Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

Overview of the LHCb experiment Status and Results
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
Open Charm and Charmonium Production: First Results from LHCb Zhenwei Univ. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration 21-24, October, 2010 IHEP,
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Description of BTeV detector Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The BTeV Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug , 2000 Columbus, Ohio.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Tomasz Szumlak (University of Glasgow) Epiphany 2010, Jan 2010, Krakow, Poland 1 Status of the LHCb experiment Outline Introduction to the LHCb.
1 The LHCb Vertex detector 15/9/2003 Physics –Goals –Properties and consequences LHCb –Overview of the detector Vertex –Specifications –Silicon stations.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
The LHCb VErtex LOcator Doris Eckstein Universität Hamburg, Institut für Experimentalphysik The LHCb Experiment - Motivation The LHCb Detector The VErtex.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Martin van Beuzekom, STD6 14 th September Outline: Introduction to LHCb and VErtex LOcator (VELO) Status of VELO Beamtests Upgrades Summary LHCb.
The LHCb VErtex LOcator Olaf Behrendt on behalf of the VELO group Novosibirsk,
Chris Parkes for VELO software Group VELO Software Overview & Shutdown Planning Organisation Milestones 3 Critical Areas.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Testbeam Studies of the LHCb Vertex Locator Modules Lisa Dwyer.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
1 LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance Gerhard Raven NIKHEF and VU, Amsterdam Representing.
Chris Parkes, Silvia Borghi, Christoph Hombach WP2 Alignment Task: Status Report Introduction Alignment Monitoring – LHCb VELO Weak Modes – LHCb VELO AIDA.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
A novel approach to detector calibration parameter determination and detector monitoring Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb VELO Group CHEP 2010,
LHCb trigger: algorithms and performance Hugo Ruiz Institut de Ciències del Cosmos March 12 th -17 th 2009, Tsukuba, Japan On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Commissioning the LHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO) Mark Tobin University of Liverpool On behalf of the LHCb VELO group July 28, 2008Vertex 2008: 17th International.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
LHCb Vertex Locator (VELO) Lars Eklund École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Liverpool University Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
12 th LECC, Valencia Sep 2006Aldo F. Saavedra 1 The Vertex Detector of LHCb - VeLo Aldo F. Saavedra Glasgow University On behalf of the VeLo group.
First collisions in LHC
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
On behalf of the LHCb VELO project
Simulated vertex precision
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
LHCb Velo: commissioning, performance and High flux tests.
Vertex, Track Reconstruction & Luminosity Monitoring at LHCb
The LHC collider in Geneva
Status of the LHCb experiment
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb vertex detector
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference 2010 Dec. 2009

2 LHCb is a dedicated experiment to study flavour physics at the LHC Search for New Physics in quantum loop processes CP violation and rare decays allowing to probe beyond the LHC energy frontier Detector requirements Efficient trigger for both leptonic and hadronic final states Excellent vertex finding and tracking efficiency Outstanding particle identification Primary vertex: many tracks ~50 Primary vertex: many tracks ~50 B decay vertices: a few tracks B decay vertices: a few tracks B-B- -- ++ µ-µ- D0D0 µµ 10 mm B0B0 Introducing LHCb

3 LHC: 2  7  14 TeV 2 fb -1 in data taking year of 10 7 s, bb pairs LHCb: forward spectrometer mrad acceptance η = Pile-up at high luminosity choose 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1  most events have single interactions LHC will reach early in run Interactions/crossing B Production

4 Interaction Point Muon System Calorimeters Tracking System Vertex Locator RICH Detectors The LHCb Detector

5 Poster: Davide Pinci Interaction Point Muon System Calorimeters Tracking System Vertex Locator RICH Detectors Talk: Miriam Calvo Gomez Talk: Antonio Pellegrino Poster: Jeroen van Tilburg The LHCb Detector

6 Interaction Point Muon System Calorimeters Tracking System Vertex Locator RICH Detectors The LHCb Detector Fully installed and commissioned Conducting first physics !

7 Act 2: VELO Design Twinkle, Little Star, How I wonder what you are

8 Velo Roles Primary / b decay Vertex reconstruction Standalone Tracking –A principle tracking device for the experiment Second Level Trigger –Fast tracking Velo Modules n-on-n & 1 n-on-p Two semi-circular designs –R-measuring –Phi-measuring double metal layer readout 2048 strips, µm pitch.25 µm Analogue Readout TPG core Hybrid, CF paddles

9 VELO Layout 2 retractable detector halves 21 stations per half with an R and  sensor Operates in secondary vacuum 300 μm foil separates detector from beam vacuum 8 mm from LHC beam RF box module z x y p p injection stable beams x y 60 mm partly overlapping sensors collision vacuum

10 Production, Testing and Installation Assembly Transport Module productionVacuum Tank Testing CO 2 coolingElectronics Simulation & Reconstruction Installation Design to Installation

11 Act 3: Performance with first LHC data 10 years – that’s longer than I took to write my first symphony

12 First Tracks 2008 LHC synchronisation test Beam collision with absorber Reconstruct tracks through VELO First Alignment & Resolution First Event 17:33 22nd Aug 2008 Nucl. Instr. Meth. A Vol. 604, 2009, 1 LHC accident September Commissioning & Optimisation TED

13 Non Zero Suppressed data Raw Event FPGA / Emulation Cross-talk Removal Pedestal Subtraction Clusterisation Reordering Common Mode Subtraction Data Processing FPGA processing –10 6 parameters Bit-perfect emulation in full software –Low rate non-zero suppressed data Off-line optimise algorithm performance

14 Time Alignment Tune front-end chip sampling time Optimise for –Maximum signal –Minimum spillover Next & previous Each sensor adjusted separately: –time of flight –cable length R sensorsPhi sensors

15 Alignment 1 Velo moved for each LHC injection Decay length measurement –Alignment is key Motion system resolver position updated in reconstruction Track based alignment in three stages Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A596 (2008) Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A596 (2008) µm Sensor x,y Alignment (biased Residual)

16 Vertices Beam-gas blue/red Collisions green Contributions from collisions & Beam-gas Beam-gas removed with Bunch ID and Vertex cuts in analyses in this talk Closed to ±15mm d

17 Alignment 2 Align two halves by fitting positions of primary vertices using tracks in each half X, Y translations ± 10  m Z translations ± 30  m X Y xx Carbon-Fibre Expansion ~ 1µm/ o C Using absorber collision data at higher T. Data taking at stable T

18 Cluster ADCs R sensors Phi sensors VELO Preliminary S/N = 20:1 Cluster finding efficiency = 99.5 % Track extrapolation, full area One dead chip in full system ! Reprocessed Data ADC value

19 Single Hit Resolution Detector resolution from corrected residuals 7 µm resolution, angle average, at 40 µm pitch Track angle Resolution improves as charge sharing increases Weighted cluster centre 6-12 o angle tracks

20 Impact Parameters -- ++ 10 mm B0B0 Primary Vertex IP Distance between track and PV Already reasonable agreement with simulation over primary momentum range Velo at 15mm open Velo preliminary simulation Data Key Physics quantity in identifying long lived B meson decay

21 K S and Λ Without VELO σ = 3.1 ± 0.2MeV/c 2 M(Λ) = ± 0.2MeV/c 2 M(Λ PDG )= MeV/c 2 σ = 11.0 ± 0.4MeV/c 2 M(Ks) = ± 0.3 MeV/c 2 M(Ks PDG )= MeV/c 2 Tracking detectors were well calibrated at the start-up !

22 K S and Λ With VELO σ = 1.4 ± 0.1MeV/c 2 M(Λ) = ± 0.1MeV/c 2 M(Λ PDG )= MeV/c 2 σ = 4.3 ± 0.1MeV/c 2 M(Ks) = ± 0.2 MeV/c 2 M(Ks PDG )= MeV/c 2 Power of precision vertexing – even with VELO 15mm open

23 Summary First LHC operation demonstrated Preliminary VELO performance: –99.5% Cluster Finding Efficiency –< 7 µm resolution –4 µm sensor alignment Further improvements anticipated Encore ! Dec. 2009

24

25 Velo Closing, Occupancy d Extreme care taken on VELO closing Primary vertex monitoring Beam position monitors Data quality checks – occupancy, noise, common mode….