March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford SAM Overlay Protocol draft-buford-irtf-sam-overlay-protocol-01.txt John Buford, Avaya Labs Research IETF 71.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAN 1.Distributed Hash Tables a)DHT recap b)Uses c)Example – CAN.
Advertisements

1 IP Forwarding Relates to Lab 3. Covers the principles of end-to-end datagram delivery in IP networks.
IP Forwarding Relates to Lab 3.
Multicast on the Internet CSE April 2015.
,< 資 管 Lee 附錄 A0 IGMP vs Multicast Listener Discovery.
COS 461 Fall 1997 Routing COS 461 Fall 1997 Typical Structure.
1 Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, nature calls a butterfly. - Anonymous.
Copyright © 2011, Dr. Dharma P. Agrawal and Dr. Qing-An Zeng. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 09 Network Protocols.
SCRIBE A large-scale and decentralized application-level multicast infrastructure.
1 Interdomain Routing Protocols. 2 Autonomous Systems An autonomous system (AS) is a region of the Internet that is administered by a single entity and.
IPv4 and IPv6 Mobility Support Using MPLS and MP-BGP draft-berzin-malis-mpls-mobility-00 Oleg Berzin, Andy Malis {oleg.berzin,
Scribe: A Large-Scale and Decentralized Application-Level Multicast Infrastructure Miguel Castro, Peter Druschel, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, and Antony L. T.
1 Internet Networking Spring 2004 Tutorial 7 Multicast Routing Protocols.
1 Internet Networking Spring 2006 Tutorial 7 DVMRP.
Chapter 4 IP Multicast Professor Rick Han University of Colorado at Boulder
Slide Set 15: IP Multicast. In this set What is multicasting ? Issues related to IP Multicast Section 4.4.
Transition Mechanisms for Ipv6 Hosts and Routers RFC2893 By Michael Pfeiffer.
Internet Networking Spring 2002
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits 13 February Sensicast Systems Network Layer General Comments This.
MULTICASTING Network Security.
1 IP Forwarding Relates to Lab 3. Covers the principles of end-to-end datagram delivery in IP networks.
Group Management n Introduction n Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) n Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) protocol.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 70 – Vancouver draft-ietf-ancp-framework-04.txt.
Draft-gu-ppsp-protocol-00 PPSP Session IETF 77, Anaheim March 22, 2010.
PPSP Tracker Protocol draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol PPSP WG IETF 82 Taipei Rui Cruz (presenter) Mário Nunes, Yingjie Gu, Jinwei Xia, David Bryan, João.
Chapter 22 Network Layer: Delivery, Forwarding, and Routing
© Janice Regan, CMPT 128, CMPT 371 Data Communications and Networking Multicast routing.
1 IP Forwarding Relates to Lab 3. Covers the principles of end-to-end datagram delivery in IP networks.
Hybrid Overlay Multicast Framework draft-irtf-sam-hybrid-overlay-framework-02.txt John Buford, Avaya Labs Research IETF 71.
10/8/2015CST Computer Networks1 IP Routing CST 415.
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 8: IP Multicasting (Ch. 17) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
Multicast Outline Multicast revisited Protocol Independent Multicast - SM Future Directions.
Multicast Routing Algorithms n Multicast routing n Flooding and Spanning Tree n Forward Shortest Path algorithm n Reversed Path Forwarding (RPF) algorithms.
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 71 – Philadelphia draft-ietf-ancp-framework-05.txt.
Chapter 22 Network Layer: Delivery, Forwarding, and Routing Part 5 Multicasting protocol.
Virtual Private Ad Hoc Networking Jeroen Hoebeke, Gerry Holderbeke, Ingrid Moerman, Bard Dhoedt and Piet Demeester 2006 July 15, 2009.
Multicast Routing Protocols. The Need for Multicast Routing n Routing based on member information –Whenever a multicast router receives a multicast packet.
Multicasting Part I© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS4254 Spring CS4254 Computer Network Architecture and Programming Dr. Ayman A. Abdel-Hamid Computer.
1 Countering DoS Through Filtering Omar Bashir Communications Enabling Technologies
© J. Liebeherr, All rights reserved 1 Multicast Routing.
IP Multicast COSC Addressing Class D address Ethernet broadcast address (all 1’s) IP multicast using –Link-layer (Ethernet) broadcast –Link-layer.
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 7: IPv6 (ch. 33) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
2007/03/26OPLAB, NTUIM1 A Proactive Tree Recovery Mechanism for Resilient Overlay Network Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Volume 15, Issue 1, Feb.
© J. Liebeherr, All rights reserved 1 IP Multicasting.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 3 v3.0 Module 9 Virtual Trunking Protocol.
1 Spring Semester 2009, Dept. of Computer Science, Technion Internet Networking recitation #7 DVMRP.
Network Layer4-1 Chapter 4 roadmap 4.1 Introduction and Network Service Models 4.2 Routing Principles 4.3 Hierarchical Routing 4.4 The Internet (IP) Protocol.
Information-Centric Networks10b-1 Week 10 / Paper 2 Hermes: a distributed event-based middleware architecture –P.R. Pietzuch, J.M. Bacon –ICDCS 2002 Workshops.
Application Layer Multicast Extensions to RELOAD draft-kolberg-sam-baseline-protocol-00 ALM Usage for RELOAD John Buford, Mario Kolberg 3/29/2011.
4: Network Layer4-1 Chapter 4: Network Layer Last time: r Internet routing protocols m RIP m OSPF m IGRP m BGP r Router architectures r IPv6 Today: r IPv6.
Application Layer Multicast Extensions to RELOAD draft-kolberg-sam-baseline-protocol-01 Mario Kolberg, University of Stirling, UK (Editor) John Buford,
Chapter 21 Multicast Routing
4.6 Multicast at the Network Layer Introduction: The Internet multicast abstraction and multicast groups The IGMP Protocol Multicast.
Chapter 25 Internet Routing. Static Routing manually configured routes that do not change Used by hosts whose routing table contains one static route.
2/25/20161 Multicast on the Internet CSE 6590 Fall 2009.
Multicasting EECS June Multicast One-to-many, many-to-many communications Applications: – Teleconferencing – Database – Distributed computing.
1 Group Communications: Reverse Path Multicast Dr. Rocky K. C. Chang 19 March, 2002.
1 Group Communications: Host Group and IGMP Dr. Rocky K. C. Chang 19 March, 2002.
DMET 602: Networks and Media Lab
BGP 1. BGP Overview 2. Multihoming 3. Configuring BGP.
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: VLANs
Zueyong Zhu† and J. William Atwood‡
(How the routers’ tables are filled in)
Multicast Outline Multicast revisited
Chapter 10 IGMP Prof. Choong Seon HONG.
Networking and Network Protocols (Part2)
IP Multicast COSC /5/2019.
IP Forwarding Relates to Lab 3.
Optional Read Slides: Network Multicast
Presentation transcript:

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford SAM Overlay Protocol draft-buford-irtf-sam-overlay-protocol-01.txt John Buford, Avaya Labs Research IETF 71

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Abstract The previously proposed Hybrid Overlay Multicast Framework uses a structured peer-to-peer overlay to connect peers in different types of multicast regions of the Internet. We use AMT (Automatic IP Multicast Without Explicit Tunnels) to connect peers in ALM (Application Layer Multicast) regions with peers in native multicast regions. Here we define the overlay messaging needed to support the multicast tree operations. –Intended to be algorithm agnostic One goal of this approach is to ensure that the SAM framework is compatible with the P2P-SIP overlay, which is still being defined. Another goal is to be overlay agnostic so that different overlay algorithms can interoperate in a single SAM (Scalable Adaptive Multicast) session.

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Topics

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Create(PeerId, SessionKey, GroupId, Options) A new ALM tree is created in the overlay with the identity specified by GroupId. The usual interpretation of GroupId is that the peer with peer id closest to and less than the GroupId is the root of the tree. The tree has no children at the time it is created. The GroupId is generated from a well-known session key to be used by other Peers to address the multicast tree in the overlay. The generation of the GroupId from the SessionKey MUST be done using the overlay's id generation mechanism. Example: Create(peer-123,”John’s meeting ”, GroupId, []) Creator Peer Peer 1 Peer n GroupId-Peer Create

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Join(PeerId, GroupId, Options) JoinAccept(ParentPeerId, ChildPeerId, GroupId, Options) JoinConfirm(ChildPeerId, ParentPeerId, GroupId, Options) JoinDecline(PeerId, ParentPeerId, GroupId) Causes the distributed algorithm for peer join of a specific ALM group to be invoked. If successful, the PeerId is notified of one or more candidate parent peers in one or more JoinAccept messages. The particular ALM join algorithm is not specified in this protocol. Multiple step approach permits joining peer to identify multiple candidates and then select one or more parents (could use multiple parents for redundancy) Joining Peer Peer 1 Peer n GroupId-Peer or Closest Tree Member join 1 st Joining Peer Peer 1 Peer n GroupId-Peer n th Joining Peer Peer x Peer y GroupId-Peer joinAccept joinConfirm

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford ALM vs NM Tree Topology P N – Peer in native multicast region P A – Peer in ALM region AMT-GW – host which acts as NM gateway to other AMT supported regions P A in same region in same group use some overlay- based mechanism to find closest PA parent node Note: AMT tunnels and NM paths are outside overlay routing region PNPN PNPN PNPN PAPA PAPA PAPA PAPA PNPN P AMT-GW Native multicast Overlay ALM AMT tunnel PAPA region PNPN PNPN PNPN AMT-GW

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford JoinViaAMTGateway(PeerId, AMT-GW, GroupId, Options) A request to create a hybrid native multicast connection for the specified PeerId peer to join the tree identified by the GroupId. The request is transmitted to one or more parent peer candidates and/or rendezvous peers for the specified group id, according to the usual join protocol in this overlay. If the parent peer is a P-AMT-GW (a peer which supports the AMT-GW interface), then after JoinAccept and JoinConfirm steps, instead of an overlay parent-child link, an AMT tunnel is formed using the AMT protocol from the P-AMT-GW to the specified AMT-GW to which the Peer is associated. If parent peer is a peer P-NM in native multicast region, then after JoinAccept and JoinConfirm steps, the tunnel is created between P- NM's AMT-GW and the specified AMT-GW, using the AMT protocol. If parent peer is a P-ALM, then the requested is propagated to other peers in the tree according to the join processing rules.

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford JoinViaAMTGateway(PeerId, AMT-GW, GroupId, Options) Request is transmitted to one or more parent peer candidates and/or rendezvous peers for the specified group id, according to the usual join protocol in this overlay –If the parent peer is a P AMT-GW, then a tunnel is formed using the AMT protocol from the P AMT-GW to the specified AMT-GW –If parent peer is a peer P NM in native multicast region, then the tunnel is created between P NM ‘s AMT-GW and the specified AMT-GW, using the AMT protocol –If parent peer is a P ALM, then the requested is propagated to other peers in the tree according to the join rules

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Join via AMT GW Joining Peer in NM Region Peer 1 P-AMT-GW GroupId-Peer or Closest Tree Member joinViaAMTGW join joinAccept joinConfirm Local AMT-GW IGMP & AMT Notes: - Assume P-AMT-GW not already part of this session - lookupAMTGW Overlay

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Native Layer View Use existing standards and the AMT draft without modification 1) get NM group address corresponding to ALM group ID 2) after ALM messaging, host tells router it is joining that group, using IGMP Report 3) Joining Host in NM Region Multicast Router In-Region AMT-GW Multicast Router IGMP: Report overlay 1) Lookup GroupID  NM address mapping AMT: 3-step handshake

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford leaveViaAMTGateway leaveViaAMTGateway(peer, AMT-GW, group_id) –Peer is the peer requesting to leave the ALM group identified by group_id. –AMT-GW is the ip address of the AMT gateway that the peer uses in its native multicast region –Request is transmitted the parent peer which is associated with the AMT-GW or provides that role If the parent peer is a P AMT-GW, then it removes the child from its AMT children list and may tear down the AMT tunnel P AMT-GW to the specified AMT-GW if no other children are using it If parent peer is a peer P NM in native multicast region, then the tunnel is created between P NM ‘s AMT-GW and the specified AMT-GW, using the AMT protocol

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford joinWithNativeLink joinWithNativeLink(ChildPeer,ParentPeer,Group, Options) –ParentPeer and ChildPeer are either in same NM region or in two different NM regions with capability for AMT –Since media is passed via NM path, parent-child relationship is for control and membership management –Typical use is for a peer in NM region to access the local native multicast path for this group –This allows child to select specific parent peer, overriding selection based on the basic join method

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Reform(GroupId, { PeerId }, Options) Re-Form or Optimize Tree This triggers a reorganization of either the entire tree or only a sub-tree. It MAY include hints to specific peers of recommended parent or child peers to reconnect to. A peer receiving this message MAY ignore it, MAY propagate it to other peers in its subtree, and MAY invoke local algorithms for selecting preferred parent and/or child peers.

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Heartbeat(PeerId1, PeerId2, GroupId) A node signals to its adjacent nodes in the tree that it is alive. If a peer does not receive a Heartbeat message within N heartbeat time intervals, it MUST treat this as an explicit Leave message from the unresponsive peer. –N is configurable.

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Topics

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford AMT GW Advertisement and Discovery Allows peer to disclose to other peers in the overlay their ability to act as a native-multicast gateway (as in AMT) for peers in a given region. We expect to use the P2P Publish and Lookup messages for this purpose. But to avoid collision with the semantics of those operations, we temporarily define shadow versions within the SAM extension. Publish stores an advertisement object for a peer with is an AMT gateway in the DHT for the overlay, under a given key. Operations –PublishAMTGateway(PeerId, Key, Region, Options) –LookupAMTGateway(PeerId, Key) –PeerId: the peer which is the AMT gateway –Key: the key by which other peers lookup the advertisement, details TBD. There can be more than one key. –Region: an id for a region, using some region identification scheme TBD. For example, the Autonomous System Number (ASN) could be used.[RFC 1930]

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Peer Region and Multicast Properties Messages Peers can advertise the network region that they belong to and its native multicast properties if any. Similar to AMT Gateway advertisement and discovery, uses the DHT for lookup and publish. Operations –PublishPeerNMInfo(PeerId, Key, Options) –LookupPeerNMInfo(PeerId, Key)

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Topics

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Message Format We propose a new message be added to the 18 existing message types: –P2PP-Msg =... | Experimental Experimental Message –Experimental = Common-header –Peer-Info – Certificate-Sign-Request – Password –Extension-Name –Extension-Body Extension-Name = SAM |... Extension-Body = extension-specific

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford SAM Extension Body The extension-body used by the SAM extension to P2PP is as follows. Extension-Body = Extension-Message-Type | Arguments | Options Extension-Message-Type = –CreateTree | Join | JoinAccept | JoinConfirm | JoinDecline | JoinViaAMTGateway | JoinWithNativeLink | Leave | LeaveViaAMTGateway | Heartbeat | PublishAMTGateway | LookupAMTGateway | PublishPeerNMInfo | LookupPeerNMInfo | Reform Arguments = PID | GroupId | Key | SessionKey | AMT-GW –PID = PeerId | AdjacentPeerId | ChildPeerId | ParentPeerId Options = {Option}* Option = Name, Value

March 12, 2008© Copyright 2008 John Buford Discussion