Science Leadership Support Network November 20, 2009 Supported by PIMSER and Kentucky Department of Education Please enjoy some refreshments and take time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

Common Core Math: 2 > 4 Super Week Norms Silence your technology Limit sidebar conversations.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Formative Assessment A Maryland Race to the Top Initiative Denise Hunt NCSA June 2013.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership March 25, 2010 We will begin at 9:01.
1 Formative Assessment Debbie Owens AMSP University of Kentucky Kathy Strunk AMSP University of Tennessee.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Say it, learn it, own it! Increasing student understanding through engaging conversations.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers November 17, 2009 Lexington, KY Brought to you by : University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership September 23, 2009 We will begin at 9:01.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance May 7, 2008 Blue Licks State Park Welcome! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure you have.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Science Leadership Support Network May 21, 2010 Supported by PIMSER K-12 Math & Science Outreach and Kentucky Department of Education Please enjoy some.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science November 13, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science December 15, 2009 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
Blaine and Mount Vernon TWSSP Workshop September 21, 2013.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance October 28, 2008 Blue Licks State Park Good Morning! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
A Parent’s Guide to Formative Assessment Communication is Key! Education is shared between the home and the school. Good communication is important as.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science March 12, 2010 Supported by University of Kentucky PIMSER Math and Science Outreach Welcome!
“Teaching”…Chapter 11 Planning For Instruction
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Science Leadership Support Network September 25, 2009 Supported by PIMSER and Kentucky Department of Education Welcome!
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Network for New Science/Math Teachers December 10, 2009 Lexington, KY Brought to you by University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance January 13, 2009 Blue Licks State Park Good Morning! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure.
Appalachian Teacher Partners Appalachian Math Science Partnership January 28, 2010 We will begin at 9:01.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
On Going Support Training November 12, 2015 Grades 2-3 Presenters: Julie Villeneuve, Fran Gibson, and Pat Gibson.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Network for New Science/Math Teachers November 20, 2008 Lexington, KY University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science Education Reform.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
Partnering to Progress K-5 Science Alliance April 14, 2009 Blue Licks State Park Come on In! Please help yourself to some refreshments and make sure you.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
Department of Specialized Instruction & Student Services Strategic Plan – Initiative 1.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Assessment Considerations A Student Scenario. Assessment Plan Embedded Assessment (Short Cycle) Informs practice Dynamic, moment by moment Participatory.
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
LeaPS Learning in Physical Science
Science Leadership Support Network
The Learner Centered Classroom
Write your metaphors on the butcher paper
Scaled Leadership Vision 20/20 Continues: Assessing Key Elements in the 5E Mathematics Classroom Silvia Aday, District instructional supervisor David galarce,
Differentiation in Instruction
Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science
Vision 20/20: Checks and Balances
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Science Leaders Network Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Science Leadership Support Network November 20, 2009 Supported by PIMSER and Kentucky Department of Education Please enjoy some refreshments and take time to work on the SLSN Pre-Survey Welcome!

Group Norms Stay on schedule; be on time Put cell phones on silent and computers closed Stay present, giving full attention Listen actively as others are speaking Be engaged—Be IN the work Avoid sidebar conversations Balance advocacy and inquiry Keep name tags visible Rule of 2 feet Any others?

Goals of SLSN Deepen understanding of a balanced assessment system and its role in motivating students to higher levels of achievement. Understand and incorporate skills and strategies for transforming planning and practice in order to ensure that all students understand key concepts from the Energy Transformations big idea. Develop and act on a personal vision of leadership for sustainable improvement in their school or district.

October Review What’s my Word? Content Survey Heat And Temperature Global Achievement Gap Brief

Where are we going? I have data. Now What? Ch. 2 Debrief HQTL: Assessment And Reflection

Line Up! Without talking, line up as directed from the most recent high school graduate to the oldest graduate. Wait for further instructions.

Looking at the Old World Discuss with your partner: –What did you read that was most like your high school experience? –What did you read that was a dramatic difference from your high school experience? –What was missing from your high school experience (as a learner)? –What can be changed to make current and future students’ experiences better?

Table Talk Refer to your reading guide for Chapter 2 of The Global Achievement Gap. Discuss questions 2 and 3

Carousel Activity We will work as 4 groups of 3 tables each –ABC/DEF/GHI/JKL–ABC/DEF/GHI/JKL Your table will use the color of marker designated above to record your responses to the question on your chart. Ex. A = green, E = red, I = blue When the time ends, rotate the chart to the next table in your group. Ex. A to B, B to C, C to A... Read the new question, read the previous responses, and either develop new ideas or expand on existing ideas as quickly as possible. Summarize the responses when they arrive back to your original station.

New Motto Singapore’s motto is “Thinking Schools, Learning Nation,” pg. 76. Kentucky’s is “Proficient and Prepared for Success.” Is this accurate? Will this help our students compete globally? Based on your reading so far, propose a new motto or defend our current one. Work with your table group to develop/defend a motto. Be prepared to share with the group. Presenter: Most recent HS graduate

7 Survival Skills & Learning Climate Examine the list of ways SLSN participants are attending to Learning Climate in our classrooms. Will these strategies help students successfully achieve the 7 survival skills? How important is consciously attending to learning climate for attaining the 7 survival skills? What is critical to getting where we want to be?

For January Read chapters 3 and 4. Use the reading guide to help organize your thoughts.

Time to Reflect

High Quality Teaching and Learning Assessment and Reflection The teacher and student collaboratively gather information and reflect on learning through a systematic process that informs instruction.

“When teachers are asked how they assess their students, they typically talk about tests, examinations, quizzes, and other formal methods. When they are asked how they know whether their students have learned what they have taught, the answers are very different.” –Dylan Wiliam, Assessing Science Learning

Characteristics of High Quality Teaching and Learning A- Teacher uses multiple methods to systematically gather data about student understanding and ability. B- Teacher uses student work/data, observations of instruction, assignments and interactions with colleagues to reflect on and improve teaching practice. C- Teacher revises instructional strategies based upon student achievement data. D- Teacher uncovers students’ prior understanding of the concepts to be addressed and addresses students’ misconceptions/incomplete conceptions. The teacher: 1) uncovers students’ prior conceptions about the concepts to be addressed and addresses students’ misconceptions/incomplete conceptions regarding the natural and physical world. E- Teacher co-develops scoring guides/rubrics with students and provides adequate modeling to make clear the expectations for quality performance. F- Teacher guides students to apply rubrics to assess their performance and identify improvement strategies. G- Teacher provides regular and timely feedback to students and parents that moves learners forward. H- Teacher allows students to use feedback to improve their work before a grade is assigned. I- Teacher facilitates students in self- and peer-assessment. J- Teacher reflects on instruction and makes adjustments as student learning occurs. Teacher Characteristics:

A- Student recognizes what proficient work looks like and determines steps necessary for improving his/her work. B- Student monitors progress toward reaching learning targets. C- Student develops and/or uses scoring guides periodically to assess his/her own work or that of peers. D- Student uses teacher and peer feedback to improve his/her work. E- Student reflects on work and makes adjustments as learning occurs. Characteristics of High Quality Teaching and Learning Student Characteristics:

What might this look like in practice? Read the introduction to Vol. 4 of Uncovering Student Ideas in Science. As you read, put a + by descriptions that match the descriptors for HQTL and a  by descriptions of effective use of probes. Why is it important to gather information and reflect on learning through a systematic process that informs instruction?

Energy Transformations: Heat and Temperature

First Word—Last Word Working with a partner, use the handout to create an acrostic of sorts about heat and temperature. Start with the first letter in the acrostic to begin a statement related to the topic. Try to write complete statements. Try to avoid using only one word or short phrases. Place in your binder—we will revisit in May for ‘Last Word’.

Let’s Examine the Data Read the teacher notes for the warming water probe. What’s the gist of the probe? Review the notes from the heat and temperature CTS. Working with a partner, use the teacher notes for the probe and the CTS notes to complete the organizer.

What are important considerations? TemperatureHeatThermal Energy What is the suggested developmentally appropriate progression for teaching these? What are the distinguishing characteristics of each of these? What can the probe responses tell us about student understanding? Why do students struggle to understand each of these? What are some instructional considerations?

What to look for in Students’ Responses to Probes Area for AnalysisWhat to Look For Concepts and IdeasNumber of students choosing a selected response (tallies); groups of students using similar explanations Use of terminologyConfusion of everyday words with their scientific meaning; appropriate use of scientific terminology Transfer of LearningAbility to apply ideas across contexts or in new situations Prior Knowledge or experience Ideas that students bring to their learning; experiences students may have had that impact their ideas Sophistication levelGrade levels at which the students’ ideas are typically developed ReasoningTypes of rules or justifications students use to support their ideas Ability to explainStudents’ ability to write or verbalize an explanation

Using the Data to Inform Instruction Working with a partner, examine the class set of responses to the probe. Sort the responses –Got it or Don’t Resort the “Don’t” responses by similarities in thinking. Determine some ‘next steps’ instructionally for this class. Meet with another pair at your table and reach a consensus about next steps.

“…being fair would mean, among other things, seeing student mistakes as a stage of development rather than a symptom of cognitive deficiency or hopeless illiteracy…mistakes can be intelligent.” –Gerald Graff in The Chronicle of Higher Education, November, 2009

Uses for Probes and Teacher Notes To uncover students’ understanding about a science topic prior to and throughout instruction, informing teachers in short- term lesson planning, long-term unit development, and even longer-term review and modifications for units taught again the next year; As a teaching and learning activity to engage students, spark inquiry, and stimulate thinking;

Uses for Probes and Teacher Notes To help teachers self-assess and analyze their own teaching by examining how well students are progressing toward a conceptual understanding of scientific ideas; To determine whether students need to experience ideas in new and varied contexts; To provide feedback to both teachers and students about teaching and learning;

Uses for Probes and Teacher Notes To promote safe, rich discourse in the classroom that recognizes that everyone’s ideas are important regardless of whether they are right or wrong; To differentiate instruction for different groups of students that targets their preconceptions.

A formative assessment “probe” is like a _____________, because ___________.

Reflection Time

7 Strategies for Assessment… Learning Target: I can compare the 7 Strategies of Assessment for Learning and the CHQTL, in order to clarify how these can improve student learning.

Self Rank Using the descriptors for the Assessment and Reflection characteristics of HQTL, reflect on your current practice and rank yourself. Identify one descriptor you want to focus on improving prior to our next meeting. –How will you know you are improving?

Comparing 7 Strategies and CHQTL Label each descriptor for HQTL (Classroom Assessment and Reflection component) as to which of the 7 strategies of assessment for learning it addresses. –Are any missing? –Are there some that do not match one of the strategies? What label might you give these? You have been asked to determine PD needs for your grade/team/dept/school. Working with a partner, draft your elevator speech convincing the PD committee to focus on classroom assessment and reflection and/or the 7 strategies in order to improve student learning.

Applying to Practice Scan the article, Every Day in Every Classroom Highlight the different strategies described for incorporating formative assessment into teaching routines. Select one strategy described in the article to try and to report on during our January meeting.

One last reflection….

For January 2010 Read Chapters 3 and 4 in Global Achievement Gap. Read Chapter 2 in 7 Strategies. Complete the reading guides. Our next meeting will be January 22 nd