STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND YOUR TEACHER EVALUATION 88843 NYSUT Education and Learning Trust NYSUT Field and Legal Services NYSUT Research and Educational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Annual Professional Performance Reviews - An Overview -
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives “SLOs 101” March 2012 Presentation developed by Cheryl Covell, TST BOCES Data Analyst & Heather Sheridan-Thomas,
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Putting the Pieces Together…. Understanding SLOs.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives & the Assessments needed Mary Ann Luciano, Director.
Student Learning Objectives
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Student Learning Objectives 101 Presented by: Angelique Johnson-Dingle Evidence Based Observations SLO CCLS State Provided Growth Measures Locally Selected.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). What are the components of APPR? Teacher Evaluation –60 points (observation*/goal setting) –20 points (State.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Western Suffolk BOCES Boot Camp Emma Klimek Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2: January 2012.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Sample Science SLO’s Grades Student Growth Goal Setting Process (SLO’s) Y Central School District Science Points Grade Level/Subject.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Ms. Omentum 95 Students 3 sections of Grade 7 Life Science with 25, 23, 25, students respectively, 1 section of Grade 8 Physical Sciences with 22 students.
CCSS/APPR/SLO/LMA A Summary. A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty. ~ Winston Churchill.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center *Please see caveat © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Student Learning Objectives OCM.
For all of us 80% of our evaluation is in the same hands it always was—P/NW BOCES. For most of us, P/NW BOCES is in charge of 100% of our evaluation.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES Michelle Helmer IES Staff Development Specialist Erie 2 BOCES IES
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Student Learning Objectives!
Welcome! Teacher Evaluator Training Session 5
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Staff Development
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning.
Presentation transcript:

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND YOUR TEACHER EVALUATION NYSUT Education and Learning Trust NYSUT Field and Legal Services NYSUT Research and Educational Services

Today’s session will focus on…  An overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) and the use of SLOs in teacher evaluation;  Decisions your district/BOCES must make in the process  A review of the development, implementation, and scoring of SLOs;  Key considerations for successful SLOs;  Implications for local leaders, and;  Available resources * Note: This presentation will focus on using SLOs as comparable State measures of student growth based on NYSUT’s understanding of SED’s policies and procedures related to this topic. 2

Friendly Agreement  Be present: minds and hands on  Respect time boundaries  Put cell phones on vibrate  Return to large group when signaled 3

Agree/Disagree  Review the “Agree/Disagree Chart in your participant packet.  In the “before” column, answer the questions that best reflect your thinking prior to the presentation.  We will revisit this document at the end of the presentation to see if your answers have changed. 4

Brainstorm In groups, discuss what information you already know about SLOs and what you need to learn.  What are SLOs?  Why use them?  How are they used? Each group shares at least one “need to learn” statement. 5

Components of the Annual Teacher Evaluation 6 60% Teaching Standards 20% Student Growth on State Assessment or Comparable Measure Using SLO 20% Local Measures SLOs one option for measuring student achievement 100% Composite Score

20 Percent Based on Student Growth on State Assessments or other Comparable Measures 7 Measured in one of two ways:  Grades 4-8 ELA and Math Assessments – SED will generate a student growth percentile score (SGP) OR  “State-determined, district or BOCES-wide student growth goal setting process” SLOs are the state-determined process NYS Education Department

What Are Student Learning Objectives? 8  SLOs are carefully planned academic goals for what a student will learn over a given time period.  They represent the most important learning for the year (or semester or quarter where applicable)  SLOs directly link a teacher’s classroom instruction to specific measures of student achievement or growth in the relative content area.  The process leads to objectives that can be reliably measured for student growth. * Community Training and Assistance Center (CTAC))

9  SED has delegated the responsibility for the development of SLOs to school districts/BOCES  Districts/BOCES are not required to collectively bargain the establishment of SLOs that are used for the State 20 percent. Student Growth Using Other Comparable Measures

SED’s District SLO Implementation Decisions and Timeline Decision 1. Assess and identify district priorities and academic needs 2. Identify who will have state- provided growth measures and who must have SLOs as “comparable growth measures.” 3. Determine district rules for how specific SLOs will get set 4. Establish expectations for scoring SLOs and for determining teacher ratings for the growth component 5. Determine district-wide process for setting, reviewing, and assessing SLOs in schools Completed By:  March 1, 2012  April 16, 2012  May 3, How is your district doing? NYS Education Department

Which teachers require SLOs? 11 SituationRequirement 1. If there is a State-provided growth measure for at least 50% of students SLOs not required 2. If there is a State-provided growth measure for less than 50% of students State-provided growth measure and SLOs required 3. If there is no State-provided growth measure for the course Only SLOs required NYS Education Department

Which teachers are required to have SLOs? % Students Covered by State-Provided Growth Measures These teachers will receive a Growth Score from the State – SLOs not requi red E.g., 4-8 ELA, Math, Common Branch Teachers 0-49% Students Covered by State-Provided Growth Measures Teachers MUST have SLOs 1. If any course/section has State- provided growth measures, at least 1 SLO must use it. 2. SLOs MUST cover the courses taught with largest number of students, combining sections with common assessments, until a majority of students are covered. 3.If any of the largest courses have a State assessment (but do not have State-provided growth measures), the State assessment MUST be used as evidence in the SLO. 12 NYS Education Department

K-2 Teachers Must have:  1 SLO for Math  1 SLO for ELA (unless teacher focuses on a single subject area)  Must use one of the following options: State approved 3 rd party assessment District, regional or BOCES-developed assessment School or BOCES-wide, group, or team results based on state assessments 13 NYS Education Department

Grade 3 Teachers Must have:  1 SLO for Math  1 SLO for ELA (unless teacher focuses on single subject area)  Must use 3 rd grade State assessment (ELA and math) Common Branch ELA & Math Teachers  Has a State-provided growth measure  SLOs not required NYS Education Department

4-8 Science & SS Teachers Must have:  SLO for each subject/ assessment (SLOs must cover classes with largest number of students until a majority of students are covered)  4 & 8 science must use State assessment as evidence  Grades 6-7 science and 6- 8 social studies use one of the following options as evidence: State approved 3 rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES developed assessments 15 NYS Education Department

4-8 Other Subject Teachers Must have:  SLO for each subject/ assessment (SLOs must cover classes with largest number of students until a majority of students are covered)  Must use one of the following as evidence: State approved 3rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES developed assessments School or BOCES-wide, group, or team results based on state assessments 16 NYS Education Department

9-12 Regents Teachers Must have:  1 SLO for each subject/ assessment (SLOs must cover classes with largest number of students until a majority of students are covered)  Must use State assessment or Regents exam (or Regents equivalent) as evidence 17 NYS Education Department

9-12 Other Teachers Must have:  1 SLO for each subject/ assessment (SLOs must cover classes with largest number of students until a majority of students are covered)  Must use one of the following as evidence: State approved 3rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES developed assessments School or BOCES-wide, group, or team results based on State assessments 18 NYS Education Department

Self-Contained Teachers (ESL/Bilingual, students with disabilities)  If less than 50% of students are covered by State growth measure: (unless teacher focuses on a single subject area) 1 SLO for ELA 1 SLO for math  Must use State assessment as evidence if available  If not, must use one of the following as evidence: State approved 3rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES developed assessments School or BOCES-wide, group, or team results based on state assessments 19 NYS Education Department

Self-Contained Teachers (ESL/Bilingual, students with disabilities)  If more than 50% of students are covered by State growth measure:  SLOs are not required 20 NYS Education Department

Push-In, Pull-Out Teachers/Resource Teachers (AIS, SWD, ESL, etc.) Must have:  1 SLO for subject area focus Consider group/team growth on State Assessment Collaborative goal setting with classroom teachers  Must Use State assessment as evidence if available  If not, must use one of the following as evidence: State approved 3rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES developed assessments School or BOCES-wide, group, or team results based on state assessments 21 NYS Education Department

Co-Teachers If district cannot track multiple teachers of record,  Common Branch Teachers: 1 SLO for ELA 1 SLO for Math  Other subject area teachers: SLO for subject area focus  Must use State assessment as evidence, if available  If not, must use one of the following as evidence: State approved 3rd party assessments District, regional or BOCES developed assessments School or BOCES-wide, group, or team results based on state assessments 22 NYS Education Department

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) Teachers If less than 50% of students take State ELA:  1 SLO for ELA  1 SLO using NYSESLAT (as applicable)  Must use: ELA State assessment as evidence where applicable NYSESLAT as evidence 23 NYS Education Department

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) Teachers If less than 50% of students take State assessment:  1 SLO using NYSAA  Additional SLOs based on subject area taught  Must use NYSAA performance assessment as evidence  Additional evidence based on subject areas taught (i.e., ELA, math, Regents) 24 NYS Education Department

20 Percent Locally-Selected Measure of Student Growth/Achievement  SLOs are one of the options for the locally-selected measures and must be negotiated.  The assessments used (State assessment, approved student assessment, or district/BOCES developed assessment) must either be different from or used in a different manner than the growth component.  As a local measure, labor and management have flexibility in establishing the rules for implementing SLOs. 25

State-Provided Growth Measure or SLOs? Activity Directions:  Review the State-Provided Growth Measure or SLOs Worksheet in the participant packet and determine the extent that SLO(s) are required. 26

SLO Responsibilities and Decisions NYSED responsibilities and decisions : 1. SLO components 2. Teachers: who must use SLO’s and who must have State-provided growth measures 3. Assessments to be used; allowable options 4. Scoring: Ranges and categories for measures of student growth Scoring rules that include state growth measures Scoring multiple SLO’s 27 NYS Education Department

SLO Responsibilities and Decisions 28 District responsibilities and decisions: 1.Assess and identify district priorities and academic needs 2.Identify who will have State-provided growth measures and who must have SLOs as “comparable growth measures” 3.Establish expectations for scoring SLOs and for determining teacher ratings for the growth component 4.Determine district-wide processes for setting, reviewing, and assessing SLOs in schools NYS Education Department

SLO Responsibilities and Decisions School responsibilities and decisions: 1.Implementation of State and district determined processes 2.Make choices as needed when district leaves flexibility to schools 3.Approval of each teacher’s goals by lead evaluator and monitor/assess results 4. Secure assessments 29 NYS Education Department

SLO Responsibilities and Decisions Teacher responsibilities and decisions : 1.Rationale (based on district and school requirements) 2.Obtain data to inform baseline 3.Consider implications for student learning results 30 NYS Education Department

NYSED SLO Components 31 All SLOs MUST include the following basic components: Student PopulationWhich students are being addressed? Learning Content What is being taught? CCSS/National/State standards? Will this goal apply to all standards applicable to a course or just to specific priority standards? Interval of Instructional Time What is the instructional period covered (if not a year, rationale for semester/quarter/etc)? Evidence What assessment(s) or student work product(s) will be used to measure this goal? Baseline What is the starting level of learning for students covered by this SLO? Target(s) What is the expected outcome (target) by the end of the instructional period? HEDI Criteria How will evaluators determine what range of student performance “meets” the goal (effective) versus “well-below” (ineffective), “below” (developing), and “well-above” (highly effective)? RationaleWhy choose this learning content, evidence and target? NYS Education Department

Student Population  The student population must be defined. If there are multiple sections each must be included. Student names and/or identification numbers must be included. Guiding Questions: Within and across classes, how many and what types of identifiable subgroups exist? How will instruction be differentiated to meet specific student learning needs? 32 NYS Education Department

Learning Content  Identify the course name and source of standards (NYS Learning Standards, Common Core, national, local) associated with this SLO.  Specify the exact standards, performance indicators, etc., that will be taught, learned, and assessed. Guiding Questions: To what extent is the content central to this and future coursework, as well as college and career readiness? What instructional approaches are needed to achieve the identified goal for all students in mastering these standards? 33 NYS Education Department

Interval of Instructional Time  Indicates a clear start and end date.  Provides a rationale if the interval is less than one year (e.g., course length is less than one year). Guiding Question: Is the course a semester, quarter, or year long course? 34 NYS Education Department

Evidence  Identify the specific pre-assessment(s) and summative assessment(s) that will be used for providing baseline and summative data for the SLO.  Districts and BOCES must verify comparability and rigor for any assessments they develop.  Pre-assessments for entering students are to be given throughout the year. Guiding Questions: Are you using the same assessment as the pre- and summative assessment? How will you measure progress? To what extent are the measures aligned to the learning content? 35 NYS Education Department

Baseline  Describe how students performed on the identified pre-assessment(s) for the learning content. (Actual baseline scores for each student are required.) Guiding Question: In addition to the pre-assessment(s), what other data sources were reviewed to confirm student learning needs? Within and across classes, what are students’ current skill and knowledge levels which may impact the target and the learning content? 36 NYS Education Department

Evidence and Baseline Group Activity In small groups, discuss the following questions: How will you handle administering pre-assessments to minimize student stress? Will you use:  the same pre- and summative assessment?  a modified summative as the pre-assessment?  one or more previous course summatives as the pre-assessment? or  develop a pre-assessment? *Remember: Students entering during the year are to be given the pre-assessment. 37

Target(s)  Define numerical growth goals for student performance on identified summative assessment(s). Guiding Questions: Is the target rigorous enough to ensure that all students will achieve college and career readiness? Does the target align with school and district goals and expectations? Will the targets for this population prepare students for success in future progressions (next grade level or level of study) of the same content? Is the current knowledge and skill of the targeted students informing the target? What professional development, resources, and/or supports are required to meet the target? 38 NYS Education Department

HEDI  Provide specific descriptions of student learning for each rating category, aligned with the narrative description. Highly effective = exceeds district expectations Effective = meets district expectations Developing = is below district expectations Ineffective = is well below district expectations Guiding Questions: Are the points/percentages defined for each category? Is it mathematically possible for the teacher to obtain every point value within a rating category? Are points clearly and objectively allocated within a HEDI rating category? Is it clear how the student’s performance will determine how the teacher will be rated? 39 NYS Education Department

Rationale  This describes the reasoning behind the choices regarding learning content, evidence, and target. Guiding Questions: How sufficient is the overall objective for increasing student achievement, and preparing students for future learning, as well as college and career readiness? What are the implications of these elements for the teacher in the planning and delivery of instruction, so that the targets are attained by all students? Is there alignment between the elements of the SLO (are the assessments aligned with the goals and the learning content)? 40 NYS Education Department

Examining the Components of an SLO Activity Directions: Review the completed SLO with a partner(s). 1.Use the SLO Checklist (pp. 7-9) to see if all parts for the components are addressed. 2.Review the HEDI rating and the student data provided. What are your reactions to the rating? 41

SLO Reflection 3.What did you learn from this activity that will assist you in your creation of an SLO? What might be some areas to be mindful of? What resources would you need in order to be more successful in creating SLOs? What would you share with a colleague about this process? 42

Key Considerations: Integrating Student Learning Standards, Teacher Standards and Teacher Evaluation 43 NYS P-12 Learning Standards: ( what students should know and be able to do) NYS P-12 Learning Standards: ( what students should know and be able to do) NYS Teaching Standards (what teachers should know and be able to do ) Multiple Measures: Student growth and achievement (20%/20%) Teaching and professional practices (60%) Multiple Measures: Student growth and achievement (20%/20%) Teaching and professional practices (60%) NYS Education Department

SLOs and Teaching Standards Student Population Standard 1: Knowledge of Students 1.3 b Plans for student strengths, interest and experiences 1.3a Meets diverse learning needs of each student 1.1b Creates developmentally appropriate lessons Learning Content Standard 2: Knowledge of Content and Instructional Planning 2.1a Understands key concepts and themes in the discipline 2.1b Understand key disciplinary language 2.1d Understands learning standards 2.3a Designs instruction to meet diverse learning needs of students 2.4a and 3.1a Aligns learning standards 2.4b Articulates learning objectives/goals with learning standards Target Standard 3: Instructional Practice 3.3c Implements challenging learning experiences 3.4a Differentiate instruction 3.4c Implements strategies for mastery of learning outcomes Standard 4: Learning Environment 4.2b Establishes high expectations for achievement 4.4.c Establishes instructional groups 44

SLO and Teaching Standards Baseline Standard 5: Assessment 5.2a Analyzes assessment data 5.1b Measures and records student achievement 5.3a Accesses and interprets assessments 5.4a Understands assessment measures and grading procedures Evidence Standard 5: Assessment 5.1a Uses assessments to establish learning goals and inform instruction 5.1c Aligns assessments to learning goals 5.1d Implements testing accommodations 5.2b Uses assessment data to set goals 5.4b Establishes an assessment system HEDI Criteria Standard 3: Instructional Practice 3.3a Establishes high expectations 3.3b Articulates measures of success 45

Key Considerations for Successful SLOs Professional Development – Don’t forget the requirement for Professional Development Plans (PDPs). – Integrate support for SLOs through the PDP process. – Target necessary skills aligned with Teaching Standards for successful SLO development and implementation. – Plan opportunities for teacher collaboration. Union/District Engagement – Build trust and collaboration. – Consider what should be addressed related to SLOs in bargaining. 46

Key Considerations for Successful SLOs Capacity Building – Remember SED’s District Decision 5 – Determine district- wide processes for setting, reviewing, and assessing SLOs in schools. – What is the district’s capacity for effective implementation? – What processes need to be built? Rigor and Reliability – Crafting a valid and sound SLO process supports increased student learning. 47

Key Considerations for Successful SLOs Comparability - Assessments should be consistent across district classes and grades. Relevancy -Ensure the SLO content is linked to NYS Learning Standards and the Common Core Learning Standards. 48

Key Considerations for Successful SLOs Aligning District Systems – Create internal linkages to current district duties/activities to inform the SLO process. – How does technology, professional development, data collection and reporting, and other processes complement and support effective SLO implementation? Communication – Ongoing, two-way communication is critical to engage all stakeholders. 49

Implications for Local Leaders 50 1.While not required by law/regulations, SLOs assume a collaborative process between teacher and evaluator. 2.Work to ensure a role for teachers in the SLO development and implementation process. 3.Negotiate the resources necessary to develop, implement and score SLOs-such as time and leveraging professional development. 4.Ensure rosters and other data are available in a timely manner.

Implications for Local Leaders 51 5.The district must negotiate for the local 20% - even if it wants to use SLOs! 6.Educate teachers about specifics of the SLOs – developing rationale, baseline, targets, etc., to be proficient with reasonable district guidelines/expectations. 7.The local should become the “Go-To” resource for accurate and timely information on APPR and SLOs.

Agree/Disagree  Look at the “Agree/Disagree Chart” in your participant packet.  In the “After” column, answer the questions that best reflect your thinking now that you have participated in this presentation.  Did your thinking change based on the information provided? 52

“Need to Learn” Statements  Review statements recorded on newsprint at beginning of session. 53

54