The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
The Impact of RTI on Learning Disabilities Identification.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
RtI and Title I in Wisconsin
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System The Wisconsin.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Today’s Objectives What is RtI and why it is here – Consensus-building Preparation for 2010 Implementation: – Three Tiers of Services – Data Analysis.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Multidisciplinary Teams
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
A Prudent Question is Half of WISEdom Using WISEdash Data Wisely to Leverage Change Kenneth S. Donahue School Administration Consultant for Data Analysis.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
Goose Creek CISD Special Education Districtwide Staff Development Conference February 15, 2013.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Presented From the WI RtI Center Lori Cameron PBIS Technical Assistance Coordinator Sara Summ and Lynn Johnson Academic Technical Assistance Coordinators.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
1 Topics to be Covered Wisconsin’s vision for RtI Essential elements High Quality Instructional practice Balanced Assessment Collaboration.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
RtI Eligibility Exclusionary Factors. Why Consider Exclusionary Factors? When We Think About Entitlement…It: Is a high stakes, high consequence, decision.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
A Preparation Presentation For: Administrators Team Members Classroom Management Trainers Coaches Start Here! The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Welcome! As you are settling in and waiting for others to join, please take a few minutes to think about and jot down any questions you may have about.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
Responsiveness to Instruction Vermont Principals Association Strand August, 2011 Julie Benay, M.Ed.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Response to Intervention (RTI)
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation and for the continued support of this federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material. Deb Heiss Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Consultant for Specific Learning Disabilities Dana McConnell Wisconsin RtI Center Coordinator of Instructional Supports for Students with Disabilities An Authentic Conversation: Systems, Data, and Practices to Consider When Meeting the Requirements of the SLD Rule Through a MLSS

Agenda System – When do you initiate the specified requirements identified in the SLD rule? – What about parent requests for a special education evaluation? Data – Decision System vs. Data System – Data Sources – Exclusionary Factors Practices Resources

Think About Your Multi-Level System of Support? Where within your MLSS do you begin implementing the requirements of the SLD rule?

SLD: Raise your hand… When do you initiate the specified requirements identified in the SLD rule? 1.Core/Universal 2.Selected 3.Intensive

Let’s Think About This… Fewer than 4% of Wisconsin’s student population are identified as eligible for Special Education services under a Specific Learning Disability – What percentage of students are meeting expectations with only core/universal instruction? Can your system sustain these efforts if SLD rule requirements are implemented too early in your system? – Is your system and staff overwhelmed? – How sustainable are current efforts regarding your decision rules?

Parent Request What if a parent requests a referral for SLD as soon as they hear their child is not being successful with core/universal instruction alone? – Some things to consider: Clarify request. Is it just for additional help or really a request for a special education evaluation? If truly a request for a special education evaluation, then we can NOT delay due to implementing interventions REMEMBER: When setting up your Multi-Level System of Support, plan for the majority and not for the exception to the rule!!! “

It will help you organize and articulate: Curriculum Instruction Assessments Collaboration practices This organizational structure helps us do that. WHY is Defining Your Culturally Responsive MLSS Important?

Have clear and agreed-upon definitions for common terms – especially those with multiple meanings “intervention” “collaboration” “research-based” “differentiation” “RtI”

A Multi-Level System of Support Is the Foundation for Establishing a Fluid and Efficient Process for SLD Referrals A MLSS is designed to be a framework for meeting students’ needs and is NOT just interventions SOLELY for SLD eligibility Impact and connection to family engagement – It is so crucial for parents to truly understand the PURPOSE or intent of your system (support needs and NOT just SLD eligibility), process and general understanding of what MLSS means and looks like in your school

ACTIVITY: Turn and Talk Within your MLSS, what are your decision rules regarding when to start implementing the requirements of the SLD rule? How do you engage with families in… – Defining your MLSS and its purpose or intent – Understanding the Process – General understanding of what a MLSS means and looks like in your school

Think About Data Within Your MLSS Decision system vs. data system – Shift your mindset What are your decision rules regarding when to begin implementing the requirements as stated in the SLD rule? Intensive research-based or evidence-based interventions Weekly progress monitoring data collected with probes Observations Other formal and informal data

Data Sources or Evidence Brought to the Conversation What are the questions you are trying to answer? “What data are you looking at?” – Start with the family and teacher (classroom lens) – Any specialist data/evidence – Progress monitoring vs. progress monitoring with probes Continuum of progress monitoring Acknowledge and honor the story behind the data Discrepancies should enhance conversation to further guide decisions and next steps – Achievement test data – Behavioral/social emotional data – Any other data? (e.g., ACCESS)

Exclusionary Factors Environmental or economic disadvantage, or cultural factors Lack of appropriate instruction in reading, math or any other areas of SLD being considered Limited English proficiency Other impairments

Exclusionary Factors in Reference to the Data Data or evidence that supports the idea of an exclusionary factor as the primary cause of their challenges? – e.g., attendance, family mobility, interviews Data or evidence that suggests the exclusionary factor may NOT be the primary cause of their challenges? – It may be a contributing factor but may not be the PRIMARY cause. – e.g., attendance, classroom observations during culturally appropriate instruction

Exclusionary Factors: More In-Depth Student’s personal history At least one person on IEP team knowledgeable about English acquisition and related achievement Student performance when individual positive support or instruction in social/emotional behavior is implemented Grade-level information

Activity: Turn and Talk Does your MLSS have a continuum of progress monitoring? We hope so! – How are you using and honoring the data? – Depending on the purpose of your meeting, what is your meeting protocol? What data/evidence are shared? Systems level Group – grade, class, intervention Individual student, etc.

Think About Practices Within Your MLSS ‘What do we need the intervention to do’ NOT ‘Which intervention’ – Then, identify which intervention will meet that need. Match the intervention to the student’s need!

Activity: Turn and Talk Within your MLSS, what is your current process for determining WHICH particular intervention a child will receive?

Resource Tool Reviewing Your Selected and Intensive Levels of Support How to use this: – Needs assessment – Explore the site – Module Facilitator Guide 1.Select a module and scenario(s) 2.Read the module narrative 3.Review vocabulary with team 4.Guiding questions and current status 5.Read and analyze scenario 6.Identify desired future 7.Identify priorities requiring action 8.Explore resources for priorities 9.How does this connect?

Needs Assessment Selected and Intensive Levels 1 Review Levels of Implementation (1.3) 2 Review SIR Levels of Implementation for Selected and Intensive Levels or SIR Alignment Document (1.4) Review Module Descriptions to find starting point (1.2) 3 Handouts

Resources RtI Action Network – RtI-Based SLD Identification Toolkit RIOT – Review, Interview, Observe, Test Intensive Intervention Selection Toolkit – Support in refining systems processes When Students Fail to Learn: Protocols for a School-Wide Response by Catherine Glaude Wisconsin’s SLD Rule: A Technical Guide

THANK YOU!!!

For More Information Deb Heiss Dana McConnell