U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Steve Fischer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

Increasing Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Transmission Pipelines and Land Use: What needs to be accomplished and why? General Session --- November.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Presentation to NACo Environment, Energy and Land Use Steering.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention PHMSA Update Annmarie Robertson PHMSA/Office.
Campus Improvement Plans
1 Pipeline Security Presented to: Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 5, 2010.
Demonstration Grant PARTNERS FOR PIPELINE SAFETY WEB PAGES Develop interactive and informative webpage for residents, property owners, contractors and.
Federal Agency Update – January 2009 Pipelines & Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Communications Task Team Status Danny Gibbs Spectra Energy / INGAA It’s.
Increased Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans, LA November 15, 2007.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Pipeline Safety Program Regulatory (DOT) Pipeline Risk Management Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 16, 2007 John A. Jacobi, P.E. PHMSA.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Program.
RST processes Session 6 Presentation 3. A framework for RST processes Establishing an RST Membership Terms of reference Work programme (schedule, agenda,
Event Name/Date Presented by: Name/Title/Organization Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance A Real Estate Symposium International Right of Way Association/Appraisal Institute Las Vegas, NV January 13-15,
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance Protecting Transmission Pipelines International Right of Way Association/Appraisal Institute Las Vegas, NV January.
Challenges of a Harmonized Global Safety Regime Jacques Repussard Director General IRSN IAEA 2007 Scientific Forum.
Regulation of Pipelines
LOCAL BUFFER SUPPORT PROGRAM 1 May 2014 MAV. Liveability, growth and waste As Melbourne continues to grow, we need secure the right mix of resource recovery.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 16, 2007 New Orleans, LA Presented by Jerry Kenerson.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Julie Halliday, Program Development DOT – PHMSA – OPS November 18, Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Lessons Learned….. Were PG&E practices an anomaly or the tip of a bigger problem? How would we know? 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference – Getting to.
1 A Framework for Comprehensive Planning City of Sunset Valley.
Federal Transit Administration Transit Bus Safety and Security Program Primer for State Departments of Transportation.
La Center, Washington: Balancing Pipelines and Populations 1.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Protecting Communities Co-Chairs Cathy Pratt- City of St. Peters Greg Ford- Williams Gas Pipeline;INGAA.
Track # SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL © 2006 The Shaw Group 4171 Essen Lane Baton Rouge LA USA.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
Protecting Communities Task Team Update Las Vegas January 14, 2009.
Pipelines & Land Use Planning Tim Sweeney Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 3,
Planning Zones to Protect People Near Pipelines Chuck Lesniak City of Austin Watershed Protection Department.
Pipeline Safety & Development Changes File # ZON Proponent Carl Weimer, Whatcom County Council Docketed Unanimously by the Whatcom County Council.
Damage Prevention – Are States as engaged as they need to be ? Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Glynn Blanton, PHMSA State.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1 November 3, 2006 David Knoelke API Public Awareness Committee Chair (BP Pipelines N.A.) Greater Public Involvement – What does that mean?
Energy topic Presentation by working group September 2015 Joint US/EU Conference.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
PROTECTING TRANSMISSION PIPELINES Protecting transmission pipelines is protecting the public -
Forum on Internet of Things: Empowering the New Urban Agenda Geneva, Switzerland, 19 October 2015 Cooperation and Opportunities for Standards in the New.
An ordinance amending the County’s zoning and land use regulations to increase pipeline safety Adopted July 27, 2010.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1 Mike Israni Senior Technical Advisor Manager: Standards & Committees.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
Federal Guidance for Pipeline Rights-of-Way Daron K. Moore El Paso Pipeline Group November 16, 2007.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
Senate Select Committee on Aging and Long Term Care Final Report and Progress in 2015 Suzanne Reed, Chief of Staff Senator Carol Liu (Chair)
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Sustainable Community EMS Design Including Pollution Prevention Michelle M. Wyman Reed Smith Shaw & McClay LLP EMS Models and Strategies: ISO & Beyond.
Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety Katie Hansen, Board of Directors Pipeline Safety Trust.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Our Mission... “To facilitate collaboration and partnerships through a comprehensive master plan which promotes economic growth, community development.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Natural Gas is Moving Forward
PHMSA Update for the API RP1162 Rewrite Team
Images and logos as appropriate
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Steve Fischer USDOT/PHMSA

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Why? Our Nation’s economy is driven by abundant energy. Natural gas and liquid transmission pipelines play a crucial role by safely transporting energy products. The safety risks of transmission pipelines are low due to low level of likelihood of pipeline incidents; however, Individual pipeline incidents hold the possibility of serious safety and economic consequences. Development near transmission pipelines increases the likelihood of pipeline damage and serious incidents. Communities need risk-informed guidance related to property development and land use near transmission pipelines to help ensure safety. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Transmission pipelines reach across our country and are located in urban and rural areas. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Our dependency on energy is growing Energy from oil and natural gas essential to our daily lives.  E.g., Transportation, heating; electricity generation  Oil and natural gas supply approximately 2/3 of U.S. energy needs Oil and natural gas are produced in distant regions  Crude oil must be moved to refineries  Refined oil products and natural gas must be moved to consumers Pipelines = primary means of transporting oil & natural gas  100% of natural gas and approximately 67% of oil. Pipelines are critical to our communities and necessary for basic needs and economic mobility Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Transmission pipelines link energy production to end users. (Oil & Refined Products) Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Transmission pipelines link energy production to end users. (Natural Gas) Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Transmission pipeline risks increase as population density increases. Illustrated: Growth Along Pipeline in Washington State

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Required DOT and FERC to study land use practices, zoning ordinances, and preservation of environmental resources relative to transmission pipeline ROW and maintenance. Pipeline Safety Improvement Act 2002 (PSIA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Local Conditions are Unique ROW width & position within ROW Number of pipelines & other facilities in the ROW Total area being developed and price of real estate Type of construction equipment for adjacent development

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Information from study to be used to: Determine effective practices to limit encroachment on transmission pipeline ROW. Address and prevent hazards and risks to public, workers, and environment associated with ROW encroachment. Raise awareness of the risks and hazards of encroachment. Address preservation of environmental resources while maintaining ROW, recognizing pipeline operators’ regulatory obligations. Pipeline Safety Improvement Act 2002 (PSIA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Study, TRB Special Report 281, September 2004 Recommendations to PHMSA:  Develop risk-informed land use guidance.  Involve all stakeholders.  Include expertise in risk analysis, risk communication, land use management, and developing regulation.  Ensure process is transparent, independent, and peer reviewed.  Refine the guidance over time. Recommendations to transmission pipeline industry:  Develop best practices for specification, acquisition, development, and maintenance of transmission pipeline ROW. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Why is PHMSA leading this effort? Past Success in fostering collaborative approaches to address difficult issues  Risk Assessment Quality Teams  Common Ground Study Part of PHMSA’s Strategic Plan for  “An Enterprise Approach to Achieving Safety” Recognition that – Collaborative involvement of affected stakeholders provides rich input and acceptable results Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration What Has PHMSA Already Done? Commissioned TRB study to help frame the issue. Continues to support the CGA Established the Stakeholder Communications website Issued new rules for pipeline operator public awareness programs Initiated and supports PIPA Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration January, 2008 – PHMSA hosted the inaugural meeting of the Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Approximately 130 people attended the meeting and are participating in the PIPA effort. PIPA is a partnership of stakeholders whose purpose is to further enhance pipeline safety PIPA focus – to develop more detailed guidance for property development in the vicinity of transmission pipelines. Completion of the PIPA effort planned for January Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PIPA is: Investigating existing best practices and different stakeholder needs and challenges Seeking consensus to develop practical guidance on:  Land use policies  Range of appropriate land uses  Setbacks and other measures Discussing topics and approaches to include:  Model local zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations  Model planning policies  Model state legislation Through PIPA, stakeholders are engaging each other to develop best practices for property development adjacent to transmission pipelines. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PIPA will produce High-quality, national level risk assessment  Include classes of pipelines, risk profiles and field conditions Simple and easy-to-use decision-guiding tools  Relative to risk levels associated with various aspects of land use planning near pipeline ROW Plan for implementation  Providing help to local communities Plan for long-term communication  Of risk with input from all stakeholders Plan for integrating and refining  Preceding components, on a continuing basis, using actual experience. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Organizations Represented in PIPA Federal Government State and Local Government Associations Public Advocacy Groups Non-Pipeline Industry Associations Pipeline Industry Associations Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Protecting Communities - recommend practices for:  Defining recommended characteristics of land use adjacent to transmission pipeline ROW.  Using enhanced building codes for structures adjacent to transmission pipeline ROW.  Developing risk-informed guidance for above, based on attributes of transmission pipelines and proposed developments.  Developing model ordinances, planning policies, regulations, or state legislation incorporating or promoting any of these best practices. PIPA Task Teams

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Protecting Transmission Pipelines – recommend practices for:  Incorporating transmission pipeline ROW space in new developments – residential, commercial, and industrial.  Defining acceptable land owner uses and activities on ROW.  Ensuring land owners working in the ROW notify transmission pipeline operators prior to making changes in land use.  Guiding transmission pipeline operator specification, acquisition, development, and maintenance of ROW.  Managing and recording land documents (easements, encroachment agreements, retention, recording practices). PIPA Task Teams

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Protecting Transmission Pipelines (cont’d) Develop guidance, model ordinances, planning policies, regulations, or state legislation incorporating or promoting any of these best practices. Review Common Ground Alliance (CGA) Best Practices and one-call system requirements for gaps in protecting transmission pipelines due to changes in land use in the ROW. Additional issue discussed among PC and PTP task teams – development and use of building setbacks General agreement that implementation of PIPA practices is best over use of setbacks PIPA Task Teams

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Communications Determine best practices for fostering early communication among stakeholders. Determine best practices for communicating acceptable uses and activities on transmission pipeline ROW. Determine best practices for real estate disclosure of transmission pipeline ROW. Determine barriers to effective communication and best practices for engaging stakeholders. PIPA Task Teams

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Communications Describe benefits of pipeline transportation. Describe best practices to effectively communicate risk of pipelines and how risk is managed. Examine possible tie-ins with Common Ground Alliance (CGA) Best Practices. Formulate PIPA risk communication plan and design format of final PIPA work product for all Task Teams. PIPA Task Teams

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Followed a discussion and consensus agreement process. Pursued respective goals separately via series of telephone and web-assisted conferences. Supported by a mid-point face-to-face meeting to discuss cross-team issues and ensure initiative was on track. Draft final report issued November 2008 to participating stakeholder organizations for review. PIPA Task Teams

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PIPA Report Participating stakeholder organizations given approximately 1½ months to review draft final report. Resulting comments consolidated and associated with specific report elements for additional review and consensus by task teams. Task teams reviewed revised practices and additional comments in series of Live Meeting teleconferences. Second level consensus required on revisions. Difficult issues addressed in additional meetings of stakeholder representatives. Some recommended practices were removed. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PIPA Report Final PIPA Report will be integrated into an interactive application on PHMSA’s Stakeholder Communications website. Stakeholder’s will be encouraged to refer to website for land use planning guidance and to link to it from their own websites. Use of website will enhance ability to accommodate and make available future revisions. Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Other Resources Are Available Washington State Consultation Process National Pipeline Mapping System Pipeline Operator Public Awareness Programs Reference resources on PHMSA Stakeholder Communications Website Reference Document for Familiarization to Risk-Informed (Land Use) Planning List of References Related to Risk- Informed Land Use Planning Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Some communities already active City of Austin, TX, Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Ordinance Washington State Model Ordinance Municipal Code of Edison, NJ, Township Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration At least one state requires complex risk assessments Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Resources Are Available Washington State Consultation Process National Pipeline Mapping System Pipeline Operator Public Awareness Programs Reference resources on PHMSA Stakeholder Communications Website  Reference Document for Familiarization to Risk- Informed (Land Use) Planning  List of References Related to Risk-Informed Land Use Planning Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration For more information regarding PIPA, contact: Steve Fischer David Spangler Director of Program DevelopmentCATS CoordinatorPHMSA/OPS Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA)