Course on Professionalism Statement of Principles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revenue Recognition Construction-Type and Production –Type Contracts
Advertisements

Movie Ticket, $8; Popcorn, $5; Pay-as- you Drive Insurance, $1.10 Chet Szczepanski Chief Actuary Pennsylvania Insurance Department.
CAS Seminar on Ratemaking Introduction to Ratemaking Relativities March 13-14, 2006 Salt Lake City Marriott Salt Lake City, Utah Presented by: Brian M.
1 PROVISIONS FOR PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (MIS-35) Seminar on Ratemaking Nashville, TNRuss Bingham March 11-12, 1999Hartford Financial Services.
Course on Professionalism ASOP 43 – Property / Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates.
Assignment Nine Actuarial Operations.
Legislative Audit Division Audit and Rate Review.
Tillinghast–Towers Perrin Montana State Fund The Role of Surplus Senate Bill 304 Study Committee September 23, 2003 Presented by: Robert F. Conger, FCAS,
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Skit on Ratemaking Committee on Professionalism Education.
*connectedthinking  Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Sabine Wuiame.
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF BANGLADESH ICAB CPE on Insurance Accounts under IFRS 4 Presented by: Md Shahadat Hossain, FCA October 28, 2008.
1 Ken Fikes, FCAS, MAAA Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science November 2005.
1 Math 479 Casualty Actuarial Mathematics Fall 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Professor Rick Gorvett Session 7: Ratemaking I September.
54 th Annual June Conference Reporting entities are required to file a supplement to the annual statement titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”
Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education.
1 RCM-1 Broadening and Evolving the Ratemaking Role in Insurance Company Management Russ BinghamRatemaking Seminar Vice President Actuarial Research Atlanta,
FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORTING Ioana Abrahams 13 November 2009.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Insurance Company Operations.
Profit Provisions Should Not Be a Function of the Firm Lee Van Slyke Provisions for Profits and Contingencies Casualty Actuarial Society Ratemaking Conference.
Non-Life Loss Reserving Practices and Documentation IAIS – ASSAL Training Seminar April 29, 2009 David Oakden.
Auditing Fair Value Measurements. 2 General Challenges presented to auditors:  Obtain a sufficient understanding of the entity’s processes and relevant.
Basic Track I 2007 CLRS September 2007 San Diego, CA.
MROC Munich Re Group P&C Loss Reserve Discounting Canadian Perspective Spring Meeting Quebec City June 18, 2008 Claudette Cantin.
1 Actuarial Evaluation of Premium Liabilities By:Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Partner – KPMG LLP CLRS - Minneapolis September 19th, 2000.
Ratemaking: An ERM Function CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 13 & 14, 2006 Russ Bingham, Hartford Curt Parker, Grange Mutual John Kollar, ISO.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
1 CLRS Basic Track I Basic Track I 1998 CLRS September 28, 1998 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ratemaking ASOPS By the CAS Committee on Professionalism Education.
Traditional Actuarial Roles – Putting It All Together in an ERM (and EOM) Framework CAS Spring Meeting June 18, 2007 John Kollar, Russ Bingham, Hartford.
SUVs and Automobile Insurance Costs SUV Drivers Have Different Underlying Liability Loss Costs Michael C. Dubin, FCAS, MAAA, MCA 1999 CAS Seminar on Ratemaking.
May 18, 2004CAS Spring Meeting1 Demand Based Pricing: A Company Perspective CAS Spring Meeting May 18, 2004 Floyd M. Yager, FCAS, MAAA Allstate Insurance.
1 Welcome To The IEI-Sponsored Insurance Workshop MTSU June 4-6, 2007.
IAS 18 : Revenue The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (Set up by an Act of Parliament)
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
Loss Reserves from the Actuarial, Accounting and IRS Perspectives Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
1 METODOLOGÍAS Y PRÁCTICAS EN RESERVAS TÉCNICAS PARA SEGUROS DE SALUD Y SEGUROS GENERALES LIMA - 31 DE MAYO, 2007 APESEG Presentado por: APESEG & Milliman,
© 2005 Towers Perrin March 10, 2005 Ann M. Conway, FCAS, MAAA Call 3 Ratemaking for Captives & Alternative Market Vehicles.
Financial Audit Autonomous Bodies AS 1 and 4 Session Accounting Standards.
March 9-10, 2000 The Contest - Part I CAS Seminar on Ratemaking SPE - 47 Thomas L. Ghezzi, FCAS, MAAA Katharine Barnes, FCAS, MAAA.
Slide 1 Basic Track III 2001 CLRS September 2001 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA Iowa Actuaries Club, February 9, 2004.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009.
Estimation and Application of Ranges of Reasonable Estimates Charles L. McClenahan, FCAS, MAAA 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Insurance Company Operations.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
The Chubb Corporation 2005 Update on Asbestos Reserves Date of release 01/31/2006.
Accounting Implications of Finite Reinsurance Contracts 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, IL Session 4 – Recent Developments in Finite Reinsurance.
IRS/Actuary Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
1 A Stochastic Approach to Recognizing Profits of Finite Products Jeffrey W. Davis, FCAS, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Society Reinsurance Seminar July 2001.
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Munich Reinsurance Company of Canada September 14, 2004 Las Vegas Session 7 Loss Reserve.
Casualty Actuarial Society Insurance Accounting for Actuaries May 17, 2005  Presented by: Kevin Wick, FCAS, MAAA.
The Price Is Right (A.K.A. Optimal Pricing) Chet Szczepanski Chief Actuary Pennsylvania Insurance Department.
1 PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES IN RATEMAKING (FIN - 12) Russ Bingham Vice President and Director of Corporate Research Hartford Financial Services Seminar.
Chapter 4 Measurement PowerPoint Presentation by Matthew Tilling ©2012 John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd.
Aggregate margins in the context of level premium term life insurance Results of a study sponsored by the Kansas Insurance Department Slides prepared by.
1 RISK AND RETURN: DEBATING ALTERNATIVE MODELING “APPROACHES” (FIN - 10) Russ Bingham Vice President and Director of Corporate Research Hartford Financial.
1$1001 2$2002 3$3003 4$5004 6$2,0006 7$4,0007 8$8,0008 9$16, $50, $100, $250, $500, $1, $25, $1 Million15.
Basic Track I 2008 CLRS September 2008 Washington, DC.
Chapter 9 Impairment of Assets.
Casualty Actuaries of New England
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
Valuation and Forecasting
Risk adjustment (margin)
Discussion Draft of Proposed Revision to 1988 Statement of Principles Regarding Property and Casualty Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves May 16,
Accounting for general insurance contracts
New Approach to Ratemaking & Reserving
Presentation transcript:

Course on Professionalism Statement of Principles

2 Introduction Statement of Principles for Ratemaking, Loss Reserving, Valuations and Risk Classification Statement of Principles for Ratemaking, Loss Reserving, Valuations and Risk Classification Specific guidance on definitions, principles, considerations, and conclusions Specific guidance on definitions, principles, considerations, and conclusions Template for items to include in the documentation Template for items to include in the documentation

3 Ratemaking - Definitions Incurred Losses Incurred Losses ALAE / ULAE ALAE / ULAE Commission and brokerage expenses Commission and brokerage expenses Other Acquisition expenses Other Acquisition expenses Taxes, licenses and fees Taxes, licenses and fees Policyholder Dividend Policyholder Dividend General Expenses General Expenses Underwriting profit and Contingency provisions Underwriting profit and Contingency provisions

4 Ratemaking - Principles 1: A rate is an estimate of the expected value of future costs 1: A rate is an estimate of the expected value of future costs 2: A rate provides for all costs associated with the transfer of risk 2: A rate provides for all costs associated with the transfer of risk 3: A rate provides for the costs associated with an individual risk transfer 3: A rate provides for the costs associated with an individual risk transfer 4: A rate is reasonable and not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory if it is an actuarially sound estimate of the expected value of all future costs associated with an individual risk transfer 4: A rate is reasonable and not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory if it is an actuarially sound estimate of the expected value of all future costs associated with an individual risk transfer

5 Ratemaking - Considerations Data – relevance, organization, homogeneity, credibility Data – relevance, organization, homogeneity, credibility Loss development, trends, catastrophes, policy provisions, mix of business Loss development, trends, catastrophes, policy provisions, mix of business Reinsurance, operational changes, external factors Reinsurance, operational changes, external factors Class plans, individual risk rating Class plans, individual risk rating Actuarial judgment Actuarial judgment

6 Question #1 Which of the following are required for a rate to be reasonable and not excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory: A: A rate needs to be an estimate of the expected value of future costs A: A rate needs to be an estimate of the expected value of future costs B: A rate needs to provide for all costs associated with the transfer of risk B: A rate needs to provide for all costs associated with the transfer of risk C: A rate needs to provide for the costs associated with an individual risk transfer C: A rate needs to provide for the costs associated with an individual risk transfer D: All of the above D: All of the above

7 Loss Reserving - Definitions Loss reserve Loss reserve Case reserve Case reserve Provision for future development on known claims Provision for future development on known claims Reopened claims Reopened claims Provision for claims incurred but not reported Provision for claims incurred but not reported Claims in transit Claims in transit Loss adjustment expenses Loss adjustment expenses

8 Loss Reserving - Principles 1: Actuarially sound loss reserve …is a provision, … for the unpaid amount required to settle all claims, whether reported or not, …. 1: Actuarially sound loss reserve …is a provision, … for the unpaid amount required to settle all claims, whether reported or not, …. 2: Actuarially sound loss adjustment expense reserve …is a provision, … for the unpaid amount required to settle all claims, whether reported or not, …. 2: Actuarially sound loss adjustment expense reserve …is a provision, … for the unpaid amount required to settle all claims, whether reported or not, ….

9 Loss Reserving – Principles (continued) 3: The uncertainty inherent in the estimation… implies that a range of reserves can be actuarially sound 3: The uncertainty inherent in the estimation… implies that a range of reserves can be actuarially sound 4: The most appropriate reserve within a range… depends on both the relative likelihood of estimates and the financial reporting context 4: The most appropriate reserve within a range… depends on both the relative likelihood of estimates and the financial reporting context

10 Question #2 Which is not true for the following question: The most appropriate reserve within a range depends on: Which is not true for the following question: The most appropriate reserve within a range depends on: A. The size of the reserve A. The size of the reserve B. The relative likelihood of the estimates B. The relative likelihood of the estimates C. The financial reporting context C. The financial reporting context

11 Loss Reserving - Considerations Data – relevance, organization, homogeneity, credibility, availability Data – relevance, organization, homogeneity, credibility, availability Loss development, trends, catastrophes, freq/severity mix of business, form of coverage Loss development, trends, catastrophes, freq/severity mix of business, form of coverage Reinsurance, operational changes, external factors, discounting Reinsurance, operational changes, external factors, discounting Uncertainty, reasonableness, methodology Uncertainty, reasonableness, methodology Standards of practice Standards of practice

12 Valuations - Definitions Valuation Valuation Risk bearer Risk bearer Cashflow Cashflow Asset Asset Obligation Obligation Consideration Consideration

13 Valuations - Principles 1: Every obligation, consideration or asset is associated with one or more items of cash flow 1: Every obligation, consideration or asset is associated with one or more items of cash flow 2: Value of every item depends on: 2: Value of every item depends on: Occurrence Occurrence Amount Amount Timing Timing Interest rate Interest rate 3: Degree of uncertainty depends on: 3: Degree of uncertainty depends on: Nature Nature Environment (regulatory, judicial, social, financial) Environment (regulatory, judicial, social, financial) Predictive value Predictive value

14 Valuations - Principles 4: Value of items … are not only uncertain, they are also not independent of each other. Uncertainty should reflect interactions 4: Value of items … are not only uncertain, they are also not independent of each other. Uncertainty should reflect interactions 5: Value of every item is equal to the combined values of its constituent items of cash flow 5: Value of every item is equal to the combined values of its constituent items of cash flow 6: Result of a valuation is the combined value of the items involved with due recognition of receipts and disbursements 6: Result of a valuation is the combined value of the items involved with due recognition of receipts and disbursements

15 Valuations – Principles (continued) 7: Principles can apply to all items or only specific segments 7: Principles can apply to all items or only specific segments Commitments made on or before valuation date Commitments made on or before valuation date Commitments made after the valuation date Commitments made after the valuation date Both Both

16 Valuations - Considerations Data – relevance, organization, homogeneity, credibility Data – relevance, organization, homogeneity, credibility Operating conditions, Environmental, Loss and LAE Operating conditions, Environmental, Loss and LAE Rules and Assumptions, Valuation variables Rules and Assumptions, Valuation variables Uncertainty Uncertainty Interaction with other professionals Interaction with other professionals Actuarial Judgment Actuarial Judgment

17 Valuations - Considerations Valuation Risk Valuation Risk Asset Risk - The risk that the occurrence, amount or timing of items of cash flow connected with assets will differ from that anticipated as of the valuation date for reasons other than a change in the interest environment Asset Risk - The risk that the occurrence, amount or timing of items of cash flow connected with assets will differ from that anticipated as of the valuation date for reasons other than a change in the interest environment Obligation and Consideration Risk - The risk that the occurrence, amount or timing of items of cash flow connected with obligations and considerations will differ from that anticipated as of the valuation date for reasons other than a change in the interest environment Obligation and Consideration Risk - The risk that the occurrence, amount or timing of items of cash flow connected with obligations and considerations will differ from that anticipated as of the valuation date for reasons other than a change in the interest environment

18 Valuations - Considerations Interest Risk – The risk that different amounts of change in the anticipated values, and the degree of uncertainty therein, of obligations and of the assets and considerations with which the obligations are being compared will occur due to changes in the interest environment Interest Risk – The risk that different amounts of change in the anticipated values, and the degree of uncertainty therein, of obligations and of the assets and considerations with which the obligations are being compared will occur due to changes in the interest environment

19 Question #3 Which of the following is not considered a Valuation Risk? Which of the following is not considered a Valuation Risk? A. Asset Risk A. Asset Risk B. Parameter Risk B. Parameter Risk C. Obligation & Consideration Risk C. Obligation & Consideration Risk D. Interest Rate Risk D. Interest Rate Risk

20 Risk Classification - Purpose Protection of Program’s Financial Soundness Protection of Program’s Financial Soundness Primary solvency threat is through adverse selection Primary solvency threat is through adverse selection Enhanced Fairness Enhanced Fairness Economic Incentive Economic Incentive

21 Risk Classification - Principles 1.System should reflect expected cost differences. 2.System should distinguish among risks on the basis of relevant cost-related factors. 3.System should be applied objectively. 4.System should be practical and cost effective. 5.System should be acceptable to the public.

22 Risk Classification - Considerations Underwriting Underwriting Marketing Marketing Program Design Program Design Includes degree of choice available to buyer, experience based pricing, and premium payer Includes degree of choice available to buyer, experience based pricing, and premium payer Statistical Considerations Statistical Considerations Homogeneity Homogeneity Credibility Credibility Predictive Stability Predictive Stability

23 Risk Classification – Considerations (continued) Operational Considerations Operational Considerations Expense Expense Constancy Constancy Availability of Coverage Availability of Coverage Avoidance of Extreme Discontinuities Avoidance of Extreme Discontinuities Absence of Ambiguity Absence of Ambiguity Manipulation Manipulation Measurability Measurability

24 Risk Classification – Considerations (continued) Hazard Reduction Incentives Hazard Reduction Incentives Public Acceptability Public Acceptability Not differentiate unfairly among risks Not differentiate unfairly among risks Based upon clearly relevant data Based upon clearly relevant data Respect personal privacy Respect personal privacy Risks tend to identify with their classification Risks tend to identify with their classification Causality Causality Controllability Controllability

25 Question #4 Which of the following is not one of the stated purposes of a risk classification system? Which of the following is not one of the stated purposes of a risk classification system? A. Enhance Fairness A. Enhance Fairness B. Full Employment of Actuaries B. Full Employment of Actuaries C. Protection of Financial Soundness of System C. Protection of Financial Soundness of System D. Promote economic incentives D. Promote economic incentives