The MEaSUREs PAR Project Robert Frouin Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA _______________________________________ OCRT Meeting, 4-6 may 2009,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Advertisements

A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
Characterization of radiance uncertainties for SeaWiFS and Modis-Aqua Introduction The spectral remote sensing reflectance is arguably the most important.
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
Gregory Leptoukh, David Lary, Suhung Shen, Christopher Lynnes What’s in a day?
Atmospheric effect in the solar spectrum
Aerosol radiative effects from satellites Gareth Thomas Nicky Chalmers, Caroline Poulsen, Ellie Highwood, Don Grainger Gareth Thomas - NCEO/CEOI-ST Joint.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Air Quality
Reflected Solar Radiative Kernels And Applications Zhonghai Jin Constantine Loukachine Bruce Wielicki Xu Liu SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
The IOCCG Atmospheric Correction Working Group Status Report The Eighth IOCCG Committee Meeting Department of Animal Biology and Genetics University.
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
Atmospheric Correction Algorithms for Remote Sensing of Open and Coastal Waters Zia Ahmad Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) NASA- Goddard Space Flight.
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Determination of the optical thickness and effective radius from reflected solar radiation measurements David Painemal MPO531.
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Robert H. Evans & Peter J. Minnett Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
1 Applications of Remote Sensing: SeaWiFS and MODIS Ocean Color Outline  Physical principles behind the remote sensing of ocean color parameters  Satellite.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 GOES Solar Radiation Products in Support of Renewable Energy Istvan Laszlo.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
 Introduction  Surface Albedo  Albedo on different surfaces  Seasonal change in albedo  Aerosol radiative forcing  Spectrometer (measure the surface.
On the application of CERES SW ADMs Cédric Bertrand.
DEVELOPING HIGH RESOLUTION AOD IMAGING COMPATIBLE WITH WEATHER FORECAST MODEL OUTPUTS FOR PM2.5 ESTIMATION Daniel Vidal, Lina Cordero, Dr. Barry Gross.
What is the key science driver for using Ocean Colour Radiometry (OCR) for research and applications? What is OCR, and what does it provide? Examples of.
Definition and assessment of a regional Mediterranean Sea ocean colour algorithm for surface chlorophyll Gianluca Volpe National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.
Identifying 3D Radiative Cloud Effects Using MODIS Visible Reflectance Measurements Amanda Gumber Department of Atmospherics and Oceanic Sciences/CIMSS.
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
Application of an adaptive radiative transfer parameterisation in a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model DWD Extramural research Annika Schomburg.
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
GlobColour / Medspiration user consultations, Nov 20-22, 2007, Oslo Validation of the GlobColour Full product set ( FPS ) over open ocean Case 1 waters.
Chelle L. Gentemann & Peter J. Minnett Introduction to the upper ocean thermal structure Diurnal models M-AERI data Examples of diurnal warming Conclusions.
ISAC Contribution to Ocean Color activity Mediterranean high resolution surface chlorophyll mapping Use available bio-optical data sets to estimate the.
SCIAMACHY TOA Reflectance Correction Effects on Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval W. Di Nicolantonio, A. Cacciari, S. Scarpanti, G. Ballista, E. Morisi,
Initial Analysis of the Pixel-Level Uncertainties in Global MODIS Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Size Retrievals Steven Platnick 1, Robert.
Aerosol Radiative Forcing from combined MODIS and CERES measurements
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration from Merged CERES and MODIS Observations Anand Inamdar & A. French Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (ALARC/ARS/USDA)
1/13 Development of high level biophysical products from the fusion of medium resolution sensors for regional to global applications: the CYCLOPES project.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
CIOSS Ocean Optics Aug 2005 Ocean Optics, Cal/Val Plans, CDR Records for Ocean Color Ricardo M Letelier Oregon State University Outline - Defining Ocean.
Contact © European Union, Monitoring the State of the Global Terrestrial Surfaces The state of vegetation is analysed using.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
New Aerosol Models for Ocean Color Retrievals Zia Ahmad NASA-Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) MODIS Meeting May 18-20, 2011.
AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
Interannual Variability of Solar Reflectance From Data and Model Z. Jin, C. Lukachin, B. Wielicki, and D. Young SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Incorporating Satellite Time-Series data into Modeling Watson Gregg NASA/GSFC/Global Modeling and Assimilation Office Topics: Models, Satellite, and In.
Limitations of ’column physics’ for radiation computations in atmospheric models Bent H Sass Danish Meteorological Institute 1 May 2009 As the horizontal.
MODIS Atmosphere Group Summary Summary of modifications and enhancements in collection 5 Summary of modifications and enhancements in collection 5 Impacts.
Some Practical Considerations for the GEO-CAPE Mission Sensitivity, Saturation, Sun glint, Cloud cover, etc Chuanmin Hu, Zhongping Lee, Keping Du, Antonio.
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
Jian Wang, Ph.D IMCS Rutgers University
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Ming-Dah Chou Department of Atmospheric Sciences
Studying the cloud radiative effect using a new, 35yr spanning dataset of cloud properties and radiative fluxes inferred from global satellite observations.
Assessment of Satellite Ocean Color Products of the Coast of Martha’s Vineyard using AERONET-Ocean Color Measurements Hui Feng1, Heidi Sosik2 , and Tim.
Presentation transcript:

The MEaSUREs PAR Project Robert Frouin Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA _______________________________________ OCRT Meeting, 4-6 may 2009, New York, NY

Objective -To produce a 12-year (and continuing) time series of daily PAR at the ocean surface from SeaWiFS, MODIS-Terra, and MODIS-Aqua. -The product will cover the global oceans, with a spatial resolution of about 9.3x9.3 km (equal area grid), the resolution of Level 3 ocean-color products from those sensors. -The time series will start in September 1997, i.e., at the beginning of the SeaWiFS operational phase.

Definition -PAR is defined as the quantum energy flux from the Sun in the spectral range nm. It is expressed in Einstein/m 2 /day. Daily PAR is the average flux during a day (24 hours). -The factor required to convert units of mW cm -2 μ m -1 to units of Einstein m -2 day -1 is equal to to an inaccuracy of a few percent regardless of meteorological conditions (Kirk, 1994).

Importance -PAR controls the growth of phytoplankton and, therefore, the development of crustaceans, fish, and other consumers. -It ultimately regulates the composition and evolution of marine ecosystems. -Knowing the distribution of PAR over the oceans, spatially and temporally, is critical to: Understanding bio-geo-chemical cycles of carbon, nutrients, and oxygen, and Addressing climate and global change issues, such as the fate of anthropogenic atmospheric carbon dioxide.

Satellite Estimation -PAR is computed as the difference between the nm solar flux incident on the top of the atmosphere (known) and reflected back to space by the atmosphere and surface (measured), taking into account atmospheric absorption (modeled). -Knowledge of pixel composition is not required, eliminating the need for cloud screening and arbitrary assumptions about sub-pixel cloudiness.

Model -The PAR model uses plane-parallel theory and assumes that the effects of clouds and clear atmosphere can be de-coupled. The planetary atmosphere is therefore modeled as a clear sky atmosphere positioned above a cloud layer. -The solar flux reaching the ocean surface is given by E = E clear (1 – A)(1 – A s ) -1 where A is the albedo of the cloud-surface system and A s the albedo of the surface. -E clear = E 0 cos(  s )T d T g is the solar flux that would reach the surface if the cloud/surface system were non reflecting and non-absorbing. -In clear sky conditions, A reduces to A s.

Algorithm -In order to compute E, A is expressed as a function of the radiance measured by the ocean-color sensor in the PAR spectral range (e.g., in bands 1 through 6 for SeaWiFS). This includes: (1) converting the TOA radiance into reflectance, (2) correcting the TOA reflectance for gaseous absorption and scattering by the atmosphere/surface system, and (3) transforming the corrected reflectance into albedo.

Procedure No. 1: -A daily PAR estimate is obtained for each instantaneous pixel, assuming the cloud/surface system is stable during the day and corresponds to the satellite observation. -Daily PAR estimates obtained separately from different orbits and individual sensors are binned using a simple, linear averaging scheme (arithmetical mean). Procedure No. 2: -The Level 1b data from each sensor is processed individually, as in the first procedure, but up to the albedo of the cloud- surface system A. -The daily fields of A and associated sun zenith angle, obtained for each orbit of each satellite, are used to perform daily integration and generate the Level 3 binned PAR product.

-Since MODIS-Terra, SeaWiFS, and MODIS-Aqua cross the Equator at different local times (i.e., 10:30, 12:00, and 13:30) the diurnal variability of clouds is taken into account by averaging individual estimates (Procedure No. 1). -Procedure No. 2 is preferred, since the multiple sensor data, obtained at different times during the day, are used in the daily integration of instantaneous PAR. -To ensure consistency of the PAR data over time, estimates using data from one, two, or three sensors need to be compared, and statistical adjustment factors determined. -Procedure No. 1 has been used to generate the operational SeaWiFS PAR product. It has been adapted to POLDER, GLI, MODIS, and MERIS. It has been applied by the GlobColour project to create a merged MERIS/SeaWiFS PAR product.

MERIS SeaWiFS Merged MERIS/ SeaWiFS Daily PAR 05 July 2003

MERIS SeaWiFS Merged MERIS/ SeaWiFS 8-Day PAR July 2003

MERIS SeaWiFS Merged MERIS/ SeaWiFS Monthly PAR July 2003

Evaluation -The SeaWiFS PAR algorithm has been evaluated against in situ measurements from moored buoys off the west coast of Canada (Halibut Bank data set, 49.34N W) and in the central equatorial Pacific (ep1 data set, 0.00N W). the COVE platform off the west coast of the US (2 PAR sensors, 36.90N-75.71W)

Comparison statistics of SeaWiFS PAR versus in situ PAR at Halibut Bank and ep1 (Frouin, Franz, Werdell, 2003).

SeaWiFS PAR versus in situ PAR, in mW/cm 2 /µm, daily average. COVE site (36.90N-75.71W), 2006 r 2 = Bias = 2.57 mW/cm 2 /µm (7.3%) RMS Diff. = 6.79 mW/cm 2 /µm (19.3%) Nb. Points = 239

SeaWiFS PAR versus in situ PAR, in mW/cm 2 /µm, 8-day average. r 2 = Bias = 1.81 mW/cm 2 /µm (5.1%) RMS Diff. = 3.77 mW/cm 2 /µm (10.7%) Nb. Points = 46 COVE site (36.90N-75.71W), 2006

SeaWiFS PAR versus in situ PAR, in mW/cm 2 /µm, monthly average. r 2 = Bias = 2.00 mW/cm 2 /µm (5.7%) RMS Diff. = 2.58 mW/cm 2 /µm (7.3%) Nb. Points = 12 COVE site (36.90N-75.71W), 2006

-The good statistical performance, i.e., 15-20%, about 10%, and 6-8% RMS errors on daily, 8-day, and monthly time scales, makes the algorithm suitable for large-scale studies of aquatic photosynthesis, especially in view of the difficulty to estimate efficiency factors. -But satellite estimates are biased high by about 5%.

The bias between satellite PAR estimates and in situ measurements may be due to uncertainties in the modeling and/or effects of diurnal cloud variability. -Clear sky PAR values agree well with those from accurate and validated RT code, i.e., the bias is not explained by the modeling of clear sky PAR. -In maritime convective regions, clouds tend to occur mostly in the afternoon, and in maritime non-convective regions in the morning and late afternoon. -Smaller PAR values from MODIS-Terra (10:30am) or MODIS-Aqua (1:30pm) suggest that diurnal cloud variability may explain, at least partly, the higher SeaWiFS values.

Clear sky PAR from SeaWiFS PAR code V1.4 and 6S RT code. Aerosols are of maritime type with optical thickness of 0.2 at 550 nm, and ozone amount is 0.34 atm.cm.

Factor, F, used to convert reflectance of the cloud/surface system into albedo, for cloud optical thickness of 5 (left) and 20 (right). Tau = 5Tau = 20

Comparison of MODIS-Terra PAR estimates with SeaWiFS PAR estimates for April 2003 (monthly average).

Comparison of MODIS-Aqua PAR estimates with SeaWiFS PAR estimates for April 2003 (monthly average).

Comparison of MODIS-Aqua PAR estimates with MODIS-Terra PAR estimates for April 2003 (monthly average).

Modifications to Version 1.4 -Computation of the ozone transmittance and the spherical albedo of the atmosphere, to fix minor bugs. -Tests for missing aerosol optical thickness and Angstr ö m coefficient. -Surface albedo parameterization as a function of aerosol optical thickness and sun zenith angle, based on extensive measurements at the COVE site (Jin et al., GRL, 2004).

Paramerization of surface albedo as a function of sun zenith angle and aerosol optical thickness at 500 nm. Vertical bars represent variability due to wind speed and chlorophyll concentration. (Based on Jin et al., GRL, 2004.)

Modeled daily clear sky PAR (in mW/cm 2 /µm) as a function of day during the year for various latitudes (Version 1.7 of the SeawiFS PAR code).

Difference between daily clear sky PAR (in mW/cm 2 /µm) computed with versions 1.7 and 1.4 of the SeaWiFS PAR code.

Modeled daily clear sky PAR (in mW/cm 2 /µm)as a function of day during the year for various latitudes (Version 1.7 of the SeawiFS PAR code). Input radiance is 20 mW/cm 2 /µm/sr. VZ = 45 deg., RelAz =90 deg..

Difference between daily PAR (in mW/cm 2 /µm) computed with versions 1.7 and 1.4 of the SeaWiFS PAR code. Input radiance is 20 mW/cm 2 /µm/sr.

Future Work -Continue to test Version 1.4 and test Version 1.7 against in situ measurements (COVE and BOUSSOLE sites). Understand biases, and make adjustments. -This using SeaWiFS and MODIS data. Application to MODIS requires selecting spectral bands that do not saturate over clouds (land bands). -Generate a first 12-year time series of daily PAR using one, two, or three sensors. -Determine adjustment factors, by comparing estimates with one, two, or three sensors. Generate a second time series.