1  Organization, Roles, and Skills  Methodology  Standards Analysis  Tool Evaluation Terminology Collaboration Business Plan  Project Identification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Information Systems
Advertisements

ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
Let Us Bring You the Insight You Need. I need to limit risk. I need to improve quality. I need access to information. I need to make informed decisions.
Area 4 SHARP Face-to-Face Conference Phenotyping Team – Centerphase Project Assessing the Value of Phenotyping Algorithms June 30, 2011.
Overview of Nursing Informatics
Clinical Information System Implementation Project Prepared for Clinical Affairs Committee December 4, 2002.
The Integrated Care Record Service - a Local Trusts Perspective Peter Knight Head of IM&T Winchester & Eastleigh Healthcare Trust.
Measuring the effectiveness of government IT systems Current ANAO initiatives to enhance IT Audit integration and support in delivering Audit outcomes.
Optimizing Business Operations Business Priorities Presentation.
Enterprise Architecture
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
September, 2005What IHE Delivers IHE Eye Care Integration Profiles Andrew Casertano Department of Veterans Affairs.
Copyright © 2011, 2007 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. 1 Contemporary Nursing Practice Chapter 1 Overview.
Decision Support for Quality Improvement
E-Referral enabled collaborative health care Opportunities and considerations Presented by: Sasha Bojicic Emerging Technology Group Canada Health Infoway.
Initial slides for Layered Service Architecture
Standards for nursing content of electronic records Anne Casey Information Standards Adviser Royal College of Nursing, UK Harnessing technology to promote.
SESIH Redesign Update Older Persons and Chronic Care Project Paul Preobrajensky Manager Redesign Program 19 September 2007.
Optimizing Technology to Achieve Population Health Shannon Nielson, MHSA, PCMH-CCE Centerprise, Inc May 5 th, 2015 Indiana PCA Annual Conference
- 1 - Roadmap to Re-aligning the Customer Master with Oracle's TCA Northern California OAUG March 7, 2005.
Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012 Project Management Chapter 3 Project Management for Strategic Goal Achievement.
HIT Policy Committee Quality Measures Workgroup October 28, 2010 Fred D Rachman, MD.
Ann OBrien RN MSN CPHIMS National Senior Director of Clinical Informatics Kaiser Permanente Robert Wood Johnson Executive Nurse Fellow Data Analytics and.
Lisa A. Lang, MPP Assistant Director for Health Services Research Information Head, National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health.
© Copyright IBM Corporation 2008 Health Analytics: An Overview HealthTech Net November 20, 2008 Richard Singerman, Ph.D.
Survey of Medical Informatics CS 493 – Fall 2004 September 27, 2004.
Component 11/Unit 8b Data Dictionary Understanding and Development.
Sharing Value Sets (SVS Profile) Ana Estelrich GIP-DMP.
Shawn Stewart, RN, CCM Thomas Edison State College August 24, 2008 Dr Donna Bailey.
N222Y Health Information Technology Module: Improving Quality in Healthcare and Patient Centered Care Looking to the Future of Health IT.
DEFINITION Quality assurance is the process of verifying or determining whether the products or services meet or exceed the customers expectations. Quality.
Health Management Information Systems
System Changes and Interventions: Registry as a Clinical Practice Tool Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care, a national program of the Robert.
World Class Commissioning and World Class Informatics, the quest for quality information Jan Sobieraj - Chief Executive, NHS Sheffield.
Workflow Management Systems for Disease Management Scenarios May 8, 2007 Harm Scherpbier MD Product Manager, Clinical Decision Support Siemens Health Services.
Intelligent Performance Management Empowering Your Enterprise Duane E. Presti, CEO PARIS Technologies, Inc.
School of Health Sciences Week 8! AHIMA Practice Briefs Healthcare Delivery & Information Management HI 125 Instructor: Alisa Hayes, MSA, RHIA, CCRC.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative February 2, 2004 Oakland, CA Clinical.
Clinical Quality Workgroup Update Jim Walker MD, Chair July 25, 2012 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
IHE Workshop – June 2007What IHE Delivers 1 Nicholas Steblay Boston Scientific Implantable Device Cardiac Observations (IDCO) Profile.
Managing Transformational Change in Healthcare: The Integration of Mayo Clinic Robert E. Nesse MD Chief Executive Officer Mayo Clinic Health System Associate.
Clinical Computing Secure, reliable technology that improves clinical workflow at the point of care.
ULTIMA*HUB for hospitals and clinics. ULTIMA*HUB for hospitals and clinics 1 Concept of modern HIS HIS : Hospital Information System OCS: Order Communication.
ULTIMA*DCF for children and adolescents clinics and hospitals.
IHE Workshop – June 2006What IHE Delivers 1 Nicholas Steblay Boston Scientific Implantable Device Cardiac Observations (IDCO) Profile.
Shaping the Future of Healthcare | CERTIFIED TECHNOLOGY COMPARISON TASK FORCE JIGNESH SHETH MD, MPH THE WRIGHT CENTER.
QUERI Robert L Jesse, MD, PhD Chief Consultant Medical Surgical Service.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
Using Data To Drive Practice Faith Muigai Jacaranda Health.
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
SAGE Nick Beard Vice President, IDX Systems Corp..
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9c: Quality Indicators.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Patricia Alafaireet  Lecture 2 – Implementation and go-live strategies Data conversion Communication Planning Downtime.
TO IMPROVE  Safety  Quality  Improve patient outcomes  Reduce cost of healthcare.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLINICAL HEALTH INFORMATION. Information System - can be define as the use of computer hardware and software to process data into information.
Building Capacity for EMR Adoption and Data Utilization Among Safety Net Organizations Presented by Chatrian Reynolds, MPH, Evaluator, LPHI Shelina Foderingham,
ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLINICAL HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM
Lessons learned from implementing a full-package Electronic Medical Record System in Lesotho Outpatient Departments to improve Patient Waiting Time and.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
The International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua) – Guidelines.
1 Accredited Southern Group. 2 Accredited Southern Group Quality of Life Group 6: 5 years Strategic Objectives Internal Process Objectives:  Excellence.
Definition and Use of Clinical Pathways and Case Definition Templates
Health Information Professionals
Component 11 Configuring EHRs
Mary Alexander, MA, RN, CRNI®, CAE, FAAN Chief Executive Officer
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
US Army Patient Safety Center
Presentation transcript:

1  Organization, Roles, and Skills  Methodology  Standards Analysis  Tool Evaluation Terminology Collaboration Business Plan  Project Identification  Mission Effect Analysis  Financial Effect Analysis  Risk Analysis  Business Case  Goals and Objectives  High-Level Requirements  Architecture  Process Design  Functional Requirements  Non-Functional Requirements  Infrastructure Deployment  System Configuration  Testing Phased Implementation Solution Outline Validation Whitepaper Knowledge and Vocabulary Management Methodology

2 Data Standards Development

3 Change Proposal Process

4 Tools

5 System Context

6

7

8

9

10 System Context

11

12 Terminology Management

13 Why Terminology Management? Expansion and growth Localized decision making for system selection and configuration Multiple versions of the electronic medical record Fragmentation of patient information within the medical record, something that Dr. Plummer’s unified paper medical record was created to eliminate

14 Why Terminology Management? Differing medical records, clinical systems, and terminology have resulted in diverse clinical processes in the delivery of care. Provides considerable challenge as we seek Enterprise-wide improvements in outcomes and safety of care Provision of the best of the entire Mayo Clinic for each patient Efficiencies of operation and public reporting

15 Why Terminology Management? Standardization of Clinical Systems Policies Core Clinical Processes Terminology Develop and access standardized evidence-based protocols and guidelines Promote accuracy and Consistency of Patient Care Delivery Increase Access to Patient Data Decrease Costs Improve Patient Outcomes

16 Why Terminology Management? “…no matter where a patient is at Mayo Clinic, that patient should know all the Mayo Clinic resources are at his or her disposal.” “…a promise to our patients, staff, and other customers that we are organized and function as a system with a single purpose: our mission. And the mission, as we all know, is to provide the best care to every patient every day…” - Glenn Forbes, M.D.

17 Clinical Examples

18 Clinical Notes Document Naming Problem Many different ways to view clinical note documentation (nearly 10 systems!) Standards are implemented at a site, not enterprise level Record review is inefficient and complex How do I navigate? Do I have the entire record? How do we aggregate data? Can we?

19 Clinical Notes Document Naming Scope Develop enterprise naming standard for Clinical Notes Documents in EMR. Develop standardized value sets for each component of naming standard

20 Clinical Notes Document Naming

21 Clinical Notes Document Naming

22 Clinical Notes Document Naming

23 Clinical Notes Document Naming

24 Vital Signs Need Identify and apply best practices (policies, processes, and terminology) across Mayo Clinic to promote accuracy and consistency of care delivery

25 Vital Signs - Scope Height and Weight Temperature Respiratory Rate Pulse Blood Pressure Oxygen Saturation Pain Score Body Mass Index, Body Surface Area Head Circumference Fetal heart tone/rate monitoring with qualifiers (OB patients) Central Venous Pressure plus monitored

26 Vital Signs

27 Nursing Assessments Business Need Identify standard value sets for use by EMR applications Provide a semantic context for the value sets and align the model to the Enterprise Data Model Document a gap analysis between existing and standard terminologies to identify areas for further work

28 Business Information Model

29 Enterprise Context EDM Concept Unified Model New

30 Unified Nursing Assessment Model EDM Concept Unified Model Problem Specific

31 Problem-Specific Models Unified Model Problem Specific

32 Data Model to Vocabulary Vocabulary Data Model

33 Inpatient Pain Management Problem Inpatient pain service wanted to proactively find patients with unresolved pain, reduce dependency on manually generated referrals Solution Reported pain scores recorded in EMR Data replicated into analytic databases Nightly report was generated to identify patients whose reported pain scores did not fall below a specified value Clinical guidelines were applied Multi-disciplinary provides patient care (Clinical Nurse Specialists, Pharmacists, Pain Clinic)

34 Inpatient Pain Management Solution illustrates Simple use of controlled terminology for patient focused data capture and inference (data) Information delivered to multi-specialty practice team about a dynamic patient population (information) Actions taken by multidisciplinary team (knowledge driven care)

35 Problem List Problem ICD 9 standard (for billing) does not adequately meet the needs of the practice to define a clinical problem Limits workflow and automated decision support Would like to map terms to multiple standards Approach Enterprise data modeling Process analysis and design Data and system requirements

36 Race and Ethnicity Need for enterprise standardization Research Meet internal and external (e.g., funding agencies) research requirements Education Conform to The US Department of Education (USDOE) accreditation requirements Practice Collect the data necessary to assure diversity does not create disparities in care and every patient receives the best care at Mayo

37 Laboratory

38 Laboratory – System Integration Transactions to:RES Type:13ASTM From:MNL On:10/02/2001 TX Seq Transaction Data MSH|^~&\|Antrim|MNL|A |MML| |C |ORU^R01||P|2.2 PID|1| | | |HANSEN^JEANE M || |F|| |||1001:PD00011R|||| ORC|RE|K OBR|1|K ||9387^PTH Whole Molecule, ||| |||C ^Immanuel-St Josephs Hosp^ |N|||||^STOROLE Storvic||L |1001:PD00011R||||C|CH|A||^^^^^R~R OBX|1|ST|2238^Calcium^ROCLIS||8.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| OBX|2|ST|7596^Calcium, S^ROCLIS||DNR|mmol/L| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 19 years) OBX|3|ST|2239^Creatinine^ROCLIS||5.8|mg/dL| |h|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 9 years) OBX|4|ST|2240^Phosphorus^ROCLIS||3.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^|

39 Laboratory – System Integration Transactions to:RES Type:13ASTM From:MNL On:10/02/2001 TX Seq Transaction Data MSH|^~&\|Antrim|MNL|A |MML| |C |ORU^R01||P|2.2 PID|1| | | |HANSEN^JEANE M || |F|| |||1001:PD00011R|||| ORC|RE|K OBR|1|K ||9387^PTH Whole Molecule, ||| |||C ^Immanuel-St Josephs Hosp^ |N|||||^STOROLE Storvic||L |1001:PD00011R||||C|CH|A||^^^^^R~R OBX|1|ST|2238^Calcium^ROCLIS||8.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| OBX|2|ST|7596^Calcium, S^ROCLIS||DNR|mmol/L| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 19 years) OBX|3|ST|2239^Creatinine^ROCLIS||5.8|mg/dL| |h|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 9 years) OBX|4|ST|2240^Phosphorus^ROCLIS||3.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^|

40 Laboratory – System Integration Transactions to:RES Type:13ASTM From:MNL On:10/02/2001 TX Seq Transaction Data MSH|^~&\|Antrim|MNL|A |MML| |C |ORU^R01||P|2.2 PID|1| | | |HANSEN^JEANE M || |F|| |||1001:PD00011R|||| ORC|RE|K OBR|1|K ||9387^PTH Whole Molecule, ||| |||C ^Immanuel-St Josephs Hosp^ |N|||||^STOROLE Storvic||L |1001:PD00011R||||C|CH|A||^^^^^R~R OBX|1|ST|2238^Calcium^ROCLIS||8.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| OBX|2|ST|7596^Calcium, S^ROCLIS||DNR|mmol/L| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 19 years) OBX|3|ST|2239^Creatinine^ROCLIS||5.8|mg/dL| |h|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 9 years) OBX|4|ST|2240^Phosphorus^ROCLIS||3.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^|

41 Laboratory – System Integration Transactions to:RES Type:13ASTM From:MNL On:10/02/2001 TX Seq Transaction Data MSH|^~&\|Antrim|MNL|A |MML| |C |ORU^R01||P|2.2 PID|1| | | |HANSEN^JEANE M || |F|| |||1001:PD00011R|||| ORC|RE|K OBR|1|K ||9387^PTH Whole Molecule, ||| |||C ^Immanuel-St Josephs Hosp^ |N|||||^STOROLE Storvic||L |1001:PD00011R||||C|CH|A||^^^^^R~R OBX|1|ST|2238^Calcium^ROCLIS||8.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| OBX|2|ST|7596^Calcium, S^ROCLIS||DNR|mmol/L| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 19 years) OBX|3|ST|2239^Creatinine^ROCLIS||5.8|mg/dL| |h|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 9 years) OBX|4|ST|2240^Phosphorus^ROCLIS||3.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^|

42 Laboratory – System Integration Transactions to:RES Type:13ASTM From:MNL On:10/02/2001 TX Seq Transaction Data MSH|^~&\|Antrim|MNL|A |MML| |C |ORU^R01||P|2.2 PID|1| | | |HANSEN^JEANE M || |F|| |||1001:PD00011R|||| ORC|RE|K OBR|1|K ||9387^PTH Whole Molecule, ||| |||C ^Immanuel-St Josephs Hosp^ |N|||||^STOROLE Storvic||L |1001:PD00011R||||C|CH|A||^^^^^R~R OBX|1|ST|2238^Calcium^ROCLIS||8.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| OBX|2|ST|7596^Calcium, S^ROCLIS||DNR|mmol/L| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 19 years) OBX|3|ST|2239^Creatinine^ROCLIS||5.8|mg/dL| |h|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 9 years) OBX|4|ST|2240^Phosphorus^ROCLIS||3.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^|

43 Laboratory – System Integration Transactions to:RES Type:13ASTM From:MNL On:10/02/2001 TX Seq Transaction Data MSH|^~&\|Antrim|MNL|A |MML| |C |ORU^R01||P|2.2 PID|1| | | |HANSEN^JEANE M || |F|| |||1001:PD00011R|||| ORC|RE|K OBR|1|K ||9387^PTH Whole Molecule, ||| |||C ^Immanuel-St Josephs Hosp^ |N|||||^STOROLE Storvic||L |1001:PD00011R||||C|CH|A||^^^^^R~R OBX|1|ST|2238^Calcium^ROCLIS||8.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| OBX|2|ST|7596^Calcium, S^ROCLIS||DNR|mmol/L| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 19 years) OBX|3|ST|2239^Creatinine^ROCLIS||5.8|mg/dL| |h|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^| (Females > or = 9 years) OBX|4|ST|2240^Phosphorus^ROCLIS||3.9|mg/dL| |N|||F| ||| NTE|1|N^|

44 Referral Optimization Project Enterprise Data Trust Institutional Appointment Reporting Categories Enterprise Category Code Enterprise Category Code Description MCR Reporting CategoriesMCJ Reporting CategoriesMCA Reporting Categories ADMAdministrative Non-patientNon-Patient UNDUndifferentiatedSlot OnlyOPEN CONConsultConsult/Limited Exam Consultation/PAME Consult/PAME MEMulti-System EvaluationMulti-system Evaluation Evaluation Direct SVSubsequent Visit Return Visit/ Acute IllnessEstablished VIRTVirtual Visit Virtual Visit (Future) OTHOtherOther (Receptionist Only Visit, Research Visit, Educational Visit), Procedure (Blood Test, Procedure/Diagnostic Testing, Radiology, Specimen Collection, Therapy) AncillaryOther – Registration, Receptionist Visit, Procedure, Ancillary

45 Patient Focused Data Capture Point of care knowledge execution Practice Based Evidence Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines Clinically Derived Knowledge Bases Expert Systems Transactional Databases Inform Research, evaluation, & performance measurement Storage and Processing Consolidate with other evidence, other knowledge bases Analytic Data Repositories Replication and modeling Data Inference Knowledge Management Decision support Vision Terminology

46 Questions?