Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
Advertisements

Jane Frankenberger Purdue University.  Opportunity for agreement -- Even people with widely divergent views can agree on numbers drawn from the literature.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico Spring 2013.
Scenario Analysis costs per acre for various practices estimate each fully applied practice for N or P then combine for N or P to reach 20 or 45% finally,
Flex Leases Land Bubble and Profitability Henderson County January 12, 2011 Greg Halich
Increased Ethanol Production Impacts on Minnesota Wetlands Dr. David Kelley University of St. Thomas 2013 Minnesota Wetlands Conference.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Practice – CP-39 Farmable Wetland Program Constructed Wetland.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
The Benefits of Investing In Conservation… …and the Costs of Not Investing Developed by Daniel Mountjoy USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Laura.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren.
Iowa Science Assessment of Nonpoint Source Practices to Reduce Phosphorus to the Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Reduction Strategy Phosphorus Science.
Eric G. Hurley, Nutrient Management Specialist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Agricultural Water Pollution: Some Policy Considerations Catherine Kling Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University Iowa Environmental.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Conservation Drainage: Drainage for the 21st Century
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Increasing No-Till Soybean Productivity with Cover Crops and/or Gypsum Randall Reeder Ext. Agricultural Engineer (retired) Food, Agr. and Biological Engineering.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Iowa Nutrient Reduction Science Assessment Cost Estimate and Outreach John D. Lawrence Associate Dean and Director Ag and Natural Resources Extension Iowa.
Economics of Precision Agriculture, What Technologies are Being Adopted and Why Danny Dallas Soil 4213.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
1 Land in: Other Uses In Transition In Switchgrass Crop Lifetime Net SG Addition Of Acres Acres in Switchgrass Yield from Ag R&D Ave Yield in Established.
SOIL CONDITION INDEX – (SCI) AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS AT THE FARM BUTMIR NEAR SARAJEVO Prof. Dr. Hamid Čustović Tvica Mirza.
CRP LAND: It’s in your hands. Many Contracts Set to Expire More than 1 million acres of CRP contracts are set to expire by October, 2009 More than 1 million.
Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner Agricultural Outlook Forum Washington, DC Michael Duffy Director, Iowa State University Beginning.
Soil Conservation. Erosion Two billion tons of U.S. soil lost annually Improved from Five billion tons in 1982 Conservation programs and voluntary conservation.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Perspectives on Impacts of the 2002 U.S. Farm Act Paul C. Westcott Agricultural Economist U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service April.
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Drainage and Nitrate Loss Matthew Helmers Dean’s Professor, College of Ag. & Life Sciences Professor, Dept. of Ag. and Biosystems Eng. Iowa State University.
Invest Nutrient Retention model Yonas Ghile.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Linking Land use, Biophysical, and Economic Models for Policy Analysis Catherine L. Kling Iowa State University October 13, 2015 Prepared for “Coupling.
Grain Profitability Outlook Cash Rents Land Values Greg Halich Univ. of Kentucky
Biofuel Policy Effects on Soil Erosion C. Robert Taylor, Auburn University Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M.
Using the ISU ACRE Calculator July 2009 Steven D. Johnson Farm & Ag Business Management Specialist (515)
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
Grain Profitability Outlook Cash Rents Land Values Greg Halich Univ. of Kentucky
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell August 8,
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
The state belongs to all of us - "Kansas Don't Spoil It"
Soil Conservation.
Iowa Conservation Practices:
Costs and Environmental Gains from Conservation Programs
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
retaiN Conservation Districts of Iowa Iowa State University
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Long-term Rotations ……
Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016
Soil Conservation.
Drainage Water Management
Cover Crops.
Prairie Strips.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Fall Ag Seminar Thursday • August 29, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning

Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy Voluntary, science-based State goal of 45% reduction of Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorous (P) Point sources achieve maximum biological removal rate: 4% N and 16% P Non-point source goal 41% N and 29% P

Cover Crops in the NRS

Nutrient Reduction Potential 31% reduction in nitrate 29% reduction in phosphorus

Example: Combination Scenarios that Achieve N and P Goal From Non-Point Sources From Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy: Goals for Nonpoint Sources is 41% reduction on Nitrogen and 29% reduction on Phosphorus Nitrate-N Reduction Phosphorus Reduction Initial Investment Total Equal Annualized Cost Statewide Average EAC Costs Practice/Scenario % (from baseline) (million $) (million $/yr)($/acre) MRTN Rate, 60% Acreage with Cover Crop, 27% of ag land treated with wetland and 60% of drained land has bioreactor 42303, MRTN Rate, 95% of acreage in Cover Crops, 34% of ag land in heavily tile drained land treated with wetland, and 5% land retirement 42501,2221,21458

Cost of Cover Crops Approximately $30+ per acre for seed, planting, and termination Costs offset by cost- share initially Can we estimate the value cover crops bring to the land?

How do you account for cover crop value in your operation?

Estimating the Value of Cover Crops Estimates of soil loss reductions On-farm research sites comparing cover and no- cover treatments

RUSLE2 Input field management practices and compare cover vs. no cover treatments Obtain soil loss in tons/acre/year

Soil Erosion Most sites in this study are no-till corn- soybean rotations Initial calculations range from 20-40% erosion reductions for the cover crop sites

Value Estimates Estimating change in land value and lost nutrients Based on protecting the soil from erosion

Soil Comparison Tama County –Tama 120C –Tama 120C2 Loss of 4” to change erosion phase 616 tons of soil per acre

Nutrient Value Topsoil is the most nutrient rich horizon Higher OM=higher nutrient content and value

Assumptions Nutrient value of soil just in the OM fraction ranges from $2-$10 per ton of soil In land value change calculations, cost of soil erosion averages $0.49 per ton Tim Smith

Cover Crop Scenarios ScenarioNo cover erosion rate Cover crop erosion rate DifferenceValue of retained soil by cover crop use 12 tons/acre1 ton/acre $6.06/acre 23 tons/acre1.5 tons/acre $9.09/acre 35 tons/acre2.5 tons/acre $15.15/acre

How long does it take to observe a return on investment in terms of soil quality, erosion reduction, or other factors?

Project Funding and Partners State Soil Conservation Committee Partners –USDA-ARS National Lab for Agriculture and the Environment –Practical Farmers of Iowa

Jamie Benning Liz Juchems