Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
Advertisements

Module 11: Community TB Care Image source: Pierre Virot, World Lung Foundation.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
1 Patients’ Rights and Responsibilities. PATIENT RIGHTS 2 Every healthcare facility is mandated to display the following Rights and Responsibilities:
Case Studies – Australia Ross Attrill – International IDEA.
Public Health Seattle & King County Incident Command System Overview May 2004.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
1 Parent Survey Project: Results from Year One Conducted by SRI International for the Office of the Independent Monitor March 13, 2006.
Documenting Disciplinary Issues
Eligibility for Accommodations & Required Disability Documentation Revisions to Section Catalog.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Clinical Examination and Procedural Skills The assessment of psychomotor skills in WPBA for the MRCGP examination.
Unit 4: Monitoring Data Quality For HIV Case Surveillance Systems #6-0-1.
Hospital Patient Safety Initiatives: Discharge Planning
Welcome to the Performance Indicator Data Webinar Hosted by: The Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar will begin shortly. Thank.
Version MOLST for EMS & First Responders MOLST Program Overview for EMS Providers, First Responders and other initial decision makers.
1 Meeting with Contacts for TB Assessment. Learning Objectives After this session, participants will be able to: 1.Explain why contact assessments are.
REAL-START : Risk Evaluation of Autism in Latinos (Screening Tools and Referral Training) Assuring No Child Enters Kindergarten With an Undetected Developmental.
Training Module 2: Respondent Eligibility Criteria.
Patient-Centered Medical Home.
Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.
Crofton & Sharlston Medical Practice Questionnaire Results 2013/14 Presentation of 2013/14 Patient Questionnaire Results Patient Participation Group Wednesday.
Health Systems – Access to Care and Cultural Competency Tonetta Y. Scott, DrPH, MPH Florida Department of Health Office of Minority Health.
Community Issues And Needs Associated With Microbicides Clinical Trials Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison Officer with University of Zimbabwe.
POD 101 Introduction to Point of Dispensing Emergency Preparedness and Response Program & Community Health Services Version 1.1.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
Module 7: REDCap. This training session contains information regarding: REDCap navigation REDCap navigation Data conventions Data conventions Data entry.
NORTH AMERICAN HEALTHCARE INFORMED CONSENT. RESIDENT RIGHTS Make decisions Accept or refuse treatment Be free from any physical/chemical restraints Receive.
Quality Directions Australia Improving clinical risk management systems: Root Cause Analysis.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES Health Care Providers MDs, NPs, PAs.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
Module 3: Informed Consent. This training session contains information regarding: Documenting consent Documenting consent Conducting informed consent.
A partnership of the Healthcare Association of New York State and the Greater New York Hospital Association NYSPFP Preventable Readmissions Pilot Project.
Household Applications and Verification School Year Revised July 2014.
Report Patient Questionnaire 2013 Dr S. J. Swinden Darnall Health Centre 2 York Road.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
Building Human Resource Management SkillsNational Food Service Management Institute 1 Crisis Management Procedure and Practice Objectives At the completion.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board Brown Bag Series February 7, 2007 CITI – What is It & Why Do I have to Do It?
June 10, PM Discharge Planning Goal Local Contact Agency (LCA) SECTION Q PARTICIPATION IN ASSESSMENT AND GOAL SETTING.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Module 4: Central Randomization System (CRS). This training session contains information regarding: Overview of Data Collection & Entry Overview of Data.
VHA Training for Staff Who Provide Information on Advance Directives and Assistance with Completing Advance Directives.
Academic Progress & Exclusion Information Sessions.
Building Human Resource Management SkillsNational Food Service Management Institute 1 This training is conducted by the National Food Service Management.
Mental Capacity Act and DoLS. Aim – Mental Capacity Act You will: Know what is covered by the MCA Understand the principles of the Act Understand what.
The Implementation of Medication Reconciliation in PAC Enhancing Patient Safety The Implementation of Medication Reconciliation in PAC Enhancing Patient.
Training Manual: The Basics of Financing Agriculture Module 6.2 | Roles and Responsibility of the Management.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation Spring 2016.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
Textbook of Palliative Care Communication Section VIII: Opportunities for the Future.
PATIENT & FAMILY RIGHTS AT DOHMS. Fully understand and practice all your rights. You will receive a written copy of these rights from the Reception, Registration.
What are the DCC-413 and DCC-414 and how do they pertain to me? The STARS Interim Report.
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
QUALITY INSPECTIONS Inspection team briefing. THE PURPOSE OF QUALITY INSPECTIONS: To provide a rolling programme of assurance throughout the year To ensure.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Landpower Project Zero Harm Learning Series Module:. #7a Module Title:
Understanding VPNPP Advancement
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
Consent Training Module
Participant Retention
Roles of District Community-Directed Intervention (CDI) Team Members
Module 6: Case Report Form (Chart Abstraction)
Module 4: Central Randomization System (CRS)
Presentation transcript:

Module 5: Data Collection

This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire Administration Institution Level Data Institution Level Data Patient/Family Member ACP Questionnaires Patient/Family Member ACP Questionnaires ACP Questionnaire Walk-through ACP Questionnaire Walk-through

Audit Cycle Begins

Audit Cycle #3 Fall 2014 Participating institutions may begin to recruit patients/family members and conduct the study before or after the start date, as long as they have the necessary resources and training to begin. There are 2 types of data collection to be conducted during each Audit Cycle: Institution Level Data Patient/Family Member Data

Questionnaire Administration Institution Level Data

Degree of System Implementation Collection of institutional data will allow for a comparison between those institutions with low and high degrees of system level implementation to determine if there is a higher prevalence of ACP and greater satisfaction of EOL communication and decision-making in institutions with higher degrees of system level implementation. This is done by completing the Degree of System Implementation questionnaire

There is one Degree of System Implementation Questionnaire: Hospital - Unit Evaluation

To be completed at the beginning of the audit cycle. The questionnaire should be completed by interview with the hospital staff member (Patient Care Coordinator, Manager) with responsibility for overall unit or specific involved program(s) from which the patients are recruited.

Questionnaire Administration Patient & Family Member ACP Questionnaire

Enrollment A total of 60 enrollments are expected at each participating institution during each Audit Cycle. There should be a minimum of 20 patients and 20 family member respondents. For example, a site may enroll 22 patient respondents and 38 family member respondents.

Enrolling Patients & Family Members at Different Times It may be difficult to enroll family members since they often have other obligations that take them away from the hospital during regular business hours. An option is to make initial contact with family members by telephone to arrange for a mutually agreeable time to meet.

We suggest you: Identify yourself as a member of the patient’s healthcare team Indicate the patient/family member is eligible for a study we are conducting about hospitalized elderly patients Indicate you would like to make an appointment with them to further discuss. We are not suggesting that consent be obtained by telephone; rather we are proposing to make the initial contact by telephone. Ensure you check with your ethics committee to ensure this strategy is acceptable

General Instructions Determine which ACP Questionnaire should be given to the Respondent (i.e. Patient or Family Member version). Schedule a time to return and pick up the questionnaire or give instructions regarding a dropbox or other method of collection.

If you are around and the respondent does not understand a question. The researcher coordinator should not interpret the questions for the respondent. If both the patient and family member are enrolled, have them complete the questionnaires as close to each other as possible. They can be completed up to 1 week apart however, every effort should be made to have them completed as close to each other as possible.

If the questionnaire is started, but not completed do not discard the questionnaire. Questionnaires that are > 50% complete should be included. Questionnaires that are < 50% complete cannot be included. Another patient will need to be enrolled to replace this respondent. Contact the Project Leader for guidance on how to document this occurrence.

ACP Questionnaire Walk-Through

Questionnaire Breakdown

Enrollment # Interview Date

Section 1: About Your Health Care Before Hospitalization In this section, we are trying to ascertain whether the respondent has engaged in ACP Before hospitalization.

Section 2: Goals Care During Current Hospitalization This section is trying to determine the respondent’s perspective on communication and decision making about the use of life sustaining treatments while in hospital (during current hospitalization, not prior to hospital or previous hospitalization). If respondents refer to previous conversations outside the current hospitalization, please keep directing them back to conversations and events during the current hospitalization.

For each question in this section, you are asking the respondent ‘Did this happen, yes or no?” For each question in this section, you are asking the respondent ‘Did this happen, yes or no?” If ‘no,’ we want to know how important that issue is to the respondent. If ‘no,’ we want to know how important that issue is to the respondent. If ‘yes’ we want to know both how important and how satisfied they are with the issue. If ‘yes’ we want to know both how important and how satisfied they are with the issue.

Section 3: CANHELP Lite The CANHELP Lite questionnaire is a formal, validated satisfaction with EOL care measurement tool. The CANHELP Lite questionnaire is a formal, validated satisfaction with EOL care measurement tool. We are using the validated subscales pertinent to ACP We are using the validated subscales pertinent to ACP Literally read the instructions at the beginning of the questionnaire. Literally read the instructions at the beginning of the questionnaire. Also, explain that you are asking about their rating of care over the past month, regardless as to where the care occurred (at home, hospital or other location). Also, explain that you are asking about their rating of care over the past month, regardless as to where the care occurred (at home, hospital or other location).

Section 4: Patient Demographics Enable us to adequately describe the patients involved in this study Enable us to adequately describe the patients involved in this study Will help us explain if certain types of patients are or are not involved in ACP Will help us explain if certain types of patients are or are not involved in ACP

Section 4: Demographics, Ethnicity & Language Impact of ethnicity on access to healthcare resources Impact of ethnicity on access to healthcare resources Disparities are most related to whether you appear as a visible minority and speak another language, other than the 2 official languages of Canada. Disparities are most related to whether you appear as a visible minority and speak another language, other than the 2 official languages of Canada. Categorize patients/family members as to whether they appear to be Caucasian (by appearance) and by asking the patient/family member if the are proficient in another language other than English (or French if in Quebec). Categorize patients/family members as to whether they appear to be Caucasian (by appearance) and by asking the patient/family member if the are proficient in another language other than English (or French if in Quebec).

We will want to be able to categorize patients/family members into one of the 4 quadrants: We will want to be able to categorize patients/family members into one of the 4 quadrants:

Section 4: Frailty Index Consider the patient’s overall condition two weeks prior to admission to the hospital Consider the patient’s overall condition two weeks prior to admission to the hospital Some interviewers have noted that the patient’s response to this question differs from the family member’s response to this question. In the cases where there is a discrepancy between the respondent’s answers, always use the patient’s (self-report) response.

Complete if patient not enrolled in study ACP Questionnaire: Family Member Section 1 Section 1 Section 2 Section 2 Section 3 Section 3 Section 4 Section 4 Family Member Demographics Family Member Demographics Patient Demographics Patient Demographics Frailty Index Frailty Index

Parting words to the respondent If the respondent requests more information regarding ACP please refer them to the appropriate individual on the ward (e.g. Social Worker). If the respondent requests more information regarding ACP please refer them to the appropriate individual on the ward (e.g. Social Worker). It is also advisable to make a Progress Note entry into the patient’s medical chart to alert any other members of the patient’s care team that an interview regarding ACP was conducted. It is also advisable to make a Progress Note entry into the patient’s medical chart to alert any other members of the patient’s care team that an interview regarding ACP was conducted.

Some Research Coordinators have noted that responses provided in the questionnaire are not consistent with what is found documented in the medical chart. E.g. a patient indicates that they do not have any advance directives but a DNR form is found on the medical chart. This is an observational study, our role is to collect data and see what happens over the course of the patient’s stay. Do not intervene with the respondent and try to correct any inconsistencies. The only reason a study team member should intervene is if the patient experiences emotional/psychological trauma, induced by our interview, and help from the clinical team is required to deal with the situation.

Documentation Requirements Hard copies of all study documentation should be retained and filed Hard copies of all study documentation should be retained and filed Consent form Consent form Completed ACP Questionnaire Completed ACP Questionnaire Case Report Form (i.e. Chart Abstraction form). See Module 6. Case Report Form (i.e. Chart Abstraction form). See Module 6.

Training Module 5 Complete