Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
8621 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, MD
Advertisements

ASHA National Office Building 2011 AE Senior Thesis Ryan Dalrymple 5 th year Structural Option BAE/MAE Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby Photo Courtesy of Boggs.
The Optimus Signature Boutique Offices, India AE Senior Thesis 2013 Punit G. Das | Structural Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan.
Fraser Centre State College, PA Tyler Strange Structural Option Consultant: Dr. Thomas Boothby April 13, 2011 Tyler StrangeStructural Option Fraser Centre.
Carl Hubben – Structural Option Ae senior thesis Office Building-G EASTERN UNITED STATES.
The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Dr. Andres Lepage Steven Stein ROOSEVELT ISLAND SOUTHTOWN BUILDING.
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Jonathan E. Aberts Spring 2009
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Frank Burke Structural Option Sallie Mae HQ Reston, VA.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
LOCKWOOD PLACE BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Monica Steckroth- Structural Option.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Reading Structural Drawings
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option Office Building Washington, DC Nick Szakelyhidi Structural Option.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
TYPICAL member spot checks & alternate systems design study
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS Quantum II Corporate Headquarters Michael Sandretto Spring – 2007 Structural Option.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
BWI Hilton Hotel Thomas Sabol The Pennsylvania State University
Structural System Redesign Existing Conditions Proposal Gravity Design Lateral Design Cost Comparison Schedule Impact Conclusions.
The Odyssey Condominium Aaron Snyder Arlington, Virginia
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Gateway Plaza Wilmington, DE Elizabeth Hostutler Structural Option.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Lexington II at Market Square North, Washington D.C. Alexis Pacella – Structural Option.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
Shear Stresses in Concrete Beams
AE Senior Thesis 2009 U.S. Pharmacopeia Headquarters Consolidation Rockville, MD Analysis and Design of a Mild Reinforced One way slab with Post Tensioned.
The Executive Tower NW Washington DC Sean T Howard Structural Emphasis Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan æ Class of 2006 (Roof of the Federal Building, Chicago.
Chagrin Highlands Building One Beechwood, Ohio Branden J. Ellenberger - Structural Option Senior Thesis 2004.
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
John Pillar Hampton Inn & Suites National Harbor, Md Advisor: Dr. Memari Distinguished Speaker Series, Spring 2007.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
CBD Chemical Production Building Virginia, USA Christina DiPaolo │ Structural Option.
Hyatt Regency Pittsburgh International Airport Hiro McNulty Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Spring 2006.
R. Bryan Peiffer– Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Three PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh Pa.
Mountain State Blue Cross Blue Shield Headquarters
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Outline Introduction Structural Redesign Gravity System
Ryan Johnson - Structural Option
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
RiverView Condominiums II Chicago, IL
Presentation transcript:

Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari

Presentation Outline Background Information Project Goals Structural Depth  Existing Steel System  Redesigned Concrete System Construction Management Breadth  Steel Structural Estimate  Concrete Structural Estimate System Comparisons Final Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Project Information General Statistics Name: Washingtonian Center Location: Gaithersburg Maryland Size: 199,164 S.F. Function: Office Space Levels: Eight Floors Project Team Owner: Washington Property Company Architect: Wisnewski Blair and Associates LTD Structural: Echelon Engineering MEP: GHT Limited Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation

Site Located in Gaithersburg Maryland Previously Undeveloped Site 8 Acre Lot Planned Development Includes Two Office Buildings and a Parking Structure Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation

Thesis Goal “Determine the Best Structural Design For the Washingtonian Center” Goal Achieved By: 1. Redesigning the Structure Using Concrete Increase Leasable Space By Reducing Floor-to-Floor Heights So That An Additional Floor Can Be Added Beneath The 125’ Height Restriction 2. Comparing the Redesign to the Original Steel Design Structural Costs Leasing Revenue Construction Time Architectural Considerations Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation

Structural Depth: Existing System Core and Envelope Design Leasable Space Shown in Grey Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Typical Architectural Floor Plan: Floors 3-8 First Floor Architectural Plan

Structural Depth: Existing System Frame: Structural Steel Members Outer Bays: Typically W21x44 Spanning 45’- Spaced 10’ Inner Bays: Typically W14x22 Spanning 20’- Spaced 10’ Floor System: 20 Gage Composite Steel Deck: 3” Deep, 3.25” LW Topping Columns: Spliced at the 4 th and 7 th Levels Gravity Columns Range From W10x49-W12x96 Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Braced Frames Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation

Structural Depth: Existing System Braced Frame Elevation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Lateral Frame: 4 Identical Concentrically Braced Chevron Frames Located Around the Elevator Core Lateral Columns: Spliced at the 4 th and 7 th Levels W12x210 at Base, W12x106 in Middle, W12x65 at Top Braces: W10x77 at all Levels Beams: W18x50 at all Levels Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Braced Frame Locations

Structural Depth: PT-Floor Design Procedure  Ram Concept was used for design  Initial Tendon numbers/spacing based on 150 psi pre-compression  Balance 75% of dead load  Add stud rails at locations of punching shear failures  Jacking Stress= 0.8f pu  Total Losses at service loading= 19% Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: PT-Floor Banded Tendon Layout Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Banded Tendons: Initial Number Based 150 psi Pre-Compression in Band Strip Profile Height Initially 7” Over Columns Profile Height Initially 1” at Mid-span Number/Profiles Altered at Mid-Span to Balance 75% of Dead Load Additional Tendons Added at Locations of Tensile Failures

Structural Depth: PT-Floor Distributed Tendon Layout Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Distributed Tendons: Initial Number and Spacing Based 150 psi Pre-Compression Profile Height Initially 7” Over Columns Profile Height Initially 1” at Mid-span Profile Heights Altered at Mid-Span to Balance 75% of Dead Load Additional Tendons Added at Locations of Tensile Failures

Structural Depth: PT-Floor Latitude Mild Steel Reinforcement Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Mild Steel Reinforcement Added by requirements of ACI Top Bars: Typically #5 bars over supports extending at least 1/6 th span in each direction, distributed over design strip Bottom Bars: Typically #4 bars at mid-span extending at least 1/3 rd the span, distributed over design strip

Structural Depth: PT-Floor Longitude Mild Steel Reinforcement Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Mild Steel Reinforcement Added by requirements of ACI Top Bars: Typically #5 bars over supports extending at least 1/6 th span in each direction, distributed over design strip Bottom Bars: Typically #4 bars at mid-span extending at least 1/3 rd the span, distributed over design strip

Structural Depth: PT-Floor Supplemental Shear Reinforcement Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Stud Rail Detail

Structural Depth: Shear Walls Designed in Etabs  Service Model Sized Walls  Cracking Factors Initially Set to 1.0  Cracked Sections Changed to 0.5  Strength Model Designed Reinforcement  Cracking Factors Initially Set to 0.7  Cracked Sections Changed to 0.35 (ACI Section )  5000 psi concrete Shear Wall Location Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: Shear Walls Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: Columns  All columns designed to be the same size  Loads taken from the Etabs Strength Model  Designed in PCA Column  5000 psi Concrete Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: Foundations Design Procedure  Loads Taken From the Etabs Strength Model  Footings Designed Using PCA Mats  Where Individual Footings Intersected Combined Mat Footings Were Designed Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: Foundations Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: Analysis Drifts  Seismic-Allowable Story Drifts 0.02h  Wind-Allowable Building Drift h/400 Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Structural Depth: Analysis Building Modes and Fundamental Periods Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Construction Management Breadth Cost Analysis  Done Using Material Take-Off and RS Means for Material, Labor and Equipment Costs Steel Design Cost SummaryConcrete Design Cost Summary Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation

Construction Management Breadth Revenue From Leasing Office Space  Estimate was based on rental rate of $5/ Sq. Ft. Annually Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Cost Comparison Summary Expense/IncomeSteelConcreteDifference Structure$2,442,260.18$3,155, $713, Leasing Revenue/Year$778,325.00$877,825.00$99, Overall System Cost Comparison

Construction Management Breadth Construction Scheduling  Estimated Using RS Means and Professional Consultants Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Steel Construction Schedule: Total Time= 7 Weeks Concrete Construction Schedule: Total Time= 20 Weeks

Architectural Breadth  A Revit model of a possible interior office layout was made  Shows that the additional columns in concrete design don’t ruin the flexibility of the space Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Column Plan for Concrete Design Furniture Plan

System Comparison Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation CharacteristicSteel DesignConcrete Design Structural Cost Leasing Revenue Scheduling Time Open Floor Plan

Final Recommendation Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation Although the concrete design would provide additionally leasable space, the best solution for the Washingtonian Center is the original steel design.

Questions? Background InformationProject GoalsStructural DepthCM BreadthArchitectural BreadthSystem ComparisonFinal Recommendation Washingtonian Center: Final Thesis Presentation