1 Topological Quantum Phenomena and Gauge Theories Kyoto University, YITP, Masatoshi SATO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protected edge modes without symmetry Michael Levin University of Maryland.
Advertisements

Quasiparticle Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid arXiv: X. Zhou, C. Fang, W.-F. Tsai, J. P. Hu.
Summing planar diagrams
Exploring Topological Phases With Quantum Walks $$ NSF, AFOSR MURI, DARPA, ARO Harvard-MIT Takuya Kitagawa, Erez Berg, Mark Rudner Eugene Demler Harvard.
Anyon and Topological Quantum Computation Beijing Normal university
High T c Superconductors & QED 3 theory of the cuprates Tami Pereg-Barnea
Štefan Olejník Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia Coulomb energy, remnant symmetry in Coulomb gauge, and phases of.
Quantum “disordering” magnetic order in insulators, metals, and superconductors HARVARD Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Perimeter Institute, Waterloo,
Topological Superconductors
Gauge Field of Bloch Electrons in dual space First considered in context of QHE Kohmoto 1985 Principle of Quantum Mechanics Eigenstate does.
Funded by NSF, Harvard-MIT CUA, AFOSR, DARPA, MURI Takuya Kitagawa Harvard University Mark Rudner Harvard University Erez Berg Harvard University Yutaka.
Quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) and the quantum spin Hall effect (QSHE) Shoucheng Zhang, Stanford University Les Houches, June 2006.
QCD – from the vacuum to high temperature an analytical approach.
Subir Sachdev Science 286, 2479 (1999). Quantum phase transitions in atomic gases and condensed matter Transparencies online at
Twist liquids and gauging anyonic symmetries
Spin Chain in Gauge Theory and Holography Yong-Shi Wu Department of Physics, University of Utah, Center for Advanced Study, Tsinghua University, and Shanghai.
Topology of Andreev bound state
Fractional topological insulators
CONFINEMENT WITHOUT A CENTER: THE EXCEPTIONAL GAUGE GROUP G(2) M I C H E L E P E P E U n i v e r s i t y o f B e r n (S w i t z e r l a n d)
Revealing anyonic statistics by multiphoton entanglement Jiannis K. Pachos Witlef Wieczorek Christian Schmid Nikolai Kiesel Reinhold Pohlner Harald Weinfurter.
Smashing the Standard Model: Physics at the CERN LHC
Wilson-’t Hooft operators and the theta angle Måns Henningson Chalmers University of Technology.
Majorana Fermions and Topological Insulators
School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL & PHYSICAL SCIENCE Parallel Transport & Entanglement Mark Williamson 1, Vlatko Vedral 1 and William.
Topological Insulators and Beyond
6. Second Quantization and Quantum Field Theory
Microscopic nematicity in iron superconductors Belén Valenzuela Instituto de Ciencias Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC) In collaboration with: Laura Fanfarillo.
A direct relation between confinement and chiral symmetry breaking in temporally odd-number lattice QCD Lattice 2013 July 29, 2013, Mainz Takahiro Doi.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Entanglement Entropy in Holographic Superconductor Phase Transitions Rong-Gen Cai Institute of Theoretical Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences (April 17,
Uniform discretizations: the continuum limit of consistent discretizations Jorge Pullin Horace Hearne Institute for Theoretical Physics Louisiana State.
Static interquark potentials from lattice QCD Toru T. Takahashi (Gunma College of Technology)
Correlated States in Optical Lattices Fei Zhou (PITP,UBC) Feb. 1, 2004 At Asian Center, UBC.
Topological Insulators and Topological Band Theory
Collective modes and interacting Majorana fermions in
Chiral Dynamics Workshop, JLAB, Aug. 6-10, 2012
Topology induced emergent dynamic gauge theory in an extended Kane-Mele-Hubbard model Xi Luo January 5, 2015 arXiv:
Entanglement and Topological order in 1D & 2D cluster states
Topological Quantum Computing
Holographic Hadrons in dense medium Sang-Jin Sin
Topological Insulators
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
Dynamical Instability of Holographic QCD at Finite Density Shoichi Kawamoto 23 April 2010 at National Taiwan University Based on arXiv: in collaboration.
 Review of QCD  Introduction to HQET  Applications  Conclusion Paper: M.Neubert PRPL 245,256(1994) Yoon yeowoong(윤여웅) Yonsei Univ
Entanglement and Topological order in self-dual cluster states Vlatko Vedral University of Oxford, UK & National University of Singapore.
Entanglement Entropy In Gauge Theories Sandip Trivedi Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
高密度クォーク物質における カイラル凝縮とカラー超伝導の競 合 M. Kitazawa,T. Koide,Y. Nemoto and T.K. Prog. of Theor. Phys., 108, 929(2002) 国広 悌二 ( 京大基研) 東大特別講義 2005 年 12 月 5-7 日 Ref.
Quantum spin Hall effect Shoucheng Zhang (Stanford University) Collaborators: Andrei Bernevig, Congjun Wu (Stanford) Xiaoliang Qi (Tsinghua), Yongshi Wu.
Panjin Kim*, Hosho Katsura, Nandini Trivedi, Jung Hoon Han
Cenke Xu 许岑珂 University of California, Santa Barbara Stable 2+1d CFT at the Boundary of a Class of 3+1d Symmetry Protected Topological States.
Search for New Topological Insulator Materials April 14, 2011 at NTNU Hsin Lin Northeastern University.
1 The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE:
NTNU 2011 Dimer-superfluid phase in the attractive Extended Bose-Hubbard model with three-body constraint Kwai-Kong Ng Department of Physics Tunghai University,
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and the
From fractionalized topological insulators to fractionalized Majoranas
Fractional Berry phase effect and composite particle hole liquid in partial filled LL Yizhi You KITS, 2017.
Nuclear Symmetry Energy in QCD degree of freedom Phys. Rev
Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking and Analogies to the Higgs-Mechanism
Topological Insulators
Standard Model of Particles
Color Superconductivity in dense quark matter
Topological Order and its Quantum Phase Transition
Topological quantum computing ▬ Toric code
Quantum Computing: the Majorana Fermion Solution
Chengfu Mu, Peking University
SOC Fermi Gas in 1D Optical Lattice —Exotic pairing states and Topological properties 中科院物理研究所 胡海平 Collaborators : Chen Cheng, Yucheng Wang, Hong-Gang.
with Erich Poppitz (u of Toronto)
QCD at very high density
Hiroyuki Nojiri, Department of Physics, Okayama University
Presentation transcript:

1 Topological Quantum Phenomena and Gauge Theories Kyoto University, YITP, Masatoshi SATO

Mahito Kohmoto (University of Tokyo, ISSP) Yong-Shi Wu (Utah University) In collaboration with 2 Review paper on Topological Quantum Phenomena Y. Tanaka, MS, N. Nagaosa, “Symmetry and Topology in SCs” JPSJ 81 (12) T. Mizushima, Tsutsumi, MS, Machida, “Symmetry Protected TSF 3He-B” arXiv: “Braid Group, Gauge Invariance, and Topological Order”, MS. M.Kohmoto, and Y.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (06) 2.“Topological Discrete Algebra, Ground-State Degeneracy, and Quark Confinement in QCD”, MS. Phys. Rev. D77, (08)

Outline Part 1. What is topological phase/order 1.General idea of topological phase/order 2.Topological insulators/superconductors Part 2. deconfinement as a topological order 3

Phase or order that can be classified by “connectivity” 4 What is topological phase/order ? Connected (globally) Not connected topologically non-trivial topologically trivial

Gelation Not connected connected Ohira-MS-Kohmoto Phys. Rev. E(06) 5 cross-linkpolymer gel

Nambu-Landau theoryPhase classified by connectivity Two distinct concepts of phases phase transition at finite T spontaneous symmetry breaking classical phase phase transition at zero T spontaneous symmetry breaking quantum phase phase transition at finite T classical entanglement topological classical phase phase transition at zero T quantum entanglement phase transition at zero T quantum entanglement topological quantum phase 6 thermal fluctuation quantum fluctuation

What is quantum entanglement ? 7

Entanglement in quantum theories Not directly observed Non-locality specific to quantum theories Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox (probability wave) 8 state vector ≠ observable

0. Use entropy 1.Examine cross sections 2.Directly examine entanglement 9 How to study entanglement in quantum theories

1. Examine cross sections Topological quantum phase = “connected” phase “Not connected” movable (=gapless ) new degrees of freedom 10

Topological insulators 11 Bi 1-x Sb x x = 0.10 Hsieh et al., Nature (2008) x = 1.0 x = 0.12 Angle-resolved photo emission spectroscopy (ARPES) Nishide, Taskin et al., PRB (2010)

12 Bi 2 Se 3 Bi 2 Te 3 Hsieh et al., Nature (2009) Chen et al., Science (2009) Bi 2 Te 2 Se (Bi 1-x Sb x ) 2 (Te 1-y Se y ) 3 Pb(Bi 1-x Sb x ) 2 Te 4 … T.Sato et al., PRL (2010) Topological insulators(2)

13 Entanglement in quantum theories we need a mathematically rigid definition we need a definition calculable from Hamiltonian Topological quantum phase In actual studies

14 A mathematical definition of the entanglement is given by topological invariants (b) not entangled(a) entangled (winding # 1)(winding # 0) wave function of occupied state

15 homotopy Brillouin zone (momentum space) Hilbert space We can also prove that gapless states exist on the boundary if the bulk topological # is nonzero (Bulk-boundary correspondence) MS et al, Phys. Rev. B83 (2011) Mathematically, such a topological invariant can be defined by homotopy theory wave fn. of occupied state

16 SC: Formation of Cooper pairs In the ground state, states below the Fermi energy are fully occupied. Cooper pair Topological surface states can appear also in superconductors electron hole

17 Like topological insulators, we can have a non-trivial entanglement (non-trivial topology) of occupied states Topological Superconductors Superconducting state with nontrivial topology Qi et al, PRB (09), Schnyder et al PRB (08), MS, PRB 79, (09), MS-Fujimoto, PRB79, (09)

18 Surface gapless states in SCs can be detected by the tunneling conductance measurement. [Sasaki, Kriener, Segawa, Yada, Tanaka, MS, Ando PRL (11)] Evidence of surface gapless modes Robust zero-bias peak appears in the tunneling conductance Cu x Bi 2 Se 3 Sn

Summary (part 1) There exist a class of phases that cannot be well-described by the Nambu-Landau theory. Such a class of phases are called as topological quantum phase. One of characterizations of the topological phase is a non- trivial topological number of the occupied states. In this case, we have characteristic gapless states on the boundary. 19

20 Part 2. deconfinement as a topological phase

21 Does any topologically entangled phase have gapless surface states? Question We need a different method to study topological phase No

22 Generally, a more direct way to examine the entanglement of the system is to use excitations ≈ For example, by exchanging string-like excitations, we can examine the entanglement of the ground state, in a similar manner to examine the entanglement of muffler.

23 If the system supports only bosonic or fermionic excitations, the ground state does not have the entanglement which is detectable by the braiding of excitations No entanglement can happens State goes back to the original by two successive exchange processes The entanglement depends on the statistics of excitations

24 ①Anyon ②Non-Abelian anyon On the other hands, if there exist anyon excitation, the ground state should be entangled unitary matrix Exchange of excitations may change states completely The ground state should be entangled

25 In general, we can say that if we have a non-trivial Aharanov- Bohm phase by exchanging excitations, so we can expect the entanglement of the ground states. Charge fractionalization is a manifestation of topological phases A stronger statement

26 Topological order in QCD IdeaCharge fractionalization implies a topological order. And quarks have fractional charges The quark deconfinement implies the topological order ? To examine the entanglement of the system, it is convenient to consider a topologically nontrivial base manifold. yes

2dim case 2dim torus 3dim space with periodic boundary 3d torus Now we consider torus as a base manifold 27

If the base manifold is torus, we have a new symmetry 28 Adiabatic electromagnetic flux insertion through hole h a The spectrum is invariant after the flux insertion

operator for the movement of quark around a-th circle of torus 29 Interestingly, we have a non-trivial AB phase in the deconfinement phase Deconfiment phase is topologically ordered

30 On the other hand, we do not have such a nontrivial AB phase in the confinement phase the movement of hadron or meson around a-th circle of torus Confiment phase is topologically trivial trivial

1) quark confinement phase 2) quark deconfiment phase We only have commutative operators, and no new state is created by these operation 31 After all, we have the following algebra. no entanglement New states can be obtained by these operation Entanglement

Degeneracy of ground states in the deconfinement phase =

33 The confinement and deconfinement phases in QCD are discriminated by the ground state degeneracy in the torus base manifold! For SU(N) QCD on T n ×R 4-n deconfinement: N n –fold ground state degeneracy confinement: No such a topological degeneracy

34 comparison with the Wilson’s criteria in the heavy quark limit perturbative calculation of the topological ground state degeneracy consistency check with Fradkin-Shenker’s phase diagram comparison with Witten index To confirm the idea of topological order, I have performed the following consistency checks

35 1.comparison with the Wilson’s criteria for quark confinement QCD SU(3) YM heavy quark limit center symmetry The pure SU(3) YM has an additional symmetry known as center symmetry  link variable

36 confinement phase  ① area law In temporal gauge ② cluster property The center symmetry is not broken No ground state degeneracy

37 deconfinement phase breaking of the center symmetry 3 3 degeneracy The degeneracy reproduces our result ① perimeter law

38 In the static limit, our condition for quark confinement coincides with the Wilson’s. remark In this limit, our algebra reproduces the ‘t Hooft algebra

39 3. comparison with Fradkin-Shenker’s phase diagram Fradkin-Shenker’s result (79) Higgs and the confinement phase are smoothly connected when the Higgs fields transform like fundamental rep (complementarity). They are separated by a phase boundary when the Higgs fields transform like other than fundamental rep. Our topological argument implies that no ground state degeneracy exists when Higgs and the confinement phase are smoothly connected.

40 Z 2 gauge theory perimeter law area law Wilson loop Ising matter

41 Topological degeneracy no ground state degeneracy 2 3 -fold degeneracy

42 Abelian Higgs model perimeter law area law 1) Higgs charge =12) Higgs charge =2

43 Our topological argument works when the Higgs field has the two unit of charge.  center symmetry charge 2

44 no ground state degeneracy 2 3 -fold degeneracy massless excitation Topological degeneracy

45 Summary Generally, excitations can be used to examine the entanglement of the system directly. If we have a non-trivial Aharanov-Bohm phase by exchanging excitations, we can expect the entanglement of the ground states The concept of topological phase is useful to characteraize the quark confinement phase even in the presence of the dynamical quarks.