Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Principles of GMP
Advertisements

1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Planning and use of funding instruments
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Performance Framework
European Union Cohesion Policy
Durban Decisions on the Clean Development Mechanism DUAN Maosheng Chair of the CDM Executive Board First SDM Joint Coordination Workshop Bonn,
Project design, preparation and approval Basel Convention Resource Mobilization Workshop Nairobi, 3 – 7 December 2006 Andreas Arlt Secretariat of the Basel.
1 SAICM & the QSP Established by the International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM), which adopted the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals.
1 Project Design Module 5 Session 5. 2 Summary This session provides introduction to project preparation, project documents, and checklist for questions.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Project Management CHAPTER SIXTEEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
© The Treasury 1 Better Business Cases “Investing for change” Overview.
Determining the Significant Aspects
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
WASH Cluster – Emergency Training NA NA4 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT Session 4 Proposal Development.
1 A risk-based approach to auditing procurement in English councils Mark Wardman Senior Manager Audit Commission 19 May 2014.
1 Budgets and Budgetary Control Prepared and Presented By Gladstone K. Hlalakuhle.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
Indicative Business Case
Need to Invest Investment Objectives and Case for Change Determine Potential Value for Money Strategic Case: Economic Case: Financial Case: Affordability.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Project Management Process. Project Complexity means that: a team of people are needed to supply expertise the work needs to be broken into manageable.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Chapter 2 A Strategy for the Appraisal of Public Sector Investments.
At the end of this module, participants should have a better understanding of the following : Elements of Gender Mainstreaming Basics of Gender Analysis.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Financial Intermediaries and Resettlement Planning Instruments.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Session 8 Scoring Method Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)
Wetlands and Poverty Reduction Project Anglophone regional practitioners training course MODULE 3 POLICY SETTING AND ADVOCACY By Teddy Tindamanyire, Isah.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Flanders project application and appraisal How it supports partnership.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Need to Invest Investment Objectives and Case for Change Programme Option Identification and Assessment Analysis Strategic Case: Economic Case: Financial.
Mitigation and Impact management
International Security Management Standards. BS ISO/IEC 17799:2005 BS ISO/IEC 27001:2005 First edition – ISO/IEC 17799:2000 Second edition ISO/IEC 17799:2005.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
Service Equality Team Equalities Impact Assessment Overview.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Finance Training for Governors
Government Spending to Achieve Sustainable Development Policy Goals
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Planning Instruments
NEPAL ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF COLLEGE Project Appraisal: Group Works
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN CYPRUS
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

Project Appraisal Module 5 Session 6

Summary This session will introduce dimensions of project appraisal, including: issues of social acceptability/desirability, environmental friendliness, technical feasibility/ appropriateness, gender sensitiveness, economic soundness and ability to be sustainable and most importantly financial viability.

Project Appraisal Project appraisal is the process of assessing and questioning proposals before resources are committed. It is a means by which partnerships can choose the best projects to help them achieve what they want for their community. …But appraisal has been a source of confusion and difficulty for projects in the past.

Project Appraisal (cont.) Audits of operation of Single Project Budget schemes highlighted concerns about design and operation of appraisal systems, including; Mechanistic, inflexible systems A lack of independence and objectivity A lack of clear definition of the stages of appraisal and of responsibility for these stages A lack of documentary evidence after carrying out the appraisal

Project Appraisal (cont.) Audits/inspections specifically found problems like; Individual appraisals which do not cover the necessary information or provide only a superficial analysis of the project Particular problems in dealing with risks, options and value for money Appraisals which are considered too onerous/burdensome for smaller projects Rushed appraisals

What can a Project Appraisal deliver? Be consistent and objective in choosing projects Make sure their program benefits all sections of the community Provide documentation to meet financial and audit requirements Appraisal justifies spending money on a project. Appraisal is an important decision making tool. Appraisal lays the foundations for delivery.

Good appraisal systems should ensure that: Project application, appraisal and approval functions are separate All the necessary information is gathered for appraisal       Race/tribal equality and other equality issues are given proper consideration Those involved in appraisal have appropriate technical expertise There are realistic allowances for time involved.

Good appraisal systems should ensure that: Decisions are within a implementers’ powers. There are appropriate arrangements for very small projects. There are appropriate arrangements for dealing with novel, contentious or particularly risky projects.

Key issues in appraising projects Need, targeting and objectives Applicants should provide detailed description of project, identifying local needs/ objectives it aims to meet. Context and connections Are there links between the project and other local programmes and projects. Consultation Local consultation determines priorities and secure community consent and ownership.

Key issues in appraising projects Options This is concerned with establishing whether there are different ways of achieving objectives Inputs Important to ensure all the necessary people and resources are in place to deliver project. Value for money This is one of the key criteria against which projects are appraised .

Key issues in appraising projects Implementation Appraisal scrutinises the practical plans for implementation, asking whether staffing, timetable and implementers are okay. Risk and uncertainty There should also be contingency plans in place to minimize the estimated risks.

Key issues in appraising projects Forward strategies Appraisal should also consider mainstream links and implications in case the project funds are over Sustainability Appraisal should include an assessment of a project’s environmental, social and economic impact, its positive and negative effects.

Checklist for project appraisal Questions worth asking: Are appraisals systematic and disciplined with a clear sequence of activities and operating rules? Is there an independent assessment of the project? Does the appraisal process culminate in clear recommendations that inform approval (or rejection) of the project?

Checklist (cont.) Is the approval stage clearly separate? Is the appraisal process well documented with key documents signed, showing ownership and agreement, and allowing the appraisal documentation to act as basis for future management, monitoring and evaluation? Does appraisal system comply with relevant government guidance? Are right people involved and, if necessary, how can you widen involvement?

Feasibility Study Aim of a feasibility study: A feasibility study may be undertaken during appraisal to establish the technical, economic and financial viability, environmental compliance and social acceptability of a project. Aim of a feasibility study: Development objectives Policy framework and detailed project objectives Technical soundness of the project Administrative feasibility of the project

Feasibility Study - Aims (cont.) The economic and financial viability of the project proposal The status of demand for the project beneficiaries Considerations of customs and traditions of project benefactors and issues of compatibility Other important policy and cross cutting issues (gender, environment, HIV/AIDS)

Transformation Production Possibility Curve : helps determine opportunity cost i.e. it guides on which project is more beneficial Litres of Milk vs Tons of Matooke

Project Appraisal (cont.) Hard questions are asked and the answers determine whether project proposal is adopted or rejected. The questions raised rotate around: appropriateness of project objectives, size, scope, implementation methods, modalities, time scale, and the project technical, financial, economic, institutional, environmental, social and distributional justification of the project.

Practical From the content just described about appraisal, appraise your identified projects in terms of the following: Technical analysis Economic Analysis Financial Analysis Environmental Analysis, and Social Analysis