U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Advertisements

Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
36 CFR 218.  Moves projects documented in an Environmental Assessment (EA)/Decision Notice (DN) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Record of Decision.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
40 CFR REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing.
Presented to: 2010 Airports Conference By: Sue McDonald With slides by Tom Klin, CH2M HILL Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Cumulative.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
The Role of State, Local and Tribal Governments in the Federal NEPA Process Presented by Susan E. Bromm Director, Office of Federal Activities United States.
1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.
 Department of Interior – Bureau of Land Management  USDA – Forest Service  CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
Planning Permission Process and Procedures
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is housed in the Executive Office of the President. Introduced.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Draft RMP/EIS. Objectives Write a draft land use plan and EIS. Issue a draft land use plan and EIS for public review.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
The National Environmental Policy Act
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Rob Adams Vice President, Landrum & Brown NEPA Essentials — Tools: E, B, Desk Reference,
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs)
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
Big Sandy Rancheria Band of Western Mono Indians Casino and Resort Project Draft EIS Public Hearing Wednesday, February 2, p.m. – 9 p.m. Foothill.
Canada’s Federal Environmental Assessment Regime Presentation to the Forum of Federations Environmental Assessment Conference Ottawa, Canada September.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Tier 1 Module 4 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 3: Public Participation.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Environmental Review for Grant Projects Montana Coal Board December 2014.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs) How Do I Prepare.
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Presentation transcript:

U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State and Public Involvement in the National Environmental Policy Act Process & Introduction to Cumulative Effects NOAA Office of Program Planning & Integration Jay Nunenkamp, NOAA NEPA Policy and Training Coordinator December 3, 2014

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Part 1 State and Public Involvement in the NEPA Process 2

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N What is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)? 3 Signed into law on January 1, 1970, NEPA: –Established a national policy for considering environmental effects during federal decision-making –Established a White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA requires all federal agencies to understand the environmental impacts of their actions before making a decision on whether or not to implement that action.

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Who must conduct NEPA? 4 Only federal agencies are required to comply with NEPA. Other actors, such as state and local governments, universities, and private individuals do not need to comply with NEPA, although there are several opportunities for them to become involved in an agency’s NEPA process.

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N So, what are the rules? 5 The NEPA process to be followed by all federal agencies is specified in the CEQ regulations at 40 CFR ( implementing-procedural-provisions-nepa ) implementing-procedural-provisions-nepa Each federal agency will also have its own specific set of regulations detailing how that agency will conduct the NEPA process. These regulations must conform to the CEQ regulations cited above, but will vary in their details.

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N When is NEPA triggered? NEPA addresses any federal action that is potentially subject to an agency’s control and responsibility. 6 © IOOS Program

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N When is NEPA triggered? KEY POINT – NEPA starts with the need to make a decision. In the course of the NEPA process, the agency determines the environmental consequences of that decision. It ends when the agency has made that decision. The CEQ regulations and the specific agency regulations specify how they will conduct, share, and document the analysis of those environmental consequences. 7

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N How is NEPA analysis documented? 1) Categorical Exclusion Documents -Used when the agency determines that the environmental impacts of an action have no potential to be significant. 2) Environmental Impact Statements -Used when the agency expects the environmental effects of an action to be significant. 3) Environmental Assessments -Used to help the agency determine whether or not the environmental effects of the action will be significant. 8

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N What is a Categorical Exclusion? A Categorical Exclusion (CE) is a category of actions that the agency has determined has no potential to significantly affect the environment. Agency-specific NEPA regulations will describe the kinds of activities that may be categorically excluded. Typically there is no opportunity for agency cooperation or public involvement in the application of a CE. 9

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Environmental Impact Statements Prepared for actions with significant effects on the environment. Includes mandatory public notices and opportunities for public involvement, including scoping periods, public comment periods, and notices in locations such as the Federal Register, local newspapers, and websites. May include opportunities for cooperation between agencies and tribes - depending on the subject matter, location of the action, etc. 10

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Environmental Assessments (EA) An agency must prepare an EIS if a proposed action will have significant effects on the environment. Otherwise, they may prepare an EA. What is a significant effect? (40 CFR ) - context - intensity EA may end in a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or in a determination that an EIS is required. The level of agency cooperation and public involvement in an EA process varies by agency and action – check the agency’s specific NEPA regulations. 11

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Forms of State and Public Involvement There are two common forms of state and public involvement in the NEPA process 1.Formal cooperation for agencies and tribes that are involved in the action or knowledgeable in the action or its effects. 2.Public scoping and comment for any agency, tribe, organization, or member of the public. 12

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Involvement through formal cooperation Cooperating agencies complete the NEPA process together through a formal, written agreement. Cooperation is potentially time-consuming, but allows for the most robust involvement in the NEPA process. Potential cooperating agencies include: federal, state, or local government agencies or federally-recognized Indian tribes that propose (or are involved in) the same action or group of actions, or have relevant knowledge or expertise. May not cooperate: corporations, private companies, non- governmental organizations, universities, researchers, or other individuals. These groups may participate through public scoping and public comment periods. 13

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Involvement through public scoping and comment Anyone may become involved through the public scoping and comment process. Public Scoping determines the range of issues (such as the impacts and alternatives) to be considered in the NEPA process. It occurs at the beginning of the EIS (and potentially the EA) process. Public Comment occurs following the release of the draft EIS or EA. The public may also comment after the Final EIS or EA. Agencies may hold public meetings, or might rely on Federal Register notices, websites, or local newspaper announcements for scoping and comment. 14

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N What is the public comment period? CEQ requires that certain NEPA documents be released to the public for review and comment. –Draft Environmental Assessments: may be released - depends on agency regulations, context, and public interest. The usual time period is 30 calendar days. –Draft Environmental Impact Statements: must be released for at least 45 calendar days. Agencies must assess and consider comments both individually and collectively. Agencies shall respond to public comments, which must be disclosed in the Final EIS. 15

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Part 2 Introduction to Cumulative Effects 16

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N What are Cumulative Effects? CEQ defines cumulative impacts as “the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of time.” (40 CFR ) 17

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Why are Cumulative Effects Relevant? Your collective, local knowledge of “past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions” located in and around Lake Superior could represent a valuable resource to federal agencies working in your area. By making this resource available to federal agencies, your Working Group can position itself as a partner for federal agencies in need of local expertise. In exchange, the Working Group becomes involved in the federal planning process. 18

N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Examples of Actions Considered in a Cumulative Effects Assessment Type, location, and extent of marine traffic Recent pollutant releases Coastal development projects underway or planned (e.g., residential subdivisions, commercial centers) Local economic projects / conditions Changes in local land use (e.g., agriculture, parks or preserved areas) as they affect water quality Research on climate effects as they affect Lake Superior 19