DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS Stephen Brookfield Distinguished University Professor University of St. Thomas www.stephenbrookfield.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE SKILLFUL TEACHER Stephen Brookfield
Advertisements

CONNECTING WITH STUDENTS
BECOMING A SKILLFUL TEACHER Stephen Brookfield University of St. Thomas Minneapolis-St. Paul Stephen Brookfield University of.
Effective lesson planning and design Vallesha Adams EDU 650 Teaching learning and leading in the 21 st century Wendy Ricci November 11, 2013.
BECOMING A CRITICALLY REFLECTIVE TEACHER STEPHEN BROOKFIELD UNIVERSITY OF ST. THOMAS MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL STEPHEN BROOKFIELD.
Effective use of protocols: Don't waste my time Bethann M. McCain Educational Consultant, CIU #10.
Rationale To encourage all students to take a full part in the life of our school, college, workplace or wider community. To provide opportunities to enable.
Engaging Students in History: Analyzing Sources and Writing Historic Arguments.
Teaching Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines Stephen Brookfield University of St. Thomas Tweet: #tc5815 Stephen Brookfield.
WORKING SKILLFULLY WITH THE EMOTIONAL RHYTHMS OF COLLEGE LEARNING Stephen Brookfield University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis-St. Paul Stephen Brookfield.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Socratic Seminars. We will end the year with an in-class discussion project called Socratic Seminars. We will use our class novel to get ideas for discussion.
Getting Students to Participate Stephen Brookfield University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis-St. Paul Stephen.
BEST PRACTICES IN ADULT LEARNING
Discussion as a Way of Teaching STEPHEN BROOKFIELD Distinguished University Professor, University of St. Thomas STEPHEN BROOKFIELD Distinguished University.
WALKING OUR ROADS OF PRACTICE Stephen Brookfield Distinguished University Professor University of St. Thomas Stephen Brookfield.
Developing consistency of teacher judgment Module 2.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS Stephen Brookfield University of St. Thomas Minneapolis-St. Paul Stephen Brookfield University of.
PROM/SE Science Associates Welcome Back! Please sit at tables by grade bands K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12.
BECOMING A CRITICALLY REFLECTIVE TEACHER
Thinking, reasoning and working mathematically
Productive Math Talk Math Alliance April 3, 2012.
You Write What/How You Think Senior Project Lab II Sarah Read, C.E.L.
Participants should work in their subject group.
Jeanne M. Clerc, Ed.D. Western Illinois University (WIU) October 14, 2011.
Communication Key Skills INSET. Outline of INSET training 1. A review of the standards for all levels of communication key skill 2. Examples of portfolios.
Overall Teacher Judgements
{ Problem Solving Dr. Melanie Maxwell & Dr. Stephen Sher Pythagoras Project Common Core SMP Event July 29 – August 2, 2013 Transitioning from Teacher Problem.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Unit 2: Socratic Seminar
Goals for the Day Review the lenses and 5 Processes Focus: Process #2 Composing Text Get started on Final Project College Credit.
Critical Thinking: The Who, What, How, & Why Department of Psychology Professional Development Workshops January 15, 2004.
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
Developing Critical Thinking in Students
Australian Curriculum Geography
How to Write and Give A Speech. Organization:How should a speech be structured? Introduction - get their attention and state your main idea/message Introduction.
Stephen Brookfield Distinguished University Professor University of St. Thomas BECOMING A CRITICALLY REFLECTIVE TEACHER.
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE Assessing the Mathematics Knowledge of Teachers William S. Bush University of Louisville North Carolina Association of Mathematics.
SPEAKING ACTIVITIES ( ORAL PRACTICE ) . FAIRLY FREE FLUENCY WORK
Discussion as a Way of Teaching STEPHEN BROOKFIELD.
Inquiry Based Learning What is it and how is it achieved? Israel_Johnson_Schlosser Module 2 Assignment 6 Board of Ed Proposal.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. A variety of interactive techniques that cater specifically to.
Guided Reading How can we make this really effective for our students?
Class 2 Chapter 2.  Open-minded  Knowledgeable  Mentally active  Curious  Independent thinkers  Skilled discussants  Insightful  Self-aware 
Creative Thinking Thinking that focuses on exploring ideas, generating possibilities, looking for many right answers rather than just one.
Utilizing Small Groups in Large ESL Classes Dr. Bruce Kreutzer International University, HCMC.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Putting Critical Thinking Into Practice Stephen Brookfield John Ireland Endowed Chair University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis –St.
Session: Instructional methods; How to prepare practical exercise/case study 24 th January 2013 Dr. Eliona Kulluri Bimbashi (University of Tirana)
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
Using Story to Develop Reflective Practitioners: QSEN Competencies in Action UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL SCHOOL OF NURSING: GWEN SHERWOOD.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
University of St. Thomas,
READING Information Evening For Parents
EMBEDDING CRITICAL THINKING IN PRACTICE Lebanese American University
Putting Critical Thinking Into Practice
Developing Critical Thinking
Stephen Brookfield University of St. Thomas
Discussion as a Way of Teaching
DISCUSSION AS A WAY OF TEACHING
test 2
Applying CIQ in your classroom. Assignment 5 Digital Project Marcelo Cabral.
Socratic Seminar “I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.” - Socrates.
Discussion as a Way of Teaching
Take your science teaching to new heights this summer!
Essays that Work Convey a real and memorable sense of the applicant
Presentation transcript:

DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKERS Stephen Brookfield Distinguished University Professor University of St. Thomas

CORE ASSUMPTIONS Sincerity of Assumptions Does NOT Equate with Students’ Goodwill Good Teaching = Whatever Helps Our Students Learn Best Practice is Critically Reflective – Checking Our Assumptions About Practice Most Important Pedagogic Knowledge – How Students Experience Learning

CIRCLE OF VOICES Each person has up to 1 minute to say whatever they wish to say on the topic – no interruptions allowed. Once all have spoken the group moves into.. Open conversation: here you only talk about what someone else said in the opening round WHAT’S THE MOST RECENT EXAMPLE OF CRITICAL THINKING YOU’VE SEEN OR PRACTICED?

WHAT IS IT? 4 FUNCTIONS IDENTIFYING OUR ASSUMPTIONS CHECKING THEIR ACCURACY & VALIDITY VIEWING IDEAS & ACTIONS FROM ALTERNATE PERSPECTIVES TAKING INFORMED ACTION - THE SURVIVAL SKILL OF ADULT LIFE

WHY FOCUS ON IT? To Take Informed Action Action Based on Evidence That Can be Cited & Considered By Others Action That Can be Explained & Justified Action That Has Its Assumptions Known & Checked Action That Stands a Chance of Achieving Its Intended Consequence Action That’s In Our Best Interest

INFORMED ACTION = APPLYING & EXTENDING KNOWLEDGE Deciding that an idea or practice has utility or ‘fit’ in an area outside its original formulation Deciding an idea or practice is indeed appropriate for a context Learning to recognize the cues in situations that call forth certain ideas & practices Understanding that informed action needs new knowledge

TYPES OF ASSUMPTIONS CAUSAL - purports to explain a sequence of events PRESCRIPTIVE - assumptions about how we wish things to be PARADIGMATIC - framing, structuring assumptions viewed as obvious, natural, common sense

WHEN WE SCRUTINIZE ASSUMPTIONS WE … ANALYZE OUR PRACTICES & IDEAS FOR SIGNIFICANT CUES THAT CAUSE US TO JUDGE AN ASSUMPTION FITS MAKE JUDGMENTS CONCERNING THE ACCURACY & RELIABILITY OF EVIDENCE

WHEN WE SEE THINGS FROM DIFFERENT VIEWPOINTS WE... UNDERSTAND BETTER HOW INFORMATION FROM ONE SOURCE OR CATEGORY FITS WITH INFORMATION FROM OTHERS INTEGRATE OUR ACTIONS WITH THOSE OF OTHERS KNOW HOW TO COMMUNICATE IDEAS TO OTHERS

Circular Response 1st person responds to question for up to a minute – no interruptions. 2 nd person responds to 1 st person’s comments, 3 rd person responds to 2 nd person’s comments, and so on. When everyone has spoken group moves into open conversation. WHAT MOST HELPS YOUR STUDENTS LEARN CRITICAL THINKING?

WHEN IS IT BEST TAUGHT?  Beyond the Novice Level  After Initial Assimilation  When Classroom Skills and Knowledge Have to be Applied in the ‘Real’ World  When Independent Judgment is Called For  Beyond the Novice Level  After Initial Assimilation  When Classroom Skills and Knowledge Have to be Applied in the ‘Real’ World  When Independent Judgment is Called For

WHEN IS IT BEST TAUGHT?  When Alternative Explanations and Interpretations are Possible  When Actions, Decisions, & Judgments Need to be Informed  When Thinking on Your Feet & Improvisation is Called For  When Alternative Explanations and Interpretations are Possible  When Actions, Decisions, & Judgments Need to be Informed  When Thinking on Your Feet & Improvisation is Called For

CRITICAL INCIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE  Moment Most Engaged  Moment Most Distanced  Action Most Helpful  Action Most Puzzling  What Surprised You Most  Moment Most Engaged  Moment Most Distanced  Action Most Helpful  Action Most Puzzling  What Surprised You Most

CRITICAL INCIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE  Anonymous  Report Back at Start of Next Class  Responsiveness Not Capitulation  Early Warning System  Illustrates Diversity in Classroom  Models Critical Thinking  Anonymous  Report Back at Start of Next Class  Responsiveness Not Capitulation  Early Warning System  Illustrates Diversity in Classroom  Models Critical Thinking

Snowballing Share responses in pairs Pairs join to share as quartets Quartets join to share as octets At each stage groups share emerging issues, questions & differences Question – HOW DO YOU MODEL CRITICAL THINKING FOR YOUR STUDENTS?

WHAT STUDENTS SAY IS HELPFUL - MODELING … Seeing it MODELED & Named When Teachers Talk Out Loud Their Assumptions Behind Practices When Teachers Do Regular Assumption Audits – “Here are my assumptions I’m working under” When Teachers Say When Their Assumptions are Confirmed & Challenged

MODELING … When Teachers Use the CIQ to Check Assumptions in Front of Students When Teachers Bring in Real Life Experience When Assumptions Were Confirmed & Challenged In Team Teaching – When Members Take Different Positions and Clarify Each Others’ Assumptions

MODELING … When Teachers Critique Their Own Positions - Moving Around the Classroom When Teachers ‘Speak in Tongues’ at Different Stations in the Classroom When Teachers Consistently Discuss Their Criteria for Judging Credibility of Authoritative Sources

WHAT SHOULD WE REMEMBER AS TEACHERS? Modeling, Modeling, Modeling Resistance is Normal & Predictable Critical Thinking is Incremental - Start Well Away From the Student’s Reasoning & Actions, Help them Learn Critical Protocols, and Over Time Move Closer and Closer to the Student’s Own Reasoning & Actions

WHAT SHOULD WE REMEMBER? BUILD A CASE USING FORMER RESISTERS WHEN POSSIBLE FOCUS ON SPECIFIC EXPERIENCES CRITICAL THINKING IS A SOCIAL LEARNING PROCESS – PEERS AS CRITICAL MIRRORS

Stephen Brookfield Books  Developing Critical Thinkers (1987)  Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher (1995)  The Power of Critical Theory (2004)  Discussion as a Way of Teaching (2005, 2nd Ed.) with Stephen Preskill  The Skillful Teacher (2006, 2nd. Ed.)  All published by Jossey Bass, San Francisco  Home Page: