I NTEGRATED L IGHT V EHICLE M ODEL D EPLOYMENT R ESEARCH P ROJECT U PDATE ITS-JPO Public Workshop September 24, 2013 Mike Lukuc, NHTSA Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Animal Tracking Component Private and State Animal Tracking Databases (ATD) Animal Trace Processing System (ATPS) National Animal Identification System.
Advertisements

1 V2V Safety Research for Heavy Commercial Vehicles 2013 ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting Arlington, VA September 24, 2013 Alrik L. Svenson National.
GrooveSim: A Topography- Accurate Simulator for Geographic Routing in Vehicular Networks 簡緯民 P
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
ITS Joint Program Office 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 24, 2013 Walton Fehr.
Model Deployment Overview ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting September 24, 2012 JOHN HARDING, NHTSA.
Matthew Smith Results of the SAVE-IT Program Matthew R Smith Gerald J Witt Debi L. Bakowski May 13, 2008.
Caltrans Interests in Connected Vehicles
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Alrik L. Svenson US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration IntelliDrive.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Development of a Portable Work Zone Traffic Safety Information System using DSRC Based V2I and V2V Communication.
Human Factors Research Issues for Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems (CICAS) Vicki Neale, Ph.D. Director, Center for Vehicle-Infrastructure.
1. Overview Background Introduction to IntelliDrive SM Preliminary Research/Proof of Concept Potential Applications –Safety –Mobility –Commercial The.
Understanding Network Failures in Data Centers: Measurement, Analysis and Implications Phillipa Gill University of Toronto Navendu Jain & Nachiappan Nagappan.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives ITS Midwest Annual Meeting February 7, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. Statewide ITS Program Manager Michigan Department.
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
Safety Pilot Model Deployment Lessons Learned Connected Vehicle Public Meeting September 24, 2013 Kevin Gay USDOT / RITA.
National VII Architecture – Data Perspective Michael Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office US Department of Transportation TRB 2008 Annual Meeting Session.
1. This seminar paper is based upon the project work being carried out by the collaboration of Delphi- Delco Electronics (DDE) and General Motors Corporation.It.
Telematics & Automatic Crash Notification Michigan Traffic Safety Summit February 28, 2006.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Meeting of State Pooled Fund Partners April 20, 2005 "Reducing Crashes at Rural Intersections: Toward a Multi-State Consensus on Rural Intersection Decision.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
Department of Information Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong A Framework for Monitoring and Measuring a Large-Scale Distributed System in.
Eric Eiswerth Safety Research Project Manager FORD AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY OFFICE 2011 AASHTO Annual Meeting The Vehicle of the Future: Greener, Safer, Smarter.
Doc.: IEEE ae Submission Jan Kenney – Toyota/VSC3Slide 1 Case Study for reduced priority management frames – Vehicular Safety.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
IntelliDrive SM Vehicle Safety Communications Working Toward V2V Deployment John Harding July 20, 2010.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development Executing the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Research Program: Enabling Technology September 25, 2013 Deborah.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
IntelliDriveSM Update
C OLLABORATIVE V2V S ECURITY R ESEARCH U PDATE ITS-JPO Public Workshop September 24, 2013 Mike Lukuc, NHTSA Research.
IntelliDriveSM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Monique Evans Director, FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
Research Elements of Integrated Vehicle Based Safety Systems Jack Ference, IVBSS Technical Manager ITS America Annual Meeting May, 2005.
Michigan VII: Technology Improving Lives Safety Summit Lansing, MI February 28, 2006 Gregory D. Krueger ITS Program Manager Michigan Department of Transportation.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Stephanie C. Binder National Highway Traffic Safety Administration US Department of Transportation Human Factors.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
DSRC Coexistence Date: Authors: November 2013 April 2009
John Harding ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting
A Vehicle Manufacturer’s Perspective on VII Christopher Wilson ITS Oregon- Feb 1, 2005 Christopher Wilson.
C OLLABORATIVE V2V S ECURITY R ESEARCH U PDATE ITS-JPO Public Workshop September 24, 2013 Mike Lukuc, NHTSA Research.
New Services in Mobility: C-ITS
Driver-Vehicle Interface Design Principles Chris Monk September 24, 2013.
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
The U.S. Department of Transportation and the Next Generation Jenny Hansen – Contractor – NG9-1-1 Project Coordinator USDOT – NHTSA.
The Business of V2X Connectivity June 5, 2013 Telematics Update Detroit TRACK 4: V2X & The Autonomous Car Track – Sapphire Ballroom Steven H. Bayless,
I NTEGRATED L IGHT V EHICLE M ODEL D EPLOYMENT R ESEARCH P ROJECT U PDATE ITS-JPO Public Workshop September 24, 2013 Mike Lukuc, NHTSA Research.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
DSRC C OMMUNICATIONS S CALABILITY R ESEARCH U PDATE ITS-JPO Public Workshop September 24, 2013 Mike Lukuc, NHTSA Research.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
ITS: The Next Generation Shelley Row Director Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
Connected and Automated Vehicles April 28, 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
Security and privacy for a connected vehicle environment
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
On-board Technologies
SAE DSRC Technical Committee work and outlook
V2X Applications Dr. Faroog Ibrahim Executive Director: ADAS
Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office
Connected Vehicle Reference Implementation Architecture (CVRIA)
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July 2007 doc.: IEEE p Jan Case Study for reduced priority management frames – Vehicular Safety Communication Date:
On-board Technologies
DSRC Coexistence Date: Authors: November 2013 April 2009
Presentation transcript:

I NTEGRATED L IGHT V EHICLE M ODEL D EPLOYMENT R ESEARCH P ROJECT U PDATE ITS-JPO Public Workshop September 24, 2013 Mike Lukuc, NHTSA Research

2 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation V2V-Model Deployment (MD) Project is a collaborative effort between the Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership Vehicle Safety Communications 3 (CAMP VSC3) Consortium and the US DOT V2V MD Collaborative Research Overview AUTOMOTIVE EVENTS

3 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Build and maintain sixty-four integrated light vehicles for Safety Pilot Model Deployment Harvest data monthly for the independent evaluation of safety applications Establish BSM minimum performance requirements based upon Safety Pilot data analysis V2V Model Deployment Project

4 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Integrated Vehicle Builds

5 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation V2V Model Deployment Safety Applications EEBL: Emergency Electronic Brake LightsDNPW: Do Not Pass Warning FCW: Forward Collision WarningIMA: Intersection Movement Assist BSW/LCW: Blind Spot Warning/Lane Change WarningLTA: Left Turn Assist OEM/ApplicationsFordGMHondaMercedesToyota Hyundai- Kia NissanVW-Audi EEBLXXXXXX FCWXXXXXXX BSW / LCWXXXXXX X (BSW) DNPWXXX IMAXXXXXX LTAX

6 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation DAS Components Camera & Radar Views

7 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Event Examples FCW FCW

8 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Event Examples BSW BSW

9 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation ILV Data Harvest Summary Data Export Facts: Database Size: 361 GB Video Size: 10.3 TB Harvest:Trips: In Queue TOTAL85366

10 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Remote Monitoring All vehicles are remotely monitored via cell link Study parameters are tracked to ensure exposure is sufficient Systems are scheduled for repair when anomalies detected

11 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation CAMP VSC 3 OEM Alert Analysis Alerts are being classified into the following categories: True Positives Valid Nuisance Alert False Positives, with the following as potential root causes: Algorithmic Road Geometry (curved roads, overpass/underpass, cloverleaf) Environmental (challenging GPS conditions, VAD/ASD installation misconfigurations, etc.) System synchronization errors Unknown Model Deployment Data provides a rich set of connected vehicle naturalistic data that will guide future development Safety application and warning timing refinement Minimum performance requirements/standards

12 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation IMA improvements from Phase I to Phase II Host Vehicle on ramp Remote Vehicle on ramp Overpass Example IMA false alert scenarios observed during Phase I and eliminated in Phase II

13 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation VAD/ASD Performance Characterization Safety Application Level Testing: Integrated Light Vehicle (ILV) application performance against ASDs / VADs Characterize w.r.t Basic Safety Message (BSM) elements Update of Minimum Performance Requirements (MPR) Tests Conducted: Sep 2012 VAD Tests (Ann Arbor & Brooklyn) Acceleration and Speed Filtering Recommendation April 2013 VAD/ASD Tests (Ann Arbor & Fowlerville) Application Performance Relative Positioning Performance BSM Element Performance

14 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Primary focus is Application Testing: Integrated light vehicles as host vehicles Target Vehicles with ASD/VADs mounted as recommended in Model Deployment Performance: Summary of Safety Application Tests

15 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Device Under Test (DUT) Route:ILV2X1(VAD)X2 (VAD)Y (VAD)Z (ASD) Freeway Local Local Positioning Across Path (In-Lane Target Classification) Classification based on relative lateral position Percentage of “Ahead” classification at speeds above 15mph: HV RV X1, X2, Y, Z, WSU WSU

16 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Phase 2 Of Model Deployment Over-the-Air Security Credential Management Sixteen vehicles were equipped with a Security Framework Access Device (SFAD) 2 per OEM: 1 DSRC, 1 3G-based Forty-seven non-SFAD equipped vehicles Use short term certificates preloaded on USB drives Vehicles configured for 28-day short term cert batches, subsequent batches requested starting at 21-days Security health monitoring being performed using a variety of data source Local data harvested from vehicle SFAD (monthly) Health checks provided by DAS over 3G modem (per drive cycle) SCMS activity logs (monthly or on request to SAIC )

17 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation 3G vs. DSRC Certificate Downloads Download Times3G Avg (Total 21)DSRC Avg (Total 31) Model Deployment 1 43s (12 – 325s)76s (16 – 217s) Benchmark Tests (Jan 2013)51s45s (moving) / 16s (static) Background 28-day certificate batches (~2.7MB) Average download times do not include certificate generation time Conclusions 3G/DSRC infrastructure reliability key to end user security performance Phase 2 SCMS downtime biggest factor in failed certificate requests/downloads Phase 2 RSE outages limited DSRC availability for security functions Certificate batch download performance impacted by: Vehicle in motion Connection quality to infrastructure (distance / line-of-sight) Peak hour congestion (rush hour commute / major thoroughfare) 3G downloads on average 1.76x faster than DSRC 1 Harvests 6 – 9 (April – July)

18 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Summary Initial results show that VADs are capable of acceptable performance with obvious improvements possible MD Data and Analysis is available for use by all OEMs for future V2V safety application development MD environment characterization is critical to V2V safety application performance analysis Certification procedures need to be developed based on MD experience for successful deployment

19 This is US Government work and may be copied or distributed without permission U.S. Department of Transportation Questions? Mike Lukuc NHTSA Research