HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Public Review Administration and Finance Domain Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Overview Keith W. Boone Interoperability Architect, GE Healthcare Co-chair, IHE Patient Care Coordination PC.
Advertisements

Legal Work Group Developing a Uniform EHR/HIE Patient Consent Form.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.
0 Chicago, IL March 6 th, 2007 Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection HITSP Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection Date:
1 Operating Rules Status NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards December 3, 2010 Updated on enhancements to Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claim Status.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) for Medicare FFS Presentation to HITSC Provenance Workgroup January 16, 2015.
HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability 1 enabling healthcare interoperability 1 Standards Harmonization HITSP’s efforts to address HIT-related provisions.
HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Medication Gaps Public Review CAP117 – Communicate Ambulatory and LTC Prescription CAP118 – Communicate.
Health Information Technology Standards Panel Ed Mikoski 19MAR09 TIA Healthcare ICT Section Teleconference.
Project Update : Claims/Clinical Linkage Project MHDO Board of Directors June 6, 2013.
Massachusetts: Transforming the Healthcare Economy John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
This document and all other documents, materials, or other information of any kind transmitted or orally communicated by RxHub (or its members) in the.
1 Consolidated Health Informatics “CHI” HIPAA Summit March 9, 2004.
ISO/IEC MFI-4 Extended Registry Masaharu Obayashi SC32/WG
HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability 1 enabling healthcare interoperability 1 Standards Harmonization HITSP’s efforts to address HIT-related provisions.
AHCCCS/ASU Clinical Data Project March 17 th, 2009 Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Health System Medicaid Transformation Grant Program.
0 HITSP Technical Committee 2009 Project Plans 1/20 HITSP Panel HITSP 2009 TC Timeline Overview Note: Quality Measures, Consumer Preferences, Clinical.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
July 3, 2015 New HIE Capabilities Enable Breakthroughs In Connected And Coordinated Care Delivery. January 8, 2015 Charissa Fotinos.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
EsMD Background Phase I of esMD was implemented in September of It enabled Providers to send Medical Documentation electronically Review Contractor.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session Charter Discussion – 9:30am – 10:00am October 18, 2011.
Cross Domain Patient Identity Management Eric Heflin Dir of Standards and Interoperability/Medicity.
0 enabling healthcare interoperability 2009 Webinar Series Sponsored by the HITSP Education, Communications and Outreach Committee Presenters:Co-Chair.
What IHE Delivers Healthcare Provider Directories IHE IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Eric Heflin – Medicity/THSA.
HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Clinical Note Details Extension Public Review Capability 119 Communicate Structured Document Care Management.
E-Referral enabled collaborative health care Opportunities and considerations Presented by: Sasha Bojicic Emerging Technology Group Canada Health Infoway.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
1 HITSP General Lab Orders Public Review Communicate Lab Order Message Capability Provider Perspective TC | September 29, 2009 HITSP Capabilities Public.
0 Harmonization Process, Work Plan, and Schedule Chicago IL. March 5, 2007 HITSP Project 2007 Work Plan and Schedule Contract HHSP EC.
July 20, 2007 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Principles for Proper Use of HITSP Interoperability Specifications And Proposal for Proper.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe December 6, 2010.
RIDE ConsortiumRIDE Workshop, December 8, 2006, Brussels 1 The RIDE Roadmap Methodology and the Current Progress Prof. Dr. Asuman Dogac, Turkey Dr. Jos.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
1 HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts  For those unfamiliar with the HITSP Harmonization Framework.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
ePrescribing Functional Requirements
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,
Dynamic Document Sharing Detailed Profile Proposal for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting November 10, 2009.
0 Connectathon 2009 Registration Bob Yencha Webinar | August 28, 2008 enabling healthcare interoperability.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
1 Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel Care Delivery - IS01 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Laboratory Results Reporting July 6, 2007.
Clinical Operations Workgroup Update Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013.
Overview of ONC’s Consumer Preferences Requirements Document A HITSP eTown-Hall Meeting Presenters:Co-Chairs/Facilitators of the Consumer Preferences Tiger.
E-Prescribe: Adopting Health Care Information Technology ADG associates presenting: Barbara Antuna Jessica Carpenter Patrick Esparza Brian Frazior.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD)
Healthcare Information Standards Panel 2007,2008, and Beyond John D. Halamka MD Chair, HITSP.
Dynamic/Deferred Document Sharing (D3S) Profile for 2010 presented to the IT Infrastructure Technical Committee Karen Witting February 1, 2010.
July 27, 2007 HITSP Project Medications Management Use Case Presentation to CCHIT Steve Wagner and Scott Robertson.
May 2007 CTMS / Imaging Interoperability Scenarios March 2009.
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
What IHE Delivers Healthcare Provider Directories IHE IT Infrastructure Planning Committee Eric Heflin - Medicity.
Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel
HITSP Project Medications Management Use Case Presentation to CCHIT
Current Framework and Fundamental Concepts
HITSP 2009 TC Timeline Overview
Electronic Transactions Workshop
Electronic Transactions Workshop
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
e-Invoicing – e-Ordering 20/11/2008
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Health Information Exchange for Eligible Clinicians 2019
Presentation transcript:

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Public Review Administration and Finance Domain Technical Committee October 1,

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Requirements and Design Public Comment  Introduction  Schedule  Review of Capabilities  Technical Approach  Public Comment 2

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Requirements and Design Public Comment  Introduction  Schedule  Review of Capabilities  Technical Approach  Public Comment 3

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Introduction  The purpose of this Webinar is to provide a high-level overview of a HITSP proposed solution for exchanging prior-authorization information between a Pay Benefits Manager and a Provider or Pharmacy  Today we will be discussing the requirements section of the document. The capability and all associated HITSP constructs will be released for the traditional 4 week public comment period in early November 4

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Introduction – Co-Chairs and Staff Staff/Co-ChairContact Information Don Durwin Manick 5

Providing specifications that integrate diverse standards to meet clinical and business needs for sharing information: 1.Develop specifications that address broad stakeholder perspectives 2.Support testing and validation of specifications 3.Catalyze efforts of standards organizations to realize changes to address gaps and overlaps Enabling Interoperability between healthcare stakeholders Healthcare Information Technology Standards Program (HITSP) Specifying Standards needed to enhance care quality and contain costs 6HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

Base or Composite Standards Constructs (single purpose or reusable) Interoperability Specification (construct) Type 1: Base or Composite Standards HITSP Interoperability Specifications A complete IS set provides a framework that defines □ A hierarchy of constructs □ The role of each construct □ The relationship of one construct to another in the context of specific business and/or clinical requirements Interoperability Specification (Complete Set) 7HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

Capabilities and Service Collaborations HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar8 Keys to Simpler Definition and Implementation of HITSP Specifications

Service Collaboration (SC) □ Defines a standards-based secure infrastructure needed for interoperable information exchanges □ Includes a secure transport mechanism with topology and other options □ Uses HITSP Constructs to specify the secure infrastructure □ Does not specify the content of the information exchange but may include information to support the exchange (e.g., authorization information) HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar9

 Patient Identification  address/ distribution list Topology  System-to-System  Portable Media  System-to-HIE  HIE-to-HIE Service Collaboration Standards-based Secure Infrastructure Needed for Interoperable Information Exchanges 10HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar  Delivery notification  Patient consent Management

Service Collaborations □ SC108 - Access Control □ SC109 - Security Audit □ SC110 - Patient Identification Management □ SC111 - Knowledge and Vocabulary □ SC112 - Healthcare Document Management □ SC113 - Query for Existing Data □ SC114 - Administrative Transport to Health Plan □ SC115 - HL7 Messaging □ SC116 - Emergency Message Distribution Element 11HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

HITSP Capability □ Enables systems to address a business need for interoperable information exchange □ Bridges between business, policy and implementation views: – Defines a set of information exchanges at a level relevant to policy and business decisions – Supports stakeholder requirements and business processes – Defines information content and secure infrastructure – Specifies use of HITSP constructs sufficiently for implementation – Includes constraints and identifies specific network topologies 12HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

What is an example of a capability?  Requirement: An organization wants to exchange a prescription with an ambulatory organization  The diagram on the right shows how Capability 117 was assembled to support this requirement CAP117 – Communicate Ambulatory and Long Term Care Prescription System Roles Medication Order Prescriber Medication Order Filler Health Plan Health Information Exchange (HIE) I want to exchange a prescription with an Ambulatory or Long-Term Care (LTC) Organization 13HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

Existing HITSP Capabilities – Clinical Operations Clinical Operations Communicate Ambulatory and Long Term Care Prescription - CAP117 Communicate Hospital Prescription - CAP118 Communicate Clinical Referral Request - CAP121 Retrieve Genomic Decision Support - CAP125 Communicate Lab Results Message - CAP126 Communicate Lab Results Document - CAP127 Communicate Imaging Information - CAP128 Retrieve and Populate Form - CAP135 Communicate Encounter Information Message - CAP137 14HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

Existing HITSP Capabilities – Public Health and Emergency Response; Administration and Finance Administration and Finance Communicate Benefits and Eligibility - CAP140 Communicate Referral Authorization - CAP141 Public Health and Emergency Response Communicate Quality Measure Data - CAP129 Communicate Quality Measure Specification - CAP130 Update Immunization Registry - CAP131 Retrieve Immunization Registry Information - CAP132 Communicate Immunization Summary - CAP133 Communicate Emergency Alert - CAP136 Communicate Resource Utilization - CAP139 15HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

Existing HITSP Capabilities - Security, Privacy, and Infrastructure Security, Privacy, and Infrastructure Communicate Structured Document - CAP119 Communicate Unstructured Document - CAP120 Retrieve Medical Knowledge - CAP122 Retrieve Existing Data - CAP123 Establish Secure Web Access - CAP124 Retrieve Pseudonym - CAP138 Retrieve Communications Recipient - CAP142 Manage Consumer Preference and Consents - CAP143 16HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

 Patient Identification  address/ distribution list Topology  System-to-System  Portable Media  System-to-HIE  HIE-to-HIE  Patient consent Management Marrying Content Definition with Secure Infrastructure for a set of Interoperable information exchanges  Delivery notification Capability Service Collaboration Defining Content  Component Service Collaboration 17HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar

HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Requirements and Design Public Comment  Introduction  Schedule  Review of Capabilities  Technical Approach  Public Comment 18

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Schedule  Requirements for Prior-Authorization introduced to the Public via Webinar October 1 st  Comment feedback on the Requirements for this work item closes October 8 th – The process for submitting comments is included on slide 46 of this presentation  The Capability with all supporting constructs will be released for a 4 week Public Comment period in early November 19

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Requirements and Design Public Comment  Introduction  Schedule  Review of Capabilities  Technical Approach  Public Comment 20

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Definition of Capabilities  Capabilities provide the ability for two or more systems to address a business need for interoperable information exchange  The objective is to provide the bridge between the business, policy and implementation disciplines by: – Defining a set of information exchanges at a level relevant to policy and business decisions – Supporting stakeholder requirements and business processes by including information content, infrastructure, Security, Privacy – Specifying the use of HITSP constructs sufficiently for implementation – Including constraints and operating on specific network topologies (contexts)  Capabilities have topology and other options (e.g., point-to-point, portable media, system-to-HIE, HIE-to-HIE) 21

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar What is a capability?  Capabilities are specified using HITSP Constructs  As part of the HITSP Tiger Team effort addressing ARRA, Capabilities are meant to clearly state what types of data HITSP can and cannot “exchange”  During the ARRA Tiger Team effort, no new standards were selected, and no new constructs were specified to build capabilities Requirements Capability System Roles HITSP Constructs Orchestration of HITSP Constructs and System Roles 22

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Requirements and Design Public Comment  Introduction  Schedule  Review of Capabilities  Technical Approach  Public Comment 23

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Technical Approach of Capability 141  High level review of the purpose of this capability  Review of the requirements that have been defined 24

Purpose of Capability 141 □ Addresses interoperability requirements that support electronic inquiry and response for authorizing a health plan member to be referred for service by another provider or to receive a type of service or medication under the patient’s health insurance benefits. □ The Capability supports: – Transmittal of a patient and insurance identification information – Identification of the type of service or medication requested for benefit coverage – Communication of authorization number from the Payer System □ It provides clinicians and pharmacists with information about each patient’s medical insurance coverage and benefits. It may include information on referral or authorization permission HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar25

Why The Capability Was Developed □ Capability 141 was developed to enable: – Consumers and Providers to request prior-authorization for medical related encounters and medications – Payors to respond to such requests – Payors to provide: Non-patient specific guidelines for prior-authorization Patient specific guidelines for prior-authorization HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar26

Capability 141 Information Exchanges Information Exchange Identifier Exchange Action Exchange ContentConstraints Initiating Interface Responding Interface ARequest & Response HITSP/SC114 – Administrative Transport to Health Plan, and HITSP/EC68A – Health Plan Request None1, 32, 4 BRequest & Response HITSP/SC114 – Administrative Transport to Health Plan, and HITSP/EC68B – Health Plan Response None2, 41, 3 CRequest & Response HITSP/SC114 – Administrative Transport to Health Plan, and HITSP/EC79A – Health Plan Request None1, 32, 4 DRequest & Response HITSP/SC114 – Administrative Transport to Health Plan, and HITSP/EC79B – Health Plan Response None2, 41, 3 HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar27

Service Collaborations Included in Capability 114 Manage Consent Directives Access Control Secured Communic ation Channel Security Audit Entity Identity Assertion Document Integrity Non- Repudiatio n of Origin De- identificati on Integrated NA Option HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar  Uses HITSP/Service Collaboration 114  SC 114 contains the Security, Privacy, and Infrastructure functionality depicted in the table below  Also includes HITSP/T85 – Administrative Transport to Health Plan  T85 uses CAQH Phase II CORE #270 Connectivity Rule v2.0.0, which addresses the message envelope metadata and envelope standards, submitter authentication standards, and communications-level errors, and acknowledgements 28

INFORMATION EXCHANGE OPTIONS TopologyAvailable or NotOption Point-to-PointAvailableDirect Point-to-Point*NA Portable MediaNAPortable Media System-to-HIEAvailableSystem-to-HIE HIE-to-HIENAHIE-to-HIE HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar *NOTE: As the gaps are evaluated will be reconsidered 29

Capability 141 Requirements □ Detailed definition of the requirements, recommended solutions and identified gaps in the solutions may be found in Section 6 of the document □ The following slides provide a high-level overview of the requirements HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar30

Consumer Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis A. The ability for consumers to participate in prior- authorization processes and information exchange i. Consumers may need the ability to receive certain standardized payer or provider information related to prior- authorization within their PHR or similar systems. Examples include provider lists or eligibility coverage information for various services and frequency limitations Gap Provider List Eligibility Information Formulary and Benefits Information ASC X12 does not currently support consumers as receiver ASC X12 270/271 does not support consumer as receiver Formulary and benefits information – Gap, not currently designed to interact with a consumer HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar31

Consumer Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis A. The ability for consumers to participate in prior-authorization processes and information exchange ii. Consumers may need the ability to use their PHR or similar systems to communicate prior-authorization information to provider and/or payer systems. Examples include supplying medical history or prior coverage information Gap A, B Gap Prior -Auth Information Medical History Prior coverage information There are no current standards available today that include the consumer business actor function ASC X transaction may need additional functionality to support all medical history Prior coverage is NOT part of prior-authorization. We are wondering if this really means Prior Coverage, which would be supported today by 278 HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar32

Provider Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis B. The ability for providers to access standardized prior-authorization information and to incorporate and/or use the information within an EHR or related system i. The ability to receive non patient-specific prior-authorization information such as eligibility and reimbursement guidelines. Providers may receive more detailed information than the consumer for treatment, payment, and operations A, B (Gap ) C, D (Partial Gap) X12 does not support this function. Gap solution: Ask X12 to change 278 to allow health plan to send attachment of administrative guidelines. Alternative: Ask HL7 to develop a discrete CDA dataset for this purpose T79 Pharmacy to Health Plan Authorization uses the NCPDP Telecommunication Standard for real-time PA requests, PA billings, PA inquiries for pharmacies. Gap solution: NCPDP Formulary and Benefit standard exchange might be enhanced HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar33

Provider Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis B. The ability for providers to access standardized prior-authorization information and to incorporate and/or use the information within an EHR or related system ii. The ability to query for patient- specific prior- authorization criteria. The ability to review such information without actually submitting a prior- authorization request may reduce workflow disruption and help providers aid consumers in evaluating their treatment options A, B (Partial Gap) C, D T68 provides ASC X12 270/271 for eligibility/benefit inquiries. The eligibility transaction today cannot provide information about the P.A. criteria. It also does not provide alternative treatments. T79 Pharmacy to Health Plan Authorization uses the NCPDP Telecommunication Standard for real-time PA requests, PA billings, PA inquiries for pharmacies HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar34

Provider Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis B. The ability for providers to access standardized prior-authorization information and to incorporate and/or use the information within an EHR or related system iii. The ability to electronically submit patient- specific prior- authorization requests and related information to payers A, B C, D CAP141 refers to T68 for provider obtaining prior authorization from the Payer. (no changes needed) CAP141 refers to T79 for prescriber obtaining prior authorization from the PBM. (no changes needed) HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar35

Provider Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis B. The ability for providers to access standardized prior-authorization information and to incorporate and/or use the information within an EHR or related system iv. The ability to request a modification or extension of a previously approved prior- authorization A, B C, D CAP141 refers to T68 for provider obtaining prior authorization from the Payer. (no changes needed) CAP141 refers to T79 for prescriber obtaining prior authorization from the PBM. (no changes needed) HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar36

Provider Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis B. The ability for providers to access standardized prior-authorization information and to incorporate and/or use the information within an EHR or related system v. Providers may need the ability to communicate prior-authorization information to another provider A, B C, D Supported by CAP141 with T68 transaction Supported by CAP141 with T79 transaction Need to determine the business need for a pharmacy- to-pharmacy exchange of PA information HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar37

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems i. The ability to broadly disseminate certain types of non patient- specific information such as a list of eligible providers or different therapies. Medications may need prior- authorization and what types of accompanying information are typically needed for approval A, B (Partial Gap) A, B (Gap) C, D Provider List Procedures or therapies non patient- specific eligibility request by a consumer or provider Medications P- A T68 (ASC X12 274) supports a list of providers within a health plan There is an X12 gap for showing alternate therapies, treatment No standards available that include the consumer business actor function T79 depends on HITSP/TP46-Medication Formulary and Benefits Information to provide formulary and benefit information HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar38

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems ii. The ability to communicate patient-specific prior-authorization or eligibility information in response to consumer and/or provider queries B, A (Partial Gap) D, C (Partial Gap) Eligibility Information CAP141 refers to T68 for provider obtaining prior authorization from the Payer. The gap is support of the consumer CAP141 refers to T79 for prescriber obtaining prior authorization from the PBM. The gap is support of the consumer HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar39

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems iii. The ability to electronically receive prior- authorization request submissions from providers and/or consumers and to process these requests within payers or third party intermediary systems B, A (Partial Gap) D, C (Partial Gap) Prior- Authorization Information CAP141 refers to T68 for provider obtaining prior authorization from the Payer. The gap is support of the consumer CAP141 refers to T79 for prescriber obtaining prior authorization from the PBM. The gap is support of the consumer HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar40

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems iv. The ability to communicate a request for additional information such as clinical justification or treatment history in order to make a prior-authorization decision B, A (Partial Gap) D, C (Partial Gap) Diagnosis Medical History Medication History CAP141 refers to T68 for provider which supports this function CAP141 refers to T79 for prescriber which supports this function HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar41

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems v. The ability to electronically communicate patient-specific prior-authorization decisions, co- payment, and co- insurance information to provider and/or consumer systems B, A (Partial Gap) D, C (Partial Gap) CAP141 refers to T68 for provider obtaining prior authorization from the Payer. Co-payments and co- insurance information related to an approved P.A. request would not supported in X CAP141 refers to T79 for prescriber obtaining prior authorization from the PBM. The gap is support of the consumer. Can provide co- payment or co-insurance information at the patient level HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar42

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems vi. Particularly in the event of a rejection, a payer may need the ability to communicate an explanation for a prior-authorization decision as well as to communicate information on alternative treatment options or an Advanced Beneficiary Notification (ABN) B, A (Partial Gap) D, C T68 content would be an explanation of benefits or reason for denial. The gap is being able to communicate alternate treatment options for medical benefits T79 for Pharmacy to Health Plan Authorization supports this HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar43

Payor Requirements Functional RequirementsIERData Requirements Analysis C. The ability for payors to electronically communicate standardized prior-authorization information to provider and/or consumer systems vii. A payor may need the ability to communicate co- payment, co- insurance or other information related to patient responsibility for expenses B, A D, C T68 supports this exchange. The Gap is for consumer T79 - NCPDP Formulary and Benefit Standard supports the exchange of benefit information including PA information HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar44

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar HITSP Communicate Referral Authorization Capability Requirements and Design Public Comment  Introduction  Schedule  Review of Capabilities  Technical Approach  Public Comment 45

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Comment Tracking System  HITSP.org link: Using the HITSP Comment Tracking System Using the HITSP Comment Tracking System The HITSP Comment Tracking System allows registered authors to provide comments on documents that are undergoing public review or implementation testing. A unique user ID and password is required for each comment submitter Please note that the Comment Tracking System closes at 5 PM Pacific Daylight Time on the final day of public review, October 8 th Current HITSP members: Submit comments by following the link above and entering your current user ID and password New Users: Contact for a user name and password to access the Add Comment Register a NEW comment in the tracking systemAdd Comment View (My) Comments View the status or disposition of a comment previously submittedView (My) Comments Please contact Hannah Zander with any questions or problems with entering 46

HITSP Capabilities Public Review Webinar Questions and Comments  Comments regarding the Requirements outlined to meet the needs of Communicate Referral Authorization are welcome during this portion of the Webinar  Comments regarding the complete Capabilities documents can be addressed via Comment Tracking System (see previous slide for instructions) 47