PROPOSAL OF A UNIVERSAL QUANTUM COPYING MACHINE IN CAVITY QED Joanna Gonzalez Miguel Orszag Sergio Dagach Facultad de Física Pontificia Universidad Católica.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Logical gates and quantum processors with trapped ions and cavities MIGUEL ORSZAG FACULTAD DE FISICA PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE Course at.
Advertisements

Outlines Rabi Oscillations Properties of Rydberg atoms Van Der Waals Force and Rydberg Blockade The implementation of a CNOT gate Preparation of Engtanglement.
Superconducting qubits
Holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces Lian-Ao Wu Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control In collaboration with Polao Zanardi.
Quantum Control in Semiconductor Quantum Dots Yan-Ten Lu Physics, NCKU.
Quantum Computing with Trapped Ion Hyperfine Qubits.
Quantum Computation and the Bloch Sphere
Bloch Oscillations Alan Wu April 14, 2009 Physics 138.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
PBG CAVITY IN NV-DIAMOND FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING Team: John-Kwong Lee (Grad Student) Dr. Renu Tripathi (Post-Doc) Dr. Gaur Pati (Post-Doc) Supported By:
Cavity QED as a Deterministic Photon Source Gary Howell Feb. 9, 2007.
The Integration Algorithm A quantum computer could integrate a function in less computational time then a classical computer... The integral of a one dimensional.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Quantum Computing Joseph Stelmach.
Guillermina Ramirez San Juan
Quantum Computation Using Optical Lattices Ben Zaks Victor Acosta Physics 191 Prof. Whaley UC-Berkeley.
Electron Entanglement via interactions in a quantum dot Gladys León 1, Otto Rendon 2, Horacio Pastawski 3, Ernesto Medina 1 1 Centro de Física, Instituto.
Optically Pumping Nuclear Magnetic Spin M.R.Ross, D.Morris, P.H. Bucksbaum, T. Chupp Physics Department, University of Michigan J. Taylor, N. Gershenfeld.
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information – Lecture 2 Part 1 of CS406 – Research Directions in Computing Dr. Rajagopal Nagarajan Assistant: Nick Papanikolaou.
Quantum Information Processing
Single atom lasing of a dressed flux qubit
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
Quantum Devices (or, How to Build Your Own Quantum Computer)
Quantum Error Correction Jian-Wei Pan Lecture Note 9.
Alice and Bob’s Excellent Adventure
Matt Reed Yale University Boston, MA - February 28, 2012
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
Power Dissipation Bounds and Models for Quantum-dot Cellular Automata Circuits Saket Srivastava*, Sudeep Sarkar # and Sanjukta Bhanja* * Electrical Engineering,
Quantum Information Jan Guzowski. Universal Quantum Computers are Only Years Away From David’s Deutsch weblog: „For a long time my standard answer to.
A deterministic source of entangled photons David Vitali, Giacomo Ciaramicoli, and Paolo Tombesi Dip. di Matematica e Fisica and Unità INFM, Università.
Quantum computation: Why, what, and how I.Qubitology and quantum circuits II.Quantum algorithms III. Physical implementations Carlton M. Caves University.
Engineering of arbitrary U(N) transformation by quantum Householder reflections P. A. Ivanov, E. S. Kyoseva, and N. V. Vitanov.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Meet the transmon and his friends
Quantization via Fractional Revivals Quantum Optics II Cozumel, December, 2004 Carlos Stroud, University of Rochester Collaborators:
ICSSUR 05 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Entanglement and quantum phase transitions in the Dicke model dicke model Vladimír BužekMiguel OrszagMarián.
Single-molecule-mediated heat current between an electronic and a bosonic bath In Collaboration with: Avi Schiller, The Hebrew University Natan Andrei,
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 4. Introduction to quantum treatments The variational method.
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 6. Time-Dependent Schrodinger Equation 6.1 Introduction Energy can be imparted or taken from a quantum system.
Pablo Barberis Blostein y Marc Bienert
For long wavelength, compared to the size of the atom The term containing A 2 in the dipole approximation does not involve atomic operators, consequently.
1 Quantum Computation with coupled quantum dots. 2 Two sides of a coin Two different polarization of a photon Alignment of a nuclear spin in a uniform.
Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento.
IPQI-2010-Anu Venugopalan 1 qubits, quantum registers and gates Anu Venugopalan Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Univeristy Delhi _______________________________________________.
Quantum Theory of the Coherently Pumped Micromaser István Németh and János Bergou University of West Hungary Department of Physics CEWQO 2008 Belgrade,
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
|| Quantum Systems for Information Technology FS2016 Quantum feedback control Moritz Businger & Max Melchner
Shanxi University Atomic Physics Chapter 7 The interaction of atoms with radiation Atomic Physics.
Intro to Quantum Algorithms SUNY Polytechnic Institute Chen-Fu Chiang Fall 2015.
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Universitat de Barcelona Universität Potsdam 10 December 2009 Simulation of the Laughlin state in an optical lattice.
TC, U. Dorner, P. Zoller C. Williams, P. Julienne
Quantum optics Eyal Freiberg.
Circuit QED Experiment
QUANTUM TRANSITIONS WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION REAL FUNCTIONAL
Quantum Phase Transition of Light: A Renormalization Group Study
Implementation of All-Optical Toffoli gate in Λ- systems
Outline Device & setup Initialization and read out
Quantum One.
Coupled atom-cavity system
Quantum Computing Dorca Lee.
Marco Polo, Daniel Felinto and Sandra Vianna Departamento de Física
OSU Quantum Information Seminar
Quantum Mechanical Treatment of The Optical Properties
Approximation Employed in Spontaneous Emission Theory / D. F
Quantum computation using two component Bose-Einstein condensates
QM2 Concept test 3.1 Choose all of the following statements that are correct about bosons. (1) The spin of a boson is an integer. (2) The overall wavefunction.
Quantum Computing Joseph Stelmach.
Second quantization and Green’s functions
Presentation transcript:

PROPOSAL OF A UNIVERSAL QUANTUM COPYING MACHINE IN CAVITY QED Joanna Gonzalez Miguel Orszag Sergio Dagach Facultad de Física Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Quantum Optics II COZUMEL- MEXICO

The No-Cloning Theorem (Wooters and Zurek,Nature299,802(1982)) showed that it is not possible to construct a device that will produce an exact copy of an arbitrary quantum state. This Theorem is an unexpected quantum effect due to the linearity of Quantum Mechanics, as opposed to Classical Physics, where the copying Process presents no difficulties, and this represents the most significant difference between Classical and Quantum Information. Thus, an operation like:

Is not possible, with: =INPUT QUBIT =initial state of cloner =Blank copy =final state of cloner Because of this Theorem, scientist ignored the subject up to 1996 when Buzek and Hillery (V.Buzek,M.Hillery,Phys.Rev.A,54,1844(1996) proposed the Universal Quantum Copying Machine(UQCM)-that produced two imperfect copies from an original qubit, the quality of which was independent of the input state.

UNIVERSAL QUANTUM COPYING MACHINE BASIS The quality of the copy is measured through the FIDELITY

In the present work, we propose a protocol that produces 2 copies from an input state, with Fidelity In the context of Cavity QED, in which the information is encoded in the electronic levels of Rb atoms, that interact with two Nb high Q cavities. SOME PREVIOUS BACKGROUND TO THE PROPOSAL Consider a two level atom that is prepared in a superposition state, using the Microwave pulses in a Ramsey Zone, with frequency Near the e(excited)-g(ground) transition. It generates superpositions Depends on the interaction time Is prop. detuning

On the other hand, the atom-field interaction is described by the Jaynes Cummings Hamiltonian Coupling constant

The atom-field state evolves like For example, for

Now, consider an external Classical pulse, interacting with the atom We use the dressed state basis that diagonalizes the J-C Hamiltonian:, The Energies of the dressed states are

In the limit Consider the external field in resonance with the (+,1)-  (-,0) Transition, that is Where f(t) is some smooth function of time to represent the pulse shape, with(in the dispersive case)

The above Hamiltonian has been studied by several authors (Domokos et al;Giovannetti et al) and arrive to the conclusion that For a suitable pulse, a C-NOT gate can be achieved, where the photon Number (0 or 1) is the control and the atom the target The mechanism of the above C-NOT gate that forbids, for example the (g,0>--  (e,0> transition is the Stark Effect, caused by one photon in the cavity. In order to resolve these two transitions, we have to make sure that

Where Is the frequency difference between these two transitions.

The exchange IS POSSIBLE

C-NOT GATE N=0 ATOMIC STATE IS NOT CHANGED N=1 ATOMIC STATE IS EXCHANGED CONTROLTARGET

UQCM PROPOSED PROTOCOL

ATOM 1 A1, initially at is prepared in a superposition, via a Ramsey Field A1 interacts with the cavity Ca(initially in )through a Rotation, so State swapping.The excitation of atom 1 is transferred to the cavity a

ATOM 2 IT CONTAINS THE INFORMATION TO BE CLONED This state can be prepared in the same fashion as the atom 1, for example with a Ramsey Field. Then we apply a Classical pulse, as described before, generating a C-NOT gate,nothing happens with 0 photons C-not

A3 and A4 are the atoms carrying the two copies(IDENTICAL)

FINAL STATE

DISCUSSION Experimental numbers(Haroche et al) An interaction time ofMarginally satisfies the earlier requirement. With the flight time of 100 The whole scheme should Take about 700Which is reasonable in a cavity with a Relaxation time of 16ms.They achieved a resolution required to Distinguish between 1 or 0 photons

The complete Hamiltonian in the Interaction Picture is: DISCUSSION OF THE C-NOT GATE Since the external pulse is resonant with the (+,1)-  (-,0) Transition,this imposes a condition on

Also, we notice that we have introduced exponential factors In both terms of the Hamiltonian just to mimic the passage Time and duration of the pulse, referred to as and Respectively. We have done this in order to solve Schrodingers equation With continuous functions.

Assuming We have to solve the following set of differential equations

BIBLIOGRAPHY 1.-W.K.Wooters and W.H.Zurek,Nature,London,299,802(1982) 2.-V.Buzek,M.Hillery,Phys.Rev.A 54,1844(1996) 3.-D.Bruss et al, Phys.Rev.A 57,2368(1998) 4.-N.Gisin,S.Massar, Phys.Rev.Lett,794,153(1997) 5.-D.Bruss et al, Phys.Rev.Lett,81,2598(1998) 6.-V.Buzek,S.L.Braunstein,M.Hillery,D.Bruss, Phys.Rev.A,56,3446(1998) 7.-C.Simon,G.Weihs,A.Zeilinger, Phys.Rev.Lett,84,2993(2000) 9.-P.Milman,H.Olivier,J.M.Raimond, Phys.Rev.A,67,012314(20003) 10.-M.Paternostro,M.S.Kim,G.M.Palma,J.of Mod.Opt,50,2075(2003) 11.-M.Brune et alPhys.Rev.A,78,1800(1995) 12.-V.Giovannetti,D.Vitali,P.Tombesi,A.Eckert,Phys.Rev.A,52, 3554(1995) 13.-M.Orszag,J.Gonzalez,S.Dagach,sub Phys.Rev.A 14.- M.Orszag,J.Gonzalez,Open Sys and Info Dyn,11,1(2004)