ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcap
Advertisements

STFC RAL Graduate lectures 2007/8 R M Brown - RAL 1 An introduction to calorimeters for particle physics Bob Brown STFC/PPD.
Roma, 22/11/01CMS Software & Computing Workshop - E. Longo 1 Calibrazioni del calorimetro: esperienze (L3) e prospettive Egidio Longo.
REVIEW OF CRYSTAL CALORIMETERS V.B.Golubev, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Il Calorimetro Elettromagnetico di CMS Riccardo Paramatti CERN & INFN – Roma1 IFAE 2005 Catania 31/03/2005.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group 10th ICATPP Conference on Astroparticle,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Toyoko J. Orimoto, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
8.882 LHC Physics Experimental Methods and Measurements Detectors: Electrons and Particle Id [Lecture 12, March 16, 2009]
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Calorimeters A User’s Guide Elizabeth Dusinberre, Matthew Norman, Sean Simon October 28, 2006.
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory VPTs for the CMS experiment B W Kennedy CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory St Petersburg, 26 April.
PPARC forum on developments in scintillator technology R M Brown - RAL 1 Scintillating Crystals for Particle Physics Outline  Performance considerations.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
The Design of Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) October Lu Jun-guang.
CMS Week, CERN, 2002 R M Brown - RAL 1 Performance Characteristics of Production VPTs R M Brown, B W Kennedy, P R Hobson (with crucial input from D J A.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
PSD8 September 2008, Glasgow.P R Hobson, Brunel University 1 Avalanche Photodiodes and Vacuum Phototriodes for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory CMS ECAL Split 08/09/04 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.
Valery Dormenev Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk
Panic 05, 27 th Oct 2005Q. Ingram, PSI1 The Lead Tungstate Electromagnetic Calorimeter of CMS Q. Ingram on behalf of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
Photodetection EDIT Internal photoelectric effect in Si Band gap (T=300K) = 1.12 eV (~1100 nm) More than 1 photoelectron can be created by light in silicon.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Roger Rusack The University of Minnesota On behalf of the CMS ECAL collaboration.
CMS ECAL Elba May 2006 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Status of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter R M Brown On behalf of the CMS ECAL Group.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
CMS ECAL performance and upgrade Anton Karneyeu (INR, Moscow) CMS Collaboration INSTR14, Novosibirsk, Russia, 27 February 2014.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
The ZEUS Hadron-Electron-Separator Performance and Experience Peter Göttlicher (DESY) for the ZEUS-HES-group Contributions to HES Germany, Israel, Japan,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC
Coseners House Forum on LHC Startup 13th April 2007 David Futyan Imperial College 1 David Futyan Imperial College Calibration of the CMS ECAL Using Vector.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
B W Kennedy, CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Endcaps K.W.Bell, R.M.Brown, D.J.A.Cockerill,
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
1 P.Rebecchi (CERN) “Monitoring of radiation damage of PbWO 4 crystals under strong Cs 137  irradiation in GIF-ECAL” “Advanced Technology and Particle.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
R.S. Orr 2009 TRIUMF Summer Institute
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Photon Detector with PbWO 4 Crystals and APD Readout APS “April” Meeting in Denver, CO on May 4, 2004 presented by Kenta Shigaki (Hiroshima University,
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Georgios Daskalakis On behalf of the CMS Collaboration ECAL group CALOR 2006 – Chicago,USA June 5-9, 2006 CMS ECAL Calibration Strategy.
The CMS electromagnetic calorimeter
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
PbWO 4 crystals Calorimeter Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
CMS ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER Jean-Pierre Ernenwein OVERVIEW 6th international conference on advanced technology and particle physics Villa Olmo, Como,
Brett Fadem of Muhlenberg College for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with LHC collision data Maria Margherita Obertino on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Introduction The.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
HEP2001, Budapest, July 2001 R M Brown - RAL 1 The Vacuum Phototriodes for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter P R Hobson, D C Imrie, O Sharif Brunel University,
Ilhan TAPAN* and Fatma KOCAK
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
Calorimeters at CBM A. Ivashkin INR, Moscow.
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
Overview Detector details Crystals Photo-detectors
Mickey Chiu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Spectrometry of high energy gamma ray
A study on stochastic term of calorimetric energy resolution
Mickey Chiu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Presentation transcript:

ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER at CMS EVANGELOS XAXIRIS June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques 4 detectors Tracker, Electromagnetic Calorimeter, Hardronic Calorimeter, Muon Chambers Rapidity Coverage |η|= 5 equivalent to θ = 0.8º Radius R = 7.5 m Weight tons Magnet Superconductive solenoid, B = 4 Tesla COMPACT MUON SOLENOID

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: General Purposes Need for a high-resolution electromagnetic calorimeter comes from the Higgs decay channel H  2γ, for Higgs mass 100 < m H < 140 GeV ECAL just outside the tracker, in the magnetic field ECAL will operate in a challenging environment of B = 4 T, 25nsec bunch crossings and radiation flux of a few kGy/year

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques Homogeneous Crystals 50% Lead Oxide PbO - 50% Tungsten Oxide WO 3 Approximately 80,000 Crystals (22 X 22mm 2 ) Properties Small Radiation Length (0.89cm) Small Moliere Radius (22mm) Quick Scintillation decay time Easy production from raw materials Large radiation hardness ECAL: Lead Tungsten Crystals, PbWO4 Compact Calorimeter

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Lead Tungsten Crystals, PbWO4 Nal (Tl) BGOCSI BAF 2 CeFe 3 PbWO 4 Density [g/cm 3 ] Radiation [cm] Interaction Length [cm] Moliere Radius [cm] Light decay time [ns] (39%) 14 (60%) 100 (1%) Retractive Index Maximum of Emission [nm] Temperature Coefficient [%/ºC] App / Relative Light Output /481.3

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Lead Tungsten Crystals, PbWO4 Optical Properties Light Emission Spectrum Gaussian at 440nm ( nm) 5ns39% 15ns60% 100ns1% All light collected in 100ns Decay time Large slow reducing molybdenum component impurities 80% quantum efficiency in APDs at that region

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Lead Tungsten Crystals, PbWO4 Light Yield Thermal quenching of scintillation mechanism gives the photon yield coefficient a strong dependence on temperature temperature stability to a tenth of a degree at crystals and APDs is needed 10 photoelectrons/MeV

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Lead Tungsten Crystals, PbWO4 Radiation Hardness Not Affected Scintillation mechanism Longitudinal uniformity Affected Transparency of crystal (self- absorption from colour centres) Loss in the amount of collected light Correction by the monitoring system, results in no effect on the energy resolution

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Photodetectors Strong axial magnetic field in the barrel High levels of radiation in the endcap No photomultiplier to deal with both aspects Avalanche Photodiodes in barrel Vacuum Phototriodes in endcap

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Photodetectors, APDs 2 in each crystal Cover 50mm 2 crystal surface Compactness (2mm thickness) Fast rise time (2ns) 70-80% quantum efficiency Insensitive to magnetic fields Gain at approximately 50 Receiving a small flux of 2 X neutrons/cm 2

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Photodetectors, VPTs Cover 180mm 2 crystal surface Quantum efficiency 15% Gain approximately 12 (B=0) Insensitive to bias voltage faceplates of C96-1 radiation hard glass

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Barrel Rapidity Coverage |η| < 1.48 Τ = 16ºC±0.1ºC No. crystals: Crystal Volume: 8.14 Crystal dimensions: 21.8 X 21.8 X 230mm 3 (25.8 X 0 ) Submodule 10 Crystals 2 in φ, 5 in η 17 types

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Barrel Module 5 submodules in φ 36 modules in barrel 4 types Supermodule 4 modules 36 supermodules in barrel 20 in φ, 85 in η 1 type

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Endcaps Rapidity Coverage 1.48 <|η| < 3.00 (precise measurements till n=2.6) Τ = 18ºC±0.1ºC No. crystals: Crystal Volume: 3.04 Crystal dimensions: 24.7 X 24.7 X 220mm 3 (24.7 X 0 ) Each endcap consists of 600 supercrystals Each supercrystal is made up of an array of 6 X 6 crystals Barrel-Endcap transition: Loss of coverage in the range 1.46 <|η|< 1.59 (5.2% of η,φ space) 4.8% loss of photons

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Endcap Preshower Rapidity Coverage <|η| < 2.60 Τ = -5ºC±0.1ºC At channel Hγγ, 1 photon falls to endcaps and must be separated by high energy π 0, which also give closely spaced decay photons (π 0 γγ)

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Endcap Preshower 40mm neutron moderator Thin hitting film 10mm insulating foam Cooling unit 1.75Χ 0 Al-Pb-Al absorber (2 X 9.3 X 2mm) Si detectors (shower profile in y) Electronics/Cooling Cooling unit 0.77Χ0 Al-Pb-Al absorber Si detectors (shower profile in x) 10mm insulating foam Heating film 40mm moderator

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Barrel Preshower Low luminosities vertex known High luminosities spread in interaction vertices in z (5.3cm rms) Knowledge of vertex required for good energy resolution Angular determination (photon angle in η direction) Preshower section at |η| < 0.9 Τ = 12ºC η Combining position measurements of ECAL and Preshower gives a 500 MeV/c 2 contribution to the energy reconstruction Without preshower: contribution of 1.5 GeV to energy resolution

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Barrel Preshower 5mm insulating foam 4mm Al cover Electronics Al-Pb-Al absorber  4mm Al  Varying thickness of Pb 13.2mm at η = 0 9.0mm at η = 0.9  Cooling pipes in second Al Si detectors Front-end Electronics 5mm insulating foam

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Cooling systems 1 st System Cooling crystals and APDs Water flow of 50l/sec 2 nd System Prevents heat from very-front-end electronics Water flow of 3l/sec temperature spread of 0.05 ºC temperature spread of 2.5 ºC

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Cooling systems

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Calibration 1) Pre-Calibration In high energy electron beams (2 energies) resolution 2% 2) In Situ Calibration In physics events (mainly the channel Z e + e -, where e have correlated energies) resolution reaches 0.3% (400 crystals, 250pb -1 lum.) Combined information from ECAL and Tracker for electrons which haven’t radiated gives a typical resolution (in barrel) in E/P = 1.5% Goal: 0.5% constant term

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Monitoring System Injects light pulses into each individual PbWO 4 Measure optical transmission near the scintillation spectrum peak (~ 500nm) Relation between  Transmission losses of an electromagnetic shower scintillation light  Correlated losses in laser transmission in the crystal helps in the recovery (self-annealing processes) of the PbWO 4 crystals from radiation damage

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction  Finding ‘clusters’ of energy  Correcting the amount of energy deposit there Correction for the impact position Different energy deposits for impact in the centre and in the corner of the crystal (mainly for the endcaps) Cluster: 5X5 array of crystals centered on the crystal with the max signal

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction Correction for intermodule gaps in the cluster Algorithms take into account the loss in energy deposition Different functions for gaps on η and on φ Only in regions and Loss of 3.8% of photons which hit the barrel

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction Correction of converted photons ECAL Region UnconvertedConverted(Invisible)Converted(Visible) Barrel 76.2 % 5.0 % 18.8 % Endcap 65.1 % 8.7 % 26.2 % Photons convert into e + e - in materials 2 types of conversion, visible/invisible electrons

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction Loss 4.8% photons in the barrel Loss 9.3% photons in the endcaps

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction Correction with isolation cuts Pile up events and underlying events excluded with the isolation of the particle Cuts on the summed transverse energy within a region around and behind the particle (P T thresholds) Loss of approximately 5% of photons due to isolation cuts

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction π 0 s rejection For a π 0 of 25 GeV the 2 photons have a distance of 15mm when they hit the crystal 1st method Distinguishes the 2 showers using the lateral shower shape in the crystal

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction 2 nd method Distinguishes the 2 showers using the preshower detector (smaller granularity) π 0 s rejection

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy reconstruction Fiducial area cuts within Fiducial area cuts within |η| < % Unrecoverable conventions 94 % Isolation cuts 95 % π 0 rejection algorithms 90 % Total reconstruction efficiency 74.5 % Single photon reconstruction efficiency

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy resolution Energy resolution for 25 < m H < 500GeV a: stochastic term b: noise term c: constant term

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy resolution, Stochastic term Shower containment 1.5% Photostatistics 2.3% Fluctuations in energy deposited in preshower 5% F ~2, due to event fluctuations in the gain process N, number of photoelectrons/GeV, N > 4000/GeV in APDs, VPTs Approximately

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy resolution, Noise term Pre-amplifier noise Digitisation noise Pile-up noise 30 MeV for low luminosities 95 MeV for high luminosities Low luminosities first 2 are significant High luminosities only pile up noise significant 30 MeV/channel in barrel 150 MeV/channel in endcap

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy resolution, Constant term Factor Gaussian Smearing Non-uniformity of longitudinal light collection0.3% Crystal-to-crystal inter-calibration errors0.4% Leakage of energy from the back of the crystal < 0.1% Uncorrected and imperfectly corrected geometrical effects < 0.1%

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Energy resolution, Summary Contribution Barrel (η=0) Endcap (η = 2) Stochastic term 2.70%5.7% Constant term 0.55% 0.55% Noise term 155 MeV (low luminosity) 205 MeV (low luminosity) 210 MeV (high luminosity) 245 MeV (high luminosity)

Evangelos Xaxiris, June 2005 Experimental Physics Techniques ECAL: Conclusion Simulations for m H =100 GeV Low luminosity High luminosity σ (MeV) σ (MeV) Significant signal after 30fb -1 over the entire range 100 < m H < 140 GeV Photon reconstruction efficiency of 74.5 %