm 2 PV: 53.4 nm, Rms: 9.4 nm Grating wavefronts measured at two power densities show no difference 34.5 W, ~2 kW/cm 2

17 UCRL-PRES Next Steps Fiber laser and amplifiers to enable 100 W of single mode light Cavity configuration to enable thermal tests to reach ~30 kW/cm 2 for centimeter-scale beams Large-aperture efficiency measurements will be made at Stanford to corroborate LLNL measurements Scatterometer measurements, including back leaks

18 UCRL-PRES Efficiency/Finesse Measurements planned for near future LLNL Dielectric Grating on Translation Stage Single Frequency 6 W YAG laser 1064 nm wavelength Circulator Servo Electronics Intracavity Power ~1200 W EO Modulator Cavity end-mirror with piezo

19 UCRL-PRES Thermal aberration measurement at higher power planned for near future LLNL Dielectric Grating on Translation Stage Shack-Hartman Wavefront Sensor He-Ne Laser Beam Expander Single Frequency 100 W YAG laser 1064 nm wavelength Or Fiber Laser 100 W Circulator Servo Electronics Intracavity Power ~20 kW Power Density > 30 kW/cm 2 Interferometric Sensor CCD EO Modulator

20 UCRL-PRES Conclusions Capability exists to manufacture large-aperture multilayer dielectric diffraction gratings for demanding LIGO applications ->99% diffraction efficiency in Littrow mount -kW power-handling capability -80+ cm apertures