Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Railway Grade Separations Issues. Railway Grade Separations 1.Introduction Qualifications/experience to undertake bridge planning for railway grade separations:
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Ecological Survey Reports The level of ESR Report is determined by the type of project and its probable level of impacts.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Presented to: 2010 Airports Conference By: Sue McDonald With slides by Tom Klin, CH2M HILL Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Cumulative.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
1 Indirect and Cumulative Impacts A Federal Perspective Lamar S. Smith, CEP Federal Highway Administration Office of Project Development and Environmental.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
Demonstration Using the GIS Inventory for Environmental Professionals John Jediny Deputy Associate Director for NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Historical Background to NEPA Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution problem Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
OSU Airport – Overview of Master Plan and Draft Environmental Assessment Purpose of an Airport Environmental Assessment (EA) Identify environmental impacts.
Page 1 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Cyrville Road Bridge Replacement at Highway 417 (Ottawa Queensway) Detail Design Study Group Work Project
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
USAID Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID Procedures Overview  USAID environmental review requirements are:  A specific.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
IRRPCC Meeting Albuquerque, NM November 8,  Clarification needed on applicability of these roads into the IRR Inventory  Assignment given to IRRPCC.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)  Draft year: 1970 to present day  No Amendment Years  National Legislation By: Ayli Tulberg, Period.
Public participation of EIA in R.O.C. Hsiao-Tien Wu, Wei-Chein Sun & Tung-Wang Chang Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan R.O.C.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Disaster Recover Planning & Federal Information Systems Management Act Requirements December 2007 Central Maryland ISACA Chapter.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 4: How to Develop SCEA Land Use Information How to Develop Land Use Information.
Effects Analysis and Comparison. Objectives Accurately determine which impacts need to be evaluated in the land use plan. Develop a matrix comparing the.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
August 19, 2015 Port Bienville Rail EIS Scoping Meeting Presented by: Rhea Vincent Mike McGuire.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
PURPOSE & NEED Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
Planning – LUP Process I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures III.Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs.
5. Impact assessment world café: indirect impacts
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) August 6, 2008
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
5. Impact assessment world café: Cumulative impacts
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Unit 6 NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Introduction SCEA Organization Scoping Analysis Conclusions Mitigation.
Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM
Presentation transcript:

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments Rev. 07/21/99 SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program MODULES (Module 1) How to determine which resources should be considered in a SCEA (Module 2) How to establish the SCEA geographical boundary (Module 3) How to determine SCEA time frames (Module 4) How to develop SCEA land use information (Module 5) How to prepare the analysis & reach SCEA Conclusions (Module 6) Presentation of SCEA in the environmental documentation MODULES (Module 1) How to determine which resources should be considered in a SCEA (Module 2) How to establish the SCEA geographical boundary (Module 3) How to determine SCEA time frames (Module 4) How to develop SCEA land use information (Module 5) How to prepare the analysis & reach SCEA Conclusions (Module 6) Presentation of SCEA in the environmental documentation SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Provide SHA employees, federal and state resource agencies, local governments and consultants: Consistent procedures in conducting a secondary and cumulative effects analysis. A clear definition of direct impacts, secondary impacts and cumulative effects. A clear understanding of how SCEA applies to project development. Knowledge to facilitate the review of SCEA documentation. Provide SHA employees, federal and state resource agencies, local governments and consultants: Consistent procedures in conducting a secondary and cumulative effects analysis. A clear definition of direct impacts, secondary impacts and cumulative effects. A clear understanding of how SCEA applies to project development. Knowledge to facilitate the review of SCEA documentation. Training Goals SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program SHA Case Studies - Project Locations SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program NEPA and CEQ regulations “Secondary” versus “cumulative” effects SHA’s SCEA Guidelines SCEA and the SHA Project Planning Process Levels of Environmental Documentation NEPA and CEQ regulations “Secondary” versus “cumulative” effects SHA’s SCEA Guidelines SCEA and the SHA Project Planning Process Levels of Environmental Documentation SCEA Background SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations require that the secondary and cumulative effects of a project be examined along with direct impacts (40 CFR (c)). NEPA and CEQ Regulations SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program “Secondary” Effects - Effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. Secondary effects may include growth inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the patterns of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems (40 CFR (b)). Secondary effects are a subset of cumulative effects. An example of secondary effects is: Commercial and residential development following construction of a highway or the addition of new access points to a highway. “Secondary” Effects - Effects which are caused by the action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. Secondary effects may include growth inducing effects and other effects related to induced changes in the patterns of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems (40 CFR (b)). Secondary effects are a subset of cumulative effects. An example of secondary effects is: Commercial and residential development following construction of a highway or the addition of new access points to a highway. SCEA Introduction “Secondary” versus “Cumulative” Effects

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Per SHA's SCEA Guidelines, secondary effects may occur: When local governments or developers identify planned development that will not proceed without a specific project or transportation alternative. Zoning or land use changes that may occur (based upon professional judgement) as a result of each project alternative retained for detailed study. Per SHA's SCEA Guidelines, secondary effects may occur: When local governments or developers identify planned development that will not proceed without a specific project or transportation alternative. Zoning or land use changes that may occur (based upon professional judgement) as a result of each project alternative retained for detailed study. SCEA Introduction “Secondary” versus “Cumulative” Effects - continued

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program “Cumulative” Effects - T he impact on the environment which results from the action when added to other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal,or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions (40 CFR , 1997). Some examples of cumulative effects include: Incremental loss of wetlands under the Nationwide permit program. Forest fragmentation related to roadway right-of-way construction and other development over time. Population declines in nesting birds from multiple tree harvests over time. Increase in stormwater peak flows and pollutant loadings from commercial and residential development. Decrease in active farmlands due to development pressures. “Cumulative” Effects - T he impact on the environment which results from the action when added to other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal,or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions (40 CFR , 1997). Some examples of cumulative effects include: Incremental loss of wetlands under the Nationwide permit program. Forest fragmentation related to roadway right-of-way construction and other development over time. Population declines in nesting birds from multiple tree harvests over time. Increase in stormwater peak flows and pollutant loadings from commercial and residential development. Decrease in active farmlands due to development pressures. SCEA Introduction “Secondary” versus “Cumulative” Effects - continued

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Federal agencies have routinely addressed direct, and, to a lesser extent, secondary effects of their proposed actions on the environment. -Analyzing cumulative effects was more challenging because of the difficulty of defining geographic and time boundaries. - As a result, very little attention has been given to cumulative effects until recently. The availability of data, particularly agency - published resource reports/ inventories, coupled with the development of GIS technology, have contributed to the increase in feasibility of incorporating secondary/cumulative effects analysis in the NEPA process. Federal agencies have routinely addressed direct, and, to a lesser extent, secondary effects of their proposed actions on the environment. -Analyzing cumulative effects was more challenging because of the difficulty of defining geographic and time boundaries. - As a result, very little attention has been given to cumulative effects until recently. The availability of data, particularly agency - published resource reports/ inventories, coupled with the development of GIS technology, have contributed to the increase in feasibility of incorporating secondary/cumulative effects analysis in the NEPA process. NEPA and CEQ Regulations - continued SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Provide general purpose procedures and a “consistent” framework for preparing a SCEA. This includes: Introduction Scoping/Initial SCEA activities Analysis Mitigation Provide general purpose procedures and a “consistent” framework for preparing a SCEA. This includes: Introduction Scoping/Initial SCEA activities Analysis Mitigation SHA’s Guidelines SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Introduction Definitions - Secondary and Cumulative Combinations of Direct, Secondary and/or Cumulative Effects Levels of Environmental Documentation Introduction Definitions - Secondary and Cumulative Combinations of Direct, Secondary and/or Cumulative Effects Levels of Environmental Documentation SHA’s Guidelines - continued Scoping/Initial SCEA Activities Resource Identification/Data Availability Setting the SCEA Geographical Boundary. Setting SCEA Time Frames - Past and Future Scoping/Initial SCEA Activities Resource Identification/Data Availability Setting the SCEA Geographical Boundary. Setting SCEA Time Frames - Past and Future SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Analysis Refinement of Geographical Boundaries and Resources Data Collection and Mapping Analysis Methodologies - Trends, Overlays, Matrices, Interviews Analysis Refinement of Geographical Boundaries and Resources Data Collection and Mapping Analysis Methodologies - Trends, Overlays, Matrices, Interviews SHA’s Guidelines - Continued Documentation Preparing the Written SCEA Summary Responsibilities of SHA, agencies and locals Existing regulations and protective measures Documentation Preparing the Written SCEA Summary Responsibilities of SHA, agencies and locals Existing regulations and protective measures SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program SCEA DON’T Each SCEA is unique based upon its “Project Purpose and Need” and its “Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study.” Do not apply a “cookie cutter” approach! SCEA DON’T Each SCEA is unique based upon its “Project Purpose and Need” and its “Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study.” Do not apply a “cookie cutter” approach! SHA’s Guidelines - continued SCEA Introduction

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program The following combinations of direct, secondary and/or cumulative impacts of an alternative on a resource may be encountered in transportation projects: Direct, Secondary and Cumulative Impacts - Typically, larger capacity-adding or economic development projects. SHA examples include MRECAS, Hickory Bypass and US Route 1. Direct and Cumulative Impacts Only - Typically, smaller improvement-type projects, such as bridge replacements and widenings to alleviate congestion/improve safety, but can include larger projects. SHA examples include US 113 Planning Study, MD 4 and MD 5. Secondary and Cumulative Impacts only - Probably not encountered often. If project alternatives do not result in direct or secondary impacts upon a resource, then no further analysis of that resource is required. The following combinations of direct, secondary and/or cumulative impacts of an alternative on a resource may be encountered in transportation projects: Direct, Secondary and Cumulative Impacts - Typically, larger capacity-adding or economic development projects. SHA examples include MRECAS, Hickory Bypass and US Route 1. Direct and Cumulative Impacts Only - Typically, smaller improvement-type projects, such as bridge replacements and widenings to alleviate congestion/improve safety, but can include larger projects. SHA examples include US 113 Planning Study, MD 4 and MD 5. Secondary and Cumulative Impacts only - Probably not encountered often. If project alternatives do not result in direct or secondary impacts upon a resource, then no further analysis of that resource is required. SCEA Introduction SHA’s Guidelines - continued Combining Impacts

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program SCEA and the SHA Project Planning Process STAGE I - Preliminary Alternatives Development through the “Public Alternates Workshop”. STAGE II - Detailed Environmental and Engineering Studies through circulation of the Draft Environmental Document and the conducting of the Location/Design Public Hearing. STAGE III - Identification of the selected alternative and preparation of the decision document. STAGE I - Preliminary Alternatives Development through the “Public Alternates Workshop”. STAGE II - Detailed Environmental and Engineering Studies through circulation of the Draft Environmental Document and the conducting of the Location/Design Public Hearing. STAGE III - Identification of the selected alternative and preparation of the decision document. SCEA Introduction Project Planning Stages

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program IRM - Interagency Review Meeting SCEA Introduction SCEA and the SHA Project Planning Process - continued SCEA and the SHA Project Planning Process - continued

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), including Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SEIS's) Environmental Assessments (EA's) Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), including Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SEIS's) Environmental Assessments (EA's) Levels of Environmental Documentation SCEA Introduction SHA’s SCEA Guidelines apply to