KFPA LO Modifications (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review January 30, 2009 G. Anderson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP-B Local Oscillator
Advertisements

CHAPTER 3: SPECIAL PURPOSE OP-AMP CIRCUITS
Loop Shaping Professor Walter W. Olson
Types Of Mixers In Radar Receivers
A CMOS Front-end Amplifier Dedicated to Monitor Very Low Amplitude Signals from Implantable Sensors ECEN 5007 Mixed Signal Circuit Design Sandra Johnson.
Mid-Semester Design Review High Frequency Radio with BPSK Modulation.
Integrated Circuits Design for Applications in Communications Dr. Charles Surya Department of Electronic and Information Engineering DE636  6220
Announcements Tuesday’s Lecture next week is cancelled –October 18 th Assignment 4 is active, due in my mailbox by 5pm Friday (October 14 th ) Mid-term.
EE 198 B Senior Design Project. Spectrum Analyzer.
Electronics Principles & Applications Sixth Edition Chapter 12 Communications (student version) ©2003 Glencoe/McGraw-Hill Charles A. Schuler.
McGraw-Hill © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved. Electronics Principles & Applications Seventh Edition Chapter 12 Communications.
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
TRF Noise Floor Related Question Prepared by Bill Wu.
CHAPTER 5 - OSCILLATORS.
ANALOGUE ELECTRONICS II
Superheterodyne Receiver RF Front End (Amps, Filters) Local Oscillator Mixer IF Strip (Amps, Filters) Channel SelectivityService Band Detector (Demodulation)
1 Mixers  Mixers plays an important role in both the transmitter and the receiver  Mixers are used for down frequency conversion in the receiver  Mixers.
Spectrum Analyzer Basics Copyright 2000 Agenda Overview: What is spectrum analysis? What measurements do we make? Theory of Operation: Spectrum analyzer.
Filters and the Bode Plot
Satellite Microwave MMG Rashed Sr. Lecturer, Dept. of ETE Daffodil International University.
Sensitivity System sensitivity is defined as the available input signal level Si for a given (SNR)O Si is called the minimum detectable signal An expression.
ADS Design Guide.
Vector Modulator AMC board Marcin Smelkowski Warsaw University od Technology PERG – ISE Presentation is based on „Draft.
Filtering. What Is Filtering? n Filtering is spectral shaping. n A filter changes the spectrum of a signal by emphasizing or de-emphasizing certain frequency.
Sept. 25, 2006 Assignment #1 Assignment #2 and Lab #3 Now Online Formula Cheat Sheet Cheat SheetCheat Sheet Review Time, Frequency, Fourier Bandwidth Bandwidth.
Amplitude Modulation 2.2 AM RECEIVERS
Copyright © 2011 by Denny Lin1 Computer Music Synthesis Chapter 6 Based on “Excerpt from Designing Sound” by Andy Farnell Slides by Denny Lin.
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Shaping.
CHAPTER 2 Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS. Introduction AM demodulation – reverse process of AM modulation. Demodulator: converts a received modulated-
Solid State Microwave Oscillators Convert dc energy to microwave signals Can be used as generators in all communication systems, radars, electronic counter.
Frank Ludwig, DESY Content : 1 Stability requirements for phase and amplitude for the XFEL 2 Next LLRF system for optimized detector operation 3 Limitations.
EMT212 - ANALOGUE ELECTRONIC II
CHAPTER 2 Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS. Introduction AM demodulation – reverse process of AM modulation. Demodulator: converts a received modulated-
Amplifiers Amplifier Parameters Gain = Po/Pi in dB = 10 log (Po/Pi)
Communication Systems
K-Band Focal Plane Array: Integrated Downconverter Module #1 Matt Morgan and Tod Boyd National Radio Astronomy Observatory 8/7/2008.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
All materials are taken from “Fundamentals of electric circuits”
Lecture 2: Filters.
Receivers Receivers perform the inverse operations to transmitter
1 TOPIC 4: FREQUENCY SELECTIVE CIRCUITS. 2 INTRODUCTION Transfer Function Frequency Selective Circuits.
Single Balanced Mixer Design ECE 6361
Travis Newton LO-IF Engineer EVLA LO/IF PDR January IF Downconverter Travis Newton LO/IF Engineer.
Tests of STO IF Components S. Weinreb April 15, 2009 Two 1-2 GHz IF amplifier plates and one 5 GHz converter plate for the Texas test flight have been.
ELEC 202 Circuit Analysis II
December 1997 Circuit Analysis Examples 걼 Hairpin Edge Coupled Filter 걼 Bipolar Amplifier 걼 Statistical Analysis and Design Centering 걼 Frequency Doubler.
Electronics Technology Fundamentals Chapter 15 Frequency Response and Passive Filters.
1 Noise Figure Improvement using a Front End Transformer Hooman 9/9/13.
April 12 | Comparison of Sophisticated Synthesizer Concepts and Modern Step Attenuator Implementations | 2 Comparison of Sophisticated Synthesizer Concepts.
Chapter 5 Active Filter By En. Rosemizi Bin Abd Rahim EMT212 – Analog Electronic II.
The Working Theory of an RC Coupled Amplifier in Electronics.
1 Transmitters A transmitter must generate a signal with the right type of modulation, with sufficient power, at the right carrier frequency, and with.
RF components Design for the Internet Over TV Band Adaptor
Communication 40 GHz Anurag Nigam.
Single Pixel Mixer Tests July 2008 (version 2, posted 11 Aug 2008)
Lets Design an LNA! Anurag Nigam.
TOPIC 3: FREQUENCY SELECTIVE CIRCUITS
Noise Figure, Noise Factor and Sensitivity
Digital Control Systems Waseem Gulsher
RF Front End Radio Design- Simulations and Specifications
A Software Defined Radio for the Masses, Part 4
Chapter 3 ACTIVE FILTER.
8.5 Modulation of Signals basic idea and goals
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
CH-6 CABLE TV.
AM-7027 Up Converter-Amplifier
AM-7026 Down Converter-Receiver
Chapter 5: Active Filters
KFPA CDR R. Norrod Feb 27, 2008.
System Specifications Lab Tests
Presentation transcript:

KFPA LO Modifications (from single pixel results) Critical Design Review January 30, 2009 G. Anderson

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Concerns Several issues were raised during single-pixel KFPA prototype testing with regard to the LO system: Why does the output power fall off rapidly at the band edges? Can we increase the frequency range of the 1st LO output? Should the output power specification be modified? Should additional spectral purity requirements be added to the specification?

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Original Requirements Two local oscillator sources (HP/Agilent synthesizers that generate up to 20 GHz) are available in the GBT receiver room. The original specification called for the following to be supplied to each of 7 Downconverter modules: –LO1: 25.7 to 32.4 GHz At 25.7 GHz, -2 dBm (+/- 5 dBm) At 32.4 GHz, -4 dBm (+/-7 dBm) A gain slope of -0.3 dB/GHz at the mixer input would give nominal levels. –LO2: dBm (+/- 5 dBm)

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, No spectral purity specification was imposed. However, a self-imposed specification of 30 dB rejection of the third harmonic of the 1st LO input signal (as provided by the generator) seemed reasonable and was used as a design guide. The following are slides from the Conceptual Design Review giving the schematic of an LO Distribution Module. One module will supply LO power to all 7- pixels. (one output is not used and is terminated) Original Requirements

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, LO Distribution Module (High Frequency Side) 3dB Input: GHz +7 dBm (from LO Driver Module) Hittite HMC578 (Active Multiplier) Output +17 dBm for +4 dBm drive BPF X2 3dB Output (each): -1 dBm Loss = 1.5 dB MAX

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, LO Distribution Module (Low Frequency Side) 3dB 8.9 GHz -1.5 dBm (from LO Driver Module) Hittite HMC451 Gain = 22 dB Output IP3 = +32 dBm NF = 7 dB Each Output: +4 dBm dBm

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Single Pixel Testing Single-pixel tests were performed using a test fixture consisting of the multiplier and bandpass filter shown in the schematic (LO Distribution Module (High Frequency Side)) above. Tests showed the following problems: The LO multiplier output dropped off sharply outside the original frequency range. During test, the LO drive desired for the input of the downconverter was significantly higher than called for by the LO1 specification. A spur was detected at the noise floor during a one minute integration. Its frequency indicated that one of the mixing inputs that created it was the LO1 input to the x2 multiplier. This was verified during test when an improvised high pass filter (waveguide) was added to the x2 output and the spur disappeared.

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Corrective Action The multiplier output filter was originally designed around the initial specification. The original bandwidth was kept as narrow as possible to improve the 3rd harmonic rejection and to give some margin to allow for manufacturing tolerances.

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, New Filter

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Specification Change –LO1: 24.8 to 34.3 GHz At 24.8* GHz, -5 to +3 dBm At 34.3* GHz, -3 to +4 dBm Specified differently at upper and lower band edges to allow a positive gain slope. This will largely counteract the negative gain slope from cables. –LO2: dBm (+/- 5 dBm)

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, The wider LO1 frequency range will allow operation over the sky frequency range of 18.0 to 27.5 GHz. The minimum power levels to be applied to the Down- Converter Module were also increased.

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, High Pass Filter The original plan was to add a high-pass filter to the multiplier output. –The spurious output that drove this addition was at the noise floor for a 1 minute integration. –Discussion with T. Minter and J. Lockman revealed that the maximum integration time one could ever expect was 1000 hours……worst case. –The reduction to the noise floor would be proportional to the square root of the ratio of integration time…..yielding a reduction in the noise floor of 23.9 dB.

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Bandpass Filter Instead of adding a high pass….why not cascade another bandpass filter? –Still reduces the feedthrough of any x2 fundamental. –Adds additional rejection to any x3 multiplier output. Why not increase the number of poles of the original filter? –We already have greater than 50 dB rejection of the x2 input. –Approaches ultimate rejection of the filter where stray coupling dominates.

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, New Amplifier The addition of the high-pass filter and the change in the output power specification forced the addition of an amplifier to the multiplier output. The large attenuators placed at the input and output serve two functions: –to lower the amplifier input power –to mask the input and output return loss of the amplifier (output return loss is 6 dB).

KFPA LO Critical Design Review, January 30, Final Version LO Distribution Module (High Frequency Side) 3dB Input: GHz +7 dBm (from LO Driver Module) Hittite HMC578 (Active Multiplier) Output +17 dBm for +4 dBm drive BPF X2 3dB Output (each): 1 dBm* Loss = 2 dB MAX 3dB BPF 10 dB Hittite HMC283 Amplifier +21 dB gain 3 dB Loss = 2.0 dB MAX