Window of Opportunity Peter Scharf University of Missouri.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rate: 1.3 lbs. / Bu. of yield goal Timing 1/3 or planting 2/3 or sidedress Source/Application method Urea sources may volatilize on surface.
Advertisements

Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
Missouri algorithm for N in corn
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
Ammonia Emissions from Field- Applied Manure: Management for Environmental and Economic Benefits Bill Jokela 1 and Jack Meisinger 2 Research Soil Scientists,
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
Using aerial photography & fertigation to fine-tune N management
Use of Active Optical Sensor in North Dakota Dave Franzen and Lakesh Sharma, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Corn Growth and Development
Effect of Nitrogen Sources, Rates, and Application Time on Spring Wheat Yield and Grain Protein Olga S. Walsh, Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center,
Improving NUE in Corn With Crop Sensing: Reflections, Concerns, and Needed Research Rain fed Southern Corn Belt.
Long-Term Field Research for Developing Nitrogen BMP’s Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center
May 15,  Rates – current industry recommendations  Soil and Foliar Applied ◦ Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc ◦ Calcium – Foliar only  NDVI, Soil,
On-Farm Response Tests for P & K Peter Scharf University of Missouri Plant Sciences.
Bermudagrass management for improved production AND stand maintenance Dr. Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Specialist UGA – Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences.
Tool for real time N management
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo,
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Top 10 lessons learned in 6 years of on-farm sensor demos Peter Scharf University of Missouri > ?
Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard,
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
Jac J. Varco1, Robert E. Earnest1, and Jimmy D. Johnson2
Fertilizer Trials Two fertilizer trials were conducted in One in Clinton Co. and one in Brown Co., Ohio. Sources of nitrogen were compared. The effects.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
What did we learn in 2015: growth regulators and mid-season N applications on wheat yield, lodging and protein J Ransom, G Mehring, B Hansen, M Ostlie,
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
Dave Mengel, Kansas State University Multi-State Winter Wheat Sensor Project,
Plant Roots and P - K Uptake  Relatively immobile nutrients, main uptake mechanism is slow diffusion through soil water to roots from a short distance.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Components of a Variable Rate Nitrogen Rec
Exploratory Research in Corn
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
INTENSIFYING THE CORN-SOYBEAN ROTATION WITH THE USE OF WINTER RYE FOR
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Development of a Response Index for Corn
Sensor Algorithms.
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
2017 NUE Conference Baton Rouge, LA – August 7 - 9, 2017
What is this?.
Responsible Nitrogen Management in 2018: Rates, Treatments and Timing IFCA Webinar February 9, 2018 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois.
Strategies for Split N Applications for Corn
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Irrigated Corn VT VT Irrigated Corn
Figure 1. Long term annual precipitation received at Bird City, Kansas
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
Gyles Randall and Jeff Vetsch University of Minnesota
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO
Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota 2007 NUE Workshop Monmouth, IL
Three Key Considerations in Planning Your 2019 Soil Fertility Program
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

Window of Opportunity Peter Scharf University of Missouri

Window of Opportunity? Sensors

Factors defining the window  Effect of N timing on yield How late can you go?  Effect of sensor timing on diagnostic accuracy How early can you go?

Effect of N timing on yield tassel

How late can you apply?  Planned single application: as late as V11? Northern data needed

Effect of N timing on yield tassel

How late can you apply?  Planned single application: as late as V11? Northern data needed  With modest preplant N: later yet

How late can you apply?  Planned single application: as late as V11? Northern data needed  With modest preplant N: later yet  As a rescue application: at least silking

Factors defining the window  Effect of N timing on yield  Effect of sensor timing on diagnostic accuracy

Effect of sensor timing on accuracy  Can work as early as V6

Effect of sensor timing on accuracy  Chlorophyll meter prediction of N rate V5 to V9, R 2 = 0.53 V10 to R1, R 2 = 0.66  Chlorophyll meter: equation changes as season progresses

Prime window: V6 to V11? Discussion?

Effect of N timing on yield  Russelle et al  Evanylo 1991  Jokela and Randall 1989  Sripada et al  Miller et al  Hoeft  Bausch

Effect of N timing on yield depends on placement…

…and source (N burn) (average of 7 locations in Missouri, ) Treatment 1 foot 2 feet 3 feet 4 feet Ammonium nitrate % N solution Urea00X4 Yield loss (between-row minus broadcast) when 150 lb N applied broadcast at corn height:

 Kansas producer 2006: 4000 acres of corn fertilized in six days using sensors

…and source (N burn) (average of 7 locations in Missouri, ) Treatment 1 foot 2 feet 3 feet 4 feet Ammonium nitrate % N solution Urea00X4 Yield loss (between-row minus broadcast) when 150 lb N applied broadcast at corn height:

Effect of N timing on yield tassel Scharf et al., 2002, Agron. J. 94:

Effect of N timing on yield tassel Binder et al., 2000, Agron. J. 92:

Effect of N timing on yield tassel Walsh, 2006, MS Thesis

Effect of N timing on yield tassel

Effect of N timing on yield  Producer N rate, preplant vs sidedress (on average V9)  Field-length strips

Effect of N timing on yield Year # expts. Yield effect of sidedress Yield effect is very weather-dependent!

Only when corn has visible N stress Yield response to late N: Only when corn has visible N stress

Window of Opportunity: Later for unplanned (rescue) applications  Application until at least silking can give a large yield response when N stress is substantial  35 to 50 bu/ac in three MO tests