William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, Alabama, USA Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PLMR Calibration Valerio Paruscio Dr Jeff Walker University of Melbourne.
Advertisements

MoistureMap: Multi-Angle Retrieval Sandy Peischl PhD-candidate Jeffrey Walker, Dongryeol Ryu, Christoph Rüdiger, Damian Barrett, Robert Gurney, Jetse Kalma,
MoistureMap: Multi-sensor Retrieval of Soil Moisture Mahdi Allahmoradi PhD Candidate Supervisor: Jeffrey Walker Contributors: Dongryeol Ryu, Chris Rudiger.
Extension and application of an AMSR global land parameter data record for ecosystem studies Jinyang Du, John S. Kimball, Lucas A. Jones, Youngwook Kim,
Scaling and Assimilation of Soil Moisture and Streamflow (SASMAS): project overview and preliminary results G Willgoose (U. Leeds, UK), H Hemakumara (U.
A Short Note on Selecting a Microwave Scattering or Emission Model A.K. Fung 1 and K. S. Chen 2 1 Professor Emeritus University of Texas at Arlington Arlington,
Shenglei Zhang ﹡, Jiancheng Shi, Youjun Dou Xiaojun Yin, Liying Li, Chenzhou Liu ﹡ Experiments of satellite data simulation based on.
Near Surface Soil Moisture Estimating using Satellite Data Researcher: Dleen Al- Shrafany Supervisors : Dr.Dawei Han Dr.Miguel Rico-Ramirez.
1 Microwave Vegetation Indices and VWC in NAFE’06 T. J. Jackson 1, J. Shi 2, and J. Tao 3 1 USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab, Maryland, USA 2.
Remote Sensing of Hydrological Variables over the Red Arkansas Eric Wood Matthew McCabe Rafal Wojcik Hongbo Su Huilin Gao Justin Sheffield Princeton University.
AMSR-E Soil Moisture Retrievals Using the SCA During NAFE’06 T.J. Jackson and R. Bindlish USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab September 22, 2008.
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
SMOS – The Science Perspective Matthias Drusch Hamburg, Germany 30/10/2009.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Soil Moisture Algorithm Results Oklahoma H Polarization Shown here are 1.4 GHz results obtained using an aircraft sensor and 19 GHz satellite data The.
Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture Lecture 7. What is soil moisture? Soil moisture is the water that is held in the spaces between soil particles. Surface.
Single Column Experiments with a Microwave Radiative Transfer Model Henning Wilker, Meteorological Institute of the University of Bonn (MIUB) Gisela Seuffert,
SMEX04/NAME Soil Moisture Remote Sensing Field Experiment Status Report 11/6/03.
Synergy of L-band and optical data for soil moisture monitoring O. Merlin, J. Walker and R. Panciera 3 rd NAFE workshop sept
J. S. Parihar Agricultural Resources Group Space Applications Centre (ISRO) Ahmedabad, India Land applications from Megha.
Intercalibration of AMSR-E and WindSat TB over Tropical Forest Scenes Thomas Meissner adapted by Marty Brewer for AMSR Science Team Meeting Huntsville,
Slide 1/32NOAA Soil Moisture/Soil Temperature Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, 3-5 March, 2009 Value of Ground Network Observations in Development of Satellite.
MWR Roughness Correction Algorithm for the Aquarius SSS Retrieval W. Linwood Jones, Yazan Hejazin, Salem Al-Nimri Central Florida Remote Sensing Lab University.
Experiments with the microwave emissivity model concerning the brightness temperature observation error & SSM/I evaluation Henning Wilker, MIUB Matthias.
On Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture from SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
EVALUATION OF SMAP LEVEL 2 SOIL MOISTURE ALGORITHMS USING SMOS DATA
DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Title: Fully Polarimetric Airborne SAR and ERS SAR Observations of Snow: Implications For Selection of ENVISAT ASAR Modes Journal: International.
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
SMOS+ STORM Evolution Kick-off Meeting, 2 April 2014 SOLab work description Zabolotskikh E., Kudryavtsev V.
Retrieving Snowpack Properties From Land Surface Microwave Emissivities Based on Artificial Neural Network Techniques Narges Shahroudi William Rossow NOAA-CREST.
Pang-Wei Liu 1, Roger De Roo 2, Anthony England 2,3, Jasmeet Judge 1 1. Center for Remote Sensing, Agri. and Bio. Engineering, U. of Florida 2. Atmosphere,
Water Cycle Breakout Session Attendees: June Wang, Julie Haggerty, Tammy Weckwerth, Steve Nesbitt, Carlos Welsh, Vivek, Kathy Sharpe, Brad Small Two objectives:
- Microwave Remote Sensing Group IGARSS 2011, July 23-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 M. Brogioni 1, S. Pettinato 1, E. Santi 1, S. Paloscia 1, P. Pampaloni 1,
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing Lecture 11. Principals  While dominate wavelength of Earth is 9.7 um (thermal), a continuum of energy is emitted from.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI)  Michigan Technological University 3600 Green Court, Suite 100  Ann Arbor, MI (734) – Phone 
APPLICATIONS OF THE INTEGRAL EQUATION MODEL IN MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING OF LAND SURFACE PARAMETERS In Honor of Prof. Adrian K. Fung Kun-Shan Chen National.
L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB)
PASSIVE MICROWAVE TECHNIQUES FOR HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS by : P. Ferrazzoli Tor Vergata University Roma, Italy
Building a GIS Dataset of the Walnut Creek Watershed Sally Holl.
Soil moisture estimates over Niger from satellite sensors (T. Pellarin, M. Zribi)
Estimating Soil Moisture Using Satellite Observations By RamonVasquez.
Land Surface Microwave Emissivity: Uncertainties, Dynamics and Modeling Yudong Tian, Christa Peters-Lidard, Ken Harrison, Sujay Kumar and Sarah Ringerud.
Update status of soil moisture algorithm Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting, July 14-16, Telluride, CO H.Fujii (JAXA/EORC) and T.Koike(UT)
EG2234: Earth Observation Interactions - Land Dr Mark Cresswell.
Remote sensing for surface water hydrology RS applications for assessment of hydrometeorological states and fluxes –Soil moisture, snow cover, snow water.
DRAINMOD APPLICATION ABE 527 Computer Models in Environmental and Natural Resources.
Remote Sensing Microwave Image. 1. Penetration of Radar Signal ► ► Radar signals are able to penetrate some solid features, e.g. soil surface and vegetative.
WATER VAPOR RETRIEVAL OVER CLOUD COVER AREA ON LAND Dabin Ji, Jiancheng Shi, Shenglei Zhang Institute for Remote Sensing Applications Chinese Academy of.
Land Surface Modeling Studies in Support of AQUA AMSR-E Validation PI: Eric F. Wood, Princeton University Project Goal: To provide modeling support to.
A. Snow Recognition (SNOBS1-b) b. Fractional Snow Cover (SNOBS2-b) c. Snow Water Equivalent (SNOBS3-b) Ankara-Turkey 1 Snow Products development.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture with SAR Jiancheng Shi ICESS University of California, Santa Barbara.
Estimating Soil Moisture Using Satellite Observations in Puerto Rico By Harold Cruzado Advisor: Dr. Ramón Vásquez University of Puerto Rico - Mayagüez.
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 27, Vancouver 1 Monitoring Vegetation Water Content by Using Optical Vegetation Index and Microwave Vegetation Index: Field Experiment.
Use of AMSR-E Land Parameter Modeling and Retrievals for SMAP Algorithm Development Steven Chan Eni Njoku Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting Telluride, Colorado.
Satellite Microwave Radiometry: Current and Future Products Rogre De Roo and Tony England Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences.
Measurement of a Temporal Sequence Of DInSAR Phase Changes Due to Soil Moisture Variations Keith Morrison 1, John Bennett 2, Matt Nolan 3, and Raghav Menon.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Evaluation of the SMAP.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
Recent SeaWiFS view of the forest fires over Alaska Gene Feldman, NASA GSFC, Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, Office for Global Carbon Studies
“Land Surface Study” Scenario – Ted Strub’s Effort Search on “soil moisture brightness temperature” At the bottom of the first page of the results was.
Sarah Abelen and Florian Seitz Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology (ESPACE) IAPG, TUM Geodätische Woche 2010 Contributions of different water storage.
Microwave Emission Signature of Snow-Covered Lake Ice Martti Hallikainen (1), Pauli Sievinen (1), Jaakko Seppänen (1), Matti Vaaja (1), Annakaisa von Lerber.
In order to accurately estimate polar air/sea fluxes, sea ice drift and then ocean circulation, global ocean models should make use of ice edge, sea ice.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Term Project Presentation
Scaling Properties of L-band Passive Microwave Soil Moisture: From SMOS to Paddock Scale My work is focused on the scaling properties of L-band retrieval.
Development and Evaluation of a Forward Snow Microwave Emission Model
Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties
Presentation transcript:

William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, Alabama, USA Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C- and X-band Radiometer Observations in SMEX02: Successes and Challenges

Motivation and Objective Motivation: Data from NASA’s Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR) are being used to estimate near-surface soil moisture. Analysis of the retrieval algorithms is needed to better understand the sensitivity of retrieved soil moisture to model parameters. Objective: To utilize C- and X-band horizontally polarized brightness temperature data collected from an aircraft platform during the SMEX02 field experiment to evaluate the feasibility and limitations of soil moisture retrieval under conditions of significant vegetation biomass.

Soil Moisture Experiments in 2002 (SMEX02) Location: Near Ames, IowaTime: 24 June – 13 July 2002 Regional Area: ~5000 km 2 Walnut Creek Watershed Area: ~ 400 km 2 31 ground sampling sites for measuring gravimetric soil moisture, surface and soil temperatures (daily, AM), and vegetation properties (~weekly) Surface energy flux stations, lidar, and radiosonde measurements Aircraft microwave remote sensing data Iowa Walnut Creek Watershed Soybeans (40% of area) Corn (50% of area)

Polarimetric Scanning Radiometer (PSR) 10 km Platform: NASA P-3B Altitude: 7300 m regional, 1800 m Walnut Creek Watershed Incidence angle: 55 o 3 dB footprint resolution (watershed): 750 m (C), 500 m (X) C-band frequencies (GHz): , , , X-band frequency (GHz): – Walnut Creek Watershed coverage PSR TB measurements Corn Soybeans

Daily mean volumetric soil moisture based on field site gravimetric ‘scoop’ measurements with 2*standard error bars Vegetation water content based on in situ destructive sampling PSR days Daily Soil Moisture and Vegetation Water Content

Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm Volumetric Soil Moisture Volumetric Soil Moisture Smooth Surface Reflectivity Smooth Surface Reflectivity Effective Dielectric Constant Effective Dielectric Constant Vegetation Transmissivity Vegetation Transmissivity Surface Temperature Surface Temperature Soil Properties Soil Properties Brightness Temperature Brightness Temperature Land Cover Type Land Cover Type Soil Temperature Soil Temperature Rough Bare Surface Reflectivity Rough Bare Surface Reflectivity Surface Roughness Surface Roughness Vegetated? Yes Apparent Reflectivity Effective Temperature No Veg Water Content Veg Water Content Parameterizations: Dobson Mixing Model Choudhury et al. (1979) surface roughness correction Choudhury et al. (1982) effective temperature Jackson and Schmugge (1991) vegetation correction Fresnel Reflectance

Experiment Design Retrieve soil moisture: Using input data characterizing mean conditions over the SMEX02 Walnut Creek Watershed on each of 7 days, apply the retrieval algorithm for various points across a 3-dimensional parameter space (surface roughness, vegetation B parameter and single scattering albedo) Validate: Using observed soil moisture conditions for each day, determine the parameter combinations that yield soil moisture estimates within a defined error range about the observed mean Inputs representing mean conditions for given day: Brightness temperature – Mean of PSR C- or X-band ‘postings’ Surface and soil temperatures – Mean of observed temperatures Vegetation water content – Mean of values measured at field sites (corn and soybeans), interpolated between ~weekly measurements

Parameter Space Comparison C-band, H-Pol Single Scattering Albedo = 0.03 Shaded regions indicate combinations of surface roughness and vegetation B parameter that produce soil moisture values within 2 standard errors of the observed mean for the given day. The observed mean is for the 0-1 cm layer, intended to represent the effective C-band emitting depth. There is no overlap in valid soil moisture retrievals for July 9 and July 11. July 1/July 11 (Wet) Overlap July 1 (Very Dry) July 1/July 9 (Moderately Wet) Overlap Roughness (cm)

Parameter Space Comparison X-band, H-Pol Single Scattering Albedo = 0.03 Shaded regions indicate combinations of surface roughness and vegetation B parameter that produce soil moisture values within 2 standard errors of the observed mean for the given day. The observed mean is for the 0-1 cm layer, intended to represent the effective X-band emitting depth. July 1/July 11 (Wet) Overlap July 1 (Very Dry) July 1/July 9 (Moderately Wet) Overlap Roughness (cm) All Days Overlap

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface Roughness C-band, H-pol SS Albedo =.03, Vegetation B = 0.16 The range of roughness values for which retrieved soil moisture is within.04 of the observed values for each day is represented here by the horizontal bars.

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface Roughness C-band, H-pol SS Albedo =.03, Vegetation B = 0.16 Soil moisture retrievals for wet, moderate and dry days have distinctly different sensitivity to roughness.

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface Roughness C-band, H-pol SS Albedo =.03, Various B Parameter Values

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface Roughness X-band, H-pol SS Albedo =.03, Vegetation B = 0.16

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Vegetation C-band, H-pol SS Albedo =.03, Roughness = 0.05 cm The horizontal bars indicate the range of Vegetation B parameter values for which the retrieved soil moisture is within.04 VWC of the observed value.

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Single Scatter Albedo C-band, H-pol Vegetation B = 0.16, Roughness = 0.05 cm Wet Dry

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Surface Roughness C-band, V-pol SS Albedo =.03, Vegetation B = 0.07

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Vegetation C-band, V-pol SS Albedo =.03, Roughness = 0.05 cm

Sensitivity of Retrieved VWC to Single Scatter Albedo C-band, V-pol Vegetation B = 0.07, Roughness = 0.05 cm

Soil Moisture Retrievals Using Constant Parameters C-band, H-pol

Soil Moisture Retrievals Using Constant Parameters C-band, V-pol

Soil Moisture Retrievals Using Constant Parameters X-band, H-pol

July 1 July 9 July 8 June 25 July 12 July 7 June 25 Acceptable Parameter Ranges as Function of Soil Moisture C-band, H-pol Roughness = 0.05 cm Vegetation B parameter =.16 Due to increasing sensitivity, valid parameter ranges tend to narrow with increasing VWC. June 27 July 11 July 1 July 9 July 12 July 11 June 27 July 8 Illustrations of the range of parameter values that produce retrievals within.04 of the observed VWC. Single scattering albedo =.03. Lower roughness values are indicated for wetter soils.

Acceptable Parameter Ranges as Function of Soil Moisture X-band, H-pol Due to increasing sensitivity, valid parameter ranges tend to narrow with increasing VWC. Roughness = 0.2 cm July 1 July 9 July 11 June 27 July 1 July 9 Vegetation B parameter =.16 June 27 July 11 Illustrations of the range of parameter values that produce retrievals within.04 of the observed VWC. Single scattering albedo =.03. Lower roughness values are indicated for wetter soils.

Conclusions Using a single-frequency, single-polarization soil moisture retrieval algorithm, there is no parameter vector (surface roughness, vegetation B parameter, single scattering albedo) that produces soil moisture values for aggregate corn and soybean fields that are within two standard errors of the observed values for each of the five days for which complete PALS L-band coverage is available. For three days that are relatively wet, excellent retrievals were obtained with a single parameter vector. For each of the two dry days, different sets of parameter vectors were required to produce acceptable results. The inability to obtain accurate soil moisture retrievals with a single parameter vector does not appear to be related to errors in brightness temperatures. Under wet conditions, retrieved soil moisture for corn is seen to be very sensitive to all three parameters. For dry conditions, sensitivity is lower, but not negligible.