By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Eys, M.A., & Johnson,K. (2008). Femalemate choice is influenced by male sport participation. Evolutionary Psychology, 6,
Advertisements

Predictors of How Often and When People Fall in Love Clara & Peter.
Short Term Sexual Strategies
An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship Desirability Within Hook-up Culture: Nice-Guys vs. Bad-Boys An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship.
Sex and Mating Strategy Differences in Jealousy Sarah L. Strout, Sarah E. Bush, & James D. Laird: Clark University Abstract Previous research focused on.
AGE VARIATION IN MATING STRATEGIES AND MATE PREFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Danielle Ryan and April Bleske-Rechek, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
Relationships Psychology.
Gender and Infidelity Why do men cheat?. Depends on how you define the term “cheating.” Bill Clinton: “… I believe at the time that she filled out this.
Can women perceive male genetic & paternal quality? Q:
Men in Contemporary America Why is Muscularity Sexy? Tests of the Fitness Indicator Hypothesis Maggie, Genie, Joe Frederick, D., Haselton, M. (2007). Why.
Introduction to Psychology Suzy Scherf Lecture 14: How Do We Interact? Human Mating Strategies.
Sexual Conflict The Coevolutionary Battle of the Sexes (Part I)
Women’s Long Term Mating Strategies
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
Evolutionary Forces on personality Sociobiology = the study of biological bases of social behavior **psychological qualities have been retained in people.
Why the Sexes Still See Love and Commitment So Differently By John Marshall Townsend What Women Want- What Men Want Presented by: Julia Baird, Lily Garcia,
Sex and sexual orientation differences in sexual attraction Brad Moser University of Lethbridge.
Abstract Deciding the topic of SES Kristen Morgan & Caitlin Vandre-Schmidt  Psychology  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Kristen Morgan & Caitlin Vandre-Schmidt.
The Nature of Adolescents’ Non-romantic Sexual Relationships and Their Link With Well-being Catherine M. Grello Deborah P. Welsh University of Tennessee.
Brooke Bussone Dylan Antovich. The Evolutionary Theory of Romantic Jealousy Jealousy is an adapted function designed to increase fitness Two factors in.
Close Relationships. Passionate love Must come into contact with someone who is an appropriate love object. –Role of chance.
Elizabeth F. Broady Sarah J. Hickman Hanover College
Short-Term Mating Strategies Why Jerry Springer is so Much Fun.
Ch 9: Attraction Pt 2: Nov 2, First Encounters Similarity & Reciprocity Hard-to-get effect.
Genetic Factors Predisposing to Homosexuality May Increase Mating Success in Heterosexuals Written by Zietsch et. al By Michael Berman and Lindsay Tooley.
Darwin (1871) Didn’t specify morphological features that females used to select males Females used aesthetic preference Independent of male health or fitness.
Sex Differences in Everyday Risk-Taking Behavior in Humans By Annelise Lorenzo, Brea Talsness, Jenna Tioseco Pawlowski, B. B., Atwal, R., & Dunbar, R.
Sex on the Brain? An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social Desirability From Journal of Sex Research.
Women in Contemporary Culture Understanding the image of women in today’s society. Brittany, Haydee, Nikita, and Sarah.
Summary by Amber Kika, Nina Dangourian, and Esmeralda Huerta
© 2013 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. The Personality Puzzle Sixth Edition by David C. Funder Chapter 9: The Inheritance of Personality: Behavioral Genetics.
Attraction and Flirtation in Young Adults’ and Middle-Aged Adults’ Opposite-Sex Friendships Erin E. Hirsch, Cierra A. Micke, and April Bleske-Rechek University.
Wendy Wolfe, Forrest Files, & Shrinidhi Subramaniam Abstract Method This study assessed self-reported alcohol use by college students during a variety.
Origins of Attraction MATTHEW CORRINET. Biological: Fischer et al. (2003)  “... used an fMRI... to investigate blood flow in the brains of 20 men and.
Evolution & mate choice Sexual selection suggests that men & women adopt different mating strategies Male – relatively indiscriminate, interested in fertility.
Chapter 9 Attraction and Close Relationships. The Need to Belong The need to belong is a basic human motive. We care deeply about what others think of.
Figure 1. Display of the percentage of men and women in each age group who spontaneously nominated mating desires as a benefit of their friendships (left)
>  Slide 1 Coaching Insights Coaching statistics and analysis 2015/16.
The “Bridge” Study Misattribution of Emotional Arousal Tilted, swayed (6 ft.), wobbled Low handrails (3 feet) 230 foot drop to rocks and rapids.
Gender differences in mate selection What are men and women attracted to? (Campos, Otta & Siqueira, 2002) explored how men and women responded to personal.
This research was supported by funding from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at the University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire. References Study.
Attractive Equals Smart? Perceived Intelligence as a Function of Attractiveness and Gender Abstract Method Procedure Discussion Participants were 38 men.
THE IMPORTANCE OF SYMMETRY. Women appear to be more attracted to men who have features that are more symmetrical than other men. One study (Thornhill.
College Students’ Expectations for Hook-Ups. Amanda Smitley Hanover College.
1 of 29 Department of Cognitive Science Adv. Experimental Methods & Statistics PSYC 4310 / COGS 6310 Mixed Model ANOVA Michael J. Kalsher PSYC 4310/6310.
The ‘science’ of ATTRACTION. Parental Investment Sexual selection – ‘survival of the sexiest’ Leads to choosy females …and competitive males Leads to.
Schulte-Hostedde, Albrecht I, Eye, Mark A, & Johnson, Krista (2008). Female mate choice is influenced by male sport participation. Evolutionary Psychology.
Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective Summary by Amber Kika, Nina Dangourian, and Esmeralda Huerta For.
Buss 1989 Sex differences in mate preferences. Objectives Lesson 1  To understand the context, aims and procedures of Buss’s evolutionary study  To.
Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April
Chapter Six Genetics, Evolution, and Personality Genetics, Evolution, and Personality.
Sex Differences in Mate Selection Preferences Summary by: Kathryn Hogan, Roxanne Majich, Alyssa Reichental Furnham, A. (2009). Sex differences in mate.
Every human face has certain characteristics that impact human attractiveness. Facial features are determined in humans by prenatal sex steroids during.
Fisher, M., Voracek, M., Rekkas, P., & Cox, A. (2008). Sex differences in feelings of guilt arising from infidelity. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 3,
Personality, Mating Strategies, and Mating Intelligence Clegg, H.,& Nettle, D.(2008) Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive.
Chapter 10 Motivation. Objectives 10.1 Motivational Theories Define the concept of motivation. Discuss the theories about what moves individuals toward.
MADELEINE A. FUGÈRE, ALITA J. COUSINS, & STEPHANIE A. MACLAREN Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Please contact Dr.
Sex vs. Reproduction Reproduction is essential –Brain is genetically hardwired to motivate us to reproduce Reproduce via sex Sex is pleasurable – motivated.
Scenario Your have been in a long-term relationship for 3 years. You have decided to move in together. Your best friend has just told you that when they.
Women Control Male Romantic Partners to Pursue Extra Pair Partners INTRODUCTION MATE GUARDING AND MATE RETENTION Mate guarding controls with whom the female.
If You’ve Done it Before, Will You Do it Again? Factors Affecting Willingness to Participate in Controversial Sexual Relationship Types Miranda Dempewolf,
Biological, Cognitive and Sociocultural Explanations to the origins of attraction The Origins of Attraction.
Safe Sex Communication, Practices and Risks of Married Women to HIV/AIDS in the Evangelical Churches of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia By Aelaf Habte.
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Predicting Variations in Motivations for Romantic Kissing
Natural Sampling versus Mental Concepts Whitney Joseph
Gender and Infidelity Why do men cheat?.
Presentation transcript:

By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco Sex Differences in Romantic Kissing Among College Students: An Evolutionary Perspective By: Deanna Duermit, Mikayla Mowzoon, Jenna Tioseco Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Purpose & Participants The study provides a descriptive account of kissing behavior by measuring attitudes, preferences, and sex differences and considers kissing within the context of both short-term and long-term mating situations among a large sample of college students that were enrolled in psychology classes at the University of Albany and State University of New York. 1,041 college students enrolled in psychology classes at the University of Albany, State University of New York Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Study #1 Hypothesis: Kissing as a mate assessment device Given that males are less sensitive to chemosensory cues, making such assessments of a female’s fertility by means of kissing may be more difficult, and we suggest that males may require greater salivary exchange to facilitate assessments of female fertility and, for that reason, prefer wetter, open mouth, tongue kisses. Report attitudes and experiences regarding kissing behavior in regards to: Short vs. Long-term relationships Tongue kissing Kissing in regards to sexual behavior 501 Participants 470 Sample- not counting those who have never kissed and prefer same sex relations/kissing Questions were based on a 5-pt Likert scale Breath and Taste Kissing and Sexual behavior Bonding and Relationships Salivary Exchange Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Study #1 Results Breath and taste More Females than males rated breath and taste of mouth as more important when deciding to kiss or continue kissing someone Kissing and sexual behavior Females thought kissing leads to sex more often with a long term partner than a short term partner. Men thought kissing lead to sex on the same degree no matter the relationship status. Females put greater importance on kissing in comparison to males Bonding and relationships For males, importance of kissing decreases over time in a relationship, for females it remains constant Salivary exchange Interaction: men constantly preferred wetter kisses, women preferred wetter kisses with long term partner than with short term Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Study #2 Hypothesis: Kissing induces bonding When it comes to short-term mating, men may avoid women who demand serious commitments or investments before consenting to sex. Therefore, men may place less importance on kissing with short-term mates to avoid creating a bond. The benefits afforded to females who pursue short-term mating strategies are different than those for males. Reasons why females engage in short-term mating may include gaining resources, achieving genetic diversity among their children, mate switching, or current mate manipulation. In these instances, creating a bond with a short-term mate may be more likely, so the idea of kissing Elaboration and part replication of Study #1 273 Participants 257 Sample Questions based on 5-pt Likert scale Kissing and sexual behavior Bonding and relationships Salivary exchange Attractiveness and Kissing Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Study #2 Results Kissing and sexual behavior Bonding and relationships Interaction: males more likely to have sex without kissing a short time partner versus females, and males and females the same for not kissing a long-term partner Bonding and relationships Greater bond created by kissing after sex with a long-term partner Salivary exchange Males prefer more tongue contact on a first kiss Kissing and Attractiveness Males more likely to kiss or have sex with someone they were not attracted to Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Study #3 Hypothesis: Kissing Increases Sexual Arousal and Receptivity Kissing can be viewed as an activity that increases sexual arousal and receptivity. There is evidence that males, in particular, use kissing as an attempt to “seduce” romantic partners and kissing may be used by men as a strategy to gain sexual access to females. One possibility is that men may use kissing to introduce hormones or proteins into women’s mouths, thereby manipulating their mating psychology, and making them more likely to have sex. It is also possible that males may perceive a greater wetness or salivary exchange during kissing as an index of the female’s sexual arousal/ receptivity, similar to the act of sexual intercourse. Examined perceived importance of kissing practices, attitudes towards kissing, and assessment of partners 267 Participants 250 Sample Questions based on 5-pt Likert scale Kissing and Sexual Behavior Salivary Exchange and Jealousy Attractiveness and Kissing Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Study #3 Results Kissing and sexual behavior Males more likely to kiss someone they just wanted to have sex with and not have a relationship with Salivary exchange and jealousy More jealousy occurs when their partner kisses another member of the opposite sex when tongue contact occurs verses no tongue contact. Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.

Discussion Points Out of 1,041 respondents, all aged 18 or older, only 5 individuals reported never having romantically kissed another person. About 70% of the sample acknowledged kissing 6 or more people, while 20% estimated having kissed more than 20 people. There were no or little sex differences in the number of kissing partners, nor were there sex differences in the age of experiencing one’s first romantic kiss. Overall, the data showed that males feel kissing should lead to sex more often where as females do just the opposite. Females felt there was a greater likelihood that kissing should lead to sex with a long-term partner than a short-term partner, males felt that in either instance, kissing should lead to sex. Males also categorized a “good kiss” as one that leads to sex and one where “my partner makes moaning noises,” which may signal arousal and receptivity. Video Clip: Friends http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGoC8FTLKSI Discussion Questions: Do you feel that the results of this study parallel the female/male interaction here at LMU? What do you find the most intriguing about these results? Do you feel like the results are accurate to generalize amongst all college students? Hughes, S. M., Harrison , M. A., & Gallup, G. G. (2007). Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective. 5(3), 612-631.