1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
Advertisements

Local Policy II Session Name: Local Policy II Coastal Hazards Management Course The impact of taxes, assessments and fees extends beyond merely the collection.
Colorado Springs School District No Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
35 ILCS 200 Article 27 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA TAXING DISTRICT Creating Community Excitement for Lake Dredging/Restoration Projects.
Alternatives to Financing Lake Development Infrastructure in Mississippi Public Improvement Districts and Tax Increment Financing February 4, 2009 Lucien.
2014 Election Ballot Mill Levy Override #3A For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECT FINANCE IN PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS FINANCE 101 T ERRI S MALINSKY Managing Director B.C.
2014 Election Ballot Bond Question #3B For the Elizabeth School District Explained.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
NALHFA Annual Conference Mark Ulfers, Executive Director Dakota County Community Development Agency (CDA) (651)
County of Orange Teeter Program
West Contra Costa USD Update on 2014 GO Bond Refunding Presentation to the Facilities Subcommittee May 13, 2014.
 Pay-as-you-go (cash) or Pay-as you-use (debt)?  Which approach is feasible given project costs, fund balances, debt burden, tax rates?  How will decision.
WSSDA Webinar May 14, 2014 Barbara Posthumus, Director of Business Services Lake Washington School District
Department of Finance Debt Policy and Debt Profile Overview Finance Committee/City Council August 9, 2010.
Expectations What your Construction Professional, Architect, Construction Manager/Contractor expects from you? What you can expect from your Construction.
Reverse Mortgages.  Welcome  Introductions  Facility information Welcome.
BOND SALE RESULTS WOODLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS November 19, 2013 Prepared by: Mark Prussing Senior Managing Consultant Public Financial Management, Inc
February,  Cash & Authority must be minimally maintained.  Staffing = Possible additional needs in ($600,000)  Legislative Unknowns:
Financing Tools for Capital Projects Marshall Public Schools School Board Work Session 1 February 2, 2015.
June 11, 2015 Updates on Measure P & Measure M Bond Programs.
Is it Time to Adopt a Debt Management Policy? Presented for IASBO May 17, :00 PM – 3:00 PM Salon III (140) Skybox 4 David Holm, Asst. Supt, Indian.
Financing Your CIP …and Planning Ahead for New O&M.
Capital Appreciation Bonds (CABs): Do They Have a Legitimate Role in Municipal & School Finance September 25, 2012 Capitol Public Finance Group · 1900.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
1 Introduction California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Fundamentals of Land Secured Financing March 24, 2011.
Enhanced Infrastructure Finance Districts and Your Community CALED’s 35 th Annual Training Conference April 21, 2015 Presented by Constantine Baranoff.
Supplemental Levy Election Tuesday, March 11, 2014.
Statewide Community Infrastructure Program “SCIP”.
LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW PURPOSE DISCUSS POSSIBILITY OF COMPLETING REMAINING ROAD UPGRADE PROVIDE FACTS TO INFORM COMMUNITY TO MAKE DECISION.
Introduction to Public Hospital Districts April 25, 2002 Association of Washington Public Hospital Districts.
Budget Hearing Sept. 12,  The “Budget” ($9,131,600 expenditures)  Disbursements/Transfers- $10,305,826 Salaries and Benefits - $7,154,154 Supplies,
Impact Fee Programs and Land Secured Financing Districts 2007 National Impact Fee Roundtable Portland, OR Presented by EPS, Sacramento County, & River.
1 World Water Congress and Exhibition - Montréal, Canada WATER AND POWER UTILITY PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCING Presented by: James B. McDaniel, Senior Assistant.
Budget Committee Workshop February16, Oregon’s local budget law is a group of statutes that require local governments to prepare and adopt annual.
Refinancing the District’s Outstanding Special Tax Bonds October 2, 2014.
Tax Increment Financing and New Markets Tax Credit Incentives for Real Estate Development Materials Prepared for Discussion Courtney D. Pogue, CCIM, CEcD,
Community Meeting Atwater, California CFD 1-90 July 30, 2009.
2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING FOR SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE Sam Sperry,
Eastmark No.1 Community Facilities District (CFD) - Tax Rate Update June 15,
KATIE SCHWAB SVP MICHAEL SCHRADER BOND COUNSEL Facility Funding Regional Workshop Funding Best Practices October 31, 2013.
Public Hearing on the Budget January 10, 2013 Performing Arts Center 40 Greenough Road, Plaistow, NH Overview of Budget TIMBERLANE REGIONAL SCHOOL.
Mott Community College Board of Trustees Committee of the Whole Meeting June 27, 2011 BUDGET RESOLUTIONS.
Community Facilities District Overview Saugus Union School District.
Revenue-Based Development Incentives Property Tax Revenues Bob Rychlicki Kane, McKenna and Associates, Inc.
Legal Requirements for School Bonds C.A.S.H. Local Workshop Planning for 2016 Local Bond Success September 22, 2015 and September 29, 2015 Presented by:
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
Village of Taos Ski Valley Public Improvement Finance Plan November 3, 2014.
1 Attachment A Austin Community College District Debt Status and Financial Options January 14, 2002.
So what is this thing called a school bond?. What are bonds? Bonds for school projects are very similar to a mortgage on a home. To finance construction.
City of Patterson 2013 Bond Refunding Transactions Review City Workshop December 18, 2014 Prepared by:
ESSENTIALLY LOANS USED FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS SUCH AS LAND ACQUISITION OR FACILITY CONSTRUCTION ALLOWS A FACILITY TO BE USED NOW INSTEAD OF WHEN.
An Introduction to Community Facilities District Financing City of Dixon City Council Workshop May 29, 2013 Item 6.2 Distributed at Council Meeting 5/29/2013.
Lake Ashton and Lake Ashton II Community Development Districts CDD ORIENTATION CLASS February 28, 2011.
PROPOSED CITY OF STOCKTON WATERFORD ESTATES EAST PHASE II ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council January 6, 2004.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013 Case No SV Foothills Metropolitan District Service Plan Case Manager: Russell D.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Municipal Bond Basics – A citizens guide to commonly asked questions, bond types discussed in the March 2016 undergrounding presentation, cost of issuance.
Community Improvement Districts County Counselors Association of Kansas Annual Meeting November 15, 2010 Janet S. Garms
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
Discussion Topics Election Results Capital Facilities Financing
Overview of property tax levies for Idaho Schools
Casitas Municipal Water District Community Facilities District No
PROPOSED MARCH LANE / HOLMAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Getting the Most Out of Alternative Financing Sources
PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council June 6, 2006
Tollgate crossing metro district No
Presented to: Stockton City Council June 19, 2007 Agenda Item 9.02
Metropolitan Districts 101
Public School Finance 101 Greg Cartwright, Chief Financial Officer Allen Independent School District 7:45 – 7:55 Tim Carroll (embedded slides)
Presentation transcript:

1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008

2 Overview  What is a Community Facilities District  What can CFDs pay for  Advantages and disadvantages of CFDs  Redevelopment

3 Community Facilities Districts Legal entity formed by School District Finances public facilities or fees Finances services Boundaries may be non-contiguous

4 Facilities Public capital improvements with a useful life of more than 5 years Infrastructure, school buildings and other facilities, equipment, etc. Level II fees or other May fund facilities of other public agencies (joint financing agreement) Lead Agency must have greater share

5 CFD Services Services –Can fund School Maintenance with a registered voter vote. –Limited to new maintenance and services

6 Community Facilities Districts Maximum special tax set by election If less than 12 registered voters within proposed boundaries, then landowner vote Mailed ballot 2/3 vote required - one vote per acre Annual special tax levy - collected on property tax bill Constitutes annual tax lien (fixed period for facilities, sufficient to cover debt services and other costs)

7 CFD Bonds Finance public capital facilities Maximum bond authorization set by election Requires 3 to 1 value-to-lien ratio Appraisal/absorption study Requires option to tax on undeveloped property

8 CFD Bonds (Cont.) Reserve fund, capitalized interest Issue one or more series (25 to 30 year maturities) Financial advisor, underwriter, fiscal agent, bond counsel, disclosure counsel, special tax consultant Bonds may be sold competitively or on a negotiated basis

9 Financing Policy  Agencies are required to adopt Financing Policy for land-securing financings  Guidelines minimum acceptable credit quality for bonds to be issued  Guidelines for establishing the special tax levy  Should address types of facilities and services to be funded

10 Benefits  For the School District:  Bond issue provides timely construction of facilities compared to pay-as-you-go  Provides opportunity to bring developer to the table  Usually provides higher than Level II funding  Burdens the new development with the cost of new schools, not the entire school district

11 Benefits  For the Developer/Builder:  Assists cash flow on project by passing cost onto homeowner  Provides off-book financing  For the Homeowner:  Potential lowering of home purchase price since fees paid are not added into developer’s cost to build (partially offset by higher property tax bill)

12 Disadvantages  For the School District:  Ongoing existence and administration of CFD  Line item on tax bill – public perception  For the Homeowner:  Higher overall property tax rate than those without CFD  Additional tax lien creates foreclosure risk (bonded)  For the Builder:  Pays for all costs associated with setting up CFD  Upfront credit enhancement and pays vacant land tax (bonded)

13 Redevelopment  Tax Increment  ERAF

14 Questions