Conservation Agriculture Carbon Offset Consultation October 28 – 30, 2008 West Lafayette, Indiana, USA Carbon balance and sequestration in no-till soils.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Carbon Farming Initiative and Agricultural Emissions This presentation was prepared by the University of Melbourne for the Regional Landcare Facilitator.
Advertisements

Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation in Agriculture Daniel J. Archambault Research Scientist Alberta Research Council February 25 th,2003.
Gundula Azeez, Presentation at SA conference, Bristol, November 2008 Soil Association review of soil carbon and organic farming.
Climate Smart Agriculture East Africa Regional Knowledge Sharing Meeting Thomas Cole June 11, 2012, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Univ. of Alberta Climate Change Impacts on Canadian Agriculture R.F. Grant Dept. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton,Alberta.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Julie Major Ph.D. candidate, Cornell University Extension Director, International Biochar Initiative Biochar 101 and IBI activities.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Cover crop workshop, Oct 21 st 2009 Bradford Farm Maetee Patana-Anake*, Tim Reinbott # and Bill Jacoby* *Biological Engineering # Bradford Farm Research.
By Dr. Thongchai Tangpremsri by Dr. Thongchai Tangpremsri Thailand Country Report on Conservation Agriculture.
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration in the Southeastern USA: Alan J. Franzluebbers Ecologist Watkinsville GA TN MS AL GA FL VA NC SC MD Potential and Limitations.
Short-term evolution of C-CO 2 emissions in conventional and no till systems for a Brazilian soil: effect of tillage and rainfall A.Metay 1, R. Oliver.
Studies from 17 countries were included in this review, but 87% of the studies were from Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Canada, Brazil, and.
Application to the rice production in Southeast Asia Rice Production Research Program Agro-meteorology Division National Institute for Agro-Environmental.
Climate Change and Agriculture in the Great Lakes Region Potential Impacts of Climatic Variability and Change Jeffrey A. Andresen Dept. of Geography Michigan.
No-Till in Argentina Ing. (M. Sc.) Agustín Bianchini No-Till Farmer’s Argentinean Association No-Till Farmer’s.
CHANGES IN CERRADO LAND USE Carlos A Klink University of Brasilia, Brazil.
Production and economic potentials of cattle in pasture-based systems of the western Amazon region of Brazil. J. Anim. Sci. 81: Rueda, B.F., R.W.
1 Soil Carbon Sequestration: Long-term Effect of Tillage and Rotations Charles W. Rice and Karina Fabrizzi October 28-30, 2008 Kansas State University.
Ing. Agr. M.Sc. Stella Altuve Roma – FAO September 2005 Crop Pasture Systems - Campos Region.
Division Afrique Enhancing integrated soil fertility management through the carbon market to combat resource degradation in overpopulated Sahelian countries.
Making sure we can handle the extremes! Carolyn Olson, Ph.D. 90 th Annual Outlook Forum February 20-21, 2014.
Sustainable High Yields on Poorly Drained Soils For presentation: Water for Food Conference Lincoln, Nebraska May 1-3, 2011 R. Wayne Skaggs.
Annual Meeting 2010 Istanbul, April Round Table Can agricultural investment coexist with climate change policies? Soil carbon sequestration Martial.
Introduction Material and Methods Results Trace gas emissions from the soil related to land-use changes in the Cerrado region 1 Kozovits, A.R., 1 Viana,
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
SOC and biodiversity dynamics under DMC systems: Enhancing soil potentialities and production of ecosystem services Examples from Laos and Brazil F. Tivet.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL IN SMALLHOLDER FARMING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN GHANA Jawoo Koo 1, J.B. Naab 2, J.W. Jones 1, W.M. Bostick 1 and K.J. Boote 3.
Matt Ruark Dept. Soil Sci. CORN STOVER REMOVAL AND SOIL FERTILITY.
An Application of Field Monitoring Data in Estimating Optimal Planting Dates of Cassava in Upper Paddy Field in Northeast Thailand Meeting Notes.
March 2005 ACIAR Project: Bridging the gaps between SCFs and decision makers Overview of Australian Case Studies John Mullen Research Leader, Economics.
Soil carbon accounting: options to measure, monitor, and address project-level issues Forestry & Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum Shepherdstown,
Agriculture, Carbon & the climate CO 2 & climate change Moberg et al Source of C emissions Change in temperature & rainfall.
Drainage Management for Water Quality and Crop Production Benefits Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer NRCS USDA Champaign, IL.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Soil Carbon and Phosphorous Fractions in Ciampitti I.A. 123, F.O. García 1, G. Rubio 2 and L.I. Picone 4 Field Crop Rotations of the Argentine Pampas Ciampitti.
A REPORT ON AGRICULTURE IN UGANDA:. COUNTRY PROFILE: Uganda is located in the eastern region of Africa. It is bordered by Sudan in the north, Kenya in.
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Moisture Controls on Trace Gas Fluxes From Semiarid Soils Dean A. Martens and Jean E. T. McLain SWRC – Tucson and Water Conservation Laboratory – Phoenix.
Pre-workshop exercise on SOC stock simulation / calibration of DNDC Steven Sleutel Dept. Soil Management & Soil Care Ghent University.
INVESTIGATING CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS IN ZAMBIA AND ZIMBABWE TO MITIGATE FUTURE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE By Christian Thierfelder and Patrick.
Ivona Sigurnjak, C. Vaneeckhaute, E. Michels, B. Ryckaert,
The Use of Natural Abundance of 13 CO 2 to Determine Soil Respiration Components in an Agro-Ecosystem a School of Environmental Sciences, University of.
Soil Moisture: Managing a Limited Resource Wisely John Holman, PhD Cropping Systems Agronomist.
2/1/20161 Soil Carbon Sequestration Methods and Tools for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification Charles W. Rice University Distinguished Professor Department.
EMISSIONS OF NOx AND N 2 O FROM OXISOL CULTIVATED WITH COTTON IN THE CERRADO REGION, BRAZIL Êrika Fernandes (CEFET/BA - UnB) Mercedes Bustamante (UnB)
Effects of Fertilizer Addition on Microbial Respiration and Uptake of Carbon Monoxide in a Cerrado Soil Marirosa Molina 1, Richard Zepp 1, Alessandra Kozovits.
Building Soil Quality with No-Till, Crop Rotations & Cover Crops $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ D. Wayne Reeves J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resource Conservation Center.
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Water for a food-secure world W. Mekuria, A. Noble, C.T.
1 Alfredo Scheid Lopes Agronomist, MSc, PhD, Emeritus Professor, UFLA, Lavras, MG Technical Consultant of ANDA – São Paulo, SP Alfredo Scheid Lopes Agronomist,
Forage quality and methane production of the grazing portion of grass produced under elevated [CO 2 ] A.L. Abdalla 1 ; R. Ghini 2 ; A.S. Natel 1 ; A.L.
Greenhouse Gases Emission and Carbon Sequestration in Agro-Ecosystems under Long-Term No-Till: Implications for Global Warming Mitigation Pierre-André.
Reduced tillage and cover crops as a strategy for mitigating atmospheric CO2 increase through soil organic carbon sequestration in dry Mediterranean agroecosystems.
Aweke M. Gelaw1, B. R. Singh1 and R. Lal2
Greenhouse Gas Emission from Paddy Rice Production Systems in Brazil
Effect of land use systems on soil resources in Northern Thailand
Creation Creation Mission Structure Infrastruture Facts & Numbers
Soil Long-term Nutrient Dynamics A Farm Experience in Brazil
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EC
Karolien Denef1, Catherine Stewart2, John Brenner3, Keith Paustian4
Gary M Pierzynski, P.V.V. Prasad, C.W. Rice, B. Lynn, and R. Lollato
Figure 1. Long term annual precipitation received at Bird City, Kansas
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EU
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EC
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EC
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EC
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EC
EU approved holdings/ Decision 2008/61/EC
Presentation transcript:

Conservation Agriculture Carbon Offset Consultation October 28 – 30, 2008 West Lafayette, Indiana, USA Carbon balance and sequestration in no-till soils under intensive cropping systems in tropical agroecozones João Carlos de Moraes Sá and Lucien Séguy

Cropping Systems and C-Sequestration Team UEPG – PR, Brazil: Dr. João Carlos de Moraes Sá (Coordinator) CIRAD – France: Dr. Lucien Seguy (Coordinator) and 12 researches located in Africa and Asia Graduate Students - 07 Undergraduate Students - 14 International Collaboration The Ohio State University: Dr. Rattan Lal

Outline General overview: soils characteristics and No-till in the tropics Concept of intensive cropping systems and comments General and specific objectives Methodology Sites location and description Description of cropping system and biomass input Results C input by biomass and conversion to SOC – SOC stock C – Sequestration rates by cropping system Estimation and scenarios for C – Sequestration for Brazilian Cerrado and other tropical areas Summary and conclusions Introduction

General overview

(10.1%)(17.9%)(7.5%)(8.1%)

Main differences – Tropical and Temperate soils Variable charges – deprotonation of surface functional groups (pH dependent charge) Permanent charges by isomorphic substitution – replacement of one atom by another of similar size Low natural fertilityHigh natural fertility Low pHModerate to High pH High exchangeable Al 3+ No exchangeable Al 3+ Good natural drainageModerate and poor natural drainage Type 1:1 – Kaolinite, Iron and Aluminum oxides Type 2:1 – Montmorilonite, Vermiculite, Ilite Oxisol Mollisol

AM AC RR PA AP RO MT MS RS SC PR SP GO MG BA TO MA PI CE RN PB PE SE AL Expansion of agricultural area in Brazil Cerrado Region New cropland area in the last 10 years Higest concentration of soybean Total cropped area 56 million ha

years million ha yr million ha yr million ha yr years years times times Expansion of No-till area in Brazil (1972 – 2006) Millions of ha year 25.50

Methodology

BrazilMadagascar Cambodia Tropic of Cancer Equator Tropic of Capricorn Vietnam Laos Thailand Cameroon Experimental Sites

The meaning of the intensive cropping system comprise in to “close the window” between the rainy season (wet summer) and the dry season (dry winter) using cover crops and cash crops, to maintain the soil surface permanent covered. The concept of Intensive cropping system

“The challenge in the tropics is to manage the decomposition rate of the crop residues, and keep the soil covered”

Crop residues decomposition (oats + remaining residues) during the corn development (Piraí do Sul, 910 m ASL, 25 °SL, , Oxisol (62% of clay) MT RO PA MA PI GO BA MG SP PR SC RS RJ MS AM RR AP Equador Tropic of Capricorn Piraí do Sul

Source: Sá, et al, 2004 y = 9002 – 29.95x R 2 = 0.98*** DAE of Corn Dry biomass (kg/ha) kg day -1 of DM Planting (05/10/03) Flowering Physiological maturation Harvest (14/03/04) Crop residues decomposition (oats + remaining residues) during the corn development (Piraí do Sul, 910 m ASL, 25 °SL, , Oxisol (62% of clay) 9106 kg ha -1 DM = 4098 kg ha -1 C 4210 kg ha -1 DM = 1985 kg ha -1 C

MT RO PA MA PI GO BA MG SP PR SC RS RJ MS AM RR AP Equador Tropic of Capricorn Rio Verde Crop residues decopmposition (Brachiaria decumbens) during the corn development (Rio Verde, 880 m ASL, Latitude  16° S, , Oxisol (65% of clay)

Planting (19/10/03) Flowering Harvest (16/02/04) Crop residues (Brachiaria decumbens) decomposition during the corn development Rio Verde, 880 m ASL, Latitude  16° S, , Oxisol (65% of clay) DAE of Corn Fonte: Sá, et al, 2004 y = 8980 – 58.26x R 2 = DM (kg/ha) kg day -1 of DM Source: Sá, et al, 2004 Physiological Maturation 8658 kg ha -1 DM  3896 kg ha -1 C 1910 kg ha -1 DM  860 kg ha -1 C

8658 kg ha -1 DM  3896 kg ha -1 C kg/ha MS  Kg/ha C Amount of crop residues to maintain the C equilibrium in the soil Zero DM General Balance = (- 3896) + (- 754) = kg C ha -1  Mg ha -1 DM

1 st yr2 nd yr3 th yr SONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJA Rainy seasonDry SeasonRainy seasonDry SeasonRainy seasonDry Season Scv 1 Soybean Fallow Scv 2 Soybean African MilletAfrican milletAfrican MilletSoybean Scv 3 Soybean E.coracana + Crt Scv 4 Soybean Sorghum + Brachiaria Corn + BrachiariaSorghum + Brachiaria C. Verde, Lucas do RV, MT 1710 mm 171 mm SowingHarvest Cover crop (Brachiaria) Sowing Harvest Sowing HarvestSowing HarvestSowing Cover crop (Brachiaria) Harvest Sowing Cover crop (Brachiaria)

Fonte: Seguy & Bouzinac, 2000 Results

Input of 1.0 ton of crop residues ton 25° SL Soil organic matter pool’s Live organism Stable (0.22 ton) Humic Substances No humic substances CO 2 Source: Sá et al. 2001; 2007 Distribution of the decomposition products of the crop residues in the SOM pools Cerrado Sinop-MT ° SL Cerrado (PvLt) ° SL

SiteCroppingSOC MeasuredC inputSOC System/Till. t1t1 t2t2 CumulativeAnnualSequestration rates Mg ha Mg ha -1 yr -1 CVCT-S MT-S/Mlt NT-S/Els+Crt NT-S/Sgh+Brq LRVCT-S NT-S/Els+Crt NT-S/Sgh+Brq SnpCT-S NT-S/Els+Crt NT-S/Tifton Adrom.Fallow Madag.NT-M/S NT-M+SD NT-S/GB+KK SOC balance for 0- to 20-cm depth for experimental sites

Soybean harvest (3.5 to 4.0 tons of DM) – February Corn and Brachiaria planting - February Corn harvest (6 to 7 tons of DM) – June After harvest 10 to 20 days after harvest (root system > 50 cm) October – Before soybean planting  tons of Brachiaria DM Example of Soybean/Corn + Brachiaria and Sorghum + Brachiaria rotation November – 12 days after soybean planting November  9.5 tons of Brachiaria DM December  7.0 tons of Brachiaria DM Soil permanent covered

Soybean Corn + Brachiaria Brach. Cover crop SoybeanSorghum + Brachiaria Sorgh. + Brach. Regrow Soybean Corn + Brachiaria African Millet SoybeanSorghum + Brachiaria Brach. Cover crop Sorghum + Brachiaria SoybeanCorn + Brachiaria Brach. Cover crop Soybean Example: Campo Verde– MT Oxisol, Red Dark Latosol, Sand-Clay Example: Campo Verde– MT Oxisol, Red Dark Latosol, Sand-Clay Annual C input (Avg) = 9.7 Mg ha -1 (21.6 Mg ha -1 of Crop Residues) SONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJAS Dry season Rainy season

Soybean harvest (3.5 to 4.0 tons of DM) – February Corn and Brachiaria planting - February Corn harvest (7 tons of DM) – June After harvest 10 to 20 days after harvest (root system > 50 cm) Example of Soybean/Corn + Brachiaria + beef cattle rotation Grazing June, July and August October December  5.5 tons of Brachiaria DM Soil permanent covered October/November (Regrow)

cm, depth Distribution of C in the particle size fraction in the profile under three crop rotations with cotton as the main crop (Campo Verde-MT, Brazil, 16  SL)

Cumulative C input x SOC sequestered

“In tropical areas the challenge with cropping systems is to adjust cash crops and cover crops that can be profitable and compensate the high decomposition rates of the crop residues”

Scenario 1 – Potential of C-sequestration based in average rate MT Average rate of C-Sequestration 0.5 Mg ha -1 yr -1 (Bernoux et al. 2006; Bayer et al., 2006; Cerri et al., 2007)

Scenario MT Cerrado 9.63 MT Southern

Scenario MT

Scenario MT Cerrado MT Southern

Scenario MT

Scenario MT Cerrado MT Southern

Scenario MT

Scenario MT Cerrado MT Southern

In tropical areas the management of the soil organic matter through adoption of intensive cropping systems with high C input (more than 7.4 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 ), and based in the systemic approach to “close the window” between wet and dry season it is the main way to enhance SOC sequestration and sustainability. Conclusions The challenge is to convince the farmers to adopt these system in large scale. Four points to convince the farmers: Reduction of costs Reduction of the risks with weather impact (Drought ) Increase the yield of the main cash crop and the profitability of the whole system Making extra money with C-sequestration and giving a good contribution to the environment.