Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Cara Cahalan Laitusis Educational Testing Service Martha Thurlow NCEO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
Advertisements

National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Goals of Project NARAP Collaboration General Advisory Committee Project Details (ETS and PARA) Plans for.
Technology Assisted Reading Assessment National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 7, 2007 Overview of TARA project.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects General Advisory Committee December 8, 2006 Overview of.
Alaska Comprehensive System of Student Assessment (CSSA) and Testing Accommodations Presentation for New District Test Coordinators, September 2007, Anchorage,
Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Exploring Assistive Technology Issues in Reading Assessment ATIA 2010 Orlando: Jason Altman, NCEO.
What’s New with PARCC for ELA? January 30, 2014 Vincent Segalini.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Audio: Dial Conference ID Navigating Your Way to AIM in the IEP: Who Needs AIM and Where Does AIM Fit? Joy.
PARCC Read Aloud Decision Making
Grade 3 Portfolio Implementation Guide Training for School Test Coordinators and Instructional Coaches NHCS Implementation Support Discussion Group Edmodo.
1 Transitioning to the New Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks in ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Susan Wheltle Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM, GROWTH AND STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES WENDY ST. MICHELL ASSESSMENT DIRECTOR.
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS The presenters are: Erika Bolig – OSA Professional Development Coordinator Linda Howley – OSA Assessment Consultant for Students.
Alternate Standards and Assessments in Michigan: Current and Future Direction Supervisors of Low Incidence Population January 16, 2015.
Accessible Materials 101: NIMAS Overview for TVIs.
Alternative Maryland School Assessment (Alt-MSA)
JHLA Junior High Literacy Assessment. The school year saw the first administration of the Junior High Literacy Assessment. The assessment was.
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
Assessment Updates CD PST Meeting March 10, 2015.
MCAS-Alt: Alternate Assessment in Massachusetts Technical Challenges and Approaches to Validity Daniel J. Wiener, Administrator of Inclusive Assessment.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O What the heck does proficiency mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities? Nancy Arnold,
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Accommodation Decisions: Policy, Training, and Monitoring as Critical Aspects of an Objective Approach.
Meeting NCLB Act: Students with Disabilities Who Are Caught in the Gap Martha Thurlow Ross Moen Jane Minnema National Center on Educational Outcomes
Kristy Green Debbie Wilson Joan Mattson. Higher Expectations 3 ELA/Literacy Read sufficiently complex texts independently Write effectively to sources.
Clarification on determining if a student meets the criteria to receive a read aloud accommodation in one of the following formats: Human Reader Text-to-Speech.
MARCH 12, 2015 Testing at Lees Corner ES. Still Online? Online Testing  Grade Level Common Assessments Mostly in grades 3-6  eCart Windows Grades 3-6.
Designing Accessible Reading Assessments Research on Making Large Scale Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities Institute of Education.
Donna McNear 1 Welcome to… Essential Supports for Beginning Readers in the 21st Century: Examining the Teacher’s Role Presented at:
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Navigating the State Assessment Program Pam Biggs NCDPI Division of Accountability Services Conference on Exceptional Children November 7, 2006.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
Junior High Literacy Assessment May 26-28, 2008.
Challenges of Administering MI-Access To Students with Visual and Hearing Impairments Presenters: COLLETTE BAUMAN Supervisor, Michigan Department of Education-Low.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Research on Making Large-Scale Reading Assessments More Accessible for Students with Disabilities June.
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
By: Kathryn Sheriff Segers, PhD, NBCT, CTVI Program Specialist -Accessible Instructional Materials (AIMs) Georgia Department of Education.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
TAKS-Alt ReportingInformation for Parents Copyright © 2007, Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or portions of this work is.
Alternate Assessment Transitions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
1 MI-Access Conference Presentations. 2 Participation and Supported Independence (P/SI) MI-Access.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
WIDA ELP Standards Providing Educational Equity to ELLs through Language Development.
1 The Literate High School Student: The Common Core State Standards for ELA and Literacy Theresa Craig, Susan Wheltle, and Paul Zinni CONNECT Conference.
Emily Day.  The state of North Carolina requires that all students be assessed at the end of the school year (middle and high school) or at the end of.
Dynamic Learning Maps Update Linda Howley, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Joanne Winkelman, Office of Special Education.
Elementary Literacy Assessment October 9 -12, 2007 Sub Code: 968.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
PARCC Accessibility Features and Accommodations Manual Training for Parents Presented on November 20, 2014 Presented by the: Office of Special Education.
Beginning in the school year, a student scoring at the lowest achievement level in reading on the 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment will not be.
OAVSNP Conference 2011 Jackie Burr, ODE 1.  Diploma Options  Indicator 14 Executive Summary Report  Secondary Transition Legislative Bills  Questions.
Accessibility and Accommodations Alabama Student Assessment Program Nannette Pence Education Specialist Student Assessment Alabama State Department of.
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
SAS Curriculum Mapping Trainer (SAS CMT) October 2011.
Vision Services and Support Emily Coleman, Teacher of the Visually Impaired Washington State School for the Blind.
The ABCs of Accessibility and Accommodations in State Assessments Martha Thurlow, Sheryl Lazarus, and Laurene Christensen National.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM):
How Refreshable Braille Displays Affect Computer Skills
TELPAS Alternate Accessibility
Presentation transcript:

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Cara Cahalan Laitusis Educational Testing Service Martha Thurlow NCEO

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Purposes of Assessment The purpose of this assessment is to serve as an accountability assessment of technology assisted reading (the use of assistive technology for accessing text).

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment High-Level Claim This assessment will measure the degree to which a student can independently access grade level English language arts text using assistive technology. Scores will be reported for three levels: Developing Proficiency, Proficient, and Advanced Proficient.

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Population of Test Takers From this large sample of students with visual impairments this assessment will focus only on: –Students in grades 7 to 10 whose primary method of reading includes assistive technology –Students whose IEP includes instruction in reading with assistive technology. The assessment will not be appropriate for students with significant cognitive impairments who participate in the state’s alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards.

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Specific Forms of AT Audio (JAWS) Magnification (ZoomText) Tactile (refreshable braille) Combination of Audio, Magnification, and Tactile

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Advanced Proficient Student can access grade-level text independently and efficiently, with satisfactory literal comprehension, using one or more forms of assistive technology. –Ability to move fluidly within and between technologies in order to optimize various technologies’ potential –Selection of most appropriate form of AT for a given task –Self-advocacy regarding technology choices

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Proficient Student can access grade-level text independently, with satisfactory literal comprehension, using one or more forms of assistive technology. –Can use the technology independently –Can use the technology to perform at grade level: visual and tactile readers decode and read words fluently enough to understand what was written and audio readers comprehend and retain heard text –Understands the basic functions of a technology

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Developing Proficiency Student has, at most, limited ability to access text independently using one or more format of assistive technology. –Student needs help from teacher –Student gets stuck with the technology

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Test Items

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Performance Task Goals Operationalize proficiency definitions Allow for variability in AT Type, document format, ways in which student might convey responses

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Performance Task Types Document Manipulation –Read and recall –Navigate –Locate –Select AT and explain selection Document Switching

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Topics of CR Items Internet use AT knowledge, use, and troubleshooting Obtaining accessible material Dealing with specific types of material (regular print, PDF, Word, Daisy, etc.)

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Test Summary Total Score Diagnostic Sub-scores Select AT for Specific Task 30-6 Locate* 30-6 Read and Recall*30-6 Navigate60-12 Document Switching60-12 General AT Knowledge100-20

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Field Test Plans Target Sample 250 students (grades 7-11) –20 Teachers will test 10 students each (n=200) –NCEO researchers will test an additional 50 students Administrators Variables –Blind (5), Sighted (15) –Rural (3), Urban (3), Suburban (14) –Itinerant (14), School for the Blind (6)

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment States in sample Arkansas California (2) Colorado (2) Georgia (2) Kentucky (2) Louisiana Maryland Massachusetts (2) Michigan Minnesota New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Texas Washington (2)

Technology Assisted Reading Assessment Timeline Training (May/July 2010) Administrations (June-Nov 2010) Data Analysis (Jan-Feb 2011) Standard Setting (March 2011) Final Report/Test Form (June 2011)