Industrial Sources of Mercury in the Atmosphere Jim Orgeron Staff Environmental Scientist, Environmental Planning Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Wonderful World of HAP Regulations
Advertisements

Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Energy and the Environment: Likely Winners & Losers in the Second Obama Administration ACG Breakfast - December 14, 2012 Copyright © by N.W. Bernstein.
Jan. EPA Final GHG Reporting Guidance (actually Dec ) Mar. 31stAnnual GHG Reporting AprilProposed HAPs or Mercury MACT July 1st Annual Toxic Release.
MSW LANDFILL MACT STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SWANA’s 22nd Annual Landfill Gas Symposium March 22-25, 1999 Michele Laur Emission Standards Division US Environmental.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
EPA Air Toxics Programs Ruben R. Casso Toxics Coordinator EPA Region 6 Phone
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-820, “Annual Refinery Report.” 2005 and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Toxics Release.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer.
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
1 Performance Track: Addressing EPA’s Significant Environmental Issues 2008 Performance Track State Conference Lisa Grogan-McCulloch Performance Track.
Beyond Coal: Transforming America’s Electricity Sector.
Overview of Environmental Regulations and Drought Impacts in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT July 13, 2015.
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation Richard Long, Region 8 Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001.
Clean Water Act 319(g) Petition Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
February 13, 2008 Scott Slesinger Environmental Technology Council 1 Suggested Improvements To EPA’s Implementation Of The Pollution Prevention Act.
WELCOME TO NEW MEXICO WESTAR Fall Business Meeting 2009.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
Chapter 25 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
Air Pollution Sources: Coal-Fired Power Plants April 13, 2011.
WILL ALLISON AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION APRIL 16, 2012 Oil and Natural Gas Air Pollution Standards.
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mercury Workshop – February 10, Medical Waste Incinerators and Other Misc. Sources of Mercury John.
Beyond Federal Standards Nevada Mercury Emissions Control Program Colleen Cripps Nevada Division of Environmental Protection September 22, 2005.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
Lesnyh Inna From 8B POLLUTION (AIR POLLUTION AND WATER POLLUTION)
1 Potential Impacts of a National SO 2 Program WRAP Forum June 3, 2004.
Possible Timeline for Environmental Regulatory Requirements for the Utility Industry Pending EPA air and water pollution regulations for coal plants have.
Clean Error Act (Titles 2 and 3) Mobile Sources and Air Toxics ©2006 Dr. B. C. Paul.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
Environmental Technology Council EPA /State / DOD Region IV Environmental Conference June 2005 Joydeb “Joy” Majumder, EPA Region 4.
NTEC -- April 24, Utility Air Toxics Regulatory Finding National Tribal Environmental Council April 24, 2001 William H. Maxwell U.S. EPA OAQPS/ESD/CG.
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
Navajo Nation Air Quality Control Program Operating Permit Program Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Route 112 North/Bldg Fort Defiance,
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 5E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 25 Environmental.
1 Region 5 Enforcement Approach George Czerniak June 13, 2007 NACAA Enforcement and Compliance Workshop.
Rules and Exceptions - The Costs of “Cheap” Coal.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Industrial Footprint Project Carol Kraege Washington State Department of Ecology May 9, 2006.
K Blake Kidd September 30, 2015 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Emergency Planning and Community Right-To- Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) Section Pollution.
1 Federal Acquisition Regulation Environmental Coverage Richard Langston Energy Representative Civilian Agency Acquisition Council.
Clean Air Mercury Rule. EPA Rule to Control Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utilities New Source Performance Standard (CAA 111) Allows for.
New Source As defined in the CAA, construction of a new source, or modification of an existing source, that will produce a significant increase in emissions.
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
WORKING BETWEEN THE LINES: ONE CITY’S APPROACH TO REDUCING AIR TOXICS
Department of Environmental Quality
Kansas Air Quality Seminar March 5, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Industrial Sources of Mercury in the Atmosphere Jim Orgeron Staff Environmental Scientist, Environmental Planning Division

Mercury emissions from man made and natural sources are released into the atmosphere Mercury can be transported locally, regionally and/or globally in the atmosphere A portion of the mercury eventually settles to the ground or is found in rainwater This deposited mercury enters water bodies Mercury Deposition

time frame Estimates 53% of Louisiana mercury emissions are deposited in Louisiana EPA Air Deposition Monitoring

Federal rules (mercury is a hazardous air pollutant) 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63 (MACT rules) Sets control requirements and work practices for major sources only A few compliance dates in the future Louisiana state rule (mercury is an air toxic air pollutant) LAC 33:III.Chapter 51 Sets control requirements and work practices for major sources only Compliance date 12/20/1996 Mercury Air Rules Which Apply to Facilities in Louisiana

No penalty for over-reporting Reporting thresholds apply Mercury/Mercury Compound Emissions 2003 TRI (lbs/yr)

Emissions data from TRI reports. The TRI mercury threshold was reduced to 10 pounds in All Louisiana Facilities Total Actual Mercury Emissions (lbs/yr)

Chloralkali Plants 2 Plants in Louisiana report 2125 pounds of Mercury to 2003 TRI (unverified) Both plants subject to federal MACT rule specifically targets mercury –Promulgated 12/19/2003 (68 FR 70904) –Compliance date—12/19/2006 –Estimated about 93% reduction  By product hydrogen streams  End box ventilation system vents  Mercury thermal recovery unit vents Largest Mercury Emitters Based Upon Reported TRI Air Emissions

Louisiana Chloralkali Facility Total Actual Mercury Emissions (lbs/yr)

Coal Burning Electrical Utilities 6 Units in Louisiana reported 1434 pounds of mercury to 2003 TRI (unverified) All units will be subject to federal MACT rule specifically targets mercury –Proposed 1/30/2004 (69 FR 4652) and 3/16/2004 (69 FR 12398) –EPA proposed control program and cap and trade program –Compliance Dates—3 years after final rule or January 1, 2010 and 2018 –Estimated 29% or 69% at 2018 Largest Mercury Emitters Based Upon Reported TRI Air Emissions (cont.)

Emissions data from TRI reports. The TRI mercury threshold was reduced to 10 pounds in Louisiana Electrical Utility Facility Total Actual Mercury Emissions (lbs/yr)

Electrical Arc Furnaces 1 Unit in Louisiana reported 451 pounds of mercury to 2003 TRI (unverified) –TRI submittal estimate based on new emission factor –Preliminary stack test results indicate emissions much lower (<20 pounds) Unit will be subject to federal MACT –Initially delisted 6/4/1996 –Rule for area (minor) sources will be proposed (EPA memo 11/18/2002) –No timing available –No control estimate available Largest Mercury Emitters Based Upon Reported TRI Air Emissions (cont.)

Oil and Gas Facilities 11 facilities in Louisiana report 292 pounds of mercury to 2003 TRI (unverified) Petroleum refineries are subject to federal MACT (40 CFR Part 63 subparts CC and UUU) but the rules do not address mercury CC in effect—UUU in effect 3/11/2005 Major sources subject to provisions of state air toxics rule (LAC 33:III.Chapter 51) Largest Mercury Emitters Based Upon Reported TRI Air Emissions (cont.)

Louisiana Oil and Gas Facility Total Actual Mercury Emissions (lbs/yr) Emissions data from TRI reports. The TRI mercury threshold was reduced to 10 pounds in 2000.

All other sources report 215 pounds of mercury to the 2003 TRI (unverified) Includes some pulp and paper mills and some chemical plants 40 CFR Part 63 applies to pulp and paper mills and many chemical plants Major sources subject to provisions of state air toxics rule (LAC 33:III.Chapter 51) Largest Mercury Emitters Based Upon Reported TRI Air Emissions (cont.)

Louisiana All Other Facilities Total Actual Mercury Emissions (lbs/yr) Emissions data from TRI reports. The TRI mercury threshold was reduced to 10 pounds in 2000.

State and federal government have rules in place to reduce mercury emissions from industrial facilities into the atmosphere Federal government has more rules on the way TRI indicates mercury air emissions from Louisiana less than 2.5 tons per year with a slight increase from year to year Conclusions

For more information regarding industrial sources of mercury in Louisiana please contact: Jim Orgeron (225)